Normal birth rates before and after the merging of mixed-risk and low-risk maternity wards in Iceland: A retrospective cohort study on the impact of inter-professional preventative measures.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the National University Hospital of Iceland (NUHI) merged a mixed-risk birth unit and a midwifery-led low-risk unit into one mixed-risk unit. Interprofessional preventative and mitigating measures were implemented since there was a known threat of cultural contamination between mixed-risk and low-risk birth environments. The aim of the study was to assess whether the NUHI's goal of protecting the rates of birth without intervention had been achieved and to support further development of labor services. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women who had singleton births at NUHI birth units in two 2-year periods, 2012-2013 and 2015-2016. The primary outcome variables, birth without intervention, with or without artificial rupture of membranes (AROM), were adjusted for confounding variables using logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcome variables (individual interventions and maternal and neonatal complications) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t test, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: The rate of births without interventions, both with and without AROM, increased significantly after the unit merger and accompanying preventative measures. The rates of AROM, oxytocin augmentation, episiotomies, and epidural analgesia decreased significantly. The rate of induction increased significantly. There were no significant differences in maternal or neonatal complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Interprofessional preventative measures, implemented alongside a mixed-risk and low-risk birth unit merger, can increase rates of births without interventions in a mixed-risk hospital setting. However, it is necessary to maintain awareness of the possible effects of a mixed-risk birth environment on the use of childbirth interventions and examine the long-term effects of preventative measures.

Gaining insight from future mothers: A survey of attitudes and perspectives of childbirth.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participant characteristics and/or birth preferences of future mothers are associated with a fear of birth. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was used to determine if fear of birth could be profiled in specific participant characteristics and birth choices. SETTING: Urban New Zealand university. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of women (final n = 339) who were < 40 years old, attending university, not pregnant nor had been pregnant but wished for at least one child in the future. FINDINGS: Multivariable analysis identified a subset of four variables that were independently associated with the instrument Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy (CFPP) measuring fear of birth (mean CFPP=38.0, SE=10.1). Preferences of birth by caesarean section (n=32, mean CFPP=44.3, SE=1.8, p < 0.0001), use of epidural analgesia (n=255, mean CFPP=45.0, SE=1.1, p < 0.0001), participants born outside of New Zealand (n=123, mean CFPP=42.9, SE=1.4, p < 0.0001), and participants who scored > 20 ('severe') for depression on DASS-21 scale (n=11, mean CFPP=44.8, SE=1.7, p < 0.0001) were all positively associated with CFPP. Post-hoc analyses revealed that mean CFPP was higher for those that perceived birth technologies as easier, safer, necessary, and required. CONCLUSIONS: Women born outside of New Zealand and/or suffering 'severe' depression were more likely to have a fear of birth. Fear of birth was associated with the participants choices towards medicalised childbirth. Familiarising women with the provision of maternity care in New Zealand and identifying mental health status early could reduce fear of birth and possibly support the vaginal birth intentions of future parents.

Changes in obstetric interventions and preterm birth during COVID-19: A nationwide study from Iceland.

INTRODUCTION: Previous evidence has been conflicting regarding the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic lockdowns on obstetric intervention and preterm birth rates. The literature to date suggests potentially differential underlying mechanisms based on country economic setting. We aimed to study these outcomes in an Icelandic population where uniform lockdown measures were implemented across the country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included all singleton births (n = 20 680) during 2016-2020 identified from the population-based Icelandic Medical Birth Register. We defined two lockdown periods during March-May and October-December in 2020 according to government implemented nationwide lockdown. We compared monthly rates of cesarean section, induction of labor and preterm birth during lockdown with the same time periods in the 4 previous years (2016-2019) using logit binomial regression adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: Our results indicated a reduction in the overall cesarean section rate, which was mainly evident for elective cesarean section, both during the first (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and second (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99) lockdown periods, and not for emergency cesarean section. No change during lockdown was observed in induction of labor. Our results also suggested a reduction in the overall preterm birth rate during the first lockdown (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.97) and in the months immediately following the lockdown (June-September) (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.89). The reduction during the first lockdown was mainly evident for medically indicated preterm birth (although not statistically significant) and the reduction during June-September was mainly evident for spontaneous preterm birth. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested a reduction in elective cesarean section during COVID-19 lockdown, possibly reflecting changes in prioritization of non-urgent health care during lockdown. We also found a reduction in overall preterm birth during the first lockdown and spontaneous preterm birth following the first lockdown, but further research is needed to shed light on the underlying mechanisms for these findings.

Enhanced Antenatal Care: Combining one-to-one and group Antenatal Care models to increase childbirth education and address childbirth fear.

BACKGROUND: We designed and implemented a new model of care, Enhanced Antenatal Care (EAC), which offers a combined approach to midwifery-led care with six one-to-one visits and four group sessions. AIM: To assess EAC in terms of women's satisfaction with care, autonomy in decision-making, and its effectiveness in lowering childbirth fear. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental controlled trial comparing 32 nulliparous women who received EAC (n=32) and usual antenatal care (n=60). We compared women's satisfaction with care and autonomy in decision-making post-intervention using chi-square test. We administered a Fear of Birth Scale pre- and post-intervention and assessed change in fear of birth in each group using the Cohen's d for effect size. To isolate the effect of EAC, we then restricted this analysis to women who did not attend classes alongside maternal care (n=13 in EAC and n=13 in usual care). FINDINGS: Women's satisfaction with care in terms of monitoring their and their baby's health was similar in both groups. Women receiving EAC were more likely than those in usual care to report having received enough information about the postpartum period (75% vs 30%) and parenting (91% vs 55%). Overall, EAC was more effective than usual care in reducing fear of birth (Cohen's d=-0.21), especially among women not attending classes alongside antenatal care (Cohen's d=-0.83). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to report findings on EAC and suggests that this novel model may be beneficial in terms of providing education and support, as well as lowering childbirth fear.

Measuring the Effectiveness of a Midwife-led Education Programme in Terms of Breastfeeding Knowledge and Self-efficacy, Attitudes Towards Breastfeeding, and Perceived Barriers of Breastfeeding Among Pregnant Women.

INTRODUCTION: Exclusive breastfeeding is the optimal mode of feeding for the first six months of a child's life. Modifiable factors associated with increased breastfeeding, may be addressed through antenatal breastfeeding education. In Greece, the rates of exclusive breastfeeding remain rather low. AIM: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured in-hospital midwife-led antenatal breastfeeding educational programme on breastfeeding knowledge and self-efficacy, attitudes towards breastfeeding and perceived-barriers of breastfeeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental study with two study groups: an intervention group (following a four-hour midwife-led antenatal breastfeeding programme) and a control group. All nulliparous women attending antenatal care at the tertiary hospital in Athens, Greece during May 2016-January 2017 were invited to participate, of which 203 nulliparous pregnant women took part. Demographic data forms, the Breastfeeding Self-efficacy Scale, the Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale, the Breast Feeding Knowledge Questionnaire and the Perceived Breast Feeding Barriers Questionnaire were used for data collection. RESULTS: Post-intervention, women in the intervention group had a more positive attitude towards breastfeeding (73.5% versus 66.1%, p<0.001), greater knowledge (14.6% versus 13.1%, p<0.001) and more breastfeeding self-efficacy (51.4% versus 45.6%, p<0.001) compared to the control group. Furthermore, they had significantly less perceived barriers regarding breastfeeding (27.4% versus 31.0%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The four-hour antenatal breastfeeding education intervention which occurred and was evaluated for the first time in the Greek female population was effective in increasing breastfeeding knowledge, self-efficacy and a positive attitude towards breastfeeding. The intervention was furthermore effective in lowering perceived breastfeeding barriers. This midwife-led antenatal breastfeeding education programme could be suitable for integration to routine antenatal care in health care services in Greece.

A systematic review of nonpharmacological prenatal interventions for pregnancy-specific anxiety and fear of childbirth.

BACKGROUND: Despite a sharp increase in the number of publications that report on treatment options for pregnancy-specific anxiety and fear of childbirth (PSA/FoB), no systematic review of nonpharmacological prenatal interventions for PSA/FoB has been published. Our team addressed this gap, as an important first step in developing guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of women with PSA/FoB. METHODS: Two databases (PubMed and Mendeley) were searched, using a combination of 42 search terms. After removing duplicates, two authors independently assessed 208 abstracts. Sixteen studies met eligibility criteria, ie, the article reported on an intervention, educational component, or treatment regime for PSA/FoB during pregnancy, and included a control group. Independent quality assessments resulted in the retention of seven studies. RESULTS: Six of seven included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one a quasi-experimental study. Five studies received moderate quality ratings and two strong ratings. Five of seven studies reported significant changes in PSA/FoB, as a result of the intervention. Short individual psychotherapeutic interventions (1.5-5 hours) delivered by midwives or obstetricians were effective for women with elevated childbirth fear. Interventions that were effective for pregnant women with a range of different fear/anxiety levels were childbirth education at the hospital (2 hours), prenatal Hatha yoga (8 weeks), and an 8-week prenatal education course (16 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review can inform the development of treatment approaches to support pregnant women with PSA/FoB.

Opting for natural birth: A survey of birth intentions among young Icelandic women.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyse factors associated with natural birth intentions in a sample of pre-pregnant Icelandic women. METHODS: An internationally validated tool was used to survey pre-pregnant women about their attitudes towards birth. The online survey was sent to all students at the University of Iceland in November 2014. Log binomial regression was used to calculate crude and adjusted relative risks (RRa), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), for intentions of natural birth (defined as vaginal birth without epidural analgesia) by high, moderate and low childbirth fear and by high, moderate and low confidence in birth knowledge. Models were adjusted for socio-demographic and psychological factors. RESULTS: 410 eligible women completed the cross-sectional survey. Women with low fear of birth were more likely to have natural birth intentions when compared to women with moderate (RRa = 2.83; 95% CI; 1.48-5.41) and high (RRa = 4.86; 95% CI; 1.37-17.27) fear. Women with high confidence in their birth knowledge were more likely to have natural birth intentions compared to women with moderate (RRa = 2.81; 95% CI; 1.51-5.22) and low (RRa = 3.42; 95% CI; 1.43-8.18) confidence in their birth knowledge. CONCLUSION: Pre-pregnant women with low fear of birth and high confidence in their birth knowledge are more likely to have natural birth intentions. Addressing concerns about pain, safety, the perceived unpredictability of birth and worries about the physical impact of childbirth may strengthen natural birth intentions.