Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 20
Filter
1.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 16: 916627, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35754768

ABSTRACT

Background: In prior reports, we described the design and initial performance of a fully implantable, bi-directional neural interface system for use in deep brain and other neurostimulation applications. Here we provide an update on the chronic, long-term neural sensing performance of the system using traditional 4-contact leads and extend those results to include directional 8-contact leads. Methods: Seven ovine subjects were implanted with deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads at different nodes within the Circuit of Papez: four with unilateral leads in the anterior nucleus of the thalamus and hippocampus; two with bilateral fornix leads, and one with bilateral hippocampal leads. The leads were connected to either an Activa PC+S® (Medtronic) or Percept PC°ledR (Medtronic) deep brain stimulation and recording device. Spontaneous local field potentials (LFPs), evoked potentials (EPs), LFP response to stimulation, and electrode impedances were monitored chronically for periods of up to five years in these subjects. Results: The morphology, amplitude, and latencies of chronic hippocampal EPs evoked by thalamic stimulation remained stable over the duration of the study. Similarly, LFPs showed consistent spectral peaks with expected variation in absolute magnitude dependent upon behavioral state and other factors, but no systematic degradation of signal quality over time. Electrode impedances remained within expected ranges with little variation following an initial stabilization period. Coupled neural activity between the two nodes within the Papez circuit could be observed in synchronized recordings up to 5 years post-implant. The magnitude of passive LFP power recorded from directional electrode segments was indicative of the contacts that produced the greatest stimulation-induced changes in LFP power within the Papez network. Conclusion: The implanted device performed as designed, providing the ability to chronically stimulate and record neural activity within this network for up to 5 years of follow-up.

2.
Neurosurgery ; 89(3): 406-412, 2021 08 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34161589

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is an effective therapy for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Best practices for surgical targeting of the ANT can be refined as new information becomes available regarding effective stimulation sites. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a retrospective analysis of the relationship between outcomes (seizure reduction during year 1) and DBS lead locations in subjects from the SANTÉ pivotal trial (Stimulation of ANT for Epilepsy) based upon recent clinical findings. METHODS: Postoperative images from SANTÉ subjects (n = 101) were evaluated with respect to lead trajectory relative to defined anatomic landmarks. A qualitative scoring system was used to rate each lead placement for proximity to an identified target region above the junction of the mammillothalamic tract with the ANT. Each subject was assigned a bilateral lead placement score, and these scores were then compared to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 70% of subjects had "good" bilateral lead placements based upon location with respect to the defined target. These subjects had a much higher probability of being a clinical responder (>50% seizure reduction) than those with scores reflecting suboptimal lead placements (43.5% vs 21.9%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Consistent with experience from more established DBS indications, our findings and other recent reports suggest that there may be specific sites within the ANT that are associated with superior clinical outcomes. It will be important to continue to evaluate these relationships and the evolution of other clinical practices (eg, programming) to further optimize this therapy.


Subject(s)
Anterior Thalamic Nuclei , Deep Brain Stimulation , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/therapy , Epilepsy/therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 89(8): 886-896, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29371415

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Refractory psychiatric disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and there is a great need for new treatments. In the last decade, investigators piloted novel deep brain stimulation (DBS)-based therapies for depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Results from recent pivotal trials of these therapies, however, did not demonstrate the degree of efficacy expected from previous smaller trials. To discuss next steps, neurosurgeons, neurologists, psychiatrists and representatives from industry convened a workshop sponsored by the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery in Chicago, Illinois, in June of 2016. DESIGN: Here we summarise the proceedings of the workshop. Participants discussed a number of issues of importance to the community. First, we discussed how to interpret results from the recent pivotal trials of DBS for OCD and depression. We then reviewed what can be learnt from lesions and closed-loop neurostimulation. Subsequently, representatives from the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and industry discussed their views on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders. In particular, these third parties discussed their criteria for moving forward with new trials. Finally, we discussed the best way of confirming safety and efficacy of these therapies, including registries and clinical trial design. We close by discussing next steps in the journey to new neuromodulatory therapies for these devastating illnesses. CONCLUSION: Interest and motivation remain strong for deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disease. Progress will require coordinated efforts by all stakeholders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/surgery , Neurosurgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Humans , United States
4.
Brain Stimul ; 10(6): 1125-1132, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28927833

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) within the Papez circuit is under investigation as a treatment for epilepsy and Alzheimer's disease. We previously reported the effects of stimulation at nodes within this network (anterior thalamic nucleus and hippocampus) on hippocampal activity in a large animal model, using a chronic implantable, clinical-grade system that permits concurrent stimulation and recording. OBJECTIVE: In this study we extended earlier work to compare the effects of fornix DBS on evoked potentials (EPs) and local field potential (LFP) activity within the hippocampus, and to assess closed-loop stimulation. METHODS: Unilateral fornix and hippocampal DBS leads were implanted in three ovine subjects using image-guided, frameless stereotaxy. Chronic, awake recordings of EPs and LFPs in response to fornix and hippocampal stimulation were collected with the implanted device and analyzed off-line. RESULTS: Stimulation of the fornix produced robust, short latency hippocampal EPs. High frequency fornix stimulation generated parameter-dependent effects. At low amplitudes, short lasting inhibition of LFP activity occurred. Above a specific amplitude threshold, DBS elicited pronounced bursts of theta activity, followed by a marked state shift in hippocampal activity. These effects persisted for minutes post-DBS and were reflected as changes in LFP spectral content and phase-amplitude coupling. Real-time modulation of hippocampal activity via the implanted device was demonstrated using LFPs as the control signal for closed-loop stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The current results expand earlier findings and demonstrate target-specific effects produced by DBS within this neural circuit. These changes in network activity may provide insights into stimulation targets and parameter selection for clinical investigations.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Fornix, Brain/diagnostic imaging , Fornix, Brain/physiology , Animals , Anterior Thalamic Nuclei/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Thalamic Nuclei/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Female , Hippocampus/diagnostic imaging , Hippocampus/physiology , Male , Sheep , Temporal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Temporal Lobe/physiology
5.
Front Neurosci ; 11: 734, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416498

ABSTRACT

The annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank provides a focal opportunity for a multidisciplinary ensemble of experts in the field of neuromodulation to discuss advancements and forthcoming opportunities and challenges in the field. The proceedings of the fifth Think Tank summarize progress in neuromodulation neurotechnology and techniques for the treatment of a range of neuropsychiatric conditions including Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, Tourette syndrome, obsessive compulsive disorder, epilepsy and cognitive, and motor disorders. Each section of this overview of the meeting provides insight to the critical elements of discussion, current challenges, and identified future directions of scientific and technological development and application. The report addresses key issues in developing, and emphasizes major innovations that have occurred during the past year. Specifically, this year's meeting focused on technical developments in DBS, design considerations for DBS electrodes, improved sensors, neuronal signal processing, advancements in development and uses of responsive DBS (closed-loop systems), updates on National Institutes of Health and DARPA DBS programs of the BRAIN initiative, and neuroethical and policy issues arising in and from DBS research and applications in practice.

6.
Neuromodulation ; 18(2): 85-8; discussion 88-9, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25171762

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for the treatment of a number of movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. The effectiveness of DBS is dependent on the density and location of stimulation in a given brain area. Adjustments are made to optimize clinical benefits and minimize side effects. Until recently, clinicians would adjust DBS settings using a voltage mode, where the delivered voltage remained constant. More recently, a constant-current mode has become available where the programmer sets the current and the stimulator automatically adjusts the voltage as impedance changes. METHODS: We held an expert consensus meeting to evaluate the current state of the literature and field on constant-current mode versus voltage mode in clinical brain-related applications. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: There has been little reporting of the use of constant-current DBS devices in movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, as impedance varies considerably between patients and over time, it makes sense that all new devices will likely use constant current.


Subject(s)
Biophysical Phenomena/physiology , Brain/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Brain Diseases/therapy , Electric Impedance , Humans , Time Factors
7.
Int J Neurosci ; 125(7): 475-85, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25526555

ABSTRACT

The proceedings of the 2nd Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank summarize the most contemporary clinical, electrophysiological, and computational work on DBS for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disease and represent the insights of a unique multidisciplinary ensemble of expert neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, scientists, engineers and members of industry. Presentations and discussions covered a broad range of topics, including advocacy for DBS, improving clinical outcomes, innovations in computational models of DBS, understanding of the neurophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Tourette syndrome (TS) and evolving sensor and device technologies.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , International Cooperation , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Tourette Syndrome/therapy , Animals , Brain/physiology , Humans
8.
Brain Stimul ; 7(3): 350-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24613614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) as a potential therapy for treatment resistant epilepsy remains an area of active clinical investigation. We recently reported the first chronic evaluation of an implantable, clinical-grade system that permits concurrent stimulation and recording, in a large animal (ovine) model developed to study DBS for epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: In this study we extended this work to compare the effects of remote (anterior thalamic) and direct (hippocampal) stimulation on local field potential (LFP) activity and network excitability, and to assess closed-loop stimulation within this neural network. METHODS: Following anesthesia and 1.5T MRI acquisition, unilateral anterior thalamic and hippocampal DBS leads were implanted in three subjects using a frameless stereotactic system. Chronic, awake recordings of evoked potentials (EPs) and LFPs in response to thalamic and hippocampal stimulation were collected with the implanted device and analyzed off-line. RESULTS: Consistent with earlier reports, thalamic DBS and direct stimulation of the hippocampus produced parameter-dependent effects on hippocampal activity. LFP suppression could be reliably induced with specific stimulation parameters, and was shown to reflect a state of reduced network excitability, as measured by effects on hippocampal EP amplitudes and after-discharge thresholds. Real-time modulation of network excitability via the implanted device was demonstrated using hippocampal theta-band power level as a control signal for closed-loop stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented provide evidence of network excitability changes induced by stimulation that could underlie the clinical effects that have been reported with both thalamic and direct cortical stimulation.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Epilepsy/therapy , Hippocampus/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Algorithms , Animals , Brain Mapping/methods , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neural Networks, Computer , Sheep , Stereotaxic Techniques , Time Factors
9.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24111143

ABSTRACT

Modulation of neural activity through electrical stimulation of tissue is an effective therapy for neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Researchers are exploring improving therapy through adjustment of stimulation parameters based upon sensed data. This requires classifiers to extract features and estimate patient state. It also requires algorithms to appropriately map the state estimation to stimulation parameters. The latter, known as the control policy algorithm, is the focus of this work. Because the optimal control policy algorithms for the nervous system are not fully characterized at this time, we have implemented a generic control policy framework to facilitate exploratory research and rapid prototyping of new neuromodulation strategies.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation , Essential Tremor/therapy , Movement Disorders/therapy , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Neurotransmitter Agents/physiology , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Algorithms , Computer Graphics , Computer Simulation , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Online Systems , User-Computer Interface
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24111144

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a new method for estimating the excitability of brain networks. The motivation for this research was to develop a system that can track pathological changes in excitability, in diseases such as epilepsy. The ability to track excitability may provide a method for anticipating seizures and intervening therapeutically. Four normally healthy canines were implanted with the Medtronic Activia PC+S deep brain stimulation and sensing system. The devices were used to probe the circuit of Papez, with electrical stimulation in the anterior nucleus of the thalamus to measure evoked potentials in the hippocampus. The canines were given three different dosage levels of anti-convulsant medication in an attempt to manipulate the excitability of the network. The results showed changes in the morphology of the evoked potentials, following a circadian profile and reflecting times of drug delivery.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation , Electrodes, Implanted , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Hippocampus/physiology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Thalamus/physiology , Animals , Anticonvulsants/chemistry , Brain Mapping , Circadian Rhythm , Dogs , Drug Delivery Systems , Electrodes , Epilepsy , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/analogs & derivatives , Piracetam/chemistry , Seizures
11.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 91(4): 220-32, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23548876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In conjunction with therapeutic stimulation, next-generation deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices may offer the ability to record and analyze neural signals, providing for unprecedented insight into DBS effects on neural networks. This work was conducted to evaluate an implantable, clinical-grade system that permits concurrent stimulation and recording using a large animal (ovine) model recently developed to study DBS for epilepsy. METHODS: Following anesthesia and 1.5-tesla MRI acquisition, unilateral anterior thalamic and hippocampal DBS leads were implanted (n = 3) using a frameless stereotactic system. Chronic, awake recordings of evoked potentials (EPs) and local field potentials were collected with the implanted device and analyzed off-line. RESULTS: Hippocampal EPs were stable over long-term (>1 year) recording and consistent in morphology and latency with prior acute results. Thalamic and hippocampal DBS produced both excitatory and inhibitory network effects that were stimulation site and parameter dependent. Free roaming recordings illustrated periods of highly correlated activity between these two structures within the circuit of Papez. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide further insight into mechanisms of DBS therapy for epilepsy and an encouraging demonstration of the capabilities of this new technology, which in the future, may afford unique opportunities to study human brain function and neuromodulation mechanism of action.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Nerve Net/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Animals , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Hippocampus/physiology , Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation , Sheep , Time Factors
12.
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng ; 20(4): 410-21, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22275720

ABSTRACT

Chronically implantable, closed-loop neuromodulation devices with concurrent sensing and stimulation hold promise for better understanding the nervous system and improving therapies for neurological disease. Concurrent sensing and stimulation are needed to maximize usable neural data, minimize time delays for closed-loop actuation, and investigate the instantaneous response to stimulation. Current systems lack concurrent sensing and stimulation primarily because of stimulation interference to neural signals of interest. While careful design of high performance amplifiers has proved useful to reduce disturbances in the system, stimulation continues to contaminate neural sensing due to biological effects like tissue-electrode impedance mismatch and constraints on stimulation parameters needed to deliver therapy. In this work we describe systematic methods to mitigate the effect of stimulation through a combination of sensing hardware, stimulation parameter selection, and classification algorithms that counter residual stimulation disturbances. To validate these methods we implemented and tested a completely implantable system for over one year in a large animal model of epilepsy. The system proved capable of measuring and detecting seizure activity in the hippocampus both during and after stimulation. Furthermore, we demonstrate an embedded algorithm that actuates neural modulation in response to seizure detection during stimulation, validating the capability to detect bioelectrical markers in the presence of therapy and titrate it appropriately. The capability to detect neural states in the presence of stimulation and optimally titrate therapy is a key innovation required for generalizing closed-loop neural systems for multiple disease states.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Biofeedback, Psychology/instrumentation , Brain/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Electroencephalography/instrumentation , Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Prostheses and Implants , Animals , Biofeedback, Psychology/physiology , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Feedback , Sheep , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
13.
Front Neural Circuits ; 6: 117, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23346048

ABSTRACT

While modulating neural activity through stimulation is an effective treatment for neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, an opportunity for improving neuromodulation therapy remains in automatically adjusting therapy to continuously optimize patient outcomes. Practical issues associated with achieving this include the paucity of human data related to disease states, poorly validated estimators of patient state, and unknown dynamic mappings of optimal stimulation parameters based on estimated states. To overcome these challenges, we present an investigational platform including: an implanted sensing and stimulation device to collect data and run automated closed-loop algorithms; an external tool to prototype classifier and control-policy algorithms; and real-time telemetry to update the implanted device firmware and monitor its state. The prototyping system was demonstrated in a chronic large animal model studying hippocampal dynamics. We used the platform to find biomarkers of the observed states and transfer functions of different stimulation amplitudes. Data showed that moderate levels of stimulation suppress hippocampal beta activity, while high levels of stimulation produce seizure-like after-discharge activity. The biomarker and transfer function observations were mapped into classifier and control-policy algorithms, which were downloaded to the implanted device to continuously titrate stimulation amplitude for the desired network effect. The platform is designed to be a flexible prototyping tool and could be used to develop improved mechanistic models and automated closed-loop systems for a variety of neurological disorders.

14.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg ; 89(2): 111-22, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21336007

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To better understand the mechanism of action of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for epilepsy and to investigate implantable device features, it is desirable to have a large animal model to evaluate clinical-grade systems. This study assessed the suitability of an ovine model of epilepsy for this purpose. METHODS: Animals were anesthetized for surgery and 1.5 T MRIs collected. Unilateral anterior thalamic DBS leads, hippocampal depth electrodes and catheters were implanted using a frameless stereotactic system. Evoked responses and local field potentials were collected and stored for off-line analysis. RESULTS: Despite limited neuroanatomic information for this species, it was possible to reliably implant leads into the target structures using MR-guided techniques. Stimulation of these regions produced robust evoked potentials within this circuit that were dependent on stimulus location and parameters. High-frequency thalamic DBS produced a clear inhibition of both spontaneous and penicillin-induced ictal activity in the hippocampus which far outlasted the duration of the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that the sheep model may be useful for further investigation of DBS for epilepsy. The demonstration of marked suppression of network excitability with high-frequency stimulation supports a potential therapeutic mechanism for this DBS therapy.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Epilepsy/therapy , Implantable Neurostimulators , Models, Animal , Animals , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials/drug effects , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Hippocampus/drug effects , Hippocampus/physiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Penicillins/pharmacology , Sheep , Stereotaxic Techniques , Thalamus/drug effects , Thalamus/physiology
15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22254420

ABSTRACT

We briefly describe a dynamic control system framework for neuromodulation for epilepsy, with an emphasis on its practical challenges and the preliminary validation of key prototype technologies in a chronic animal model. The current state of neuromodulation can be viewed as a classical dynamic control framework such that the nervous system is the classical "plant", the neural stimulator is the controller/actuator, clinical observation, patient diaries and/or measured bio-markers are the sensor, and clinical judgment applied to these sensor inputs forms the state estimator. Technology can potentially address two main factors contributing to the performance limitations of existing systems: "observability," the ability to observe the state of the system from output measurements, and "controllability," the ability to drive the system to a desired state. In addition to improving sensors and actuator performance, methods and tools to better understand disease state dynamics and state estimation are also critical for improving therapy outcomes. We describe our preliminary validation of key "observability" and "controllability" technology blocks using an implanted research tool in an epilepsy disease model. This model allows for testing the key emerging technologies in a representative neural network of therapeutic importance. In the future, we believe these technologies might enable both first principles understanding of neural network behavior for optimizing therapy design, and provide a practical pathway towards clinical translation.


Subject(s)
Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Biotechnology/trends , Brain/physiopathology , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Epilepsy/prevention & control , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Models, Neurological , Computer Simulation , Humans
16.
Biol Psychiatry ; 65(4): 267-75, 2009 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18842257

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) for treatment refractory depression. METHODS: Fifteen patients with chronic, severe, highly refractory depression received open-label DBS at three collaborating clinical sites. Electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the VC/VS region. Stimulation was titrated to therapeutic benefit and the absence of adverse effects. All patients received continuous stimulation and were followed for a minimum of 6 months to longer than 4 years. Outcome measures included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 item (HDRS), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Global Assessment of Function Scale (GAF). RESULTS: Significant improvements in depressive symptoms were observed during DBS treatment. Mean HDRS scores declined from 33.1 at baseline to 17.5 at 6 months and 14.3 at last follow-up. Similar improvements were seen with the MADRS (34.8, 17.9, and 15.7, respectively) and the GAF (43.4, 55.5, and 61.8, respectively). Responder rates with the HDRS were 40% at 6 months and 53.3% at last follow-up (MADRS: 46.7% and 53.3%, respectively). Remission rates were 20% at 6 months and 40% at last follow-up with the HDRS (MADRS: 26.6% and 33.3%, respectively). The DBS was well-tolerated in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Deep brain stimulation of the VC/VS offers promise for the treatment of refractory major depression.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Neostriatum/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Chronic Disease , Cognition/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Drug Resistance , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
18.
J Neurosurg ; 104(4): 558-65, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16619660

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral [anterior internal] capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS) is under investigation as an alternative to anterior capsulotomy for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). In neuroimaging studies of patients with OCD, dysfunction in the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, and thalamus has been identified; and modulation of activity in this circuit has been observed following successful nonsurgical treatment. The purpose of the current study was to test hypotheses regarding changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during acute DBS at the VC/VS target in patients with OCD who were participating in a clinical DBS trial. METHODS: Six patients enrolled in a DBS trial for OCD underwent positron emission tomography to measure rCBF; the rCBF measured during acute DBS at high frequency was then compared with those measured during DBS at low frequency and off (control) conditions. On the basis of neuroanatomical knowledge about the VC/VS and neuroimaging data on OCD, the authors predicted that acute DBS at this target would result in modulation of activity within the implicated frontal-basal ganglia-thalamic circuit. Data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping. In a comparison of acute high-frequency DBS with control conditions, the authors found significant activation of the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, globus pallidus, and thalamus. CONCLUSIONS: Acute DBS at the VC/VS target is associated with activation of the circuitry implicated in OCD. Further studies will be necessary to replicate these findings and to determine the neural effects associated with chronic VC/VS DBS. Moreover, additional data are needed to investigate whether pretreatment imaging profiles can be used to predict a patient's subsequent clinical response to chronic DBS.


Subject(s)
Basal Ganglia/blood supply , Deep Brain Stimulation , Internal Capsule/blood supply , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Adult , Basal Ganglia/diagnostic imaging , Brain/blood supply , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain Mapping , Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Female , Frontal Lobe/blood supply , Frontal Lobe/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Internal Capsule/diagnostic imaging , Male , Nerve Net/physiopathology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/physiopathology , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/therapy , Pilot Projects , Regional Blood Flow/physiology
19.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 23(10): 1795-802, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12427641

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent work has shown a potential for excessive heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes during MR imaging. This in vitro study investigates the relationship between electrode heating and the specific absorption rate (SAR) of several MR images. METHODS: In vitro testing was performed by using a 1.5-T MR imaging system and a head transmit-receive coil, with bilateral deep brain stimulation systems positioned in a gel saline-filled phantom, and temperature monitoring with a fluoroptic thermometry system. Standardized fast spin-echo sequences were performed over a range of high, medium, and low SAR values. Several additional, clinically important MR imaging techniques, including 3D magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo imaging, echo-planar imaging, quantitative magnetization transfer imaging, and magnetization transfer-suppressed MR angiography, were also tested by using typical parameters. RESULTS: A significant, highly linear relationship between SAR and electrode heating was found, with the temperature elevation being approximately 0.9 times the local SAR value. Minor temperature elevations, <1 degrees C, were found with the fast spin-echo, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo, and echo-planar clinical imaging sequences. The high dB/dt echo-planar imaging sequence had no significant heating independent of SAR considerations. Sequences with magnetization transfer pulses produced temperature elevations in the 1.0 to 2.0 degrees C range, which was less than theoretically predicted for the relatively high SAR values. CONCLUSION: A potential exists for excessive MR imaging-related heating in patients with deep brain stimulation electrodes; however, the temperature increases are linearly related to SAR values. Clinical imaging sequences that are associated with tolerable temperature elevations in the

Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Echo-Planar Imaging , Heating/instrumentation , Body Temperature/physiology , Electric Stimulation/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Humans , Linear Models , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiography
20.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 15(3): 241-50, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11891968

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related heating for a neurostimulation system (Activa Tremor Control System, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) used for chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different configurations were evaluated for bilateral neurostimulators (Soletra Model 7426), extensions, and leads to assess worst-case and clinically relevant positioning scenarios. In vitro testing was performed using a 1.5-T/64-MHz MR system and a gel-filled phantom designed to approximate the head and upper torso of a human subject. MRI was conducted using the transmit/receive body and transmit/receive head radio frequency (RF) coils. Various levels of RF energy were applied with the transmit/receive body (whole-body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR); range, 0.98-3.90 W/kg) and transmit/receive head (whole-body averaged SAR; range, 0.07-0.24 W/kg) coils. A fluoroptic thermometry system was used to record temperatures at multiple locations before (1 minute) and during (15 minutes) MRI. RESULTS: Using the body RF coil, the highest temperature changes ranged from 2.5 degrees-25.3 degrees C. Using the head RF coil, the highest temperature changes ranged from 2.3 degrees-7.1 degrees C.Thus, these findings indicated that substantial heating occurs under certain conditions, while others produce relatively minor, physiologically inconsequential temperature increases. CONCLUSION: The temperature increases were dependent on the type of RF coil, level of SAR used, and how the lead wires were positioned. Notably, the use of clinically relevant positioning techniques for the neurostimulation system and low SARs commonly used for imaging the brain generated little heating. Based on this information, MR safety guidelines are provided. These observations are restricted to the tested neurostimulation system.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Hot Temperature/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , In Vitro Techniques , Phantoms, Imaging , Thermography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...