Effectiveness of ChatGPT 4.0 in Telemedicine-Based Management of Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma.

The recent rise in telemedicine, notably during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlights the potential of integrating artificial intelligence tools in healthcare. This study assessed the effectiveness of ChatGPT versus medical oncologists in the telemedicine-based management of metastatic prostate cancer. In this retrospective study, 102 patients who met inclusion criteria were analyzed to compare the competencies of ChatGPT and oncologists in telemedicine consultations. ChatGPT's role in pre-charting and determining the need for in-person consultations was evaluated. The primary outcome was the concordance between ChatGPT and oncologists in treatment decisions. Results showed a moderate concordance (Cohen's Kappa = 0.43, p < 0.001). The number of diagnoses made by both parties was not significantly different (median number of diagnoses: 5 vs. 5, p = 0.12). In conclusion, ChatGPT exhibited moderate agreement with oncologists in management via telemedicine, indicating the need for further research to explore its healthcare applications.

Effectiveness of Second-Line Cabozantinib in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients After First-Line Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combinations.

Background: Cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a prevalent second-line (2 L) therapy and was approved for use after progression on TKIs. However, the 1 L treatment setting has changed since the approval of cabozantinib monotherapy in salvage therapy settings. Objective: To assess the differential effectiveness of cabozantinib after prior progression on 1 L ipilimumab with nivolumab (IPI + NIVO) compared to programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) or PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors (PD1/L1i) with TKIs. Methods: Utilizing a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, we included patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) who received 1 L treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination and 2 L treatment with cabozantinib monotherapy. These patients were categorized based on the type of 1 L ICI-based combination received: IPI + NIVO vs. PD1/L1i with TKI. Real-world time to next therapy (rwTTNT) and real-world overall survival (rwOS) were summarized using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox-proportional hazard models adjusted for International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Results: Among 12,285 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, 237 were eligible and included. Median rwTTNT was 8 months for the IPI + NIVO subgroup and 7.5 months for the PD1/L1i + TKI subgroup (HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.74-1.49, p = 0.8). Median rwOS was 17 months for IPI + NIVO and 16 months for PD1/L1i + TKI subgroup (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52-1.20, p = 0.3). Conclusions: Cabozantinib remains effective as a 2 L therapy for mccRCC independent of the type of prior 1 L ICI-based combination. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore the ideal sequencing of therapies.

Association of Tumor Mutational Burden and Microsatellite Instability With Response and Outcomes in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite Instability (MSI) and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) are associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy. We examined the association between TMB and MSI status with survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with ICI. METHODS: Patients from 15 institutions were treated with ICI monotherapy. Primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints included observed response rate (ORR), and progression-free (PFS) calculated from ICI initiation. TMB was analyzed as dichotomous (≥10 vs. <10 mut/Mb) and continuous variable. RESULTS: We identified 411 patients: 203 were treated with ICI 1L/upfront; 104 with 2 + L. For the 1L/upfront: median [m] OS was numerically longer in patients with TMB ≥10 versus TMB <10: mOS 35 versus 26 months (HR = 0.6) and with MSI-H and MSI-S (mOS NR vs. 22 months), though neither association was statistically significant. A statistically significant association was found between TMB (continuous variable) and OS (HR = 0.96, P = .01). For 2 + L: mOS was numerically longer in patients with TMB ≥10 versus TMB <10: (20 vs. 12 months; HR = 0.9); mOS was 12 and 17 months for patients with MSI-H and MSI-S, respectively. Eighty-nine patients received maintenance avelumab (mAV): mOS was longer in patients with TMB ≥10 versus TMB <10: 61 versus 17 months; (HR = 0.2, P = .02) and with MSI-H and MSI-S (NR vs. 24 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although not reaching statistical significance in several subsets, patients with high TMB and MSI-H had numerically longer OS with ICI, especially with mAV. Further validation is needed.

Effect of concomitant medications on treatment response and survival in non-metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: Exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial.

BACKGROUND: We performed an exploratory analysis of the SPARTAN trial to determine whether concomitant exposure to several classes of commonly prescribed medications influenced the effect of apalutamide on overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SPARTAN was a phase III randomized controlled trial in which nmCRPC patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive androgen deprivation therapy with or without apalutamide. We focused on 5 commonly prescribed classes of medications: metformin, statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) based on a plausible biological and clinical rationale. To determine the potential effect modification, we applied multivariable Cox regression models for OS and MFS separately with additional interaction terms. To determine the independent association of concomitant medications with OS and MFS, we used IPTW-based log-rank test. A 2-sided p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We did not find statistically significant differences in effect from apalutamide on OS across subgroups stratified by concomitant exposure to any of the medication classes. While there was some difference in the treatment effect from apalutamide on MFS between patients with concomitant statins (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.20; 95 % CI: 0.15-0.28) versus without concomitant statins (aHR: 0.31 [0.24-0.39]), this did not reach the pre-specified threshold of statistical significance (p = 0.011). On IPTW-based analysis, patients treated concomitantly with metformin (median: not reached versus 31 months; p = 0.002), or ACEI (median: 37 versus 29 months, p = 0.006) had significantly improved MFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this post-hoc exploratory analysis of SPARTAN, effects of apalutamide on MFS and OS were consistent across subgroups stratified by exposure to concomitant medications. Exposure to concomitant metformin and ACEI was independently associated with a significant improvement in MFS.

Clinical, Genomic, and Transcriptomic Characteristics of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Developed Thromboembolic Events.

Thromboembolic events (TE) are a common complication in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are associated with poorer clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of TE and clinical and genomic characteristics of patients with mRCC who develop this complication are poorly understood. Herein, we describe the incidence and clinical features of patients with mRCC with or without TE at our institution, and examine their association with the underlying genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of the tumor. This retrospective study included all consecutive cases of mRCC seen at our institution. A CLIA-certified lab performed tumor genomics and transcriptomics. Patients were classified based on the presence of a TE within the first year of diagnosis. Three hundred and seventy patients with mRCC were included in the study. TE was seen in 11% (42) of the patients. Patients with favorable International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk were less likely to develop a TE. In contrast, patients receiving combination treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor were more likely to develop a TE. No difference in overall survival among patients with or without TE was observed (52 vs. 55 months; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.5574-1.293, p = 0.24). The most upregulated pathways in mRCC with TEs versus those without were the xenobiotic metabolism and mTORC1 signaling pathways. Our findings suggest potential biomarkers that, after external validation, could be used to better select patients who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation.

Sacituzumab Govitecan Demonstrates Efficacy across Tumor Trop-2 Expression Levels in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Cancer.

PURPOSE: Human trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) is a protein highly expressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody drug conjugate with a hydrolysable linker and a potent SN-38 payload. This study explored Trop-2 expression in tumors treated with SG in cohorts 1 to 3 (C1-3) from the TROPHY-U-01 study and evaluated whether efficacy was associated with Trop-2 expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is an open-label phase II study that assessed the efficacy and safety of SG (alone or in combinations) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC (mUC). Archival tumor samples collected at enrollment for C1-3 were analyzed for Trop-2 membrane expression by considering histological scores (H-scores; scale 0-300) and the percentage of membrane positive tumor cells at low magnification (4×). The association of Trop-2 with clinical endpoints [objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)] was evaluated. RESULTS: In C1-3, tissue was collected from 158 (82%) of 192 treated patients, and 146 (76%) had evaluable Trop-2 data. Trop-2 was highly expressed in tumor samples. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] Trop-2 H-score was 215 (180-246), and the median (IQR) percentage of membrane positive tumor cells was 91% (80-98). Trop-2 expression at any level was observed in 98% of patients. Furthermore, ORR, PFS, and OS benefits were observed across all Trop-2 expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Trop-2 protein is highly expressed in UC, as confirmed by examining tumors from patients enrolled in the TROPHY-U-01 trial. The results indicate that SG demonstrates efficacy in mUC across Trop-2 expression levels.

Real-world prevalence of adverse events with first-line systemic therapies among patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The current guidelines for treating metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) recommend treatment intensification of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with the addition of an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI), with or without docetaxel. However, the adoption of these treatment options has been slow, leading to therapeutic inertia. This real-world study was conducted to investigate the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) among treated patients diagnosed with mCSPC in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective claim review estimated the occurrence of AEs among patients with mCSPC from January 2014 to June 2021 in the PharMetrics® Plus data set. The study focused on 10 common AEs (fatigue/asthenia, gastrointestinal [GI] AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, sexual function AEs, anemia, hypertension, pain, and edema) known to occur in ≥10% of patients and ≥2% more prevalent than those treated with ADT alone as selected from the US Food and Drug Administration prescribing information and published results from clinical trials. Proportions of patients experiencing these AEs at Day 90, 180, and then every 180 days until month 30 during the follow-up period were estimated using cumulative hazard plots. Results were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) across four treatment groups: ADT alone, ADT + nonsteroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) (bicalutamide, nilutamide, or flutamide), ADT + docetaxel, and ADT + ARPIs (abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide). ADT-alone cohort was the reference group for all comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 4145 patients were included (ADT alone: 2318, ADT + NSAA: 632, ADT + docetaxel: 471, ADT + ARPIs: 724). At baseline, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 64.3 (60.1-73.1) years; most common sites of metastasis were bone only (n = 1886, 45.5%) and node only (n = 1237, 29.8%); most used medications were pain medications (n = 2182, 52.6%) and corticosteroids (n = 1213, 29.3%). Median (IQR) duration of follow-up 10.2 (6.1-16.6) months in ADT alone, 6.7 (4.1-11.5) months in ADT + NSAA, 5.1 (4.3-5.9) months in ADT + docetaxel, and 11.0 (6.6-17.0) months in ADT + ARPI cohort. The reported AEs increased over time for all assessed AEs, across all treatment groups. Compared with ADT alone, no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with AEs was seen in the ADT + ARPI or ADT + NSAA cohorts at months 3 and 12; a significantly higher proportion of patients in the ADT + docetaxel cohort experienced 6 of the 10 assessed AEs at month 3 (fatigue/asthenia, GI AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, anemia). During the follow-up period, on IPTW analysis, compared with ADT alone, a significantly higher proportion of patients experienced AEs with seven AEs in the ADT + docetaxel group (fatigue/asthenia, GI AEs, skin/nail/hair AEs, immunodeficiency/thrombocytopenia, hot flash, anemia, edema; p < 0.001 for all seven), three AEs in the ADT + ARPI group (hot flash, p = 0.05; anemia, p = 0.01; edema, p = 0.019), and one AE in the ADT + NSAA group (anemia, p = 0.029). The proportion of patients with sexual function AE did not significantly differ between the treatment groups and ADT alone. CONCLUSION: Results of this large, real-world study demonstrated that all treatment groups experienced an increase in the rates of AEs over time, including ADT alone. Most AE rates with ADT + ARPIs were comparable with ADT + NSAA and not significantly different from ADT alone. ADT + docetaxel cohort was associated with significantly higher rates for all AEs over time except hypertension, sexual dysfunction, and pain. This study provides real-world evidence on AEs, beyond controlled clinical trials, and may assist healthcare providers to make better-informed decisions about disease management among patients with mCSPC.

Talazoparib for the treatment of prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Around 25% of patients with advanced prostate cancer harbor alterations in the homologous recombination/DNA damage repair (HRR) pathway. Inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in these patients leads to synthetic lethality, making PARP inhibitors (PARPi), including talazoparib, a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and potentially for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). AREAS COVERED: This article examines the mechanism of action, chemical properties, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical safety and efficacy data of different PARPis, including talazoparib in prostate cancer. It reviews the TALAPRO-1 and TALAPRO-2 clinical trials and the ongoing TALAPRO-3 trial. EXPERT OPINION: Despite recent therapeutic advancements, mCRPC remains a lethal disease. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are approved for patients with mCRPC and mHSPC, yet most patients first receive these agents in the castration-resistant setting. Real-world data indicate that around half of patients with mCRPC do not receive subsequent lines of therapy, underscoring the efficacy of upfront combination therapies. The combinations of ARPI plus PARPi are indicated for patients with mCRPC harboring HRR mutations, though identifying these patients is challenging due to limited genomic testing. Further research and improved access to genomic testing are essential to optimize treatment strategies.

Bone Pain and Survival Among Patients With Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the SWOG-1216 Trial.

Importance: The presence of bone pain is significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there are few data regarding bone pain and survival outcomes in the context of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (MHSPC). Objective: To compare survival outcomes among patients with MHSPC by presence or absence of baseline bone pain at diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc secondary analysis, conducted from September 1 to December 31, 2023, used patient-level data from SWOG-1216, a phase 3, prospective randomized clinical trial that enrolled patients with newly diagnosed MHSPC from 248 academic and community centers across the US from March 1, 2013, to July 15, 2017. All patients in the intention-to-treat population who had available bone pain status were eligible and included in this secondary analysis. Interventions: In the SWOG-1216 trial, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with orteronel, 300 mg orally twice daily (experimental group), or ADT with bicalutamide, 50 mg orally daily (control group), until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient withdrawal. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was the primary end point; progression-free survival (PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were secondary end points. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for both univariable and multivariable analyses adjusting for age, treatment type, Gleason score, disease volume, Zubrod performance status, and PSA level. Results: Of the 1279 male study participants, 301 (23.5%) had baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis and 896 (70.1%) did not. Bone pain status was unavailable in 82 patients (6.4%). The median age of the 1197 patients eligible and included in this secondary analysis was 67.6 years (IQR, 61.8-73.6 years). Compared with patients who did not experience bone pain, those with baseline bone pain were younger (median age, 66.0 [IQR, 60.1-73.4] years vs 68.2 [IQR, 62.4-73.7] years; P = .02) and had a higher incidence of high-volume disease (212 [70.4%] vs 373 [41.6%]; P < .001). After adjustment, bone pain was associated with shorter PFS and OS. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years (IQR, 2.5-5.4 years), patients with bone pain had median PFS of 1.3 years (95% CI, 1.1-1.7 years) vs 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.2 years) in patients without initial bone pain (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22-1.74; P < .001) and OS of 3.9 years (95% CI, 3.3-4.8 years) vs not reached (NR) (95% CI, 6.6 years to NR) in patients without initial bone pain (AHR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this post hoc secondary analysis of the SWOG-1216 randomized clinical trial, patients with baseline bone pain at MHSPC diagnosis had worse survival outcomes than those without bone pain. These data suggest prioritizing these patients for enrollment in clinical trials, may aid patient counseling, and indicate that the inclusion of bone pain in prognostic models of MHSPC may be warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01809691.

Treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the United States.

Aim: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) prolong metastasis-free survival and overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). This study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns, utilization and survival outcomes in patients with nmCRPC. Patients & methods: This retrospective cohort study used Optum database electronic health records of patients with nmCRPC from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2020 in the US. Results: Of 1955 patients, >80% received androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or ADT + first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) as first-line treatment, while only 8.24% received ADT + ARPI. ADT + ARPI remained underutilized even among those with high-risk nmCRPC. Further, ADT + NSAA had no survival benefit compared with ADT alone. Conclusion: Practice-improvement strategies are needed for treatment intensification with ARPIs for patients with nmCRPC.

Prostate cancer cells often use hormones called androgens to grow and survive. Hormone therapy is a treatment that lowers the amount of these hormones in the body to slow down the cancer's growth. It includes androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), which can either be used alone or along with nonsteroidal antiandrogens (NSAAs) or with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as prostate cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body but exhibits rising levels of serum prostate-specific antigen despite surgery or ADT to reduce androgens. Research shows that ARPIs can improve survival in patients with nmCRPC, but more data on its use are needed. This study looked at the electronic health records of patients with nmCRPC to review the treatment they had received and their survival. Between 2008 and 2020, most patients received ADT alone or with NSAA. Even though the number of patients receiving ADT with ARPI increased during this period, it remained underused, even in patients with a high risk of cancer spreading to other body parts. Post-2018, even after 2 years of these drugs being available, only about one in five patients received ADT with ARPI. Also, people who received ADT with NSAA did not have a longer survival than patients treated with ADT alone. The study indicates that ARPIs, which could improve survival of patients with nmCRPC, are not being utilized optimally. Strategies that promote early use of ARPIs are needed to improve survival of patients with nmCRPC.

Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Response by 6 Months Is Predictive of Treatment Effect in Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of TITAN Trial.

PURPOSE: Early PSA response has been found to be prognostic of outcomes in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. We performed a secondary analysis of the TITAN trial to determine if early PSA response was predictive of treatment efficacy in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Early PSA response was defined as achieving a PSA level of ≤ 0.2 ng/mL by 6 months of random assignment. A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed in a landmark population with an interaction term between the treatment and early PSA response to determine differential treatment effect on overall survival (OS). We applied multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model with time to early PSA response fitted with restricted cubic spline to determine the association of time to early PSA response with OS. RESULTS: Approximately 24% (124/524) of patients in the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone group and 61% (321/524) in the apalutamide group had PSA response ≤ 0.2 ng/mL by 6 months. Longer time to early PSA response was associated with significantly superior OS in the apalutamide group. There was a significant difference in treatment effect from apalutamide on OS (P = .03 for interaction) among 6-month PSA responders (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-1.00) vs nonresponders (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.89-1.46). This difference in treatment effect was not statistically significant at 3 months (P = .17 for interaction). Among 6-month PSA responders, 3-year confounder-adjusted OS was 84% (80%-88%) for the apalutamide group and 74% (66%-82%) for the ADT alone group. Among nonresponders, 3-year adjusted OS for the 2 treatment arms were 58% (52%-65%) and 56% (51%-60%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Early PSA response by 6 months was a predictor of treatment efficacy from ADT plus apalutamide on OS. Longer time to early PSA response was associated with superior OS in the apalutamide arm.

Outcomes Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced Cancers in Phase 1 Trials: A Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups (eg, Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients) have low representation in clinical trials, especially in phase 1 trials in cancer. These trials represent valuable options for patients with advanced cancer who experience disease progression with standard therapy. Objective: To determine whether the benefit of enrollment to phase 1 cancer trials extends to Asian, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic Black patients as much as it does for non-Hispanic White patients. Data Sources: Patient records at a single institution from January 1999 to December 2016 were reviewed. Treatment-related responses, toxic effects, and deaths were recorded. Study Selection: All phase 1 studies were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data underwent independent extraction by multiple observers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), assessed using univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses. Results: A total of 738 patients (median [range], 60 [22-93] years; 467 [63.3] female) including 197 Hispanic patients (26.7%), 238 non-Hispanic Black patients (32.2%), and 282 non-Hispanic White patients (38.2%), were enrolled in 64 phase 1 trials, including 33 cytotoxic trials (51.5%), 21 biologic trials (32.8%), and 10 combined therapy trials (15.6%). The primary cancer diagnoses were colorectal (187 patients [25.3%]), ovarian (141 patients [19.1%]), lung (58 patients [7.9%]), uterine (49 patients [6.6%]), and breast (41 patients [5.6%]). Patients underwent a median (range) of 3 (0-13) therapies prior to trial enrollment. Among 558 patients evaluated for response, the clinical benefit rate (ie, stable disease plus response rates) was 49.1%, and the overall response rate was 6.5%. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxic effects were observed in 27.8% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.3%) of patients and grade 3 or 4 hematological toxic effects were observed in 19.7% (95% CI, 17.0%-22.8%) of patients. The treatment-related mortality rate was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.9%). Median OS was 9.6 (95% CI, 8.2-11.0) months among Hispanic patients, 8.3 (95% CI, 6.7-10.4) months among non-Hispanic Black patients, and 9.8 (95% CI, 8.5-11.4) months among non-Hispanic White patients (P = .13). In a multivariable analysis, age older than 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or greater, more than 2 metastatic sites, lactate dehydrogenase grade 1 or 2, grade 2 or greater low albumin, grade 1 or greater total bilirubin, and grade 2 or greater anemia were associated with worse prognosis, whereas leukocytosis greater than grade 1 was associated with better OS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis assessing outcomes in phase 1 cancer trials among patients from racial and ethnic minority groups, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black patients had benefits similar to those of non-Hispanic White patients.

Trends and Disparities in Next-Generation Sequencing in Metastatic Prostate and Urothelial Cancers.

Importance: Targeted therapies based on underlying tumor genomic susceptible alterations have been approved for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) and advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). Objective: To assess trends and disparities in next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing among patients with mPC and aUC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used an electronic health record-derived database to extract deidentified data of patients receiving care from US physician practices, hospital-affiliated clinics, and academic practices. Patients diagnosed with mPC or aUC between March 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, were included. Exposures: Social determinants of health evaluated by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), region, insurance type, and sex (for aUC). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were (1) NGS testing rate by year of mPC and aUC diagnosis using Clopper-Pearson 2-sided 95% CIs and (2) time to NGS testing, which considered death as a competing risk. Cumulative incidence functions were estimated for time to NGS testing. Disparities in subdistributional incidence of NGS testing were assessed by race and ethnicity, SES, region, insurance type, and sex (for aUC) using the Fine-Gray modified Cox proportional hazards model, assuming different subdistribution baseline hazards by year of mPC and aUC diagnosis. Results: A total of 11 927 male patients with mPC (167 Asian [1.6%], 1236 Black [11.6%], 687 Hispanic or Latino [6.4%], 7037 White [66.0%], and 1535 other [14.4%] among 10 662 with known race and ethnicity) and 6490 patients with aUC (4765 male [73.4%]; 80 Asian [1.4%], 283 Black [4.8%], 257 Hispanic or Latino [4.4%], 4376 White [74.9%], and 845 other [14.5%] among 5841 with known race and ethnicity) were eligible and included. Both cohorts had a median age of 73 years (IQR, 66-80 years), and most underwent NGS testing before first-line treatment in the mPC cohort (1502 [43.0%]) and before second-line treatment in the aUC cohort (1067 [51.3%]). In the mPC cohort, the rates of NGS testing increased from 19.0% in 2015 to 27.1% in 2022, but Black patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84) and Hispanic or Latino patients (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82) were less likely to undergo NGS testing. Patients with mPC who had low SES (quintile 1: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.83]; quintile 2: HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.99]), had Medicaid (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.74) or Medicare or other government insurance (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98), or lived in the West (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94) also were less likely to undergo testing. In the aUC cohort, the NGS rate increased from 14.1% in 2015 to 46.6% in 2022, but Black patients (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61-0.96) and those with low SES (quintile 1: HR 0.77 [95% CI, 0.66-0.89]; quintile 2: HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-1.00]) or Medicaid (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97) or Medicare or other government insurance (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99) were less likely to undergo NGS testing. Patients with aUC living in the South were more likely to undergo testing (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.49). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that although NGS tumor testing rates improved over time, the majority of patients still did not undergo testing. These data may help with understanding current disparities associated with NGS testing and improving access to standard-of-care health care services.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes by Age in Metastatic Urinary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Tertiary Cancer Center Analysis.

Metastatic urinary tract cancer (mUTC) is challenging to treat in older adults due to comorbidities. We compared the clinical courses of younger and older (≥70 years) adults with mUTC receiving first-line (1L) systemic therapy in a tertiary cancer center. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatments received, tolerability, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Among 212 patients (103 older vs. 109 younger), the older patients had lower hemoglobin at baseline (84% vs. 71%, p = 0.03), the majority were cisplatin-ineligible (74% vs. 45%, p < 0.001), received more immunotherapy-based treatments in the 1L (52% vs. 36%, p = 0.01), received fewer subsequent lines of treatment (median 0 vs. 1, p = 0.003), and had lower clinical trial participation (30% vs. 18%, p = 0.05) compared to the younger patients. When treated with 1L chemotherapy, older patients required more dose adjustments (53.4% vs. 23%, p = 0.001) and received fewer cycles of chemotherapy (median 4 vs. 5, p= 0.01). Older patients had similar OS (11.2 months vs. 14 months, p = 0.06) and similar rates of treatment-related severe toxicity and healthcare visits, independent of the type of systemic treatment received, compared to younger patients. We conclude that select older adults with mUTC can be safely treated with immunotherapy and risk-adjusted regimens of chemotherapy with tangible survival benefits.

Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To guide use of multigene panels for germline genetic testing for patients with cancer. METHODS: An ASCO Expert Panel convened to develop recommendations on the basis of a systematic review of guidelines, consensus statements, and studies of germline and somatic genetic testing. RESULTS: Fifty-two guidelines and consensus statements met eligibility criteria for the primary search; 14 studies were identified for Clinical Question 4. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients should have a family history taken and recorded that includes details of cancers in first- and second-degree relatives and the patient's ethnicity. When more than one gene is relevant based on personal and/or family history, multigene panel testing should be offered. When considering what genes to include in the panel, the minimal panel should include the more strongly recommended genes from Table 1 and may include those less strongly recommended. A broader panel may be ordered when the potential benefits are clearly identified, and the potential harms from uncertain results should be mitigated. Patients who meet criteria for germline genetic testing should be offered germline testing regardless of results from tumor testing. Patients who would not normally be offered germline genetic testing based on personal and/or family history criteria but who have a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant identified by tumor testing in a gene listed in Table 2 under the outlined circumstances should be offered germline testing.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/molecular-testing-and-biomarkers-guidelines.

Differences in Tumor Gene Expression Profiles Between De Novo Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer and Metastatic Relapse After Prior Localized Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that patients with de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (dn-mCSPC) have worse prognosis and outcomes than those whose cancer relapses after prior local therapy (PLT-mCSPC). Our aim was to interrogate and validate underlying differences in tumor gene expression profiles between dn-mCSPC and PLT-mCSPC. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and the availability of RNA sequencing data for treatment-naïve primary prostate tissue. RNA sequencing was performed by Tempus or Caris Life Sciences, both of which have Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments certification. The Tempus cohort was used for interrogation, while the Caris cohort was used for validation. Differential gene expression analysis between the cohorts was conducted using the DEseq2 pipeline. The resulting gene expression profiles were further analyzed using Gene Set Enrichment software to identify pathways with enrichment in each cohort. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 128 patients were eligible, of whom 78 were in the Tempus cohort (dn-mCSPC 37, PLT-mCSPC 41) and 50 were in the Caris cohort (dn-mCSPC 30, PLT-mCSPC 20). Tumor tissues from patients with dn-mCSPC had higher expression of genes associated with inflammation pathways, while tissues from patients with PLT-mCSPC had higher expression of genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and androgen response pathways. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study revealed upregulation of distinct genomic pathways in dn-mCSPC in comparison to PLT-mCSPC. These hypothesis-generating data could guide personalized therapy for men with prostate cancer and explain different survival outcomes for dn-mCSPC and PLT-mCSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: We measured gene expression levels in tumors from patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. In patients with metastatic disease at first diagnosis, inflammatory pathways were upregulated. In patients whose metastasis occurred on relapse after treatment, androgen response pathways were upregulated. These findings could help in personalizing therapy for prostate cancer and explaining differences in survival.

Treatment Patterns and Attrition With Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US.

Importance: The treatment paradigm for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has undergone substantial transformation due to the introduction of effective, novel therapeutic agents. However, outcomes remain poor, and little is known about current treatment approaches and attrition rates for patients with aUC. Objectives: To delineate evolving treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with aUC using a US-based patient-level sample. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the nationwide deidentified electronic health record database Flatiron Health, originating from approximately 280 oncology clinics across the US. Patients included in the analysis received treatment for metastatic or local aUC at a participating site from January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2023. Patients receiving treatment for 2 or more different types of cancer or participating in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the (1) treatment received in each line (cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-based regimens, programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1] inhibitors, single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib, sacituzumab govitecan, or others) and (2) attrition of patients with each line of therapy, defined as the percentage of patients not progressing to the next line. Results: Of the 12 157 patients within the dataset, 7260 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (5364 [73.9%] men; median age at the start of first-line treatment, 73 [IQR, 66-80] years). All patients commenced first-line treatment; of these, only 2714 (37.4%) progressed to receive second-line treatment, and 857 (11.8%) advanced to third-line treatment. The primary regimens used as first-line treatment contained carboplatin (2241 [30.9%]), followed by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (2174 [29.9%]). The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors emerged as the predominant choice in the second- and third-line (1412 of 2714 [52.0%] and 258 of 857 [30.1%], respectively) treatments. From 2019 onward, novel therapeutic agents were increasingly used in second- and third-line treatments, including enfortumab vedotin (219 of 2714 [8.1%] and 159 of 857 [18.6%], respectively), erdafitinib (39 of 2714 [1.4%] and 28 of 857 [3.3%], respectively), and sacituzumab govitecan (14 of 2714 [0.5%] and 34 of 857 [4.0%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that approximately two-thirds of patients with aUC did not receive second-line treatment. Most first-line treatments do not include cisplatin-based regimens and instead incorporate carboplatin- or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data warrant the provision of more effective and tolerable first-line treatments for patients with aUC.

Differential Tumor Gene Expression Profiling of Patients With Prostate Adenocarcinoma on the Basis of BMI.

PURPOSE: An increased BMI is linked to increased prostate adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Baseline tumor gene expression profiling (GEP) can provide a comprehensive picture of the biological processes related to treatment response and disease progression. We interrogate and validate the underlying differences in tumor GEP on the basis of BMI in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The inclusion criteria consisted of histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and the availability of RNA sequencing data obtained from treatment-naïve primary prostate tissue. RNA sequencing was performed by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratory (Tempus or Caris Life Sciences). The Tempus cohort was used for interrogation and the Caris cohort for validation. Patients were stratified on the basis of BMI at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis: BMI-high (BMIH; BMI ≥30) and BMI-low (BMIL; BMI <30). Differential gene expression analysis between the two cohorts was conducted using the DEseq2 pipeline. The resulting GEPs were further analyzed using Gene Set Enrichment software to identify pathways that exhibited enrichment in each cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were eligible, with 60 patients in the Tempus cohort (BMIL = 38, BMIH = 22) and 42 patients in the Caris cohort (BMIL = 24, BMIH = 18). Tumor tissues obtained from patients in the BMIL group exhibited higher expression of genes associated with inflammation pathways. BMIH displayed increased expression of genes involved in pathways such as heme metabolism and androgen response. CONCLUSION: Our study shows the upregulation of distinct genomic pathways in BMIL compared with BMIH patients with prostate cancer. These hypothesis-generating data could explain different survival outcomes in both groups and guide personalized therapy for men with prostate cancer.

Cabozantinib with immune checkpoint inhibitor versus cabozantinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma progressing after prior immune checkpoint inhibitor.

INTRODUCTION: Rechallenge with antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 or its ligand (PD-1/L1) after discontinuation or disease progression in solid tumors following a prior PD-1/L1 treatment is often practiced in clinic. This study aimed to investigate if adding PD-1/L1 inhibitors to cabozantinib, the most used second-line treatment in real-world patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC), offers additional benefits. METHODS: Using de-identified patient-level data from a large real-world US-based database, patients diagnosed with mccRCC, who received any PD-1/L1-based combination in first-line (1L) setting, followed by second-line (2L) therapy with either cabozantinib alone or in combination with PD-1/L1 inhibitors were included. Patients given a cabozantinib-containing regimen in 1L were excluded. The study end points were real-world time to next therapy (rwTTNT) and real-world overall survival (rwOS) by 2L. RESULTS: Of 12,285 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the data set, 348 patients met eligibility and were included in the analysis. After propensity score matching weighting, cabozantinib with PD-1/L1 inhibitors versus cabozantinib (ref.) had similar rwTTNT and rwOS in the 2L setting. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for rwTTNT and rwOS are 0.74 (95% CI, 0.49-1.12) and 1.15 (95% CI, 0.73-1.79), respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study, the results align with the phase 3 CONTACT-03 trial results, which showed no additional benefit of adding PD-L1 inhibitor to cabozantinib compared to cabozantinib alone in 2L following PD-1/L1-based therapies in 1L. These results from real-world patients strengthen the evidence regarding the futility of rechallenge with PD-1/L1 inhibitors.