Postnatal genetic testing on cord blood for prenatally identified high-probability cases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of postnatal genetic testing on umbilical cord blood (CB) for prenatally identified high-probability fetuses. METHOD: CB for genetic testing was offered to individuals who met one of the following criteria: (i) fetal anomaly, (ii) positive non-invasive prenatal screening by cfDNA or biochemical analysis, or (iii) family history. Individuals with diagnostic testing, but not microarray, were also included when recommended by society guidelines. CB was collected at Brigham and Women's and Emerson Hospitals between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 448 individuals consented for cord blood testing (370 (82.6%) for fetal anomalies, 51 (11.4%) for high-probability cfDNA, and 27 (6.0%) for family history) and a total of 393 (87.7%) samples were analyzed. Genetic testing yielded a diagnosis in 92 (23.4%) neonates by karyotype (n = 37), chromosomal microarray (CMA) (n = 32), and other molecular analysis (n = 23). Testing averaged 10.3 days (range 1-118 days). 68 (73.9%) diagnoses potentially impacted neonatal management. MCC could not be definitively excluded in only 1.4% (6/418) of samples. CONCLUSION: Prenatal identification of high-probability fetuses and genetic testing on CB facilitates timely genetic diagnoses and neonatal management. Testing provides reassurance and reduces a postnatal diagnostic odyssey for high-probability neonates.

Genetic counseling for fetal sex prediction by NIPT: Challenges and opportunities.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has grown in ubiquity in the last decade and is now endorsed by Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as a screening tool for aneuploidy in all patients. Past studies have demonstrated a tendency among obstetrics patients to focus on the ability of NIPT to predict fetal sex chromosomes; however, data on the experiences of genetic counselors (GCs) counseling on NIPT and fetal sex prediction are limited. This mixed-methods study aimed to explore how GCs counsel about NIPT and fetal sex prediction, as well as the use of gender-inclusive language in this setting. A 36-item survey with multiple choice, Likert scale, and open-ended questions was distributed to GCs who currently offer NIPT to patients. Quantitative data were analyzed using R and qualitative data were manually analyzed and coded via inductive content analysis. A total of 147 individuals completed at least some portion of the survey. A majority of participants (68.5%) reported frequent interchangeable use of the terms 'sex' and 'gender' by patients. A majority (72.9%) of participants reported that they rarely or never discuss the difference between these terms in sessions (Spearman's rho = 0.17, p = 0.052). Seventy-five respondents (59.5%) indicated that they had taken continuing education courses on inclusive clinical practices for trans and gender-diverse (TGD) patients. Several themes arose from free responses; the most frequently identified themes were the need for thorough pretest counseling that properly describes the scope of NIPT and the challenge of discrepant pretest counseling by other healthcare providers. Results from our research identified challenges and misconceptions GCs face when offering NIPT and various tactics implemented to mitigate these. Our study highlighted the need for the standardization of pretest counseling regarding NIPT, additional guidance from professional organizations, and continuing education focused on gender-inclusive language and clinical practices.

Chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancy loss: Is it time for a consensus approach?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and outcomes of chromosomal microarray (CMA) in the cytogenomic evaluation of products of conception (POC). METHOD: Over a 42-month period, 323 POC samples were tested by CMA. Results were assessed using variables including phenotype, gestational age, results from orthogonal testing, and follow-up parental analysis. RESULTS: CMA identified cytogenetic abnormalities in 47.4% of first trimester losses and 10.9% of second and third trimester losses. Chromosomal microarray results specifically from 5 to 7-week losses showed similar rates of abnormalities (45.6%) compared to those of all first trimester losses combined. CMA and karyotype results were discordant in 20.0% of cases, most likely due to maternal cell overgrowth in culture. The most prevalent abnormalities identified in all losses were autosomal trisomies, followed by triploidy. In 43/323 cases, the observed abnormality suggested a parental aberration that prompted follow-up studies; two of these cases indeed identified an inherited aberration. CONCLUSION: Our findings of specific types of genetic abnormalities and the respective frequencies by gestational age closely align with those of published karyotype studies, supporting the use of routine CMA testing for POCs. CMA outperforms karyotype analysis because it does not require viable, sterile cultures free of maternal admixture or admixture due to multiple gestations. Finally, CMA results can play an important role in identifying increased recurrence risks for some couples.

Rare disease patient matchmaking: development and outcomes of an internet case-finding strategy in the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.

BACKGROUND: Although clinician, researcher, and patient resources for matchmaking exist, finding similar patients remains an obstacle for rare disease diagnosis. The goals of this study were to develop and test the effectiveness of an Internet case-finding strategy and identify factors associated with increased matching within a rare disease population. METHODS: Public web pages were created for consented participants. Matches made, time to each inquiry and match, and outcomes were recorded and analyzed using descriptive statistics. A Poisson regression model was run to identify characteristics associated with matches. RESULTS: 385 participants were referred to the project and 158 had pages posted. 579 inquiries were received; 89.0% were from the general public and 24.7% resulted in a match. 81.6% of pages received at least one inquiry and 15.0% had at least one patient match. Primary symptom category of neurology, diagnosis, gene page, and photo were associated with increased matches (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This Internet case-finding strategy was of interest to patients, families, and clinicians, and similar patients were identified using this approach. Extending matchmaking efforts to the general public resulted in matches and suggests including this population in matchmaking activities can improve identification of similar patients.

Utility of noninvasive genome-wide screening: a prospective cohort of obstetric patients undergoing diagnostic testing.

PURPOSE: Copy-number variant (CNV) assessment is recommended for patients undergoing prenatal diagnostic testing. Noninvasive screening tests have not been extensively validated for CNV detection. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) to chromosomal microarray to detect clinically significant findings. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 198 subjects at the time of consent for diagnostic prenatal testing. Genome-wide NIPS results were compared with diagnostic testing results to assess NIPS test performance (n = 160, 38 subjects without microarray results excluded). Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess test agreement. RESULTS: Genome-wide NIPS did not detect clinically significant chromosomal abnormalities at the same rate as diagnostic testing, κ = 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.87). When excluding CNVs <7 Mb and findings outside the limits of genome-wide NIPS, test agreement improved, κ = 0.88 (0.79-0.97) driven by agreement for common aneuploidies (κ = 1.0). However, among patients with an abnormal fetal survey, agreement was only fair, κ = 0.38 (0.08-0.67). CONCLUSION: While NIPS is an excellent screening test for common aneuploidies, genome-wide NIPS misses clinically significant findings detected on routine diagnostic testing. False positive and false negative cases highlight the importance of pretest counseling regarding NIPS limitations, especially in the setting of fetal anomalies.

Family genetic result communication in rare and undiagnosed disease communities: Understanding the practice.

Genetic results have implications not only for the individual, but also for their family members. Research on family communication of genetic results has primarily focused on families affected by adult-onset, dominant conditions as well as more common genetic conditions such as familial hypercholesterolemia, cardiomyopathies, and genetic hearing loss. This study therefore aimed to characterize genetic result communication in families with rare and undiagnosed conditions and identify factors that influence communication. One hundred and forty-two individuals who received a diagnosis from the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN), a study focused on providing diagnoses to individuals with undiagnosed conditions, were eligible to complete a survey assessing genetic results communication. Survey items assessed if communication was discussed with healthcare providers, with whom participants communicated genetic testing, why they chose to communicate with these family members, and what information they communicated. All respondents (5 adult UDN participants, 38 parents/guardians of UDN participants, and 2 identifying as both) shared genetic results with at least one family member. Individuals who identified as both were considered exclusively adult participants for the purpose of these analyses. Adult participants and parents/guardians of participants reported high levels of understanding (96%), utility (96%), and comfort communicating genetic results (89%). Additionally, parents/guardians were more likely to disclose genetic results due to a general desire to share (60% of parents/guardians vs. 14% adult participants), while adult participants reported that they shared results to communicate risk to family members (86% of adult participants vs. 24% of parents/guardians). Many respondents did not recall discussing with a healthcare provider how (64%) or what (42%) to communicate about results. The results of this study provide insight into the practice of result communication by individuals with rare and previously undiagnosed conditions, which can ideally inform development of more effective counseling strategies and guidelines to aid family communication.

Rural distribution of human papilloma virus in low- and middle-income countries.

Cervical cancer rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are higher than in developed countries and account for 80% of an estimated 500,000 new cases annually. Factors that contribute to this are that diagnostic and prevention strategies designed for developed countries suffer from the combination of low vaccination rates and limitations due to lack of consistent access to both healthcare and supplies. Here we: 1) improve upon our LMIC deployable HPV test and 2) determine both the high and low-risk HPV genotype prevalence in an isolated Honduran population. We found an unexpected HPV distribution with an abundance of HPV 52 and HPV 72 infections. In this context, molecular testing using a LMIC deployable approach for the detection of HPV can aid in both the triage of HPV positive cytology-based follow up and provide information regarding HPV genotype distribution in support of vaccination strategies.