ABSTRACT
AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the trend in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates in Japan before and after a policy change in 2022, involving resumption of active recommendation and start of catch-up vaccination. METHODS: From 2021 to 2023, a web-based questionnaire survey was administered to newly enrolled female college students in Yokohama, Japan. The questionnaire included items such as age, HPV vaccination status, HPV vaccine awareness, and awareness of catch-up vaccination. We compared knowledge about the HPV vaccine and cervical cancer in 2021 and 2023, before and after resumption of the national vaccination program. RESULTS: The HPV vaccination rates were 5.4% in 2021, 7.5% in 2022, and 35.3% in 2023, with a significant upward trend (p < 0.001). A similar upward trend was observed for HPV vaccine awareness (p < 0.001). Comparing 2022 and 2023 after the start of catch-up vaccination, there was no significant difference in awareness of catch-up vaccination (p = 0.669), but there was a significant increase in awareness of free vaccination tickets (p < 0.001). After resumption of the national vaccination program with adoption of the catch-up vaccination program, there was no difference in knowledge of cervical cancer, but there was a difference in knowledge of the HPV vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HPV vaccination rate has increased after the policy change, it has not recovered to the level before the suspension of active recommendation. It is important for healthcare providers and school educators to actively communicate the safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The association between sarcopenia and prognosis in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer remains unclear. This study investigated whether sarcopenia is a prognostic factor in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: A total of 52 patients diagnosed with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer who had undergone non-platinum chemotherapy at our institution formed our study population. Body composition and clinicopathological data of these patients were collected retrospectively. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans obtained at the time of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer diagnosis were used to measure the cross-sectional area of skeletal muscles at L3 level. These values were corrected for height to calculate the skeletal muscle index, and accordingly sarcopenia was defined. Overall survival was defined as the primary outcome of the study. The impact of sarcopenia on overall survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models with inverse probability weighting of treatment based on propensity scores and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The median patient age was 63 years (IQR: 53-71). The most common International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage was stage III (50%) and the most common histology was serous or adenocarcinoma (67.3%). The optimal cut-off value of skeletal muscle index was 35.6 cm2/m2, which was calculated using the data of 21 patients with sarcopenia and 31 without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.06-3.49; p=0.03). Subgroup analysis based on patient attributes and prognostic factors suggested a consistent prognostic impact of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was identified as a significant risk factor, particularly in patients who had higher CA125 levels (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.07 to 5.69; p=0.034) and a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.02 to 8.31; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia significantly shortened the overall survival of patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Although obesity is an important risk factor for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and uterine cancer, little is known about the trends in use of weight-loss therapy for patients with obesity with EIN and uterine cancer. We examined the use of weight-loss therapy among patients with obesity with EIN and uterine cancer. METHODS: The Merative MarketScan Database was used to identify patients aged 18-70 years who were obese and diagnosed with EIN or uterine cancer. The primary treatment for EIN or uterine cancer was categorized as either primary hysterectomy or hormonal therapy. Nutrition counseling, bariatric surgeries, and weight-management medications were identified as weight-loss therapy. We analyzed trends in the use of any weight-loss therapies with Cochran-Armitage tests. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to examine factors associated with weight-loss therapy use. RESULTS: Overall, 15,374 patients were identified, including 5561 (36.2%) patients with EIN and obesity, and 9813 (63.8%) patients with uterine cancer and obesity. Weight-loss therapy was utilized within 1 year after diagnosis in 480 (8.6%) patients with EIN and in 802 (8.2%) patients with uterine cancer. Use of any weight-loss therapy after diagnosis of EIN increased from 4.1% in 2009 to 12.6% in 2020 (P < .001), and the use of any weight-loss therapy after diagnosis of uterine cancer increased from 4.9% in 2009 to 11.4% in 2020 (P < .001). In a multivariable regression model, younger age and patients with high comorbidity score were associated with a higher likelihood of using any weight-loss therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Use of weight-loss therapy has increased, however there is still a significant underuse of this adjunctive therapy in patients with obesity with EIN or uterine cancer.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy; however, there is no useful blood diagnostic biomarker. This study aimed to determine the utility of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2), a biomarker of ovarian cancer, as a diagnostic marker for endometrial cancer. METHODS: We examined serum TFPI2 levels in patients with endometrial cancer (n = 328) compared to those in healthy controls (n = 65) and evaluated the performance of serum TFPI2 levels as a diagnostic marker. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with TFPI2-negative and TFPI2-positive endometrial cancer. Using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we examined TFPI2 expression in tumor tissues of 105 patients with type II endometrial carcinoma and evaluated the correlation between serum and tissue TFPI2 positivity. RESULTS: Patients with endometrial cancer had significantly higher serum TFPI2 levels than controls (196.7 pg/mL vs. 83.3 pg/mL; p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity were 54.3% and 95.4%, respectively (cutoff value, 191 pg/mL). Serum TFPI2 levels were significantly elevated along with the stage progression (stage I, 189.6 pg/mL; stage III, 230.9 pg/mL; stage IV, 312.5 pg/mL; p < 0.001). Patients with high-risk histology showed significantly elevated serum TFPI2 levels than those with low-risk histology (220.8 pg/mL vs. 187.7 pg/mL; p < 0.001). The positivity rate for TFPI2 was the highest among tumor markers, including CA125, CA19-9, and CEA. Serum TFPI2 and CA125 levels were almost independent (r = 0.203, p < 0.001), and the combined sensitivity increased to 58.8%. The 5-year survival rate was significantly worse in TFPI2-positive patients (≥ 191 pg/mL, n = 178) than in TFPI2-negative patients (< 191 pg/mL, n = 150) (hazard ratio, 8.22; 95% confidence interval, 2.49-27.1; p < 0.001). TFPI2 immunostaining revealed that 37.1% (39/105) of the samples were positive for TFPI2, with an IHC score of > 0. There was no significant difference in the immunostaining score according to histological type. Serum TFPI2 levels and immunostaining score showed poor agreement (kappa coefficient, -0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The serum TFPI2 level is a promising marker for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer. No correlation exists between serum and tissue TFPI2 levels. Further multicenter clinical trials are needed to test the utility of TFPI2 as a diagnostic marker.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Endometrial Neoplasms , Glycoproteins , Humans , Female , Endometrial Neoplasms/blood , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Middle Aged , Glycoproteins/blood , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , ImmunohistochemistryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The increasing use of fertility-preserving treatments in reproductive-aged patients with early-stage endometrial cancer necessitates robust evidence on the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the outcomes following these 2 primary progestin-based therapies in reproductive-aged patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and randomized controlled trials following the Cochrane Handbook guidance. We conducted a literature search of 5 databases and 1 trial registry from inception of the study to April 16, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting complete response within 1 year in reproductive-aged patients with clinical stage IA endometrioid cancer undergoing progestin therapy treatment were included. We used data from both observational and randomized controlled studies. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The primary exposure assessed was the type of progestational treatment (oral progestins or LNG-IUD). The primary outcome was the pooled proportion of the best complete response (CR) within 1 year of primary progestational treatment. We performed a proportional meta-analysis to estimate the treatment response. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing studies with extreme effect sizes or removing grade 2 tumors. The risk of bias was assessed in each study using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. RESULTS: Our analysis involved 754 reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, with 490 receiving oral progestin and 264 receiving levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device as their primary progestational treatment. The pooled proportion of the best complete response within 12 months of oral progestin and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment were 66% (95% CI, 55-76) and 86% (95% CI, 69-95), respectively. After removing outlier studies, the pooled proportion was 66% (95% CI, 57-73) for the oral progestin group and 89% (95% CI, 75-96) for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group, showing reduced heterogeneity. Specifically, among studies including grade 1 tumors, the pooled proportions were 66% (95% CI, 54-77) for the oral progestin group and 83% (95% CI, 50-96) for the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device group. The pooled pregnancy rate was 58% (95% CI, 37-76) after oral progestin treatment and 44% (95% CI, 6-90) after levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device treatment within a 12-month timeframe for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who desire to preserve fertility. These findings have the potential to assist in personalized treatment decision-making for patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine outcomes of patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia treated with oral progestins or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review across 5 databases to examine outcomes of progestational treatment (oral progestins or levonorgestrel-releasing IUD) for patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. The primary outcome was the best complete response rate within 12 months of primary progestational treatment. Sensitivity analyses were performed by removing studies with extreme effect sizes. Secondary outcomes included the pooled pregnancy rate. RESULTS: We identified 21 eligible studies, including 824 premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia, for our meta-analysis. Among these, 459 patients received oral progestin, and 365 patients received levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a primary progestational treatment. The pooled best complete response proportion within 12 months was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69% to 91%) following oral progestin treatment and 95% (95% CI = 81% to 99%) following levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment. After removing outlier studies, the pooled proportion was 86% (95% CI = 75% to 92%) for the oral progestin group and 96% (95% CI = 91% to 99%) for the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD group, with reduced heterogeneity. The pooled pregnancy rate was 50% (95% CI = 35% to 65%) after oral progestin and 35% (95% CI = 23% to 49%) after levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides data on the effectiveness of oral progestins and levonorgestrel-releasing IUD treatment within 12 months of treatment among premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Although based on small numbers, the rate of pregnancy after treatment is modest. These data may be beneficial for selecting progestational therapies that allow fertility preservation for patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Levonorgestrel , Pregnancy Rate , Progestins , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Administration, Oral , Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Progestins/administration & dosage , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Contrary to clinical guidelines, there has been a decrease over time in estrogen therapy use in premenopausal women undergoing bilateral oophorectomy for benign indications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the excess morbidity and mortality associated with current patterns of estrogen therapy use in women who undergo bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications. STUDY DESIGN: We developed 2 Bayesian sampling Markov state-transition models to estimate the excess disease incidence (incidence model) and mortality (mortality model). The starting cohort for both models were women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy for benign indications at the age of 45 to 49 years. The models tracked outcomes in 5-year intervals for 25 years. The incidence model estimated excess incidence of breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke, whereas the mortality model estimated excess mortality due to breast cancer, lung cancer, coronary heart disease, and all-other-cause mortality. The models compared current rates of estrogen therapy use with optimal (100%) use and calculated the mean difference in each simulated outcome to determine excess disease incidence and death. RESULTS: By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 94 (95% confidence interval, -158 to -23) fewer colorectal cancer cases, 658 (95% confidence interval, 339-1025) more coronary heart disease cases, and 881 (95% confidence interval, 402-1483) more stroke cases. By 25 years after bilateral oophorectomy with hysterectomy, there were an estimated 189 (95% confidence interval, 59-387) more breast cancer deaths, 380 (95% confidence interval, 114-792) more coronary heart disease deaths, and 759 (95% confidence interval, 307-1527) more all-other-cause deaths. In sensitivity analyses where we defined estrogen therapy use as a duration of >2 years of use, these differences increased >2-fold. CONCLUSION: Underuse of estrogen therapy in premenopausal women who undergo oophorectomy is associated with substantial excess morbidity and mortality.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Hysterectomy , Ovariectomy , Premenopause , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Bayes Theorem , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Stroke/epidemiology , Incidence , Markov Chains , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Disease/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background: This study aimed to assess the usefulness of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for older adults with heart failure (HF) who need nursing care and investigate the effect of CR on cognitive function (CF) and basic activities of daily living (BADL). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. The study included older adults with HF eligible for long-term care insurance in fiscal year 2014 (FY2014) as the baseline and followed them up until March 2018. Patients were divided into two groups, CR (+) and CR (-), and the changes in their CF and BADL scores over time for 3 years were investigated. Results: Of the 765 patients included in the study, 36.5% performed CR. BADL scores in the CR (+) and CR (-) groups (mean (SE)) were 5.81 (0.26) vs. 5.87 (0.20) in FY2014, 5.6 (0.28) vs. 5.92 (0.21) in FY2015, 5.72 (0.31) vs. 6.15 (0.22) in FY2016, and 5.64 (0.33) vs. 6.40 (0.25) in FY2017, respectively. BADL scores worsened over time in the CR (-) group but had a trend to inhibit decline in the CR (+) group, and a significant difference was observed between both groups (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed a significant difference in CR as a factor suppressing ADL decline after 1 year (adjusted odds ratios: 0.54, 95% confidence intervals: 0.36-0.82; p = 0.004). However, no significant difference in the CF scores was observed. Conclusion: CR for older adults with HF eligible for long-term care needs certification does not affect CF and may suppress ADL decline.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: As the prognosis for endometrial cancer is excellent, management of the effects of estrogen deprivation has an important influence on quality of life. We examined the trends in the use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and non-hormonal medications among patients with uterine cancer following surgery. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients 18-49 years who underwent hysterectomy plus oophorectomy and those aged 50-75 years who underwent hysterectomy between 2008 and 2020. ERT and non-hormonal treatments of menopause were identified preoperatively and postoperatively. After propensity score balancing, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were performed to compare the pre-and-postoperative changes in ERT and non-hormonal medication use between groups. The trends in postoperative use of ERT were assessed and tested using Cochran-Armitage trend tests. RESULTS: A total of 19,700 patients with uterine cancer and 185,150 controls were identified. Overall, postoperative ERT use decreased for both age groups and for patients with and without uterine cancer. The DID in ERT use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was -37.1% (95% CI, -40.5 to -33.6%) for patients 18-49 years of age and - 10.4% (95% CI, -10.9 to -9.9%) for those 50-75 years. The DID for non-hormonal medication use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was 11.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 14.7%) for younger patients and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.0%) for those 50-75 years. The postoperative new ERT use has been declining over time in patients with uterine cancer in those 18-49 years of age (P = .02) and those 50-75 years of age (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ERT is uncommon and has declined over time in patients with uterine cancer. Conversely, non-hormonal medications are more commonly used among patients with uterine cancer.
Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Uterine Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Quality of Life , Menopause , Estrogens , Uterine Neoplasms/drug therapy , Uterine Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibody-drug conjugates are attractive targeted agents in anticancer treatment because of their unique mechanism of action and reduced toxicity. Little is known about the spectrum of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates, despite tens of clinical trials. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating antibody-drug conjugate efficacy in anticancer treatment was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched for relevant studies. Meta-analyses assessed the odds ratios (ORs) of 12 treatment-related symptoms and toxicities in patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates compared with those receiving other anticancer agents without antibody-drug conjugates. All-grade and high-grade (grade ≥3) toxicities were examined. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 10â075 patients were included. Compared with control groups, antibody-drug conjugates were associated with a higher risk of all-grade fatigue (OR = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 1.45), anorexia (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.69), nausea (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97), and sensory neuropathy (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.76) as treatment-related symptoms. Patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates had a statistically significantly lower risk of all-grade febrile neutropenia (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.96). Conversely, they had a higher risk of thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.00 to 4.31), increased alanine aminotransferase (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.84 to 3.40), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 2.04 to 3.93). Subgroup analysis showed a similar toxicity profile when comparing the solid tumors with hematologic malignancy groups and the antibody-drug conjugate vs antibody-drug conjugate plus chemotherapy groups, except for some neurologic and hematologic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive profile of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugate-based treatment shows an increase in various types of all-grade treatment-related symptoms and adverse events, although no increase in high-grade adverse events was seen.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Immunoconjugates , Neoplasms , Humans , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence trends of minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan and investigate regional disparities. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort and ecological study using "The National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB) Open Data". SETTING: Nationwide Japan. PATIENTS: Individuals who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications from 2014 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Trend analysis of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) rates through laparoscopic hysterectomies (LH) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomies (RA-LH) at the national and prefecture levels. Examination of regional factors contributing to the disparity in MIS implementation rates by second medical service area (SMSA). RESULTS: The number of LH has increased from 16,016 in 2014 to 27,755 in 2020. The nationwide MIS hysterectomy rate increased from 29% in 2014 to 55% in 2020 (p less than 0.001). More than 50% of hysterectomies have been performed as MIS since 2019. There was an increasing trend in MIS rates in all age groups. All prefectures except one showed a significant upward trend (p less than 0.05) in the MIS rates, but MIS rates varied widely (23-84%). In a multivariable model, the MIS was more likely to be performed in the SMSAs in western Japan (p = 0.011), in the SMSAs where the number of laparoscopy-qualified gynecologists is 5-10 (p = 0.013), and 11 or higher (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a shift towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total hysterectomy procedures in Japan. However, significant disparities in the prevalence of MIS hysterectomy exist, potentially influenced by the number of laparoscopy-qualified gynecologists.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Databases, Factual , HysterectomyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We investigated quality of life (QOL) of patients who underwent total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases using two surgical approaches: robotic-transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (R-vNOTES) and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy (RALH). STUDY DESIGN: This single-center retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary academic setting and included 65 patients who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases. Total hysterectomy was performed using R-vNOTES or RALH by the same gynecologist between December 2021 and June 2022. The primary outcome was a comparison of QOL over time and complete QOL recovery (postoperative QOL score/preoperative QOL score ≥ 1) by postoperative day 28 (POD28) in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups. QOL was examined using EQ-5D-5L in this study. The secondary outcome was a comparison of the surgical outcomes in the R-vNOTES and RALH groups. RESULTS: Complete QOL recovery was achieved by 62.7% in the R-vNOTES group and 7.3% in the RALH group at POD7 (p <.001) and by 100% in the R-vNOTES group and 56.1ï¼ in the RALH group at POD28 (p <.001). In a multivariable model, patients who underwent R-vNOTES achieved higher complete QOL recovery at POD 28 [adjusted hazard ratio: 4.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.03-8.04]. There was no significant difference between the R-vNOTES and RALH groups in terms of operating time (p =.07), intraoperative blood loss (p =.35), uterus weight (p =.76), or postoperative complications (p =.71). CONCLUSION: The R-vNOTES approach for total hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases provided better complete QOL recovery by POD28 compared to the RALH approach. The surgical outcomes for R-vNOTES were equivalent to those for RALH, suggesting that R-vNOTES may provide a safe approach for robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Robotics , Uterine Diseases , Female , Humans , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Uterine Diseases/surgery , Vagina/surgeryABSTRACT
Importance: While changes in federal and state laws mandating coverage of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) may have led to an increase in the number of annual cases, comprehensive data describing trends in both inpatient and outpatient procedures are limited. Objective: To examine trends in inpatient and outpatient GAS procedures in the US and to explore the temporal trends in the types of GAS performed across age groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study includes data from 2016 to 2020 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and the National Inpatient Sample. Patients with diagnosis codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or a personal history of sex reassignment were identified, and the performance of GAS, including breast and chest procedures, genital reconstructive procedures, and other facial and cosmetic surgical procedures, were identified. Main Outcome Measures: Weighted estimates of the annual number of inpatient and outpatient procedures performed and the distribution of each class of procedure overall and by age were analyzed. Results: A total of 48â¯019 patients who underwent GAS were identified, including 25â¯099 (52.3%) who were aged 19 to 30 years. The most common procedures were breast and chest procedures, which occurred in 27â¯187 patients (56.6%), followed by genital reconstruction (16â¯872 [35.1%]) and other facial and cosmetic procedures (6669 [13.9%]). The absolute number of GAS procedures rose from 4552 in 2016 to a peak of 13â¯011 in 2019 and then declined slightly to 12â¯818 in 2020. Overall, 25â¯099 patients (52.3%) were aged 19 to 30 years, 10â¯476 (21.8%) were aged 31 to 40, and 3678 (7.7%) were aged12 to 18 years. When stratified by the type of procedure performed, breast and chest procedures made up a greater percentage of the surgical interventions in younger patients, while genital surgical procedures were greater in older patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Performance of GAS has increased substantially in the US. Breast and chest surgery was the most common group of procedures performed. The number of genital surgical procedures performed increased with increasing age.
Subject(s)
Gender Dysphoria , Sex Reassignment Surgery , Transsexualism , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , Gender Dysphoria/epidemiology , Gender Dysphoria/surgery , Inpatients , Transsexualism/epidemiology , Transsexualism/surgeryABSTRACT
Background: Cancer incidence is expected to increase with population aging, making the availability of places for treating patients with terminal cancer a pressing issue. However, little is known about the actual state of home end-of-life care (HEC) in Japan. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the real-world state of HEC for older adults with cancer. Methods: The Yokohama Original Medical Database was used to identify the cohort. Data of target patients was extracted based on three criteria: age ≥65 years, malignant neoplasm diagnosis, and having a specific billing code of HEC. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between age groups and HEC services or outcome indexes. Results: Overall, 1323 people (554 and 769 aged < 80 and ≥ 80 years, respectively; men, 59.2%) had planned to receive HEC. The < 80 years group had more frequent emergent home visits than the ≥ 80-year group (P < 0.001), but the number of monthly home visits was similar between the two groups (P = 0.267). The rate of emergent admission was 5.9% in the ≥ 80-year group, which was higher than that in the < 80-year group (3.1%; P = 0.018). Conversely, the rates of central venous nutrition and opioid use were higher in the < 80-year group than those in the ≥ 80-year group. Conclusions: This study reported patterns of use of HEC among older adults with cancer in the terminal stage. Our findings may provide the basis for providing HEC for older adults with cancer.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate trends in use and outcomes of progestin therapy for premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. METHODS: The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients aged 18-50 years with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from 2008 to 2020. Primary treatment was classified as hysterectomy or progestin-based therapy. Within the progestin group, treatment was classified as systemic therapy or progestin-releasing intrauterine device (IUD). The trends in use of progestins and the pattern of progestin use were examined. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to examine the association between baseline characteristics and the use of progestins. The cumulative incidence of hysterectomy, uterine cancer, and pregnancy since initiation of progestin therapy was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3,947 patients were identified. Hysterectomy was performed in 2,149 (54.4%); progestins were used in 1,798 (45.6%). Use of progestins increased from 44.2% in 2008 to 63.4% in 2020 ( P =.002). Among the progestin users, 1,530 (85.1%) were treated with systemic progestin, and 268 (14.9%) were treated with progestin-releasing IUD. Among progestin users, use of IUD increased from 7.7% in 2008 to 35.6% in 2020 ( P <.001). Hysterectomy was ultimately performed in 36.0% (95% CI 32.8-39.3%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 22.9% (95% CI 16.5-30.0%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD ( P <.001). Subsequent uterine cancer was documented in 10.5% (95% CI 7.6-13.8%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 8.2% (95% CI 3.1-16.6%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD ( P =.24). Venous thromboembolic complications occurred in 27 (1.5%) of those treated with progestins; the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate was similar for oral progestins and progestin-releasing IUD. CONCLUSION: The rate of conservative treatment with progestins in premenopausal individuals with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia has increased over time, and among progestin users, progestin-releasing IUD use is increasing. Progestin-releasing IUD use may be associated with a lower rate of hysterectomy and a similar rate of VTE compared with oral progestin therapy.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Hyperplasia , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Intrauterine Devices , Uterine Neoplasms , Venous Thromboembolism , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Progestins/therapeutic use , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Endometrial Hyperplasia/etiology , Uterine Neoplasms/etiology , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the utilization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) among newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients who experienced premature menopause due to primary treatment. METHODS: The MarketScan Databases were used to identify newly diagnosed cervical cancer patients <50 years of age with premature menopause after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (primary surgery) or primary external beam pelvic radiation (primary radiotherapy). We examined the cumulative utilization of HRT until 24 months after the loss of ovarian function. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were developed to examine the factors associated with cumulative HRT use. The duration of HRT use was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: A total of 1826 patients, including 352 (19.3%) who underwent primary surgery and 1474 (80.7%) who received primary radiotherapy, were identified. Overall, 39.0% of patients received HRT within 24 months of primary treatment. HRT was used in 49.4% of those who underwent primary surgery and in 36.6% of those who received primary radiotherapy (p<0.0001). The median duration of HRT use was 60 days among the entire cohort and was significantly shorter for the primary radiotherapy group than the primary surgery group (35 vs 90 days, p<0.0001). Primary radiotherapy, older age, residency in the Northeastern USA, and Black race were associated with a lower likelihood of HRT use. CONCLUSIONS: HRT was prescribed to less than half of patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer under the age of 50 who experienced premature menopause due to primary treatment. Among those who used HRT the duration of use was short.
Subject(s)
Menopause, Premature , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Hormone Replacement Therapy/adverse effects , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Prescriptions , MenopauseABSTRACT
Objectives: Despite the rapid aging of the population in Japan, clinical predictors for major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (MACCE) in patients with new onset of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have not been well studied. This study therefore aimed to identify the predictors of MACCE in the first onset of ACS patients requiring care. Materials and Methods: Using the Yokohama Original Medical Database, we identified 3,373 patients who experienced a first onset of ACS and had certified care information from April 2014 to March 2016. The incidence proportion of MACCE from June 2014 to March 2018 was retrospectively investigated. Each patient's independence of daily living (IDL) was classified as one of three categories (reference, mild and severe). Results: Predictors of MACCE were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Impaired IDL was associated with increased MACCE, with adjusted odds ratios for reference, mild and severe of 1.00, 1.35 (95% confidence intervals 1.14-1.60) and 2.12 (95% confidence intervals 1.61-2.80; P for trend < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: This study revealed that male sex, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, high-intensity statin use, low-intensity statin use, and lower IDL (representing less independence) were the predictors of MACCE requiring care for a first onset of ACS. Further research will be required to understand the results of interventions for the identified predictors of MACCE.
ABSTRACT
Suturing the retroperitoneum is a common technique in laparoscopic hysterectomy, which is reported to reduce vaginal cuff infection and organ evisceration in case vaginal cuff dehiscence occurs. However, physicians should take into account that it may cause internal hernia.
ABSTRACT
Importance: The risk and benefits of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy are under investigation. Pooled evidence regarding neonatal and maternal outcomes in association with COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is scarce. Objective: To evaluate the association between COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and peripartum outcomes. Data Sources: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched on April 5, 2022. Language restrictions were not applied. Study Selection: Prospective trials and observational studies comparing the individuals who received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy with those who did not and reporting the neonatal outcomes, including preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care units (NICU) admission, and intrauterine fetal death (IFD). Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two independent investigators extracted relevant data from each study. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the neonatal outcomes, including preterm birth, small for gestational age, low Apgar score, NICU admission, and IFD. The secondary outcomes were maternal outcomes, including maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and chorioamnionitis. Results: Nine observational studies involving 81â¯349 vaccinated (mean age, 32-35 years) and 255â¯346 unvaccinated individuals during pregnancy (mean age, 29.5-33 years) were included. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with lower risk of NICU admission (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97) and IFD (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.94), whereas there was no statistically significant association with preterm birth (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.04), small for gestational age (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04), and low Apgar score (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87-1.02). COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93), whereas it was not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.20), postpartum hemorrhage (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07), and chorioamnionitis (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.07). Conclusions and Relevance: COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increase in the risk of peripartum outcomes, was associated with a decreased risk of NICU admission, IFD, and maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thus, COVID-19 vaccination should be encouraged for pregnant individuals.
ABSTRACT
In 2013, the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) in Japan announced a suspension of the governmental recommendation for routine HPV vaccinations. In 2020, MHLW started individual notifications of HPV vaccine to the targeted girls. In April 2022, the governmental recommendation was restarted, and catch-up vaccinations started. We evaluated the benefits and limitations of the MHLW's new vaccination strategies by estimating the lifetime risk for cervical cancer for each birth FY under different scenarios to suggest a measure for the vaccine suspension generation. It was revealed that catch-up immunization coverage among the unvaccinated must reach as high as 90% in FY2022, when the program begins, in order to reduce the risk of the females already over the targeted ages to the same level or lower than that of women born in FY1994-1999 who had high HPV vaccination rates. For women whose vaccination coverage waned because of their birth FYs, strong recommendations for cervical cancer screening should be implemented.