Adverse Fetal Outcomes and Maternal Mortality Following Nonobstetric Abdominopelvic Surgery in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the absolute risks of adverse fetal outcomes and maternal mortality following nonobstetric abdominopelvic surgery in pregnancy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery is often necessary in pregnancy, but absolute measures of risk required to guide perioperative management are lacking. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EvidenceBased Medicine Reviews from January 1, 2000, to December 9, 2020, for observational studies and randomized trials of pregnant patients undergoing nonobstetric abdominopelvic surgery. We determined the pooled proportions of fetal loss, preterm birth, and maternal mortality using a generalized linear random/mixed effects model with a logit link. RESULTS: We identified 114 observational studies (52 [46%] appendectomy, 34 [30%] adnexal, 8 [7%] cholecystectomy, 20 [17%] mixed types) reporting on 67,111 pregnant patients. Overall pooled proportions of fetal loss, preterm birth, and maternal mortality were 2.8% (95% CI 2.2-3.6), 9.7% (95% CI 8.3-11.4), and 0.04% (95% CI 0.02-0.09; 4/10,000), respectively. Rates of fetal loss and preterm birth were higher for pelvic inflammatory conditions (eg, appendectomy, adnexal torsion) than for abdominal or nonurgent conditions (eg, cholecystectomy, adnexal mass). Surgery in the second and third trimesters was associated with lower rates of fetal loss (0.1%) and higher rates of preterm birth (13.5%) than surgery in the first and second trimesters (fetal loss 2.9%, preterm birth 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Absolute risks of adverse fetal outcomes after nonobstetric abdom- inopelvic surgery vary with gestational age, indication, and acuity. Pooled estimates derived here identify high-risk clinical scenarios, and can inform implementation of mitigation strategies and improve preoperative counselling.

Exploration of the acceptability and usability of advance care planning tools in long term care homes.

OBJECTIVES: Despite known benefits, advance care planning (ACP) is rarely a component of usual practice in long-term care (LTC). A series of tools and workbooks have been developed to support ACP uptake amongst the generable population. Yet, their potential for improving ACP uptake in LTC has yet to be examined. This study explored if available ACP tools are acceptable for use in LTC by (a) eliciting staff views on the content and format that would support ACP tool usability in LTC (b) examining if publicly available ACP tools include content identified as relevant by LTC home staff. Ultimately this study aimed to identify the potential for existing ACP tools to improve ACP engagement in LTC. METHODS: A combination of focus group deliberations with LTC home staff (N = 32) and content analysis of publicly available ACP tools (N = 32) were used to meet the study aims. RESULTS: Focus group deliberations suggested that publicly available ACP tools may be acceptable for use in LTC if the tools include psychosocial elements and paper-based versions exist. Content analysis of available paper-based tools revealed that only a handful of ACP tools (32/611, 5%) include psychosocial content, with most encouraging psychosocially-oriented reflections (30/32, 84%), and far fewer providing direction around other elements of ACP such as communicating psychosocial preferences (14/32, 44%) or transforming preferences into a documented plan (7/32, 22%). CONCLUSIONS: ACP tools that include psychosocial content may improve ACP uptake in LTC because they elicit future care issues considered pertinent and can be supported by a range of clinical and non-clinical staff. To increase usability and engagement ACP tools may require infusion of scenarios pertinent to frail older persons, and a better balance between psychosocial content that elicits reflections and psychosocial content that supports communication.

A Systematic Review of Behavioral Interventions to Decrease Opioid Prescribing After Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize strategies to reduce postsurgical opioid prescribing at discharge. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Current practices for the prescription of opioids at discharge after surgery are highly variable and often excessive. We conducted a systematic review to identify behavioral interventions designed to improve these practices. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO until December 14, 2018 to identify studies of behavioral interventions designed to decrease opioid prescribing at discharge among adults undergoing surgery. Behavioral interventions were defined according to the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) taxonomy. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using criteria suggested by Cochrane EPOC and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Of 8048 citations that were screened, 24 studies were included in our review. Six types of behavioral interventions were identified: local consensus-based processes (18 studies), patient-mediated interventions (2 studies), clinical practice guidelines (1 study), educational meetings (1 study), interprofessional education (1 study), and clinician reminder (1 study). All but one study reported a statistically significant decrease in the amount of opioid prescribed at discharge after surgery, and only 2 studies reported evidence of increased pain intensity. Reductions in prescribed opioids ranged from 34.4 to 212.3 mg morphine equivalents. All studies were found to have medium-to-high risks of bias. CONCLUSIONS: We identified 6 types of behavioral strategies to decrease opioid prescription at discharge after surgery. Despite the risk of bias, almost all types of intervention seemed effective in reducing opioid prescriptions at discharge after surgery without negatively impacting pain control.

Arterial baroreflex regulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity at rest and during stress.

KEY POINTS: The arterial baroreflex controls vasoconstrictor muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in a negative feedback manner by increasing or decreasing activity during spontaneous blood pressure falls or elevations, respectively. Spontaneous sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is commonly quantified as the slope of the relationship between MSNA burst incidence or strength and beat-to-beat variations in absolute diastolic blood pressure. We assessed the relationships between blood pressure inputs related to beat-to-beat blood pressure change or blood pressure rate-of-change (variables largely independent of absolute pressure) and MSNA at rest and during exercise and mental stress. The number of participants with strong linear relationships between MSNA and beat-to-beat diastolic blood pressure change variables or absolute diastolic blood pressure were similar at rest, although during stress the beat-to-beat diastolic blood pressure change variables were superior. Current methods may not fully characterize the capacity of the arterial baroreflex to regulate MSNA. ABSTRACT: Spontaneous sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity (sBRS) is commonly quantified as the slope of the relationship between variations in absolute diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) burst incidence or strength. This relationship is well maintained at rest but not during stress. We assessed whether sBRS could be calculated at rest and during stress (static handgrip, rhythmic handgrip, mental stress) using blood pressure variables that quantify relative change: beat-to-beat DBP change (ΔDBP), ΔDBP rate-of-change (ΔDBP rate), pulse pressure (PP) and PP rate-of-change (PP rate). Sixty-six healthy participants underwent continuous measures of blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) and multi-unit MSNA (microneurography). At rest, absolute DBP (91%), ΔDBP (97%) and ΔDBP rate (97%) each yielded higher proportions of participants with strong linear relationships (r ≥ 0.6) with MSNA burst incidence compared to PP (57%) and PP rate (56%) and produced similar sBRS slopes (DBP: -4.5 ± 2.0 bursts 100 heartbeats-1 /mmHg; ΔDBP: -5.0 ± 2.1 bursts 100 heartbeats-1 /ΔmmHg; ΔDBP rate: -4.9 ± 2.2 bursts 100 heartbeats-1 /ΔmmHg s-1 ; P > 0.05). During stress, ΔDBP (74%) and ΔDBP rate (74%) yielded higher proportions of strong linear relationships with MSNA burst incidence than absolute DBP (43%), PP (46%) and PP rate (49%) (all P < 0.05). The absolute DBP associated with a 50% chance of a MSNA burst (T50 ) was shifted rightward during static handgrip (Δ+15 ± 11 mmHg, P < 0.001) and mental stress (Δ+11 ± 7 mmHg, P < 0.001); however, the ΔDBP T50 was shifted rightward during static handgrip (Δ+2.5 ± 3.7 mmHg, P = 0.009) but not mental stress (Δ0.0 ± 4.4 mmHg, P = 0.99). These findings suggest that calculating sBRS using absolute DBP alone may not adequately characterize arterial baroreflex regulation of MSNA, particularly during stress.