Melatonin-mediated attenuation of fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia in C57BL/6 mice is dependent on the light/dark phase.

Our aims were to assess the effect of melatonin on fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia during the light (ZT 9.5-10.5) and dark (ZT 17.5-18.5) phases in mice lacking endogenous pineal melatonin (C57BL/6 mouse), and to investigate the effects of the manipulation of environmental lighting in mice with a targeted deletion of the MT1 melatonin receptor. In both knockout (C57KO MT1) and wild type (C57WT) mice, fluphenazine (1 mg/kg) induced hypokinesia during the light phase (C57WT: M=105, SEM=31.2 s, n = 31; C57 MT1KO:M=118, SEM = 32.6 s, n = 29). During the light phase melatonin (10 mg/kg, sc) significantly reduced hypokinesia in both genotypes (C57WT: M=33.1, SEM=8.4 s; C57 MT1KO: M=33.3, SEM=13.0 s). In the dark, fluphenazine did not induce a substantial hypokinesia in either C57WT or C57 MT1KO mice. Manipulating the lightning environment during testing, experiments conducted during the light phase in a dark environment served to abolish the hypokinetic effect of fluphenazine in all groups regardless of melatonin treatment. Conversely, experiments conducted during the dark phase in a light environment showed mice to have hypokinetic effects by fluphenazine treatment in both C57WT (M=98.4, SEM=20.2 s) and C57 MT1KO (M=40.4 SEM=9.5 s) groups. These data suggest that fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia is more pronounced under light than dark conditions, and that melatonin is only able to counteract hypokinesia during the light phase. Importantly, our data suggest that the effect of melatonin on hypokinesia was not solely mediated by the MT1 melatonin receptor in the C57BL/6 mouse, leaving the possible activation of MT2 receptor as the mechanism of action which is regulated by the light/dark environment.

Effect of MT1 melatonin receptor deletion on melatonin-mediated phase shift of circadian rhythms in the C57BL/6 mouse.

In the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), melatonin activates MT1 and MT2 G-protein coupled receptors, which are involved primarily in inhibition of neuronal firing and phase shift of circadian rhythms. This study investigated the ability of melatonin to phase shift circadian rhythms in wild type (WT) and MT1 melatonin receptor knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice. In WT mice, melatonin (90 microg/mouse, s.c.) administered at circadian time 10 (CT10; CT12 onset of activity) significantly phase advanced the onset of the circadian activity rhythm (0.60 +/- 0.09 hr, n = 41) when compared with vehicle treated controls (-0.02 +/- 0.07 hr, n = 28) (P < 0.001). In contrast, C57 MT1KO mice treated with melatonin did not phase shift circadian activity rhythms (-0.10 +/- 0.12 hr, n = 42) when compared with vehicle treated mice (-0.12 +/- 0.07 hr, n = 43). Similarly, in the C57 MT1KO mouse melatonin did not accelerate re-entrainment to a new dark onset after an abrupt advance of the dark cycle. In contrast, melatonin (3 and 10 pm) significantly phase advanced circadian rhythm of neuronal firing in SCN brain slices independent of genotype with an identical maximal shift at 10 pm (C57 WT: 3.61 +/- 0.38 hr, n = 3; C57 MT(1)KO: 3.45 +/- 0.11 hr, n = 4). Taken together, these results suggest that melatonin-mediated phase advances of circadian rhythms of neuronal firing in the SCN in vitro may involve activation of the MT2 receptor while in vivo activation of the MT1 and possibly the MT2 receptor may be necessary for the expression of melatonin-mediated phase shifts of overt circadian activity rhythms.

The antidepressant-like effect of the melatonin receptor ligand luzindole in mice during forced swimming requires expression of MT2 but not MT1 melatonin receptors.

We previously reported an antidepressant-like effect in C3H/HeN mice during the forced swimming test (FST) following treatment with the MT1/MT2 melatonin receptor ligand, luzindole. This study investigated the role melatonin receptors (MT1 and/or MT2) may play in the effect of luzindole in the FST using C3H/HeN mice with a genetic deletion of either MT1 (MT1KO) or MT2 (MT2KO) melatonin receptors. In the light phase (ZT 9-11), luzindole (30 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased immobility during swimming in both wild type (WT) (135.6 +/- 25.3 s, n = 7) and MT(1)KO (132.6 +/- 13.3 s, n = 8) as compared with vehicle-treated mice (WT: 207.1 +/- 6.0 s, n = 7; MT1KO: 209.5 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). In the dark phase (ZT 20-22), luzindole also decreased time of immobility in both WT (89.5 +/- 13.9 s, n = 8) and MT1KO (66.5 +/- 6.4 s, n = 8) mice as compared with the vehicle treated (WT: 193.8 +/- 3.5, n = 6; MT1KO: 176.6 +/- 6.2 s, n = 8) (P < 0.001). Genetic disruption of the MT1 gene did not alter the diurnal rhythm of serum melatonin in MT1KO mice (ZT 9-11: 1.3 +/- 0.6 pg/mL, n = 7; ZT 20-22: 10.3 +/- 1.1 pg/mL, n = 8) as compared with WT (ZT 9-11: 1.4 +/- 0.7 pg/mL; ZT 20-22: 10.6 pg/mL). Swimming did not alter the serum melatonin diurnal rhythm in WT and MT1KO mice. Decreases in immobility of WT and MT1KO mice by luzindole treatment were not affected by gender or age (3 months versus 8 months). In contrast, luzindole did not decrease immobility during the FST in MT2KO mice. We conclude that the antidepressant-like effect of luzindole may be mediated through blockade of MT2 rather than MT1 melatonin receptors.

Circadian-dependent effect of melatonin on dopaminergic D2 antagonist-induced hypokinesia and agonist-induced stereotypies in rats.

Although a melatonin/dopamine relationship has been well established in nonmotor systems wherein dopamine and melatonin share an antagonist relationship, less clear is the role melatonin may play in extrapyramidal dopaminergic function. Therefore, the purpose of the present experiments was to examine the relationship between melatonin and the dopaminergic D2 receptor system and behavior. Hypokinesia was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats with fluphenazine (D2 antagonist, 0.4 mg/kg ip) and stereotypies with apomorphine (D2 agonist, 0.6 mg/kg sc) during the light (1200 h) and dark (2200 h) phases. As expected, fluphenazine induced severe hypokinesia during the light phase (482 +/- 176 s); however, unexpectedly, fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia during the dark was almost nonexistent (25 +/- 6 s). Furthermore, melatonin treatment (30 mg/kg ip) produced a strong interaction with fluphenazine in that it reduced fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia by nearly 80% in the light (112 +/- 45 s) but paradoxically increased the minimal fluphenazine-induced hypokinesia in the dark by more than 60% (70 +/- 17 s). Melatonin also reduced apomorphine-induced stereotypies by nearly 40% in the light but had no effect in the dark. Taken together, these data show (1) a strong and unexpected nocturnal effect of fluphenazine on hypokinesia and (2) provide support for an antagonistic melatonin/dopaminergic interaction in the context of motor behavior and D2 receptor function which appears to be critically dependent on the light/dark status of the dopaminergic system.

Bright light treatment decreases depression in institutionalized older adults: a placebo-controlled crossover study.

BACKGROUND: An important parallel exists between patients with seasonal affective disorder and institutionalized older adults. Many older patients, as a result of global physical decline and immobility, are confined to their rooms, experiencing little natural sunlight. Thus, institutionalized older adults are at risk for chronic light deprivation. Testing the hypothesis that chronic light deprivation might be responsible, at least in part, for some depression among institutionalized older adults, the aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of morning bright light treatment on depression among older adults residing in a long-term care facility. METHODS: In a placebo controlled, crossover design, participants (N = 10, six women and four men; M age = 83.8) received each of the following: (i) 1 week (5 days) of 10,000 lux (therapeutic dose); (ii) 1 week (5 days) of 300 lux (placebo); or 1 week of no treatment (control). Each week of light treatment was 5 consecutive days, 30 minutes daily, with a wash-out period consisting of 1 week between conditions. RESULTS: Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores at baseline during all treatment conditions were positively correlated (r = .81, p < .01) with months of institutionalization, where participants with higher GDS scores experienced more time institutionalized. Scores on the GDS remained unchanged during the placebo and control conditions, but depression scores decreased significantly during the 10,000 lux treatment (pretest GDS M = 15 vs posttest GDS M = 11, p < .01). After the 10,000 lux treatment, 50% of the participants no longer scored in the depressed range. Improvement during the 10,000 lux condition was positively correlated (r = .62, p < .05) to baseline GDS scores, where participants with higher GDS scores experienced greater improvement following the 10,000 lux treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that bright light treatment may be effective among institutionalized older adults, providing nonpharmacological intervention in the treatment of depression. Furthermore, the length of institutionalization may play an important role in determining the efficacy of bright light treatment for older adults in the nursing-home setting.

The effect of hypothalamic peptide YY on hippocampal acetylcholine release in vivo: implications for limbic function in binge-eating behavior.

Central injection of peptide YY (PYY) in sated rats produces the most powerful stimulating effect of food intake known to date. The neural mechanisms by which PYY regulates appetite are not clear but may be important because abnormal levels of PYY have been implicated in the neurobiology of bulimia nervosa. Interactions between brain acetylcholine (ACh) and PYY had not been studied. Therefore, the present experiments were designed to explore the in vivo release of ACh from the hippocampus (HPC) of rats in response to hypothalamic infusion of PYY. Hippocampal ACh release was found to increase 400% in response to 10 microg PYY. In a separate experiment, blockade of the same area of the HPC with bilateral intracerebral injections of 3.5 microg scopolamine did not affect intake stimulated by intrahypothalamic injection of 4 microg PYY. Furthermore, a third experiment showed, for the first time, that PYY (2.5-10.0 microg) can elicit robust feeding when infused directly into the HPC. The significance of these findings to the activation of limbic functions such as memory, reinforcement, and obsessional processes that accompany human binge-eating syndromes is discussed.