A Mixed Methods Study of Perceptions of Mental Illness and Self-Disclosure of Mental Illness Among Medical Learners.

Introduction: Mental illness stigma remains rooted within medical education and healthcare. We sought to measure perceptions toward mental illness and explore perceptions of self-disclosure of mental illness in medical learners. Method: In a mixed-methods, sequential design, authors recruited medical learners from across Canada. Quantitative data included the Opening Minds Scale for Healthcare providers (OMS-HC), the Self Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (SSMIS), and a wellbeing measure. Qualitative data included semi-structured interviews, which were collected and analyzed using a phenomenological approach. Results: N = 125 medical learners (n = 67 medical students, n = 58 resident physicians) responded to our survey, and N = 13 participants who identified as having a mental illness participated in interviews (n = 10 medical students, n = 3 resident physicians). OMS-HC scores showed resident physicians had more negative attitudes towards mental illness and disclosure (47.7 vs. 44.3, P = 0.02). Self-disclosure was modulated by the degree of intersectional vulnerability of the learner's identity. When looking at self-disclosure, people who identified as men had more negative attitudes than people who identified as women (17.8 vs 16.1, P = 0.01) on the OMS-HC. Racially minoritized learners scored higher on self-stigma on the SSMIS (Geometric mean: 11.0 vs 8.8, P = 0.03). Interview data suggested that disclosure was fraught with tensions but perceived as having a positive outcome. Discussion: Mental illness stigma and the individual process of disclosure are complex issues in medical education. Disclosure appeared to become more challenging over time due to the internalization of negative attitudes about mental illness.

Shifting paradigms: A collective and structural strategy for addressing healthcare inequity.

Healthcare inequity is a persistent systemic problem, yet many solutions have historically focused on "debiasing" individuals. Individualistic strategies fit within a competency-based medical education and assessment paradigm, whereby professional values of social accountability, patient safety, and healthcare equity are linked to an individual clinician's competence. Unfortunately, efforts to realise the conceptual linkages between medical education curricula and goals to improve healthcare equity fail to address the institutional values, policies, and practices that enable structural racism. In this article, we explore alternative approaches that target collective and structural causes of health inequity. We first describe the structural basis of healthcare inequity by identifying the ways in which institutional culture, power and privilege erode patient-centred care and contribute to epistemic injustice. We then outline some reasons that stereotypes, which are a culturally supported foundation for discrimination, bias and racism in healthcare, cannot be modified effectively through individualistic strategies or education curricula. Finally, we propose a model that centres shared values for leadership by individuals and institutions with consistency in goal setting, knowledge translation, and talent development. Figure 1 summarises the key recommendations. We have provided cases to supplement this work and facilitate discussion about the model's application to practice.

Exploring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion-Related Pedagogy Across Different Professions.

PURPOSE: Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have become an important priority for academic medicine. However, several barriers challenge the effective implementation of DEI-related pedagogy. An exploration of the barriers to and enablers of DEI-related pedagogy-as they relate to professional contexts-can inform how to advance DEI in medical education. Shulman's notion of signature pedagogies offers a foundation for understanding and exploring the influence of such contexts on teaching and learning. Comparisons across professions may help make signature pedagogies more visible and may facilitate change. In this study, the authors aim to explore how the professional contexts of medicine, nursing, and teacher education approach DEI-related pedagogy. METHOD: The authors conducted a qualitative exploratory study using constructivist grounded theory methodology. Using both purposive and theoretical sampling, 24 participants from across the United States and Canada were interviewed, including physicians, nurses, and K-12 teachers in practice as well as professional educators in each discipline (May-December 2022). Interviews included a case-based elicitation approach, and data were analyzed iteratively across the data collection period using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Medicine and nursing tend to prioritize objectivity and seek to avoid or neutralize emotions that are intrinsic to DEI-related learning, view DEI expertise as being outside the purview of their profession, and view time for DEI as limited in a clinical learning environment. In contrast, teaching is built on the assumption that DEI expertise is co-constructed and inclusive of community voices and lived experiences. DEI-related pedagogy in teaching allowed for exploration of deep assumptions and learning about structural inequities. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that assumptions and values held in professions, such as medicine and nursing, that valorize objectivity and neutrality, while stigmatizing vulnerability and suppressing emotions, may constrain DEI-related teaching and learning in such contexts.

Disorienting or Transforming? Using the Arts and Humanities to Foster Social Advocacy.

Introduction: The arts and humanities (AH) have transformative potential in medical education. Research suggests that AH-based pedagogies may facilitate both personal and professional transformation in medical learners, which may then further enhance the teaching and learning of social advocacy skills. However, the potential for such curricula to advance social advocacy training remains under-explored. Therefore, we sought to identify how AH may facilitate transformative learning of social advocacy in medical education. Methods: Building upon previous research, we conducted a critical narrative review seeking examples from the literature on how AH may promote transformative learning of social advocacy in North American medical education. Through a search of seven databases and MedEdPORTAL, we identified 11 articles and conducted both descriptive and interpretative analyses of their relation to key tenets of transformative learning, including: disorientation/dissonance, critical reflection, and discourse/dialogue. Results: We found that AH are used in varied ways to foster transformative learning in social advocacy. However, most approaches emphasize their use to elicit disorientation and dissonance; there is less evidence in the literature regarding how they may be of potential utility when applied to disorienting dilemma, critical reflection, and discourse/dialogue. Discussion: The tremendous potential of AH to foster transformative learning in social advocacy is constrained due to minimal attention to critical reflection and dialogue. Future research must consider how novel approaches that draw from AH may be used for more robust engagement with transformative learning tenets in medical education.

A feasibility (pilot) mixed methods study of an innovative non-pharmacological breath-based yoga and social-emotional intervention program in an at-risk youth sample in London, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Various service provision models for youth at risk of homelessness have been researched and implemented, including access to housing and physical and mental health resources. However, even with these interventions, we remain unaware of how best to manage symptoms of depression and anxiety and the rate of drug use in these populations primarily because of a lack of feasibility data. METHODS: This paper presents the results of a mixed-methods study in London, Canada, that examined the feasibility of implementing a biopsychosocial intervention, SKY Schools, in at-risk youth aged between 16 and 25 (n = 49). The study also recorded qualitative responses about the program's usefulness from the perspective of the service users. The SKY Schools intervention consisted of social-emotional learning combined with Sudarshan Kriya Yoga, a standardized yoga-based breathing exercise routine. The intervention program was divided into two phases: an active learning phase and a reinforcement phase. The following feasibility outcome measures were collected: (1) the number of potential participants approached per month, (2) number (proportion) who were successfully screened, (3) the proportion of screened participants who enrolled, (4) the rate of retention in the study, (5) rate of adherence to study protocol, (6) proportion of planned ratings that were completed, (7) intervention cost per case, (8) completeness of final data for analysis, (9) length of time to collect all data, (10) quality of all collected data, (11) determining if partnering community organizations were willing to conduct the study as per study protocol, (12) determining if there were any capacity issues with partners providing intervention and investigators being able to perform the tasks that they were committed to doing, (13) determining if there were any problems of entering the data into a computer, (14) preliminary data about the safety of the intervention, and (15) preliminary estimate of treatment effects. RESULTS: All feasibility outcome measures were collectible. In the city of London, Canada it was feasible to conduct a pilot study in this population of youth at risk of homelessness. Foremost among the findings was a high retention rate (61.2%) and overall positive qualitative feedback with a number of potential suggestions to improve the delivery and quality of the intervention. However, we had a significantly low recruitment rate (0.27 participants per week) suggesting that multiple sites will be needed to achieve an adequate sample size for a subsequent definitive trial. CONCLUSIONS: Future researchers may consider the findings of this feasibility study when designing a randomized control trial to further assess the efficacy and tolerability of SKY Schools. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02749240. Registered April 22, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02749240 .

Structural stigma within inpatient care for people who inject drugs: implications for harm reduction.

BACKGROUND:  Individuals suffering with addiction have historically experienced disproportionally high levels of stigma. The process of inpatient care for those with substance abuse disorder (SUD) is multifaceted, shaped by the interplay of human interactions within the healthcare team and overarching structural factors like policy. While existing literature predominantly addresses personal and interpersonal stigma, the influence of structural stigma on care delivery practices remains understudied. Our research aims to investigate the impact of structural stigma on care processes for individuals with SUD admitted to acute medicine units. METHODS:  We conducted a secondary analysis of observation notes and interview transcripts utilizing an analytic framework related to structural stigma adapted from previous research. Data was collected from June 2019 to January 2020 in 2 hospitals. 81 participants consented to observation and 25 to interviews. Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 8), healthcare staff (n = 16), and caregivers (n = 1). RESULTS:  Each aspect of care for people with SUD is adversely influenced by structural forms of stigma. There was evidence of a gap in accessing care and time pressures which deteriorated care processes. Structural stigma also manifested in the physical spaces designed for care and the lack of adequate resources available for mental health and addictions care. We found that structural stigma perpetuated other forms of implicit and explicit stigma. CONCLUSIONS:  Structural stigma and other forms of stigma are interconnected. Improving care for people with SUD in hospital settings may require addressing structural forms of stigma such as how physical spaces are designed and how mental healthcare is integrated with physical healthcare within inpatient settings.

'Yourself in all your forms': A grounded theory exploration of identity safety in medical students.

INTRODUCTION: Identity threats, such as stereotype threat and microaggressions, impair learning and erode well-being. In contrast to identity threat, less is known about how learners experience feelings of safety regarding their identity. This exploratory study aims to develop a theory of identity safety in the clinical learning environment. METHODS: This multi-institutional, qualitative interview study was informed by constructivist grounded theory and critical pedagogy. Participants were clinical students at three public medical schools in the United States in 2022. Investigators purposively sampled participants for interviews based on their responses to an 11-item survey with an open-ended question soliciting students' personal identities and responses to both the racial/ethnic and gender Stereotype Vulnerability Scales. The investigators interviewed, coded, constantly compared and continued sampling until the codes could be developed into categories, then concepts and finally into a theory. The team engaged in critical reflexivity throughout the analytic process to enrich data interpretations. RESULTS: Sixteen diverse students were interviewed. We organised their identity-salient experiences into identity threat, threat mitigation and identity safety. Participants experienced identity threat through unwelcoming learning environments, feeling compelled to change their behaviour in inauthentic ways or sociopolitical threat. Threat mitigation occurred when a participant or supervisor intervened against an identity threat, dampening but not eliminating the threat impact. Participants characterised identity safety as the ability to exist as their authentic selves without feeling the need to monitor how others perceive their identities. Identity safety manifested when participants demonstrated agency to leverage their identities for patient care, when others upheld their personhood and saw them as unique individuals and when they felt they belonged in the learning environment. DISCUSSION: Attending to identity safety may lead to educational practices that sustain and leverage team members' diverse identities. Identity safety and threat mitigation may work together to combat identity threats in the learning environment.

Precision Education and Equity: A Participatory Framework to Advance Equitable Assessment.

ABSTRACT: Precision education (PE) may hold promise for the future of the field. Leveraging data and learning analytics to foster continuous improvement of individuals, programs, and organizations seems like a potential mechanism to advance both medical education and health care delivery systems toward a more equitable future. However, PE initiatives may also have unintended consequences and perpetuate inequities instead of ameliorating them. Although there have been some principles, ideas, and suggestions on how PE implementation may promote equity-particularly for the field of assessment-there is a lack of practical and evidence-informed guidance to support a more equitable and participatory approach to PE implementation. This paper provides actionable recommendations on how PE may advance equitable assessment. First, PE implementation must include democratizing access and ownership while enhancing literacy and transparency. Open and transparent access to both data and PE technology has the potential to enhance PE by fostering greater participation, rigor, and potential innovation. Transparency may also safeguard the use of assessment data for equitable purposes. Second, PE implementation must be cocreated with diverse learners. PE has the potential to empower learners if they are given an opportunity to participate in the development, application, and implementation of PE. Overall, a participatory approach to PE implementation has the potential to improve equitable assessment.

Systems-Based Practice in Graduate Medical Education: Evolving Toward an Ideal Future State.

ABSTRACT: Systems-based practice (SBP) was first introduced as a core competency in graduate medical education (GME) in 2002 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education as part of the Outcomes Project. While inclusion of SBP content in GME has become increasingly common, there have also been well-documented stumbling blocks, including perceptions that SBP has eroded the amount of curricular time available for more medically focused competencies, is not relevant for some practice contexts, and is not introduced early enough in training. As a result, SBP learning experiences often feel disconnected from medical trainees' practical reality. In this commentary, the authors provide guidance regarding potential changes that may facilitate the evolution of SBP toward an ideal future state where graduates bring a systems science mindset to all aspects of their work. Specific suggestions include the following: (1) expanding the SBP toolbox to reflect current-day health system needs, (2) evolve the teaching methodology, (3) broadening the scope of relevant SBP content areas, and (4) emphasizing SBP as an integrated responsibility for all health care team members. Levers to enact this transformation exist and must be used to influence change at the learner, faculty, program, and clinical learning environment levels.Physicians operate within an increasingly complex health care system that highlights the intersection of health care with complex social, environmental, and relational contexts. Consequently, the role of SBP in both physician work responsibilities and educational requirements continues to expand. To meet this growing demand, GME must adapt how it supports and trains the next generation of systems thinkers, ensuring they understand how levers in the health care system directly affect health outcomes for their patients, and integrate SBP into the foundation of GME curricula in an inclusive, holistic, and unrestrained way.

It is Challenging to Shift the Norm: Exploring how to Anticipate and Address Microaggressions in Clinical Learning Environments.

Purpose: Increased attention to improving a culture of belonging in clinical learning environments has led to various approaches to addressing microaggressions. However, most approaches in the literature focus on responding or reacting to microaggressions with insufficient attention to building trust before microaggressions might occur. Research on microaggressions in clinical learning environments suggests anticipatory or pre-emptive conversations about microaggressions may foster greater trust. In this study, the authors explored how diverse participants perceived the experience of anticipatory conversations about potential microaggressions. Overall, the authors sought to gain a deeper understanding of how pre-emptive and anticipatory conversations may influence an organization's approach to addressing microaggressions in clinical learning environments. Methods: The authors utilized constructivist grounded theory methodology and conducted individual qualitative interviews with 21 participants in an academic department within a larger health sciences center in the United States. Results: Findings suggest that anticipatory conversations about microaggressions were challenging due to existing norms in dynamic clinical learning and working environments. Participants shared that the idea of anticipating microaggressions elicited dissonance. Conversations about microaggressions could potentially be facilitated through leaders who role model vulnerability, organizational supports, and an individualized approach for each team member and their role within a complex hierarchical organization. Discussion: Anticipating and addressing microaggressions in clinical learning environments holds tremendous potential, however, any conversations about personal identity remain challenging in medical and healthcare environments. This study suggests that any attempts to address microaggressions requires attention to cultural norms within healthcare environments and the ways that hierarchical organizations can constrain individual agency.

Digging Deeper, Zooming Out: Reimagining Legacies in Medical Education.

Although the wide-scale disruption precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic has somewhat subsided, there are many questions about the implications of such disruptions for the road ahead. This year's Research in Medical Education (RIME) supplement may provide a window of insight. Now, more than ever, researchers are poised to question long-held assumptions while reimagining long-established legacies. Themes regarding the boundaries of professional identity, approaches to difficult conversations, challenges of power and hierarchy, intricacies of selection processes, and complexities of learning climates appear to be the most salient and critical to understand. In this commentary, the authors use the relationship between legacies and assumptions as a framework to gain a deeper understanding about the past, present, and future of RIME.

Intersectionality in Medical Education: A Meta-Narrative Review.

Introduction: Despite increasing attention to improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academic medicine, a theoretically informed perspective to advancing equity is often missing. Intersectionality is a theoretical framework that refers to the study of the dynamic nature of social categories with which an individual identifies and their unique localization within power structures. Intersectionality can be a useful lens to understand and address inequity, however, there is limited literature on intersectionality in the context of medical education. Thus, we explored how intersectionality has been conceptualized and applied in medical education. Methods: We employed a meta-narrative review, analyzing existing literature on intersectionality theory and frameworks in medical education. Three electronic databases were searched using key terms yielding 32 articles. After, title, abstract and full-text screening 14articles were included. Analysis of articles sought a meaningful synthesis on application of intersectionality theory to medical education. Results: Existing literature on intersectionality discussesthe role of identity categorization and the relationship between identity, power, and social change. There are contrasting narratives on the practical application of intersectionality to medical education, producing tensions between how intersectionality is understood as theory and how it is translated in practice. Discussion: A paucity in literature on intersectionality in medical education suggests that there is a risk intersectionality may be understood in a superficial manner and considered a synonym for diversity. Drawing explicit attention to its core tenets of reflexivity, transformational identity, and analysis of power is important to maintain fidelity to how intersectionality is understood in broader critical social science literature.

Codesigning Policy-Based Solutions to Discrimination and Harassment in Academic Medicine: An Inclusive Approach.

ABSTRACT: Academic medicine institutions have historically employed policies as a means to tackle various types of discrimination and harassment within educational and professional settings, thereby affirming their dedication to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion. However, the implementation and effectiveness of policies are constrained by limitations, including a lack of awareness and barriers to reporting. Due to concerns about accountability and transparency, many groups and individuals experiencing discrimination have lost trust in policy-based solutions to address equity in academic medicine. To address such challenges, the authors offer an evidence-informed policy framework with actionable recommendations. First, policy should be cowritten through meaningful and participatory engagement. Second, organizations should publicly report on metrics of policy effectiveness. Third, to ensure accountability, external organizations or adjudicators should be involved in oversight of policy-based processes. Fourth, leadership commitment is essential for success. Overall, policy can be an effective mechanism to address discrimination and harassment; however, a more inclusive approach is needed.

Anti-oppressive pedagogy in medical education: A qualitative study of trainees and faculty.

PURPOSE: Despite the proliferation of interest in health equity and justice in medical education, there is limited research into the practical implementation of pedagogical approaches that align with anti-oppressive practices. This study sought to explore how to integrate anti-oppressive pedagogy into medical education. METHODS: Using constructivist grounded theory, the authors conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with a continuum of medical education stakeholders including learners and faculty in a Canadian context between June and August 2021. Transcripts were iteratively analysed using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: Findings suggest that existing approaches to anti-oppressive pedagogy in medical education are misaligned with the perceived values, priorities, pace, biomedical focus and hierarchical nature of medical education, and medical practice. Although some learners are motivated to advance anti-oppressive teaching, their motivations are often related to their personal experiences of oppression. Participants suggested that transformative and structural changes are required to effectively integrate anti-oppressive pedagogy into medical education. Suggestions included a shift to community-based learning while ensuring adequate compensation for educators and addressing resistance at individual and institutional levels. CONCLUSION: Anti-oppressive pedagogy does not presently align with existing medical education practices. Effectively integrating anti-oppressive approaches will require individual and institutional reflection on the values and assumptions that underpin the field before progress can be made in a meaningful and sustainable way.

Can I Ask a Question About URiM Awards That I Don't Know the Answer to? Designing an Award for Underrepresented Medical Education Researchers.

Meaningful Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) efforts may be stymied by concerns about whether proposed initiatives are performative or tokenistic. The purpose of this project was to analyze discussions by the Research in Medical Education (RIME) Program Planning committee about how best to recognize and support underrepresented in medicine (URiM) researchers in medical education to generate lessons learned that might inform local, national, and international actions to implement meaningful EDI initiatives. Ten RIME Program Planning Committee members and administrative staff participated in a focus group held virtually in August 2021. Focus group questions elicited opinions about "if and how" to establish a URiM research award. The focus group was recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Recognition of privilege, including who has it and who doesn't, underpinned the focus group discussion, which revolved around 2 themes: (1) tensions between optics and semantics, and (2) potential unintended consequences of trying to level the medical education playing field. The overarching storyline threaded throughout the focus group discussion was intentionality. Focus group participants sought to avoid performativity by creating an award that would be meaningful to recipients and to career gatekeepers such as department chairs and promotion and tenure committees. Ultimately, participants decided to create an award that focused on exemplary Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) scholarship, which was eventually named the "RIME URiM Research Award." Difficult but productive conversations about EDI initiatives are necessary to advance underrepresented in medicine (URiM) scholarship. This transparent commentary may trigger further critical conversations.