Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
2.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 18(1): 25-32, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31951772

ABSTRACT

Introduction: There are numerous shared risk factors in the etiopathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) and cancer both at epidemiologic and molecular level. Additionally, different modalities of treatment of cancer such as radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and hormonal therapies further increase the risk of CAD and acute coronary syndrome. Most large database analysis and single-center experiences have shown that cancer patients undergoing PCI are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, bleeding, repeat revascularization.Areas covered: In this review article the authors discuss the associations between CAD and cancer, challenges for PCI in cancer patients and outcome data.Expert opinion: Interventionists performing PCI on cancer patients should be cognizant of the heightened risk of bleeding, thrombosis, possible need for interruption of dual-antiplatelet therapy, and the increased risk of target lesion revascularization in this cohort. These risks may be partially mitigated by utilization of best practices such as the use of radial artery access, intravascular imaging for lesion assessment and stent optimization and avoidance of complex stenting strategies. Finally, it is of paramount importance to have a multidisciplinary approach consisting of the treating cardiologist, medical and/or surgical oncologist, and palliative medicine, and involve the patient and their family in making informed decisions.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Stents , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 56(1): e1-54, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17190617

ABSTRACT

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include interferons, intravenous immunoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab, alefacept, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of these medications. However, numerous off-label uses have evolved. As part 1 of a 2-part series, this article will review the literature regarding the off-label uses of the interferons and intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.


Subject(s)
Immunization, Passive , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Interferons/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Drug Approval , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Infectious/drug therapy , Skin Diseases, Infectious/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL