Safety and feasibility of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) prior to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, diagnostic yield, and technical aspects of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent PACS before pancreatectomy between May 2022 and October 2023. The technical success rate, position of the drainage tube, volume of fluid administered, volume of fluid retrieved, fluid retrieval rate, and adverse events were evaluated. The cytological results of PACS were compared with those of surgical peritoneal lavage performed during pancreatectomy. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate for PACS was 100%. Drainage tube placement was outside the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the right-sided abdominal approach group (n = 10), whereas the placement was in the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the suprapubic approach group (n = 34). The mean volume of fluid administered, mean volume of fluid retrieved, and fluid retrieval rate were 185.0 ± 22.9 ml vs. 97.1 ± 32.0 ml (p < 0.001), 36.8 ± 25.6 ml vs. 50.5 ± 21.6 ml (p = 0.059), and 19.0 ± 12.4% vs. 54.9 ± 21.9% (p < 0.001) in the right abdominal approach and suprapubic approach groups, respectively. No adverse events were reported. The cytological results were benign in 42 patients; no discrepancy was observed in the results of surgical peritoneal lavage (n = 36). CONCLUSION: PACS is a feasible and safe procedure that can be performed before pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. the suprapubic approach may be ideal and PACS could be a screening method to detect carcinomatous peritonitis.

Inversion of Central Venous Ports in Children Under Six Years Old: A Retrospective Analysis of 154 Oncology Patients.

Background Although some reports have evaluated the safety and efficacy of central venous port (CVP) placement in pediatric patients, the data about the inversion rate of the device and its risk factors are scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the inversion rates of CVPs and their associated risk factors in pediatric patients. Methodology Between January 2010 and December 2021, 154 consecutive children (75 boys; median age, 28.5 months; range, 2-71 months) who underwent CVP placement at our center were included in this study. The primary outcome was the CVP inversion rate, and the secondary outcomes included technical success rate, intraoperative complications, and infectious complications. Intraoperative complications were evaluated according to the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. Patients under two years old were classified as the younger group and those aged ≥two years as the older group. Results The CVP inversion rate was 4.6% (n = 7/153), equivalent to 0.08 × 1,000 catheter-days. The inversion rate was significantly higher in the younger group (under two years old, 11.2%) than in the older group (≥two years old, 1.0%) according to the univariate analysis (p = 0.00576). The technical success rate was 99.4% (n = 153/154), and mild adverse events were observed during the procedure in three (1.9%) patients. Infectious complications were observed in 16 (10.5%) patients, equivalent to 0.19 × 1,000 catheter-days. Conclusions The CVP inversion rate was significantly higher in younger children (under two years old) than in older children (≥two years old).

Safety of propofol sedation administered by interventional radiologists for radiofrequency ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety of propofol sedation administered by interventional radiologists during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Propofol sedation was administered by interventional radiologists in 72 patients (85 procedures, 93 tumors) during RFA for HCC between August 2018 and December 2020. Interventional radiologists equipped with adequate knowledge and skills in sedation and respiratory management were responsible for sedation. Sedation was carefully assessed based on vital signs, including end-tidal carbon dioxide, consciousness status, and bispectral index. The primary endpoint was the incidence of sedation-related complications, which were evaluated separately as respiratory and cardiovascular complications. Secondary endpoints were technical success rate, ablation-related complications, and local tumor control rate. Technical success was defined as completion of ablation in the planned area. Complications were evaluated using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Sedation-related complications, technical success rate, and ablation-related complications were evaluated on a procedure basis, and local tumor control was evaluated on a tumor basis. RESULTS: Respiratory and cardiovascular complications were observed in eight (8/85, 9.4%) and two (2/85, 2.4%) patients, respectively. Four patients required the jaw thrust maneuver due to glossoptosis, whereas a decrease in oxygen saturation to < 90% was recorded in the other four patients. However, these were temporary, and none required manual ventilation or endotracheal intubation. Bradycardia (< 50 bpm) was detected in two patients; one recovered immediately without treatment, whereas the other rapidly improved after atropine sulfate administration. No severe hypotension (< 80 mmHg) was observed. The technical success rate was 100% (85/85). Grade 3 ablation-related complications were identified in three patients (3/85, 3.5%). The local tumor control rate was 95.7% (89/93). CONCLUSION: Propofol sedation can be safely administered by interventional radiologists during RFA for HCC. Although it requires special safety considerations, it may be a sedation option during hepatic RFA.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using self-expandable metallic stent for afferent loop syndrome: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy is a procedure used to connect the stomach and dilated afferent loop using a stent under endoscopic ultrasound for afferent loop syndrome. However, the actual efficacy and safety of this procedure remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a laser-cut-type fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent for afferent loop syndrome. METHODS: Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, recurrent intestinal obstruction rates, time to recurrent intestinal obstruction, and technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were evaluated in intended patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for afferent loop syndrome from October 2018 to August 2022. RESULTS: In 25 intended patients with afferent loop syndrome who intended endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy, the technical success rate was 100% (25/25), whereas the clinical success rate was 96% (24/25). Two patients experienced grade ≥ 3 early adverse events, including one with intra-abdominal abscess and one with hypotension. Both events were attributed to intestinal fluid leakage. No late adverse events were observed. The recurrent intestinal obstruction rate was 32% (8/25), and the median time to recurrent intestinal obstruction was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval: 2.8-not available). The technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were both 100% (8/8). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent is effective and safe as a treatment procedure for afferent loop syndrome.

Feasibility and safety of direct percutaneous embolization of lymphopseudoaneurysm for postoperative lymphatic leakage.

The treatment strategy for refractory postoperative lymphatic leakage is controversial. While the utility of direct percutaneous embolization of lymphopseudoaneurysm has been investigated, only a few reports on this topic exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical feasibility and safety of direct percutaneous embolization of lymphopseudoaneurysm for refractory postoperative lymphatic leakage. This case series included six consecutive patients who underwent direct percutaneous embolization of lymphopseudoaneurysm for refractory postoperative lymphatic leakage. Technical success (successful percutaneous approach and injection of NBCA glue to the lymphopseudoaneurysm), clinical success (unnecessity of percutaneous drainage tube of the lymphatic leakage), treatment duration (the duration from the treatment to the achievement of clinical success) and procedure-related complications were mainly evaluated. Direct percutaneous embolization of the lymphopseudoaneurysm using NBCA glue was successfully performed in all cases. Clinical success was achieved in five of the six cases (83%). The mean treatment period was 9 days for the cases with clinical success. No major complications occurred postoperatively. In conclusion, direct percutaneous embolization of lymphopseudoaneurysm may become a feasible and safe treatment option for cases of refractory postoperative lymphatic leakage.

Technical Feasibility and Safety of Central Venous Ports for Intravenous Chemotherapy in Infants With Retinoblastoma: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The central venous port (CVP) is widely used for intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) in adult patients because of its lower infection rates and easier management than that of a central venous catheter. However, the feasibility and safety of the CVP for IVC in infants remain unknown. This study evaluated the usefulness of CVP for IVC in infants with retinoblastoma. METHODS: The usefulness of CVP was retrospectively evaluated using technical success rates, the safety of CVP placement, and postoperative procedure-related complications in 18 infants with retinoblastoma. This study was conducted at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100% (18/18) without any procedure-related complications. The sum duration of CVP implantation was 12,836 days (mean: 713 ± 453 days, range: 10-1,639 days). Postoperative complications were observed in two cases; one was a port reversal after 20 days, which was reversed by incisional surgery, and another was a catheter-related bloodstream infection after eight days, resulting in CVP removal. The total incidence of CVP-related infections was 5.6% (1/18) and 0.08/1000 catheter days. No other CVP-related complications were noted. CONCLUSION: The use of the CVP for IVC in infants with retinoblastoma was feasible with few complications.