ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous findings on the effect of general versus spinal anesthesia on postoperative delirium in elderly people with hip fractures are somewhat controversial. This article included the latest randomized controlled study for meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) on delirium after hip fracture surgery in the elderly, so as to guide the clinical. METHODS: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web Of Science, and Embase were searched from inception up to January 16, 2024. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) was included to evaluate the postoperative results of GA and SA in elderly patients (≥50 years old) undergoing hip fracture surgery. Two researchers independently screened for inclusion in the study and extracted data. Heterogeneity was assessed by the I²and Chi-square tests, and Pâ <â .1 or I² ≥ 50% indicated marked heterogeneity among studies. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to estimate the combined relative risk ratio (RR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the binary variables. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials were included. There was no significant difference (RRâ =â 0.93, 95% CIâ =â 0.774-1.111, Pâ >â .05) in the incidence of postoperative delirium between the GA group and the SA group. In intraoperative blood transfusion (RRâ =â 1.0, 95% CIâ =â 0.77-1.28, Zâ =â 0.04, Pâ =â .971), pulmonary embolism (RRâ =â 0.795, 95% CIâ =â 0.332-1.904, Zâ =â 0.59, Pâ =â .606), pneumonia (RRâ =â 1.47, 95% CIâ =â 0.75-2.87, Pâ =â .675), myocardial infarction (RRâ =â 0.97, 95% CIâ =â 0.24-3.86, Zâ =â 0.05, Pâ =â .961), heart failure (RRâ =â 0.80, 95% CIâ =â 0.26-2.42, Zâ =â 0.40, Pâ =â .961), urinary retention (RRâ =â 1.42, 95% CIâ =â 0.77-2.61, Zâ =â 1.11, Pâ =â .267) were similar between the 2 anesthetic techniques. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the effect of GA and SA on postoperative delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture, and their effects on postoperative complications are similar.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Spinal , Delirium , Hip Fractures , Postoperative Complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, General/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Delirium/etiology , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/prevention & control , Emergence Delirium/epidemiology , Emergence Delirium/prevention & control , Emergence Delirium/etiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Middle AgedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of patients with cervical disc herniation (CDH) treated by low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (LTP-RFA) as day surgery with traditional inpatients. METHODS: According to the selection criteria, single-segment mild to moderate CDH patients who received LTP-RFA from January 2020 to December 2021 were divided into day surgery procedure (DSP) group and a traditional inpatient procedure (TIP) group. The visual analogue score (VAS) and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA) of neurological function of patients in the two groups were recorded at the time of preoperative, and one day, three months, six months after surgery and the last follow-up respectively. The gender, age, responsible segment, surgical complications, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, and patient satisfaction were recorded and analyzed for both groups. The modified Macnab standard was used to evaluate the postoperative efficacy at one month and six months after operation. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients (75 in DSP;52 in TIP) with complete data were enrolled and completed six month follow-up. There were no statistically significant pre-treatment VAS scores and mJOA scores in the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative VAS and mJOA scores in both groups were improved after surgery (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in VAS scores and mJOA scores between the two groups in the same postoperative period (all P > 0.05). The efficacy of MacNab was similar one month and six months after operation (P > 0.05). The hospitalization time and hospitalization cost were significantly lower in DSP group (all P<0.05). As the treatment effects were comparable, patients in both groups were similarly satisfied at discharge. CONCLUSION: LTP-RFA is an effective method for the treatment of mild to moderate CDH. We suggest that the application of LTP-RFA in DSP for mild to moderate CDH is worthy of wide application.
