Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mol Carcinog ; 56(11): 2446-2460, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28618017

ABSTRACT

Effective chemoprevention is critical for improving outcomes of oral cancer. As single agents, curcumin and metformin are reported to exhibit chemopreventive properties, in vitro as well as in patients with oral cancer. In this study, the chemopreventive efficacy of this drug combination was tested in a 4-nitro quinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) induced mice oral carcinogenesis model. Molecular analysis revealed a cancer stem cell (CSC)-driven oral carcinogenic progression in this model, wherein a progressive increase in the expression of CSC-specific markers (CD44 and CD133) was observed from 8th to 25th week, at transcript (40-100-fold) and protein levels (P ≤ 0.0001). Chemopreventive treatment of the animals at 17th week with curcumin and metformin indicated that the combination regimen decreased tumor volume when compared to the control arm (0.69+0.03 vs 6.66+2.4 mm3 ; P = 0.04) and improved overall survival of the animals (P = 0.03). Assessment of the molecular status showed an overall downregulation of CSC markers in the treatment arms as compared to the untreated control. Further, in vitro assessment of the treatment on the primary cells generated from progressive stages of 4NQO-induced mice tissue showed a concordant and consistent downregulation of the CSC markers following combination treatment (P < 0.05). The treatment also inhibited the migratory and self-renewal properties of these cells; the effect of which was prominent in the cultures of early dysplastic tissue (P < 0.002). Collectively, our observations suggest that the combination of curcumin and metformin may improve chemopreventive efficacy against oral squamous cell carcinoma through a CSC-associated mechanism.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/prevention & control , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Mouth Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide , AC133 Antigen/analysis , Animals , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Chemoprevention , Female , Hyaluronan Receptors/analysis , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mouth/drug effects , Mouth/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/chemically induced , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology
2.
Mol Carcinog ; 56(2): 694-711, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380877

ABSTRACT

Chemoresistance leading to disease relapse is one of the major challenges to improve outcome in head and neck cancers. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) are increasingly being implicated in chemotherapy resistance, this study investigates the correlation between CSC behavior and acquired drug resistance in in vitro cell line models. Cell lines resistant to Cisplatin (Cal-27 CisR, Hep-2 CisR) and 5FU (Cal-27 5FUR) with high Resistance Indices (RI) were generated (RI ≥ 3) by short-term treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines with chemotherapeutic drugs (Cisplatin, Docetaxel, 5FU), using a dose-incremental strategy. The cell lines (Cal-27 DoxR, Hep-2 DoxR, Hep-2 5FUR) that showed low RI, nevertheless had a high cross resistance to Cisplatin/5FU (P < 0.05). Cal-27 CisR and DoxR showed 12-14% enrichment of CD44+ cells, while CisR/5FUR showed 4-6% increase in ALDH1A1+ cells as compared to parental cells (P < 0.05). Increased expression of stem cell markers (CD44, CD133, NOTCH1, ALDH1A1, OCT4, SOX2) in these cell lines, correlated with enhanced spheroid/colony formation, migratory potential, and increased in vivo tumor burden (P < 0.05). Inhibition of ALDH1A1 in Cal-27 CisR led to down regulation of the CSC markers, reduction in migratory, self-renewal and tumorigenic potential (P < 0.05) accompanied by an induction of sensitivity to Cisplatin (P < 0.05). Further, ex vivo treatment of explants (n = 4) from HNSCC patients with the inhibitor (NCT-501) in combination with Cisplatin showed a significant decrease in proliferating cells as compared to individual treatment (P = 0.001). This study hence suggests an ALDH1A1-driven, CSC-mediated mechanism in acquired drug resistance of HNSCC, which may have therapeutic implications. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase/antagonists & inhibitors , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Cisplatin/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Piperazines/pharmacology , Theophylline/pharmacology , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase/analysis , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase/genetics , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Head and Neck Neoplasms/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/metabolism , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Hyaluronan Receptors/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , Retinal Dehydrogenase , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
3.
Proteomics Clin Appl ; 11(3-4)2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27801551

ABSTRACT

Sample processing protocols that enable compatible recovery of differentially expressed transcripts and proteins are necessary for integration of the multiomics data applied in the analysis of tumors. In this pilot study, we compared two different isolation methods for extracting RNA and protein from laryngopharyngeal tumor tissues and the corresponding adjacent normal sections. In Method 1, RNA and protein were isolated from a single tissue section sequentially and in Method 2, the extraction was carried out using two different sections and two independent and parallel protocols for RNA and protein. RNA and protein from both methods were subjected to RNA-seq and iTRAQ-based LC-MS/MS analysis, respectively. Analysis of data revealed that a higher number of differentially expressed transcripts and proteins were concordant in their regulation trends in Method 1 as compared to Method 2. Cross-method comparison of concordant entities revealed that RNA and protein extraction from the same tissue section (Method 1) recovered more concordant entities that are missed in the other extraction method (Method 2) indicating heterogeneity in distribution of these entities in different tissue sections. Method 1 could thus be the method of choice for integrated analysis of transcriptome and proteome data.


Subject(s)
Analytic Sample Preparation Methods/methods , Gene Expression Profiling , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/metabolism , Proteomics , Systems Integration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...