Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 37
Filter
1.
J Viral Hepat ; 31(2): 78-87, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111976

ABSTRACT

This study aims to identify clinically meaningful sex differences in efficacy and selected safety adverse events for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) or HIV/HCV co-infection in those receiving combination direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens. Our assessment was based on adult trial participants treated at the approved DAA dosage and treatment duration from 40 phase 3 clinical trials submitted to the FDA. Female enrollment ranged from 11% to 54% (overall mean 38%). Females with HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection had statistically significant higher unadjusted or covariant-adjusted odds of achieving sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) compared with males. Odds ratios favouring females were observed among Whites and those ≥40 years of age with HCV GT1 or 3 infections, and among those ≥50 years of age, non-cirrhotic and those with HCV GT3 infection who were treatment-experienced. These differences were not clinically relevant due to the high SVR12 rate achieved by females and males, overall or in subgroups. No differences were observed in SVR12 rates between HCV GT1 mono-infected and HCV GT1/ HIV-1 co-infected participants. Numerically, more females reported headache, fatigue and nausea compared to males, but the differences were small and predominately Grade 1 or 2 severity. Discontinuation rates for any reason or due to an adverse event were low and similar between the sexes. Our study demonstrated females successfully complete DAA regimens and achieve high SVR12 rates despite numerically higher adverse events for certain commonly reported events.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Sex Characteristics , Sustained Virologic Response , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
2.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63 Suppl 1: S176-S187, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317501

ABSTRACT

Determining the appropriate dosing regimens of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs for pregnant individuals living with HIV-1 infection is critical to maximize maternal health and prevent perinatal HIV transmission. Throughout pregnancy, pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARVs can be significantly altered due to physiological, anatomic, and metabolic changes. As such, conducting PK studies of ARVs during pregnancy is crucial to optimize dosing regimens. In this article, we summarize available data, key issues, challenges, and considerations in interpreting results of ARV PK studies in pregnant individuals. Discussion topics include the choice of the reference population (postpartum vs historical control), pregnancy trimester-dependent changes in ARV PK, effects of pregnancy on once- versus twice-daily dosing, factors to consider for ARVs that are administered with a PK booster such as ritonavir and cobicistat, and considerations when evaluating the effects of pregnancy on unbound ARV concentrations. Common approaches for the translation of the results into clinical recommendations and rationales and considerations when making clinical recommendations are summarized. Currently, limited PK data in pregnancy are available with long-acting ARVs. Collection of PK data to characterize the PK profile of long-acting ARVs is an important goal shared by many stakeholders.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents , Research Design , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Cobicistat , Postpartum Period
3.
AIDS ; 37(6): 895-903, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728423

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine female participation and the observed efficacy and safety by sex from phase 3 HIV-1 trials submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to support approval or a major labeling change. DESIGN: Our analyses were based on phase 3 trials in HIV-1 infected treatment-naive adults submitted to FDA since 2010. METHODS: We evaluated enrollment of treatment-naive females in 18 clinical trials for HIV-1. Participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) was calculated as the percentage of females among trial participants divided by the percentage of females in the disease population. PPR between 0.8 and 1.2 reflects similar representation of females in the trial and the disease population. Sex differences in efficacy (virologic response rates) and selected safety events were evaluated. RESULTS: United States (US) females, particularly US Black females were not adequately represented in clinical trials. The PPR for US females overall was 0.59 and for US Black females was 0.63. Statistically significant sex differences favoring males were observed for efficacy outcomes in both the global population and US participants. Statistically significant sex differences were observed for some safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: US females are underrepresented in phase 3 HIV-1 clinical trials. Underrepresentation was not likely due to enrollment criteria. Statistically significant sex differences were noted for efficacy and selected safety outcomes; however, some differences were not clinically relevant. The ability to detect sex differences was hindered by low numbers of female participants overall and within subgroups. Additional research into innovative approaches to recruit and retain females in clinical trials should continue.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Adult , Humans , Male , Female , United States , Sex Characteristics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Seropositivity/drug therapy , Pharmaceutical Preparations
4.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 63(2): 259-265, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36149807

ABSTRACT

The US Food and Drug Administration is committed to the development of effective antiviral regimens for pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including infants and neonates. On April 25, 2022, the approved indication of remdesivir (RDV) was expanded to include pediatric patients 28 days and older and weighing at least 3 kg with positive results of direct severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral testing, who are: Hospitalized, or Not hospitalized and have mild to moderate COVID-19 and are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death. Given the similar course of COVID-19 in adults and pediatric patients, the approval of RDV for use in pediatric patients is supported by the safety and efficacy data from adequate and well-controlled phase 3 trials in adults and adolescents; and by the safety and pharmacokinetic data from a single-arm, open-label, phase 2/3 pediatric clinical trial of 53 pediatric patients at least 28 days of age and weighing at least 3 kg with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19. At the time of the April 25, 2022, approval action, the US Food and Drug Administration also revoked the emergency use authorization for RDV that previously covered this pediatric population. This article summarizes key issues and regulatory considerations involved in the RDV COVID-19 pediatric development program, including the evolution of the emergency use authorization issued for RDV as results from registrational studies became available, and discusses lessons learned.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Adolescent , Humans , Child , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Adenosine Monophosphate/adverse effects , Adenosine Monophosphate/pharmacokinetics , Alanine/adverse effects , Alanine/pharmacokinetics , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(Suppl 4): S498-S501, 2022 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410378

ABSTRACT

The landscape for the development of therapeutics for prevention and treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection has pivoted towards long-acting antiretrovirals (LA-ARVs). LA-ARVs have the potential to transform global implementation of HIV-1 prevention and treatment strategies. The ability to identify potential knowledge gaps early in development, proactively address missing information or data gaps, and strategically leverage all the available information is the key to streamline the development of safe and effective LA-ARV therapeutics. The purpose of this article is to discuss some potential considerations for development of LA-ARVs. Three possible drug development scenarios are briefly discussed and include developing (1) a novel LA-ARV, (2) a novel LA formulation of an approved oral ARV, and (3) an LA pro-drug of an approved oral ARV. For each of these scenarios, we briefly describe what type(s) of information may be helpful and discuss potential opportunities to leverage available information. Additionally, we discuss some unique LA-ARV drug development considerations, including the use of an oral lead-in, and assessing the impact of residual ARV exposures on subsequent regimens and evaluation of LA-ARVs in specific populations. We strongly believe that efficient integration of multidisciplinary knowledge can advance the development, availability, and accessibility of therapeutics not only for HIV-1 prevention and treatment but also for other chronic viral infections.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Humans , Public Health , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use
6.
Front Pediatr ; 9: 721059, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34722417

ABSTRACT

Background: Alterations in plasma protein concentrations in pregnant and postpartum individuals can influence antiretroviral (ARV) pharmacokinetics. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models can serve to inform drug dosing decisions in understudied populations. However, development of such models requires quantitative physiological information (e.g., changes in plasma protein concentration) from the population of interest. Objective: To quantitatively describe the time-course of albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations in pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV. Methods: Serum and plasma protein concentrations procured from the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial Protocol 1026s (P1026s) were analyzed using a generalized additive modeling approach. Separate non-parametric smoothing splines were fit to albumin and AAG concentrations as functions of gestational age or postpartum duration. Results: The analysis included 871 and 757 serum albumin concentrations collected from 380 pregnant (~20 to 42 wks gestation) and 354 postpartum (0 to 46 wks postpartum) women, respectively. Thirty-six and 32 plasma AAG concentrations from 31 pregnant (~24 to 38 wks gestation) and 30 postpartum women (~2-13 wks postpartum), respectively, were available for analysis. Estimated mean albumin concentrations remained stable from 20 wks gestation to term (33.4 to 34.3 g/L); whereas, concentrations rapidly increased postpartum until stabilizing at ~42.3 g/L 15 wk after delivery. Estimated AAG concentrations slightly decreased from 24 wks gestation to term (53.6 and 44.9 mg/dL) while postpartum levels were elevated at two wks after delivery (126.1 mg/dL) and subsequently declined thereafter. Computational functions were developed to quantitatively communicate study results in a form that can be readily utilized for PBPK model development. Conclusion: By characterizing the trajectory of plasma protein concentrations in pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV, our analysis can increase confidence in PBPK model predictions for HIV antiretrovirals and better inform drug dosing decisions in this understudied population.

7.
Antiviral Res ; 195: 105182, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34582915

ABSTRACT

The development and approval of brincidofovir for the treatment of smallpox, a disease that was eradicated from the world over 40 years ago, has resulted in the second antiviral approved via the Medical Countermeasure Initiative (MCMi) to combat this disease. Approval of brincidofovir required a unique regulatory approach based on the FDA Animal Rule, and development was supported by many years of research and collaboration among academic investigators, the pharmaceutical industry and multiple government agencies. This article summarizes the FDA regulatory pathway and describes the challenges involved.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytosine/analogs & derivatives , Drug Approval , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Smallpox/drug therapy , Animals , Cytosine/therapeutic use , Disease Eradication , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 110(1): 36-48, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930408

ABSTRACT

Information on the extent of drug exposure to mothers and infants during pregnancy and lactation normally becomes available years after regulatory approval of a drug. Clinicians face knowledge gaps on drug selection and dosing in pregnancy and infant exposure during breastfeeding. Physiological changes during pregnancy often result in lower drug exposures of antiretrovirals, and in some cases a risk of reduced virologic efficacy. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) network and the World Health Organization (WHO)-convened Pediatric Antiretrovirals Working Group collaboratively organized a workshop of key stakeholders in June 2019 to define key standards to generate pharmacology data for antiretrovirals to be used among pregnant and lactating women; review the antiretroviral product pipeline; describe key gaps for use in low-income and middle-income countries; and identify opportunities to undertake optimal studies allowing for rapid implementation in the clinical field. We discussed ethical and regulatory principles, systemic approaches to obtaining data for pregnancy pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies, control groups, optimal sampling times during pregnancy, and pharmacokinetic parameters to be considered as primary end points in pregnancy PK/PD studies. For lactation studies, the type of milk to collect, ascertainment of maternal adherence, and optimal PK methods to estimate exposure were discussed. Participants strongly recommended completion of preclinical reproductive toxicology studies prior to phase III, to allow study protocols to include pregnant women or to allow women who become pregnant after enrolment to continue in the trial. The meeting concluded by developing an algorithm for design and interpretation of results and noted that recruitment of pregnant and lactating women into clinical trials is critical.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Algorithms , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Breast Feeding , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Developing Countries , Drug Approval , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Lactation , Patient Selection , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology
9.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS ; 15(1): 61-65, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483323

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Outline some regulatory considerations and scientific challenges related to the development of long-acting antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. RECENT FINDINGS: Poor adherence to oral ARV regimens continues to pose challenges for effective treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. The development of long-acting ARV modalities for treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection is emerging as a promising alternative to the current treatment and prevention paradigm and has gained considerable interest. SUMMARY: The development of long-acting ARVs can present some unique drug development challenges. Advance planning and prioritization of studies early in development can facilitate the development of long-acting ARVs for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1 infection for all populations, including pediatric patients and pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , HIV Infections , Adolescent , Anti-Retroviral Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Retroviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Drug Administration Routes , Drug Implants/administration & dosage , Drug Implants/therapeutic use , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV-1/drug effects , Humans , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Injections , Medication Adherence , Pregnancy
10.
J Virus Erad ; 5(3): 138-144, 2019 Sep 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31700657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Under representation of black subjects in trials of hepatitis C virus (HCV) direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) complicates assessment of differential outcomes for black individuals vs non-black individuals. HCV trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (2013-2017) to support approval or to expand an indication of 12-week interferon-free DAA regimens with or without ribavirin to treat HCV genotype 1 (GT1) infection were pooled to explore efficacy comparisons by ethnicity. METHODS: Twenty-six trials were pooled and included 2869 individuals with HCV GT1 alone and 742 individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV. RESULTS: Of the 2869 HCV GT1-mono-infected subjects, 408 (14.2%) were black. Sustained virological response assessed 12 weeks following cessation of treatment (SVR12) was 92%-100% in black individuals and 87.5%-100.0% in non-black individuals. In pooled analyses, SVR12 was numerically similar between black and non-black subjects (97.1% vs 97.3%). Baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for the two groups. Of the 742 subjects with both HCV GT1 and HIV, 243 (32.7%) were black: SVR12 was 89.5%-100% in black individuals and 94.4%-100% in non-black individuals. In pooled analyses for HCV GT1/HIV co-infection, black individuals had a 4% (95% confidence interval -7.7% to 0.3%) lower SVR12 than non-black individuals (93.4% vs 97.0%). This difference was driven by ION-4 in which study SVR12 was approximately 10% lower for black than for non-black individuals (89.5% vs 99.1%). Baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for the two groups. CONCLUSION: No notable SVR12 differences were seen in between black and non-black individuals with HCV GT1 alone. Although a numerical difference was observed between black and non-black individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV, this finding was driven by results from a single trial and may be due to reasons other than ethnicity: 19 subgroup analyses showed baseline characteristics did not affect SVR12 for black and non-black individuals with both HCV GT1 and HIV.

11.
Lancet HIV ; 6(8): e552-e558, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31307946

ABSTRACT

Antiretroviral agents with long-acting properties have potential to improve treatment outcomes substantially for people living with HIV. In November 2017, the Long acting/Extended Release Antiretroviral Resource Program (LEAP) convened a workshop with the aim of shaping the research agenda and promoting early development of long-acting or extended release products for key populations: pregnant and lactating women, children aged up to 10 years, and adolescents aged 10-19 years. Goals included strategies and principles to ensure that the needs of children, adolescents, and pregnant and lactating women are considered when developing long-acting formulations. Research should focus not only on how best to transition long-acting products to these populations, but also on early engagement across sectors and among stakeholders. A parallel rather than sequential approach is needed when establishing adult, adolescent, and paediatric clinical trials and seeking regulatory approval. Pregnant and lactating women should be included in adult clinical trials. Adolescent-friendly trial design is needed to improve recruitment and retention of young people.


Subject(s)
Anti-Retroviral Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Research , Adolescent , Breast Feeding , Child , Child, Preschool , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Retention in Care , Young Adult
12.
AIDS ; 33(6): 1089-1093, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30946163

ABSTRACT

: Product labels for cobicistat with atazanavir or darunavir, and for elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir (alafenamide or disoproxil fumarate) were recently updated to state that these products are not recommended for initiation during pregnancy, and an alternative regimen is recommended for those who become pregnant during therapy with these products. Herein, we present the rationale for these recommendations, which are based on studies in pregnant women evaluating the pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of darunavir/cobicistat or elvitegravir/cobicistat-containing antiretroviral regimens. In these studies, mean steady-state minimum concentrations in the second and third trimester versus postpartum of cobicistat, darunavir, and elvitegravir were reduced by 61-83%, 89-92%, and 82-86%, respectively. In the absence of data with atazanavir/cobicistat, we leveraged the available data with darunavir/cobicistat and elvitegravir/cobicistat to make recommendations for atazanavir/cobicistat. Darunavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir remain viable treatment options for pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , Cobicistat/administration & dosage , Cobicistat/pharmacokinetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care ; 29(3): 371-382, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29475784

ABSTRACT

Age and sex effects on antiretroviral therapy (ART) response are not well elucidated. Our pooled analysis of 40 randomized clinical trials measured the association of age and sex on CD4+ T cell count changes and virologic suppression using multivariable regression modeling. The average increase in CD4+ T cell count from baseline to week 48 was 17.3 cells/mm3 lower and clinically insignificant (95% confidence interval -30.8 to -3.8) among women ages ≥ 50 years (n = 573), compared to women ≤ 35 years (n = 3,939). Results were similar for men. Virologic suppression odds were 60% and 21% times greater among participants ≥50 years compared to ≤35 years, in women and men, respectively. In both sexes, larger increases in CD4+ T cell count changes were observed in younger, compared to older, participants; however, virologic suppression was higher in older, compared to younger, participants suggesting a non-sex-specific age effect response to ART.


Subject(s)
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/methods , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Viral Load/drug effects , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Hepatology ; 67(2): 482-491, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059462

ABSTRACT

On July 18, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) (Vosevi) fixed-dose combination (FDC), an interferon-free, complete regimen for adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) who have: • genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor; and • genotype 1a or 3 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Approval was based on an acceptable safety profile and high sustained virological response rates 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) in two phase 3 clinical trials in subjects previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen. In POLARIS-1, 96% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. In POLARIS-4, 98% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. A key and challenging question in evaluating the data was determining the contribution of VOX to SOF/VEL and how this differed depending on the genotype and patient population. In this article, we provide our perspective on the issues considered in making these determinations, especially regarding the POLARIS-4 data in subjects who have previously been treated with a chronic HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Conclusion: We seek to provide context as to why a broad indication was given for NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients (HCV genotypes 1-6) while the indication for NS5A inhibitor- naïve patients was limited to HCV genotypes 1a and 3 only. (Hepatology 2018;67:482-491).


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Adult , Aminoisobutyric Acids , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Carbamates/administration & dosage , Carbamates/adverse effects , Cyclopropanes , Drug Therapy, Combination , Genotype , Hepatitis C/classification , Hepatitis C/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/adverse effects , Humans , Lactams, Macrocyclic , Leucine/analogs & derivatives , Macrocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Macrocyclic Compounds/adverse effects , Proline/analogs & derivatives , Quinoxalines , Risk Assessment , Sofosbuvir/administration & dosage , Sofosbuvir/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/administration & dosage , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic Response , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors
15.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 57(10): 1295-1304, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569994

ABSTRACT

Management of comorbidities and medications is complex in HIV-1-infected patients. The overall objective of this project was to develop separate physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) substrate models for the protease inhibitors darunavir and lopinavir. These protease inhibitors are used in the treatment of HIV infection. Both darunavir and lopinavir are coadministered with another medication that inhibits cytochrome (CYP) 3A. The current project focused on PBPK modeling for darunavir and lopinavir coadministered with ritonavir. Darunavir and lopinavir PBPK models that accounted for ritonavir CYP3A inhibition effects (linked PBPK models) were developed. The linked PBPK models were then used to predict the effect on darunavir or lopinavir exposure from CYP modulators. In the next step, the predicted effect of hepatic impairment was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses predicted CYP3A inhibition effects on darunavir or lopinavir exposure in simulated hepatically impaired subjects. The linked PBPK models reasonably predicted darunavir or lopinavir exposure based on simulations with CYP inhibitors or inducers. Exploratory simulations using the linked darunavir or lopinavir PBPK models indicated CYP3A inhibition may further increase darunavir or lopinavir exposure in patients with hepatic impairment.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors , Darunavir/pharmacokinetics , HIV Protease Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Liver Diseases/metabolism , Lopinavir/pharmacokinetics , Models, Biological , Ritonavir/pharmacology , Adult , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inducers/pharmacology , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Darunavir/blood , Drug Interactions , Female , HIV Protease Inhibitors/blood , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Lopinavir/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
16.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 57(3): 287-296, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654843

ABSTRACT

This review paper summarizes the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and chronic HCV infection, including HCV virology and treatment regimens. Specifically, we focus on the evolution of past, current, and future HCV treatment options, the reasons for treatment failure, and the impact of resistance-associated variants on treatment success.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepacivirus/metabolism , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Humans , Interferons/chemistry , Interferons/therapeutic use , Phosphoproteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Serine Proteases , Sustained Virologic Response , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors
17.
Curr Opin HIV AIDS ; 10(4): 278-81, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26049954

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To outline some of the regulatory challenges inherent to the development of long-acting antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the treatment or prevention of HIV infection. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite advances in drug development that have reduced ARV dosing to once daily, suboptimal drug adherence remains an obstacle to successful HIV treatment. Further, large randomized trials of once daily oral ARVs for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have shown that drug adherence correlates strongly with prophylactic effect and study outcomes. Thus, the prospect of developing long-acting ARVs, which may mitigate drug adherence issues, has attracted considerable attention lately. SUMMARY: Because of their pharmacokinetic properties, the development of long-acting ARVs can present novel regulatory challenges. Chief among them is determining the appropriate dosing regimen, the need for an oral lead-in, and whether existing data with an approved oral agent, if available, can be leveraged for a treatment or prevention indication. For PrEP, because validated biomarkers are lacking, additional nonclinical studies and evaluation of tissue concentrations in multiple compartments may be necessary to identify optimal dosages. Study design and choice of controls for registrational trials of new long-acting PrEP agents might also prove challenging following the availability of an oral PrEP drug.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/therapy , Legislation, Drug , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Discovery , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , United States
18.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 52(6): 446-53, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24755134

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Literature reports regarding the efficacy of efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg with rifampin (RIF) are not consistent. Evaluation of a drug-drug interaction (DDI) study and supportive semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were undertaken to help delineate this issue. DESIGN/METHODS: DDI study and supportive semi-mechanistic population PK analyses were provided by BMS. Population PK analysis was based on six studies with intensive EFV PK sampling. An ACTG study with sparse PK sampling was used for model evaluation. Simulations compared EFV exposure at various doses in combination with RIF to EFV exposures at 600 mg once daily (QD). Effects of CYP2B6 genotypes on the magnitude of EFV-RIF interaction were also explored. RESULTS: In DDI study, co-administering EFV 600 mg QD and RIF reduced mean EFV exposure by ~ 30%. Population PK model provided acceptable predictive performance of central tendency and variability for EFV C0, Cmax, and AUC. Simulations predicted that increasing EFV to 800 mg QD with RIF would result in EFV AUC and Cmax similar to EFV 600 mg QD alone. EFV AUC and Cmax were ~ 2 times higher in subjects with reduced function CYP2B6 genotypes. However, the RIF effect was consistent across all genotypes. EFV dose adjustment to 800 mg QD did not increase the risk of overexposure compared to 600 mg EFV QD within each genotype. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustment based on matching systemic exposure was recommended to mitigate the potential for sub-therapeutic EFV exposures. Our review did not reveal any safety concerns in subjects receiving EFV 800 mg QD with RIF.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antitubercular/administration & dosage , Benzoxazines/administration & dosage , Drug Approval , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Rifampin/administration & dosage , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , United States Food and Drug Administration , Alkynes , Antibiotics, Antitubercular/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases/genetics , Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases/metabolism , Benzoxazines/adverse effects , Benzoxazines/pharmacokinetics , Coinfection , Computer Simulation , Cyclopropanes , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2B6 , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Dosage Calculations , Drug Interactions , Genotype , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/metabolism , Humans , Models, Biological , Phenotype , Polypharmacy , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Rifampin/adverse effects , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/metabolism , United States
20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(9): 875-92, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23917901

ABSTRACT

This report updates US Public Health Service recommendations for the management of healthcare personnel (HCP) who experience occupational exposure to blood and/or other body fluids that might contain human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although the principles of exposure management remain unchanged, recommended HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimens and the duration of HIV follow-up testing for exposed personnel have been updated. This report emphasizes the importance of primary prevention strategies, the prompt reporting and management of occupational exposures, adherence to recommended HIV PEP regimens when indicated for an exposure, expert consultation in management of exposures, follow-up of exposed HCP to improve adherence to PEP, and careful monitoring for adverse events related to treatment, as well as for virologic, immunologic, and serologic signs of infection. To ensure timely postexposure management and administration of HIV PEP, clinicians should consider occupational exposures as urgent medical concerns, and institutions should take steps to ensure that staff are aware of both the importance of and the institutional mechanisms available for reporting and seeking care for such exposures. The following is a summary of recommendations: (1) PEP is recommended when occupational exposures to HIV occur; (2) the HIV status of the exposure source patient should be determined, if possible, to guide need for HIV PEP; (3) PEP medication regimens should be started as soon as possible after occupational exposure to HIV, and they should be continued for a 4-week duration; (4) new recommendation-PEP medication regimens should contain 3 (or more) antiretroviral drugs (listed in Appendix A ) for all occupational exposures to HIV; (5) expert consultation is recommended for any occupational exposures to HIV and at a minimum for situations described in Box 1 ; (6) close follow-up for exposed personnel ( Box 2 ) should be provided that includes counseling, baseline and follow-up HIV testing, and monitoring for drug toxicity; follow-up appointments should begin within 72 hours of an HIV exposure; and (7) new recommendation-if a newer fourth-generation combination HIV p24 antigen-HIV antibody test is utilized for follow-up HIV testing of exposed HCP, HIV testing may be concluded 4 months after exposure ( Box 2 ); if a newer testing platform is not available, follow-up HIV testing is typically concluded 6 months after an HIV exposure.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel/standards , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/standards , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Emergency Medicine/standards , Female , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...