Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Ultrasound Q ; 36(1): 1-5, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107426

ABSTRACT

Structured reporting of ultrasound examinations can add value throughout the imaging chain. Reports may be created in a more efficient manner, with increased accuracy and clarity. Communication with referring providers and patients may be improved. Patient care can be enhanced through improved adherence with guidelines and local best practices. Radiology departments may benefit from improved billing and quality reporting. Consistent discrete data can enable research and collaborations between institutions. This article will review the multifaceted impact of structuring ultrasound reports.


Subject(s)
Documentation/standards , Radiology Information Systems/standards , Ultrasonography , Humans , Quality Improvement
2.
Ultrasound Q ; 35(4): 346-354, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30807547

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) utilizes high-intensity focused ultrasound to noninvasively, thermally ablate lesions within the body while sparing the intervening tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging provides treatment planning and guidance, and real-time magnetic resonance thermometry provides continuous monitoring during therapy. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound is ideally suited for the treatment of extra-abdominal desmoid fibromatosis due to its noninvasiveness, lack of ionizing radiation, low morbidity, and good safety profile. Conventional treatments for these benign tumors, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, can carry significant morbidity. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound provides a safe and effective alternative treatment in this often-young and otherwise healthy patient population. While there is considerable experience with MRgFUS for treatment of uterine fibroids, painful bone lesions, and essential tremor, there are few reports in the literature of its use for treatment of benign or malignant soft tissue tumors. This article reviews the principles and biologic effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound, provides an overview of the MRgFUS treatment system and use of magnetic resonance thermometry, discusses the use of MRgFUS for the treatment of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors, and provides several case examples.


Subject(s)
Fibromatosis, Aggressive/therapy , High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/diagnosis , Humans
3.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 14(5S): S154-S159, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28473071

ABSTRACT

Most men with hematospermia or hemospermia (HS) are young (<40 years of age), presenting with transient or episodic HS without other signs or symptoms of disease. The condition is self-limiting in most cases and idiopathic in nature. When a cause can be identified, infections of the urogenital tract are the most common. Imaging does not play a role in this patient population. In older men (>40 years of age), clinical screening for prostate cancer is advised. Furthermore, when HS is persistent or has symptoms, causes include obstruction or stricture at the level of the verumontanum, calcifications or calculi in the prostate, ejaculatory ducts or seminal vesicles, and cysts arising within these structures. Noninvasive imaging, predominantly transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and MRI, can be used in men of any age with persistent or refractory HS, or other associated symptoms or signs. TRUS is considered as the first-line imaging with MRI used when TRUS is inconclusive or negative. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Hemospermia/diagnostic imaging , Age Factors , Hemospermia/etiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Prostatic Diseases/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Radiology , Societies, Medical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography/methods , United States , Urinary Tract Infections/complications
4.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 13(10): 1203-1209, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27526969

ABSTRACT

Testicular cancer represents only 1% of all malignancies occurring in men. However, it is the most frequent malignancy in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, accounting for 10% to 14% of cancer incidence in that age group. In most instances, the diagnosis of testicular tumors is established with a carefully performed physical examination and scrotal ultrasonography. Tumor markers are useful for determining the presence of residual disease. Cross-sectional imaging studies (CT, MRI) are useful in determining the location of metastases. Chest radiography and CT are used to assess pulmonary disease. Fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET scans have slightly higher sensitivity than CT, but their role in staging testicular cancer has not been determined in a large study. FDG PET may play a role in the follow-up of higher stage seminoma after chemotherapy. Bone scans are useful in the absence of FDG PET scans and should be used when bone metastases are suspected. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Incidence , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Physical Examination , Sensitivity and Specificity , Testicular Neoplasms/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
5.
Can J Urol ; 20(4): 6840-3, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23930609

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) at the time of percutaneous suprapubic catheter (SPC) placement. US has been recommended as a way to minimize complications, such as bowel injury, during percutaneous SPC placement, yet there is limited data supporting this recommendation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing percutaneous SPC placement from 2002 to 2011. The method of percutaneous SPC placement (cystoscopic and/or ultrasound guidance, blind) was recorded and patients were subdivided into groups based on the use of US. The need to modify the approach based on US findings and complications such as bleeding or bowel injury were noted and compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 307 percutaneous SPCs were placed: cystoscopy alone was used in 190 (62%) patients, cystoscopy + US in 86 (28%) patients, US alone in 6 (2%) patients, and 25 (8%) patients had the SPC placed blindly. Previous lower abdominal surgery was noted in 41/92 (45%) of patients with and 32/215 (15%) of patients without US usage. US identified intervening loops of bowel in 5/92 cases (5%), all of whom had a history of lower abdominal surgery. The approach was modified in 2/5 and abandoned in 3/5 based on US findings. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 1/215 (0.5%) of patients with and 1/92 (1%) of patients without US usage. No bowel injuries occurred. CONCLUSIONS: While US may not be needed in most patients, particularly when cystoscopy is used, it may help to avoid bowel injury in patients with a history of lower abdominal surgery.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Catheterization/methods , Ultrasonography/methods , Urinary Catheters , Adult , Aged , Cystoscopy , Female , Gastrointestinal Tract/injuries , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction/therapy , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy
6.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 10(6): 402-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23632132

ABSTRACT

A fundamental consideration in the workup of a jaundiced patient is the pretest probability of mechanical obstruction. Ultrasound is the first-line modality to exclude biliary tract obstruction. When mechanical obstruction is present, additional imaging with CT or MRI can clarify etiology, define level of obstruction, stage disease, and guide intervention. When mechanical obstruction is absent, additional imaging can evaluate liver parenchyma for fat and iron deposition and help direct biopsy in cases where underlying parenchymal disease or mass is found. Imaging techniques are reviewed for the following clinical scenarios: (1) the patient with painful jaundice, (2) the patient with painless jaundice, and (3) the patient with a nonmechanical cause for jaundice. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Cholestasis/diagnosis , Cholestasis/etiology , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Jaundice/complications , Jaundice/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiology/standards , Humans , United States
7.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 9(11): 775-81, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23122343

ABSTRACT

Because virtually all patients with colonic cancer will undergo some form of surgical therapy, the role of preoperative imaging is directed at determining the presence or absence of synchronous carcinomas or adenomas and local or distant metastases. In contrast, preoperative staging for rectal carcinoma has significant therapeutic implications and will direct the use of radiation therapy, surgical excision, or chemotherapy. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is recommended for the initial evaluation for the preoperative assessment of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Although the overall accuracy of CT varies directly with the stage of colorectal carcinoma, CT can accurately assess the presence of metastatic disease. MRI using endorectal coils can accurately assess the depth of bowel wall penetration of rectal carcinomas. Phased-array coils provide additional information about lymph node involvement. Adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional MRI yields better diagnostic accuracy than conventional MRI alone. Transrectal ultrasound can distinguish layers within the rectal wall and provides accurate assessment of the depth of tumor penetration and perirectal spread, and PET and PET/CT have been shown to alter therapy in almost one-third of patients with advanced primary rectal cancer. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Preoperative Care/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Radiology/standards
8.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 8(11): 749-55, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22051456

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic imaging of patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis may be organized according to age and gender and to the presence or absence of "classic" signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis. Among adult patients presenting with clinical signs of acute appendicitis, the sensitivity and specificity of CT are greater than those of ultrasound, with improved performance when CT is performed with intravenous contrast. The use of rectal contrast has been associated with decreased time in the emergency department. Computed tomography has also been shown to reduce cost and negative appendectomy rates. Both CT and ultrasound are also effective in the identification of causes of right lower quadrant pain unrelated to appendicitis. Among pediatric patients, the sensitivity and specificity of graded-compression ultrasound can approach those of CT, without the use of ionizing radiation. Performing MRI after inconclusive ultrasound in pregnant patients has been associated with sensitivity and specificity of 80% to 86% and 97% to 99%, respectively. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis/diagnosis , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Radiation Effects , Abdomen, Acute/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Imaging/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Male , Pregnancy , Radiation Protection , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Societies, Medical/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/adverse effects , Ultrasonography, Doppler/standards
9.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 7(9): 670-8, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20816627

ABSTRACT

Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common causes of cancer death in this country. This malignancy is ideally suited for screening because the detection and removal of the precursor adenomatous polyp can prevent most colorectal cancers from ever forming. The choice of a test for screening involves consideration of various individual parameters, including patient age and the presence of risk factors for the development of colorectal cancer. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has emerged as the leading imaging technique for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals on the basis of the evidence presented in this paper. The double-contrast barium enema is an alternative imaging test that is appropriate particularly when CTC is not available. In 2008, the American Cancer Society guideline for colorectal cancer screening was revised jointly with the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the ACR to include CTC every 5 years as an option for average-risk individuals. Computed tomographic colonography is also the preferred test for colon evaluation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Imaging tests including CTC and the double-contrast barium enema are usually not indicated for colorectal cancer screening in high-risk patients with polyposis syndromes or inflammatory bowel disease. This paper presents the new colorectal cancer imaging test ratings and is the result of evidence-based consensus by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Mass Screening/standards , Radiology/statistics & numerical data , Adenoma/complications , Biopsy , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnostic imaging , Colonography, Computed Tomographic/methods , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Radiology/standards , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , United States/epidemiology
10.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 7(2): 94-102, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20142082

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, new therapeutic agents have been developed that permit gastroenterologists to treat virtually all forms of Crohn's disease. The success of these treatments depends on an accurate diagnosis of the nature and extent of disease. Fortunately, radiologists now possess a powerful arsenal of imaging techniques to guide the choice of therapy. This article discusses the usefulness of both traditional and newer imaging techniques in the management of Crohn's disease and its various clinical presentations.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/therapy , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Humans
11.
J Endourol ; 23(7): 1199-201; discussion 1202, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19530950

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of patients with ureteroenteric strictures after ileal conduit urinary diversion that were managed with Resonance metallic ureteral stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten ureteroenteric strictures in patients with ileal conduits that were managed with metallic ureteral stenting were retrospectively identified. Charts were examined for patient age, anastomosis type, stricture cause, stricture laterality, complications, and follow-up. RESULTS: Nine of 10 (90%) cases resulted in distal stent migration. Mean time to stent migration was 21 days (range 3-60 d). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of Resonance metallic stents in patients with ileal conduits is ineffective for management of ureteroenteric strictures because of the high rate of distal migration.


Subject(s)
Metals , Stents , Ureter/pathology , Ureteral Obstruction/therapy , Abdomen/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Constriction, Pathologic , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Failure , Ureter/diagnostic imaging
12.
13.
J Urol ; 179(3): 862-7; discussion 867, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18221955

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We determined whether multidetector computerized tomography urography is sensitive and specific for detecting urinary tract neoplasms when used as the primary imaging modality for evaluating patients with hematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the radiological, urological and pathological records of 468 patients without a history of urinary neoplasms who presented with hematuria. All patients underwent multidetector computerized tomography urography and complete urological evaluation, including cystoscopy. Laboratory urinalysis and cytology were done in 350 and 318 of the 468 patients, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using the variables multidetector computerized tomography urography diagnosis, worst urine cytology, number of red blood cells per high power field, gross hematuria, age and gender to predict urinary tract neoplasm. RESULTS: A total of 50 urinary neoplasms were diagnosed in 468 patients. Multidetector computerized tomography urography detected 32 of 50 neoplasms for a sensitivity of 64%, specificity of 98%, positive predictive value of 76% and negative predictive value of 96%. There were 10 false-positive and 18 false-negative multidetector computerized tomography urography studies. Multivariate logistic regression showed that abnormal multidetector computerized tomography urography findings, ie neoplasm (p <0.0001), and suspicious or positive urine cytology (p = 0.0009) were significant. Patients with an abnormal multidetector computerized tomography urography diagnosis and suspicious or positive urine cytology had 44 and 47 times greater odds, respectively, of having urinary neoplasms compared to the odds in those with normal examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computerized tomography urography is relatively sensitive and highly specific for detecting urinary neoplasms. It may serve as the primary imaging modality to evaluate patients with hematuria. Multidetector computerized tomography urography does not eliminate the role of cystoscopy in the evaluation of hematuria.


Subject(s)
Hematuria/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urography , Urologic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Urologic Neoplasms/complications
14.
J Hand Surg Am ; 31(4): 524-9, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16632042

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: After the surgical repair of finger tendons finger range of motion may be limited by tendon rupture or adhesive scarring. Differentiating tendon rupture from adhesive scarring may be difficult clinically. Digital tendon sonography allows the evaluation of tendon integrity in a dynamic setting. Our objective was to determine if sonography could differentiate tendon rupture from adhesive scarring in patients who have had primary tendon repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the radiographic, clinical, and surgical records of patients referred for finger sonography over a 2-year period. Twenty-eight digits in 21 patients were evaluated for finger tendon disruption after primary surgical repair. The diagnosis of complete tendon rupture was made when 1 or more of the following was identified: a gap separating the proximal and distal tendon margins, visualization of only the proximal tendon margin, or visualization of only the distal tendon margin. Adhesive scarring was diagnosed if the tendon appeared intact with abnormal peritendinous soft tissue abutting or partially encasing the tendon, with synovial sheath thickening, or with restricted tendon motion during dynamic evaluation. RESULTS: Sonography correctly identified tendon rupture or adhesive scarring in 27 of 28 digits with 1 false-positive case (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 93%; positive-predictive value, 93%; negative-predictive value, 100%; accuracy, 96%). CONCLUSIONS: Sonography is an accurate modality for differentiating tendon rupture from adhesive scarring in patients with prior surgical tendon repair. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level I.


Subject(s)
Finger Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Finger Injuries/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Tendons/diagnostic imaging , Tendons/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Finger Injuries/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/diagnosis , Rupture/physiopathology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tendons/physiopathology , Tissue Adhesions/diagnosis , Tissue Adhesions/physiopathology , Ultrasonography
15.
Int J Urol ; 13(1): 84-6, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16448440

ABSTRACT

In the testicular cancer post-treatment setting a rapidly growing retroperitoneal mass leads to a differential diagnosis including recurrent germ cell tumor, residual mature teratoma, or sarcomatoid degeneration. We report the case of a 27-year-old man with a large abdominal mass occurring in the setting of a mixed germ cell tumor after radical orchiectomy with primary chemotherapy followed by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Surgical excision of this mass followed by pathological review revealed an intra-abdominal desmoid tumor. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for isochromosome 12p failed to demonstrate a germ cell tumor origin. This is the fourth such case of an intra-abdominal desmoid tumor after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer in the urologic literature. This case highlights the need for careful consideration of a desmoid tumor when a rapidly growing spindle cell tumor is encountered in a post-treatment testis cancer patient.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/complications , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/complications , Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Abdominal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/diagnosis , Fibromatosis, Aggressive/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laparotomy , Male , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/diagnosis , Orchiectomy/adverse effects , Retroperitoneal Space , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
16.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 186(1): 122-9, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16357390

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a saline bolus during CT urography improves urinary collecting system opacification and whether the addition of enhanced CT digital radiography (CTDR) improves urinary collecting system visualization with or without a saline bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred eight CT urography and enhanced CTDR examinations were reviewed. Fifty-four patients were given a saline bolus during CT urography, and 54 patients underwent CT urography without a saline bolus. Urinary collecting system opacification was evaluated by group (saline vs nonsaline), imaging technique (CT urography alone vs CT urography plus enhanced CTDR), number of enhanced CTDR images, and site of nonopacified urinary segments. Using a multivariate logistic regression model, we determined significance of variables and odds of complete opacification. RESULTS: In the saline group, 248 nonopacified sites were identified on CT urography alone and 95 sites with CT urography plus enhanced CTDR. In the nonsaline group, 185 nonopacified sites were identified on CT urography alone and 59 sites with CT urography plus enhanced CTDR. Combining both groups, 433 nonopacified sites were identified with CT urography alone and 154 sites with CT urography plus enhanced CTDR. Multivariate logistic regression showed significance for group (p = 0.010), imaging method (p < 0.0001), number of enhanced CTDR images (p = 0.048), and site of segment opacification (p < 0.0001). The renal pelvis shows the greatest odds and the distal ureter the lowest odds for complete opacification by group or imaging method. CONCLUSION: The addition of a saline bolus offers no improvement, whereas the addition of enhanced CTDR offers significant improvement in collecting system opacification during CT urography.


Subject(s)
Sodium Chloride , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urography/methods , Urologic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hematuria/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged
17.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 23(1): 21-32, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21326717

ABSTRACT

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful functional imaging method that complements conventional anatomic imaging modalities for screening patients with colorectal hepatic metastases and hepatocellular cancer to determine their suitability for interventional procedures. FDG PET is more sensitive in detecting colorectal cancer than hepatocellular cancer (~90% versus ~50%). The likelihood of detecting hepatic malignancy with FDG PET rapidly diminishes for lesions smaller than 1 cm. The greatest value of FDG PET in these patients is in excluding extrahepatic disease that might lead to early recurrence after interventional therapy. Promising results have been reported with FDG PET that may show residual (local) or recurrent disease before conventional imaging methods in patients receiving interventional therapy. For patients with colorectal hepatic metastases, many investigators believe that patients with PET evidence of recurrent hepatic disease should receive additional treatment even when there is no confirmatory evidence present on other methodologies. For patients with hepatocellular cancer no conclusions regarding the value of FDG PET for assessment of response to interventional therapy can be reached as there is almost no published data.

18.
Ultrasound Q ; 21(3): 175-85, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16096614

ABSTRACT

Infected pelvic fluid collections are relatively common particularly after abdominal or pelvic surgery or in patients suffering from benign intestinal disease such as diverticulitis, appendicitis, or Crohn's disease. Historically the treatment of pelvic abscess has been either laparotomy with lavage or blind surgical incision and drainage through the rectal or vaginal wall. More recently, computed tomography and ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage has become the procedure of choice, when feasible, for the treatment of pelvic abscess. However, many deep pelvic collections are not amenable to percutaneous technique. Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasound-guided abscess drainage is a safe and effective method used in the treatment of deep pelvic abscesses. The purpose of this article is to review the techniques, patient selection, pre- and post-procedural care, and monitoring aspects of transrectal or transvaginal ultrasound-guided drainage.


Subject(s)
Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Abscess/therapy , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Drainage , Female , Humans , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic , Rectum , Vagina
19.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 184(1): 131-8, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15615963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D-rendered CT urography (CTU) depicts both normal and abnormal findings in patients with urinary diversions and if the addition of contrast-enhanced CT digital radiography (CTDR) improves opacification of the urinary collecting system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR examinations were performed in 24 patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer. Indications for evaluation included hematuria, tumor surveillance, or suspected diversion malfunction. All examinations were evaluated without knowledge of the stage or grade of a patient's tumor and were compared with the clinical records. Opacification of the urinary collecting system was evaluated with 3D CTU alone, contrast-enhanced CTDR alone, and combined CTU and CTDR. RESULTS: Nine abnormalities were identified including distal ureteral strictures (n = 4), vascular compression of the mid left ureter (n = 1), scarring of the mid right pole infundibulum (n = 1), bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureter (n = 1), urinary reservoir calculus (n = 1), and tumor recurrence invading the afferent limb of the neobladder (n = 1). Eight of the nine detected abnormalities were surgically or pathologically confirmed. All abnormalities were identified on all three imaging techniques but were best seen on 3D CTU and enhanced CTDR images. Incomplete opacification of the urinary collecting system occurred in 17 patients with CTU alone, 12 patients with contrast-enhanced CTDR alone, and nine patients with combined CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR. Compared with CTU alone, the combined technique of 3D CTU and contrast-enhanced CTDR improved opacification by a statistically significant difference (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: CTU with 3D rendering can accurately depict both normal and abnormal postoperative findings in patients with urinary diversions. Adding enhanced CTDR can improve visualization of the urinary collecting system.


Subject(s)
Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Urinary Diversion , Urography/methods , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Contrast Media , Cystectomy , Female , Hematuria/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Urinary Bladder/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
20.
Surgery ; 136(4): 854-60, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15467672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of barium radiography compared with intraoperative evaluation with passage of a balloon catheter for assessment of stricturing Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease center's consecutive records of surgical patients between 1998 and 2003 with small intestinal CD to compare the number of strictures found at surgery with those identified preoperatively by barium imaging. Age, gender, prior surgical procedures, and steroid usage were recorded. By decision of the surgeons, all patients were treated with an identical approach that utilized intraluminal sizing with passage of a balloon-tipped catheter. RESULTS: In 118 patients, 230 strictures were identified by barium examination; 365 strictures were identified using the balloon catheter technique. Barium examination overestimated or underestimated the number of strictures in 43 of 118 patients (36%). Overall, barium radiography was least accurate in patients with strictures amenable to strictureplasty. Prior surgery and multiple strictures identified preoperatively by barium studies were found to decrease the accuracy of the barium examination, but the decrease did not reach statistical significance. After successful surgery for stricturing small intestinal CD, more than 90% of patients can successfully be weaned from their steroids within 3 months. Failure to be able to wean from steroids may suggest a missed stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that careful exploration and intraoperative, intraluminal testing of intestinal patency identify additional strictures compared with barium radiographs in a significant number of patients with CD undergoing small bowel surgical intervention.


Subject(s)
Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Crohn Disease/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Barium Sulfate , Body Weights and Measures , Catheterization/instrumentation , Constriction, Pathologic , Contrast Media , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Intestine, Small/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...