Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars ; 52(3): 189-198, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38573091

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Significant involvement of the cardiovascular system is known in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). This study aimed to examine the recovery of affected cardiovascular parameters over a medium-term follow-up. METHODS: A cohort of 69 children was studied prospectively. Assessments of left ventricular (LV) function and coronary artery abnormalities (CAA) were conducted at admission, 1.5 months, and 3 months. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibody titers were assessed at these three time points. Echocardiographic and antibody parameters (rising/decreasing) were analyzed for correlation. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: At admission, among the 78.2% of patients who were tested, 88.9% tested positive for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A quarter of the patients had pericardial effusion, and half had valvulitis. Decreased ejection fraction, global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were seen in 54.4%, 68.6%, and 35.8% of patients, respectively. CAAs were observed in 27.78% of patients. Systolic dysfunction was significantly associated with older age. During follow-up, severe LV dysfunction normalized within 6-7 weeks, while mild to moderate dysfunction reached normalcy by two weeks. Both GCS and GLS reached normalcy within a median of two weeks. Diastolic parameters recovered by six weeks. Most small and moderate coronary aneurysms resolved, but a giant aneurysm in an infant remained large even after 15 months. Trends in antibodies and ejection fraction (EF) at three months were significantly correlated. Admission EF, GLS (at 6 weeks) and deceleration time (at 3 months) were significantly associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The median segmental strain of the cohort remained low in certain segments at three months. CONCLUSION: Smaller CAAs resolve, whereas giant CAAs persist. EF and GLS are important predictors of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay. The residual impairment of median segmental strain and persistent diastolic dysfunction at three months indicate the need for long-term follow-up.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complications , Echocardiography , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome , Infant , Humans , Child , Follow-Up Studies , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 24(2): 119-121, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355014

ABSTRACT

Lead reversals are a common cause of electrocardiographic abnormality, which can lead to a false diagnosis like chamber enlargement, myocardial ischemia or infarction. Isolated limb lead reversals and chest lead reversals are common in clinical practice. This article reports a rare case where multiple limb and chest leads were reversed due to the reversal of cables leading to a false diagnosis of myocardial ischemia.

4.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 47(2): 239-241, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264970

ABSTRACT

A 51-year-old female with congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries (CCTGA), situs solitus, dextrocardia, atrial septal defect and persistent left superior vena cava underwent electrophysiology study for recurrent palpitations with documented narrow complex, short RP tachycardia. With a catheter in the region of the anterior mitral annulus, a His signal was recorded and HV interval was 35 msec. Tachycardia was induced with a ventricular extrastimulus. During the tachycardia there was 1:1 ventriculo-atrial conduction and central atrial activation with a VA interval of 20 msec. The recorded His signal could be seen after the QRS. What is the mechanism of the tachycardia?


Subject(s)
Transposition of Great Vessels , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries , Transposition of Great Vessels/complications , Transposition of Great Vessels/surgery , Vena Cava, Superior , Tachycardia , Heart Rate
5.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 46(8): 840-847, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37477545

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP-CRT), the addition of a coronary sinus lead, that is, Left bundle optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) might confer additional benefits. OBJECTIVES: To compare the electrocardiographic characteristics between LBBP-CRT and LOT-CRT MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% who underwent implantation of an atrial lead, a left bundle lead, and a coronary sinus lead were included in this prospective study. Digital 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded in three pacing modes-AAI, DDD with pacing from the LBB lead (LBBP-CRT), and DDD with pacing from both left bundle and coronary sinus leads (LOT-CRT). QRS duration (QRSd), QRS area, QT interval, and T peak-T end (TpTe) intervals were compared. RESULTS: Among 24 patients, QRSd reduced from 167 ± 21.2 ms to 134.5 ± 23.6 ms with LBBP-CRT (p < .001) and 129.5 ± 18.6 ms with LOT-CRT (p < .001) without a significant difference between LBBP-CRT and LOT-CRT (p = .15). Patients with QRS duration with LBBP-CRT > 131 ms showed a significant reduction in QRSd with LOT-CRT (p = .03). QT interval was reduced with both modes of CRT. LOT-CRT was associated with a greater reduction in QRS area (p = .001), TpTe interval (p = .03), and TpTe/QT ratio (p = .013) compared to LBBP-CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NICMP and LBBB, there was no significant difference in QRSd with LOT-CRT compared to LBBP-CRT. However, in patients with QRSd > 131 ms after LBBP-CRT, LOT-CRT resulted in a significantly narrower QRS.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Humans , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Stroke Volume , Prospective Studies , Ventricular Function, Left , Treatment Outcome , Electrocardiography/methods , Bundle-Branch Block , Bundle of His , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/methods
7.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 6413, 2022 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35440611

ABSTRACT

Indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has been presented as a broad-spectrum antiviral agent. This randomised clinical trial in a hospital setting evaluated the efficacy and safety of this drug in RT-PCR-positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. A total of 210 RT-PCR-positive COVID-19 patients who provided consent were allotted to the control or case arm, based on block randomisation. The control arm received standard of care comprising paracetamol, ivermectin, and other adjuvant therapies. The patients in the case arm received indomethacin instead of paracetamol, with other medications retained. The primary endpoint was the development of hypoxia/desaturation with SpO2 ≤ 93, while time to become afebrile and time for cough and myalgia resolution were the secondary endpoints. The results of 210 patients were available, with 103 and 107 patients in the indomethacin and paracetamol arms, respectively. We monitored patient profiles along with everyday clinical parameters. In addition, blood chemistry at the time of admission and discharge was assessed. As no one in either of the arms required high-flow oxygen, desaturation with a SpO2 level of 93 and below was the vital goal. In the indomethacin group, none of the 103 patients developed desaturation. On the other hand, 20 of the 107 patients in the paracetamol arm developed desaturation. Patients who received indomethacin also experienced more rapid symptomatic relief than those in the paracetamol arm, with most symptoms disappearing in half the time. In addition, 56 out of 107 in the paracetamol arm had fever on the seventh day, while no patient in the indomethacin group had fever. Neither arm reported any adverse event. The fourteenth-day follow-up revealed that the paracetamol arm patients had faced several discomforts; indomethacin arm patients mostly complained only of tiredness. Indomethacin is a safe and effective drug for treating patients with mild and moderate covid-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Humans , Indomethacin/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...