Comparison between a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system and a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compares the efficacy and safety of a tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery (AID) system with that of a tubeless, on-body sensor-augmented pump (SAP). METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group, RCT was conducted at 13 tertiary medical centres in South Korea. Adults aged 19-69 years with type 1 diabetes who had HbA1c levels of <85.8 mmol/mol (<10.0%) were eligible. The participants were assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a tubeless, on-body AID system (intervention group) or a tubeless, on-body SAP (control group) for 12 weeks. Stratified block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Blinding was not possible due to the nature of the intervention. The primary outcome was the percentage of time in range (TIR), blood glucose between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/l, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. ANCOVAs were conducted with baseline values and study centres as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 104 participants underwent randomisation, with 53 in the intervention group and 51 in the control group. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 40±11 years. The mean (±SD) TIR increased from 62.1±17.1% at baseline to 71.5±10.7% over the 12 week trial period in the intervention group and from 64.7±17.0% to 66.9±15.0% in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: 6.5% [95% CI 3.6%, 9.4%], p<0.001). Time below range, time above range, CV and mean glucose levels were also significantly better in the intervention group compared with the control group. HbA1c decreased from 50.9±9.9 mmol/mol (6.8±0.9%) at baseline to 45.9±7.4 mmol/mol (6.4±0.7%) after 12 weeks in the intervention group and from 48.7±9.1 mmol/mol (6.6±0.8%) to 45.7±7.5 mmol/mol (6.3±0.7%) in the control group (difference between the adjusted means: -0.7 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.0, 0.8 mmol/mol] (-0.1% [95% CI -0.2%, 0.1%]), p=0.366). No diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia events occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The use of a tubeless, on-body AID system was safe and associated with superior glycaemic profiles, including TIR, time below range, time above range and CV, than the use of a tubeless, on-body SAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) KCT0008398 FUNDING: The study was funded by a grant from the Korea Medical Device Development Fund supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT; the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy; the Ministry of Health and Welfare; and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (grant number: RS-2020-KD000056).

Intensity of statin therapy and primary prevention of cardiovascular in Korean patients with dyslipidemia.

This study aimed to investigate the association between the intensity of statin therapy and the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in individuals without prior diabetes who were being treated for dyslipidemia with statins for the primary prevention of CVD, using the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening database. The database is a longitudinal cohort study of Korean men and women 40 years of age or older who underwent comprehensive biannual screening health examinations by Korean National Health Insurance Service from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2015. We included patients in the health screening checkup cohort who underwent health checkups in 2009 and 2010.The primary outcome was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event, new-onset diabetes. A total of 20,322 participants without prior diabetes at baseline from 2009 to 2015 were followed up for a mean duration of 81.2 ±â€…6.6 months. The mean age of all participants at baseline was 59.2 ±â€…8.4 years and 43.0% of them were male. Their index low lipoprotein cholesterol level was 130.4 ±â€…mg/dL, the mean duration of taking statins was 337.4 ±â€…52.3 days, and 93.9% of them had been taking moderate-intensity statins. At that time, a total of 641 diabetes cases occurred, 41 from using low-intensity statins, 588 from moderate-intensity statins, and 11 from high-intensity statins. The results indicated no significant differences in the incidence of death, CVD death, or CVD among those in the strong statin group compared with the reference groups. While statin treatment for the primary prevention of CVD in patients with dyslipidemia showed a subtle difference in the incidence of diabetes, there was no difference in the occurrence of CVD or CVD death according to statin intensity.

Glucocorticoid-Induced Hyperglycemia: A Neglected Problem.

Glucocorticoids provide a potent therapeutic response and are widely used to treat a variety of diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. However, the issue of glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia (GIH), which is observed in over one-third of patients treated with glucocorticoids, is often neglected. To improve the clinical course and prognosis of diseases that necessitate glucocorticoid therapy, proper management of GIH is essential. The key pathophysiology of GIH includes systemic insulin resistance, which exacerbates hepatic steatosis and visceral obesity, as well as proteolysis and lipolysis of muscle and adipose tissue, coupled with ß-cell dysfunction. For patients on glucocorticoid therapy, risk stratification should be conducted through a detailed baseline evaluation, and frequent glucose monitoring is recommended to detect the onset of GIH, particularly in high-risk individuals. Patients with confirmed GIH who require treatment should follow an insulin-centered regimen that varies depending on whether they are inpatients or outpatients, as well as the type and dosage of glucocorticoid used. The ideal strategy to maintain normoglycemia while preventing hypoglycemia is to combine basal-bolus insulin and correction doses with a continuous glucose monitoring system. This review focuses on the current understanding and latest evidence concerning GIH, incorporating insights gained from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Adrenalectomy Improves Body Weight, Glucose, and Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion: Results of an Randomized Controlled Trial by the Co-work of Adrenal Research (COAR) Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the metabolic effects of adrenalectomy in patients with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS). BACKGROUND: Despite retrospective studies showing the association of adrenalectomy for MACS with beneficial metabolic effects, there have been only 2 randomized prospective studies with some limitations to date. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study randomized 132 patients with adrenal incidentaloma without any features of Cushing syndrome but with serum cortisol >50 nmol/L after a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test into an adrenalectomy group (n = 66) or control group (n = 66). The primary outcomes were changes in body weight, glucose, and blood pressure (BP). RESULTS: Among the 118 participants who completed the study with a median follow-up duration of 48 months (range: 3-66), the adrenalectomy group (n = 46) exhibited a significantly higher frequency of improved weight control, glucose control, and BP control (32.6%, 45.7%, and 45.7%, respectively) compared with the control group (n = 46; 6.5%, P = 0.002; 15.2%, P = 0.002; and 23.9%, P = 0.029, respectively) after matching for age and sex. Adrenalectomy [odds ratio (OR) = 10.38, 95% CI = 2.09-51.52, P = 0.004], body mass index (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.08-1.79, P = 0.010), and cortisol after a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test levels (OR = 92.21, 95% CI = 5.30-1604.07, P = 0.002) were identified as independent factors associated with improved weight control. Adrenalectomy (OR = 5.30, 95% CI = 1.63-17.25, P = 0.006) and diabetes (OR = 8.05, 95% CI = 2.34-27.65, P = 0.001) were independently associated with improved glucose control. Adrenalectomy (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 0.87-5.94, P = 0.095) and hypertension (OR = 10.77, 95% CI = 3.65-31.81, P < 0.001) demonstrated associations with improved BP control. CONCLUSIONS: adrenalectomy improved weight, glucose, and BP control in patients with MACS.