Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(6): e032516, 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471825

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rilonacept, a once-weekly interleukin-1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin-1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long-term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision-making during 24 additional months of open-label rilonacept treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four patients commenced the long-term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18-month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient-year versus 4.4 events/patient-year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18-month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18-month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In the RHAPSODY long-term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18-month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-1alpha , Pericarditis , Humans , Pericarditis/drug therapy , Pericarditis/epidemiology , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/adverse effects , Recurrence , Risk Reduction Behavior , Treatment Outcome
2.
Tex Heart Inst J ; 38(6): 714-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22199446

ABSTRACT

Elevated catecholamine levels are a well-recognized cause of various types of cardiomyopathy. Causes of catecholamine elevation include tumors, toxins, drugs, emotional stress, and sepsis. Milnacipran is a dual and equipotent inhibitor of norepinephrine and serotonin uptake. It is frequently prescribed as therapy for fibromyalgia, and the drug has a good safety profile. Herein, we report the case of a 42-year-old woman with undefined connective-tissue disease and fibromyalgia who developed a severe and reversible cardiomyopathy while taking recommended doses of milnacipran. The cardiomyopathy was associated with a hyperadrenergic state manifested by tachycardia, hypertension, and elevated plasma catecholamine levels. The discontinuation of milnacipran and the initiation of anti-failure therapy resulted in complete resolution of the cardiomyopathy in 6 months. To our knowledge, this is the first report of milnacipran as a possible cause of catecholamine-induced cardiomyopathy.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cardiomyopathies/chemically induced , Cyclopropanes/adverse effects , Hypertension/chemically induced , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Tachycardia/chemically induced , Adult , Cardiomyopathies/blood , Cardiomyopathies/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathies/drug therapy , Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Catecholamines/blood , Coronary Angiography , Female , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Milnacipran , Tachycardia/blood , Tachycardia/diagnosis , Tachycardia/drug therapy , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Up-Regulation
3.
J Rheumatol ; 32(12): 2440-2, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16331780

ABSTRACT

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is a multisystem fibrotic disease that commonly manifests with severe Raynaud's phenomenon and slow-healing cutaneous ulcerations. Reduced nitric oxide levels have been proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease in scleroderma, and therefore sildenafil (which increases nitric oxide levels) is an attractive therapeutic prospect. We describe a patient with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis who presented with severe nonhealing finger ulcerations despite conventional management, who showed marked improvement with oral sildenafil.


Subject(s)
Fingers , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Skin Ulcer/drug therapy , Skin Ulcer/etiology , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Adult , Fingers/pathology , Humans , Male , Purines , Sildenafil Citrate , Skin Ulcer/pathology , Sulfones , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosage
4.
South Med J ; 98(2): 185-91, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15759949

ABSTRACT

Laboratory testing for the rheumatic diseases can allow for rapid diagnosis and appropriate management, while false-positive tests can lead to inappropriate management and unnecessary concern for the patient. An evaluation of laboratory testing for rheumatic illnesses is discussed, including the well-known acute phase proteins, the use of ANA in screening, and the newer antibodies which may potentially allow for an earlier diagnosis. A thorough history and examination are arguably the best screening tests. Clinicians should be judicious in their use of laboratory testing, and should only do so in an attempt to further refine the diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Antibodies/blood , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Blood Sedimentation , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Rheumatoid Factor/blood
5.
Arch Dermatol ; 139(1): 50-4, 2003 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12533164

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an anti-inflammatory agent and an immunomodulator that inhibits the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha. It has shown promise as a treatment option for the cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus (LE). OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of clinical response per subtype of cutaneous lupus, the duration of therapy before documented clinical improvement, and the incidence of adverse effects, including peripheral neuropathy, with low-dose thalidomide therapy at 100 mg daily in the treatment of refractory cutaneous lesions of LE. METHODS: This retrospective medical record review of patients with refractory cutaneous manifestations of LE is one of the largest modern series in the literature. There were 29 patients seen at the Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, NC), who were unresponsive to conventional agents including antimalarial agents, and who started treatment between 1998 and 2000. Twenty-three patients who took the drug for 1 month or more were included in the analysis. Clinical responses were assessed by the investigators based on statements of improvement listed in the clinic notes and were categorized as "no response," "partial response," and "complete response." Partial response was classified as either 75% or greater or less than 75% improvement. The incidence of adverse effects including peripheral neuropathy was determined. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients, 17 (74%) demonstrated complete resolution of the cutaneous manifestations of LE, whereas 3 patients (13%) demonstrated 75% or greater partial improvement; 3 patients (13%) had less than 75% partial clinical improvement; and 21 patients (91%) who demonstrated a complete or partial response did so within 8 weeks of initiating thalidomide therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this case series, we believe that thalidomide should be given prime consideration as a treatment for antimalarial drug-resistant interface lesions of LE. The design of prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for this indication is warranted.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Thalidomide/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL