[Health Effects Caused by Soil Fumigant Chloropicrin, Reduction of Exposure to Chloropicrin, and Alternative Technology of Soil Fumigants].

Pesticides are essentially toxic to living things and are used openly, so it is necessary to monitor them to prevent their adverse effects. We have studied farmers'exposure to pesticides during soil fumigation operations with chloropicrin, and have noted a danger to the farmers in the form of dyspnea. We examined accidents/symptoms of residents from chloropicrin reported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery from 2010 to 2019. Eighty percent of the cause of these manifestations was the failure to cover fumigated soil with plastic film. Symptoms shown by residents included eye pain (91%), sore throat (35%), and headache (14%). The most common film used for covering fumigated soil in Japan is polyethylene. The agricultural technology centers in Japan have studied the use of gas barrier films, and found it possible to decrease the amount of chloropicrin used to 1/3, and leakage into the atmosphere to less than 1/10. This technology has become popular in the production of sweet potatoes in Tokushima Prefecture. Soil disinfection by solar heat has also been studied in Japan. These studies have shown positive advancements in the fertilization of soil and in the control of microbes. Chloropicrin has caused occupational exposure to farmers and environmental exposure to local residents. It is advisable that the technologies mentioned above become common practice.

[Dermatitis in Greenhouse Farmers Caused by Acaricide Cyflumetofen - An Interview Study].

Pesticides are essentially toxic to living things, and, as they are used openly, it is necessary to monitor them and to prevent their adverse effects. A self-administered questionnaire survey given to a group of the greenhouse farmers told us that some of them developed dermatitis from acaricide cyflumetofen, so we conducted an interview study on dermatitis caused by cyflumetofen. The participants were affiliated with a strawberry producing group, and were interviewed at their annual health checkups in the spring of 2016 and 2017. The questions covered the status of spraying, dermatitis from cyflumetofen, and visitations to clinics/hospitals. Of 108 farmers interviewed, 20 had subjective symptoms of dermatitis from cyflumetofen. Seven of them had visited clinics/hospitals. The most affected body part was the face, especially around the eyes, followed by the hands and forearms. The subjective symptoms varied from slight (rubor and itching) to serious (swelling with aching around the eyes). Three male farmers had visited clinics/hospitals for 3-4 weeks, and had stopped using cyflumetofen. We advised them to continue avoiding the use of cyflumetofen, considering the results of an animal test: a "pesticide abstract" stated that cyflumetofen had caused skin sensitization in guinea pigs. It is necessary, therefore, to mention this skin sensitization in the safety datasheet of cyflumetofen.

Pesticide exposure and subjective symptoms of cut-flower farmers.

Sales of cut-flowers depend much on the outer appearance of the flowers. They are not intended to be used as foodstuffs; thus, pesticides are used more liberally for cut flower growing than for other agricultural products. Flower production is often carried out in greenhouses; therefore, pesticide exposure seems to reach not only the person spraying the pesticides, but also the non-spraying workers as well. In 2009, a special research project on pesticide poisoning, affiliated with the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine, developed a study that focused on cut-flower farmers' exposure to pesticide, subsequent adverse symptoms experienced, and treatment modalities to relieve pesticide-related symptoms. In this group of farmers, the pesticide sprayers were almost entirely male, while the females did not do any spraying. The organophosphate metabolite level in the urine of the males was higher than that of the females. However, in the female group, a positive relation was found between average working times in the greenhouse, and urine concentration of dialkylphosphates. In 2 males of this group, the level of dimethylphosphate was detected at 1,000 times the median level. Their butyrylcholinesterase activity levels on the day of testing had declined to 64%, 72% of their average level of the proximate 4 years, respectively. Communication with these subjects regarding pesticide exposure and methods of prevention appeared to be an effective approach for reducing symptom severity. Among soil fumigants, chloropicrin and 1,3-dichloropropene were most often used. Difficulty breathing was one of the subjective symptoms associated with chloropicrin, as well as watery eyes, coughing, and runny nose. These symptoms were effectively suppressed by the preventative practice of wearing gas masks and goggles while using soil fumigants. It would be beneficial to strongly encourage use of suitable protective gear among farmers exposed to soil fumigants.

Gender differences in the occurrence of nonfatalagricultural injuries among farmers in Fukuoka, Japan.

BACKGROUND: The lack of information regarding nonfatal agricultural injuries has been recognized as an obstacle for effective injury prevention. The aim of this study was to describe gender differences in the pattern of nonfatal agricultural injuries between the years 2008 and 2009. METHODS: Farmers' compensation injury claims were utilized to determine the mechanisms involved (machinery, non-machinery, and traffic), types of accident, sources of injury, kinds of injury, body parts affected place of injury, work being performed at the time of injury, and length of hospitalization. Agricultural injuries were identified using the International Classification of External Causes of Injury (ICECI). The Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software was used for all statistical analyses. Study variables were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 2,729 (1,921 males) farmers' compensation injury claims were analyzed. There were approximately 9 times as many nonfatal agricultural machinery injuries in males compared with females. The most common machinery injuries were cuts resulting from a rotary blade (31%) for males and injuries caused by being struck by a machine (24%) for females in the 65-89 years of age group. The male:female ratio of non-machinery injuries averaged 2:1 (actual numbers of 1,293 and 676, respectively), but the percentage was higher for females (83.7%) than males (67.3%). For both males and females in the 65-89 years of age group, the main source of non-machinery injuries was slopes, the main type of accident was falling/slipping, the leading kind of injury was fracture, and the main work being performed was harvesting. Female farmers had a greater risk of prolonged hospitalization (more than 30 days) compared with males (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gender is an important factor to consider in the interpretation of nonfatal agricultural injuries. A greater number of males had machinery injuries than females; however, a higher percentage of females had non-machinery injuries than males. Further research will be needed to understand the role of differential job tasks within agriculture in explaining the difference in risk.

Cervical spine disorders in farm workers requiring neck extension actions.

BACKGROUND: Cervical extension is considered a risk factor for provoking radicular and spinal cord compromise. However, there have been no reports on the relation between extension strain (ES) and cervical spine disorders: degenerative cervical spine disorders, dynamic canal stenosis (DCS), and cervical myelopathy. We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the relation. METHODS: Orthopedic examinations were performed on 177 grape-growers (ES-exposed group) and 191 eggplant-growers (control group) between May and August 2000; and patients with degenerative cervical spine disorders, DCS, and cervical myelopathy were identified in the two groups. ES, degenerative cervical spine disorders, DCS, and cervical myelopathy were regarded as exposure variables; and age, sex, and working years were regarded as confounders. In cases where the subject was exposed to each exposure variable, multivariate-adjusted odds ratios to degenerative cervical spine disorders, DCS, and cervical myelopathy and multivariate-adjusted odds ratios regarding cervical myelopathy as the dependent variable were calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed a significant odds ratio of ES to degenerative cervical spine disorders [2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-4.56]. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed significant odds ratios for DCS (4.50, 95% CI 2.03-9.96) and age (1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14) regarding cervical myelopathy as the dependent variable. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that ES of the cervical spine is a risk factor for degenerative cervical spine disorders, and DCS and the aging process are risk factors for cervical myelopathy.