Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
LGBT Health ; 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656903

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We aimed to identify the self-reported reasons for being uninsured and sociodemographic factors associated with uninsurance among lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB) adults before and after the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Methods: We analyzed the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey data using multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the odds of being uninsured and the prevalence of self-reported reasons for not having insurance among LGB adults aged 18-64 years. Results: The study included 2124 LGB adults. The weighted uninsured rate decreased significantly from 19.6% in 2013 to 13.2% in 2017-2018 (odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.78). The primary reason cited for not having insurance post-ACA was similar to pre-ACA, with cost-related factors being the most commonly reported (31.5%). Conclusion: The overall uninsured rate decreased among LGB adults from 2013 to 2018, whereas disparities across subpopulations remained. Cost-related factors remained significant barriers to obtaining insurance coverage.

2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 30(4): 376-385, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38555628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the geographic disparity in the distribution of phase 1-3 clinical trials of new cancer treatments in the US and the associated factors. OBJECTIVE: To examine county-level variation in the number of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials and the associations between county characteristics and having phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. METHODS: We identified phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials started in the US between January 2008 and December 2022 from the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. We analyzed the distribution of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials at the county level. Using a mixed-effects regression with states as random intercepts, we estimated the associations between a county's median age, median household income, percentage of population from racial and ethnic minority groups, proportion of population aged 25 years or older with an educational attainment of bachelor's degree or higher, rurality, cancer incidence rate, and number of medical oncologists per population with having any phase 1-3 cancer clinical trial in a county. RESULTS: After excluding trials that were suspended, terminated, and withdrawn, a total of 14,977 phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials started in the United States between January 2008 and December 2022 were included in the primary analysis. Only 1,333 out of 3,143 counties (42.4%) had 1 or more trial during this period. Counties that were rural, with lower median household income, a less educated population, fewer medical oncologists per population, and lower cancer incidence rates demonstrated a significantly lower likelihood of having phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed substantial geographic disparities in the distribution of phase 1-3 cancer clinical trials. Limited trial availability in low-income, low-education, low-oncologist, and rural areas can be a significant barrier to patient participation, potentially hindering adoption and worsening outcomes in disadvantaged populations.


Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Neoplasms , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Minority Groups , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Income , Rural Population
4.
J Surg Oncol ; 128(8): 1285-1301, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37781956

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated whether Medicaid expansion (ME) was associated with improved 2-year survival and time to treatment initiation (TTI) among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: GI cancer patients diagnosed 40-64 years were queried from the National Cancer Database. Those diagnosed from 2010 to 2012 were considered pre-expansion; those diagnosed from 2014 to 2016 were considered post-expansion. Cox models estimated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 2-year overall survival. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI of TTI within 30- and 90 days. Multivariable Difference-in-Difference models were used to compare expansion/nonexpansion cohorts pre-/post-expansion, adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospital factors. RESULTS: 377,063 patients were included. No significant difference in 2-year survival was demonstrated across ME and non-ME states overall or in site-based subgroup analysis. In stage-based subgroup analysis, 2-year survival significantly improved among stage II cancer, with an 8% decreased hazard of death at 2 years (0.92; 0.87-0.97). Those with stage IV had a 4% increased hazard of death at 2 years (1.04; 1.01-1.07). Multivariable GEE models showed increased TTI within 30 days (1.12; 1.09-1.16) and 90 days (1.22; 1.17-1.27). Site-based subgroup analyses indicated increased likelihood of TTI within 30 and 90 days among colon, liver, pancreas, rectum, and stomach cancers, by 30 days for small intestinal cancer, and by 90 days for esophageal cancer. In subgroup analyses, all stages experienced improved odds of TTI within 30 and 90 days. CONCLUSION: ME was not associated with significant improvement in 2-year survival for those with GI cancer. Although TTI increased after ME for both cohorts, the 30- and 90-day odds of TTI was higher for those from ME compared with non-ME states. Our findings add to growing evidence of associations with ME for those diagnosed with GI cancer.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Medicaid , Time-to-Treatment , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models
5.
Palliat Support Care ; : 1-8, 2023 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37017397

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Palliative care can improve the quality of life of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer. However, little is known about the utilization of palliative care among AYA cancer patients. Identifying factors associated with the utilization of palliative care could inform efforts to improve palliative care access among AYA patients living with cancer. METHODS: Using data from the National Inpatient Sample 2016-2019, a representative sample of US hospitalizations, we examined palliative care encounters and associated characteristics among hospitalizations of AYA with cancer and high inpatient mortality risk. Survey design-adjusted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations of patient- and hospital-level characteristics with palliative care. RESULTS: Of 10,979 hospitalizations by AYA cancer patients with high mortality risk, 19.9% received palliative care services between 2016 and 2019. After adjusting for all characteristics, independent predictors of palliative care use were as follows: older age (25-39 years old vs. 25-39 years; odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.49), Hispanic/Latinx (vs. non-Hispanic White; OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.34), female (vs. male; OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.41), public insurance (vs. private insurance; OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.10-1.38), hospital location in the US South (vs. Northeast; OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.94), and a large hospital (vs. small; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Less than 20% of AYAs with cancer and high risk of mortality received inpatient palliative care services. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for lower palliative care utilization in the younger age groups.

6.
Curr Diab Rep ; 23(1): 1-17, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640218

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Substance use is a major public health problem in adolescents and young adults (AYA) and is particularly dangerous for AYA with type 1 diabetes (T1D) due to additional health consequences related to T1D. Rates of substance use among AYA with T1D are difficult to ascertain. Currently, we aim to provide a summary of published rates of substance use, over the last 10 years, among AYA with T1D in the USA. RECENT FINDINGS: This review included a database search, abstract screening, and synthesizing of articles published in the last 10 years that reported rates of substance use among AYA with T1D. We also compared rates to national survey data from the Center for Disease Control and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Of 138 articles, 123 abstracts were excluded due to non-relevance or because they were conducted outside of the USA; 15 articles were evaluated, and 8 provided original data on AYA with T1D. These 8 studies were summarized and compared to nationwide survey data. Most of the published rates of substance use among AYA with T1D were similar to national survey data for alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana. Rates of illicit drug use were lower among AYA with T1D. Despite additional health consequences, alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use is about as prevalent among AYA with T1D as in the general US population. These findings emphasize the importance of conducting more research in this area, developing effective interventions, and incorporating prevention into standard clinical practices.


Subject(s)
Cannabis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
AJPM Focus ; 2(2): 100065, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36687321

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted the entire healthcare system, resulting in unmet needs for medical care (e.g., delayed or forgone care) among patients with cancer. Methods: Using 2020 National Health Interview Survey data, we examined the prevalence of unmet healthcare needs and whether the self-reported experience of having delayed or forgone healthcare is associated with increased emergency services use and hospitalizations. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between unmet healthcare needs because of COVID-19 and emergency services use and hospitalization, controlling for potential confounding. All analysis was conducted in March and April 2022. Results: Among 2,386 study participants living with cancer (representing 25.6 million U.S. adults), 33.7% reported having unmet healthcare needs because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The prevalence of unmet healthcare needs was higher among younger cancer survivors and those with higher education. In the adjusted analysis, cancer survivors with unmet healthcare needs were 31% more likely to report any emergency services use (adjusted OR=1.31, 95% CI=1.05, 1.65) than those without. Having unmet healthcare needs was not significantly associated with hospitalization (p=0.465). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the unmet need for cancer care because of the pandemic and potential adverse health outcomes.

8.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities ; 10(2): 977-985, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35297497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Literature shows that limited English proficiency (LEP) influences individual healthcare-seeking behaviors. The Asian population is the fastest-growing racial/ethnic group in the US, and approximately 50% of foreign-born Asians are estimated to live with LEP. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations of LEP and patient-provider language concordance (PPLC) with evidence-based cancer screening utilization for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancers among Asian American adults. METHODS: We obtained LEP, PPLC, and up-to-date status on the three types of cancer screening from a nationally representative sample of Asian Americans aged ≥ 18 years in the 2010-2016 and 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys. We used multivariable logistic regression models with recommended survey weighting to examine associations of LEP and PPLC with the cancer screening uptake based on USPSTF guidelines. RESULTS: The study population comprised 8953 respondents, representing 8.17 million Asian American adults. Overall, 11.9% of respondents experienced LEP; of those with LEP, 20% were with PPLC. In multivariable models, compared to respondents without LEP, respondents with LEP and without PPLC were significantly less likely to report up-to-date status on breast (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.76), cervical (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.75), or colorectal cancer screening (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.26-0.80). However, these differences were not detected in respondents with LEP and with PPLC. CONCLUSION: LEP is associated with lower up-to-date status on cancer screening among Asian Americans, while PPLC seems to moderate this association. These findings suggest the enhancement for language-appropriate and culturally competent healthcare for Asian Americans with LEP, which helps accommodate their communication needs and promotes cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Communication Barriers , Limited English Proficiency , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Asian , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Early Detection of Cancer , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Female , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology
9.
JAMA Health Forum ; 3(12): e224716, 2022 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36525257

ABSTRACT

Importance: In 2019, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended patient-clinician shared decision-making for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in adults aged 27 to 45 years. Less is known about the HPV vaccine administration trends in this age group before and after this recommendation update. Objective: To examine the association between the ACIP recommendation update and the HPV vaccine administration among US adults aged 27 to 45 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This large commercial claim-based retrospective cohort study used the Optum Clinformatics database for validated claims from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2020. A total of 22 600 520 US adults aged 27 to 45 years without previous HPV vaccination claims during the study and enrollment period were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The first-appearing HPV vaccination claim per individual was defined as a new HPV vaccine administration. Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted to assess the association between the ACIP update and the quarterly vaccine administration rate change. The annual rate trends across race and ethnicity groups and the proportions of vaccination cases by sub-age groups and valent types were also estimated. Vaccine administration trends were assessed by race and ethnicity in this age group because HPV vaccination trends were found to differ by race and ethnicity in the initially eligible population. Results: Among 22 600 520 final study participants, the majority were men (50.9%) and non-Hispanic White (53.4%), and the mean (SD) age when first observed was 34.6 (5.8) years. In women, the ACIP update was associated with an immediate increase in vaccine administration rate (coefficient ß2, 40.18 per 100 000 persons; P = .01) and an increased slope (coefficient ß3, 9.62 per 100 000 persons per quarter; P = .03) over time postupdate. The ACIP update was only associated with an immediate increase in vaccine administration in men (coefficient ß2, 27.54; P < .001). The annual rate trends were similar across race and ethnicity groups. Age at vaccine administration shifted over time (eg, women aged 40-45 years comprised only 4.9% of vaccinations in 2017, then 19.0% in 2019, and 22.7% in 2020). The most administered HPV vaccines in 2020 were 9 valent (women, 97.0%; men, 97.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study, there were statistically significant increases in HPV vaccine administration in adults aged 27 to 45 years after the ACIP recommendation update. Patient-clinician shared decision-making may have been the main associated factor for this increase. Further research is warranted to explore the decision-making process in receiving HPV vaccination and to develop effective decision aids to maximize the cancer prevention benefit in this age group.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Male , Adult , Female , Humans , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Human Papillomavirus Viruses , Advisory Committees , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination
10.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 6(6)2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352501

ABSTRACT

Despite the overall national decline in Kaposi sarcoma (KS) incidence in the United States among persons living with HIV, previous studies suggest there might be specific subgroups of the US population that are associated with higher KS incidence rates than others. Using the 2001-2018 National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database, we assessed KS incidence trends among young men aged 20-34 years by race and ethnicity and geographic region. Statistical significance is 2-sided. The KS incidence rate increased nationally by 1.5% per year in non-Hispanic Black men, whereas the rate decreased statistically significantly by 3.5% per year in non-Hispanic White men. A statistically significant 3.3% per year increase among young non-Hispanic Black men in the South and no change among those living in non-South regions were observed. Targeted HIV prevention and treatment in young non-Hispanic Black men in the South and further research addressing the increased KS incidence and burden in this vulnerable population are needed.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Sarcoma, Kaposi , Male , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Sarcoma, Kaposi/epidemiology , Incidence , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/complications , Ethnicity , Black People
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(9): e2233429, 2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36166230

ABSTRACT

Importance: Area-level factors have been identified as important social determinants of health (SDoH) that impact many health-related outcomes. Less is known about how the social vulnerability index (SVI), as a scalable composite score, can multidimensionally explain the population-based cancer screening program uptake at a county level. Objective: To examine the geographic variation of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)-recommended breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates and the association between county-level SVI and the 3 screening rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cross-sectional study used county-level information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's PLACES and SVI data sets from 2018 for 3141 US counties. Analyses were conducted from October 2021 to February 2022. Exposures: Social vulnerability index score categorized in quintiles. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was county-level rates of USPSTF guideline-concordant, up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal screenings. Odds ratios were calculated for each cancer screening by SVI quintile as unadjusted (only accounting for eligible population per county) or adjusted for urban-rural status, percentage of uninsured adults, and primary care physician rate per 100 000 residents. Results: Across 3141 counties, county-level cancer screening rates showed regional disparities ranging from 54.0% to 81.8% for breast cancer screening, from 69.9% to 89.7% for cervical cancer screening, and from 39.8% to 74.4% for colorectal cancer screening. The multivariable regression model showed that a higher SVI was significantly associated with lower odds of cancer screening, with the lowest odds in the highest SVI quintile. When comparing the highest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q5) with the lowest quintile of SVI (SVI-Q1), the unadjusted odds ratio was 0.86 (95% posterior credible interval [CrI], 0.84-0.87) for breast cancer screening, 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.79-0.81) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.72 (95% CrI, 0.71-0.73) for colorectal cancer screening. When fully adjusted, the odds ratio was 0.92 (95% CrI, 0.90-0.93) for breast cancer screening, 0.87 (95% CrI, 0.86-0.88) for cervical cancer screening, and 0.86 (95% CrI, 0.85-0.88) for colorectal cancer screening, showing slightly attenuated associations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, regional disparities were found in cancer screening rates at a county level. Quantifying how SVI associates with each cancer screening rate could provide insight into the design and focus of future interventions targeting cancer prevention disparities.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Social Vulnerability , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
12.
Int J Cancer ; 151(11): 1889-1901, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793241

ABSTRACT

To inform optimal approaches for detecting anal precancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of anal cancer screening tests in different populations with elevated risk for anal cancer. We conducted a literature search of studies evaluating tests for anal precancer and cancer (anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, AIN2+) published between January 1, 1997 to September 30, 2021 in PubMed and Embase. Titles and abstracts were screened for inclusion and included articles underwent full-text review, data abstraction and quality assessment. We estimated the prevalence of AIN2+ and calculated summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of test positivity, sensitivity and specificity and predictive values of various testing strategies, overall and among population subgroups. A total of 39 articles were included. The prevalence of AIN2+ was 20% (95% CI, 17-29%), and ranged from 22% in men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV to 13% in women and 12% in MSM without HIV. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology and HPV testing were 81% and 62% and 92% and 42%, respectively, and 93% and 33%, respectively for cytology and HPV co-testing. AIN2+ risks were similar among those testing positive for cytology, HPV, or co-testing. Limited data on other biomarkers (HPV E6/E7 mRNA and p16/Ki-67 dual stain), suggested higher specificity, but lower sensitivity compared with anal cytology and HPV. Our findings provide important evidence for the development of clinical guidelines using anal cytology and HPV testing for anal cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , HIV Infections , Papillomavirus Infections , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Anus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Ki-67 Antigen , Male , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , RNA, Messenger/genetics
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(6): e2217380, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35708688

ABSTRACT

Importance: Bariatric surgery effectively treats severe obesity and metabolic diseases. However, individual outcomes vary depending on sustainable lifestyle change. Little is known about lifestyle patterns after bariatric surgery among the US population. Objective: To compare the level of physical activity and eating behavior among postbariatric surgery patients, individuals eligible for surgery, and those with normal weight. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018. Respondents included for analysis were age 18 years or older, and categorized by individuals with normal weight, individuals who received bariatric surgery, and individuals clinically eligible for bariatric surgery. Analyses were performed from February to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported measures were used to assess physical activity (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], sedentary activity, and whether PA guidelines were met) and eating behaviors (total energy intake and Healthy Eating Index [HEI]-2015 diet quality scores). Results: Of 4659 study participants (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [18.6] years; 2638 [weighted percentage, 58.8%] women; 1114 [weighted percentage, 12.7%] Black, 1570 [weighted percentage, 68.6%] White), 132 (3.7%) reported that they had undergone any bariatric surgery. Median (IQR) time since surgery was 7 (3-10) years. After propensity-score weighting, individuals who underwent bariatric surgery reported more time spent in MVPA than those eligible for surgery (147.9 min/wk vs 97.4 min/wk). Among respondents with normal weight, 45.6% (95% CI, 40.8% to 52.4%) reported meeting PA guidelines, almost 2 times higher than those in the bariatric surgery (23.1%; 95% CI, 13.8% to 32.4%) or in the surgery-eligible group (20.3%; 95% CI, 15.6% to 25.1%). Propensity-score weighted overall HEI was higher for individuals with normal weight (54.4; 95% CI, 53.0 to 55.9) than those who underwent bariatric surgery (50.0; 95% CI, 47.2 to 52.9) or were eligible for the surgery (48.0; 95% CI, 46.0 to 50.0). Across all HEI components, mean scores were similar between the bariatric surgery and surgery-eligible groups. Total energy intake was the lowest among those who underwent bariatric surgery (1746 kcal/d; 95% CI, 1554 to 1937 kcal/d), followed by those with normal weight (1943 kcal/d; 95% CI, 1873 to 2013 kcal/d) and those eligible for bariatric surgery (2040 kcal/d; 1953 to 2128 kcal/d). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, individuals who underwent bariatric surgery had beneficial lifestyle patterns compared with those eligible for surgery; however, these improvements seemed suboptimal based on the current guidelines. Efforts are needed to incorporate benefits of physical activity and a healthy, balanced diet in postbariatric care.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Diet, Healthy , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise , Feeding Behavior , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys
14.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 6(2)2022 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35603851

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancer burden is rising in the United States. Trends in the incidence by county-level income and smoking prevalence remain undescribed. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 21 database to ascertain HPV-associated cancers during 2000-2018. Trends were estimated by county-level income and smoking prevalence quartiles. Anal and vulvar cancer incidence among women and anal cancer incidence among men increased markedly in the lowest-income counties, whereas the increases were slower in the highest-income counties (eg, for vulvar cancer, incidence increased 1.9% per year, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9% to 2.9%, in the lowest-income counties vs 0.8% per year, 95% CI = 0.6% to 1.1%, in the highest-income counties). In recent years, cervical cancer incidence plateaued (0.0% per year [95% CI = -0.5% to 0.5%]) in the highest-income counties; in the lowest-income counties, the annual percentage change was 1.6% per year (95% CI = -0.7% to 4.0%). Counties with high smoking prevalence had marked increases in incidence compared with their counterparts (eg, anal cancer among men increased 4.4% per year [95% CI = 2.7% to 6.0%] for those living in counties with the highest smoking prevalence vs 1.2% per year [95% CI = 0.7% to 1.7%] for those living in counties with the lowest smoking prevalence). Improved and targeted prevention is needed to combat the widening disparities.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Anus Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Vulvar Neoplasms , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Prevalence , Smoking/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology , Vulvar Neoplasms/epidemiology
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(1): e2143582, 2022 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35040970

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cervical cancer screening rates are suboptimal in the US. Population-based assessment of reasons for not receiving screening is needed, particularly among women from historically underserved demographic groups. Objective: To estimate changes in US Preventive Service Task Force guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening over time and assess the reasons women do not receive up-to-date screening by sociodemographic factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled population-based cross-sectional study used data from the US National Health Interview Survey from 2005 and 2019. A total of 20 557 women (weighted, 113.1 million women) aged 21 to 65 years without previous hysterectomy were included. Analyses were conducted from March 30 to August 19, 2021. Exposures: Sociodemographic factors, including age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, rurality of residence, and health insurance type. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were US Preventive Services Task Force guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening rates and self-reported primary reasons for not receiving up-to-date screening. For 2005, up-to-date screening was defined as screening every 3 years for women aged 21 to 65 years. For 2019, up-to-date screening was defined as screening every 3 years with a Papanicolaou test alone for women aged 21 to 29 years and screening every 3 years with a Papanicolaou test alone or every 5 years with high-risk human papillomavirus testing or cotesting for women aged 30 to 65 years. Population estimation included sampling weights. Results: Among 20 557 women (weighted, 113.1 million women) included in the study, most were aged 30 to 65 years (16 219 women; weighted, 86.3 million women [76.3%]) and had private insurance (13 571 women; weighted, 75.8 million women [67.0%]). With regard to race and ethnicity, 997 women (weighted, 6.9 million women [6.1%]) were Asian, 3821 women (weighted, 19.5 million women [17.2%]) were Hispanic, 2862 women (weighted, 14.8 million women [13.1%]) were non-Hispanic Black, 12 423 women (weighted, 69.0 million women [61.0%]) were non-Hispanic White, and 453 women (weighted, 3.0 million women [2.7%]) were of other races and/or ethnicities (including Alaska Native and American Indian [weighted, 955 000 women (0.8%)] and other single and multiple races or ethnicities [weighted, 2.0 million women (1.8%)]). In 2019, women aged 21 to 29 years had a significantly higher rate of overdue screening (29.1%) vs women aged 30 to 65 years (21.1%; P < .001). In both age groups, the proportion of women without up-to-date screening increased significantly from 2005 to 2019 (from 14.4% to 23.0%; P < .001). Significantly higher rates of overdue screening were found among those of Asian vs non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity (31.4% vs 20.1%; P = .01), those identifying as LGBQ+ (gender identity was not assessed because of a small sample) vs heterosexual (32.0% vs 22.2%; P < .001), those living in rural vs urban areas (26.2% vs 22.6%; P = .04), and those without insurance vs those with private insurance (41.7% vs 18.1%; P < .001). The most common reason for not receiving timely screening across all groups was lack of knowledge, ranging from 47.2% of women identifying as LGBQ+ to 64.4% of women with Hispanic ethnicity. Previous receipt of a human papillomavirus vaccine was not a primary reason for not having up-to-date screening (<1% of responses). From 2005 to 2019, among women aged 30 to 65 years, lack of access decreased significantly as a primary reason for not receiving screening (from 21.8% to 9.7%), whereas lack of knowledge (from 45.2% to 54.8%) and not receiving recommendations from health care professionals (from 5.9% to 12.0%) increased significantly. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that cervical cancer screening that was concordant with US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines decreased in the US between 2005 and 2019, with lack of knowledge reported as the biggest barrier to receiving timely screening. Campaigns addressing patient knowledge and provider communication may help to improve screening rates, and cultural adaptation of interventions is needed to reduce existing disparities.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Advisory Committees , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Papanicolaou Test , Preventive Health Services/standards , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young Adult
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(10): e2129913, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34665238

ABSTRACT

Importance: Studies suggest the risk of suicide among people with cancer diagnosis is higher compared with the general population. However, little is known about how suicide risk among people diagnosed with cancer might vary according to area-level income and rurality. Objective: To examine whether the risks and patterns of suicide mortality among people with a cancer diagnosis differ by US county-level median income and rural or urban status. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based cohort study following up individuals who were diagnosed with cancer between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, was conducted. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program 18 registries (SEER 18) database was used to obtain data on persons diagnosed with a first primary malignant tumor. Comparisons with the general US population were based on mortality data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. Analyses were conducted from February 22 to October 14, 2020. Exposures: County-level median household income and urban or rural status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of suicide deaths and annual percentage changes (APCs) of SMRs. Results: The SEER 18 database included 5 362 782 persons with cancer diagnoses living in 635 counties. Most study participants were men (51.2%), White (72.2%), and older than 65 years (49.7%). Among them, 6357 persons died of suicide (SMR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.38-1.44). People with cancer living in the lowest-income counties had a significantly higher risk (SMR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.76-2.13) than those in the highest-income counties (SMR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.26-1.34). Those living in rural counties also had significantly higher SMR than those in urban counties (SMR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.70-1.92 vs SMR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.32-1.39). For all county groups, the SMRs were the highest within the first year following cancer diagnosis. However, among people living in the lowest-income counties, the risk remained significantly high even after 10 or more years following cancer diagnosis (SMR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.31-2.48). The comparative risk of suicide mortality within 1 year following cancer diagnosis significantly decreased over the years but then plateaued in the highest-income (2005-2015: APC, 2.03%; 95% CI, -0.97% to 5.13%), lowest-income (2010-2015: APC, 4.80%; 95% CI, -19.97% to 37.24%), and rural (2004-2015: APC, 1.83; 95% CI, -1.98% to 5.79%) counties. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study showed disparities in suicide risks and their patterns among people diagnosed with cancer by county-level income and rural or urban status. The findings suggest that additional research and effort to provide psychological services addressing these disparities among people with cancer may be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Income/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/psychology , Suicide/psychology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data
20.
J Affect Disord ; 294: 450-458, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Family resilience and its role in behavioral and mental health problems has not been well documented among U.S. adolescents, especially those with ADHD. METHODS: Using data from the 2016 and 2017 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH), we examined associations between family resilience connection index (FRCI) and conduct problems, depression, anxiety, and substance abuse in adolescents with ADHD aged 11-17 (n=4,169). Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and chi-square tests. RESULTS: Adolescents with ADHD who had a lower FRCI score were more likely to have conduct problems (OR:1.64, CI:1.13-2.38) and depression (OR: 3.08, CI: 2.12-4.49). There were small differences between adjusted and unadjusted odds after controlling for adverse childhood experience and other covariates. LIMITATION: We could not assert prediction or causation, only associations among variables, due to the cross-sectional design of the 2016-2017 NSCH; however, a major advantage of the NSCH is that it includes a nationally representative sample of children and allows inferences to be made for understanding of the adolescents with ADHD in the U.S. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that family resilience may serve as a protective factor that leads to decreasing conduct problems, despite experiencing adversity in childhood. Targeting family resilience, in terms of teaching families ways to cope with adversities such as: a child's diagnosis of ADHD; behavioral problems, and/or other adverse experiences in children's environments, has great potential to reduce adolescents' conduct and mental health problems.


Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Resilience, Psychological , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Family Health , Humans , Mental Health
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...