Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 7(2)2021 02 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33540400

ABSTRACT

Prompt gamma detection during proton radiotherapy for range verification purposes will need to operate in both active and passive treatment beam environments. This paper describes prompt gamma measurements using a high resolution 2″ × 2″ LaBr3detector for a 200 MeV clinical passive-scatter proton beam. These measurements examine the most likely discrete prompt gamma rays emitted from tissue by detecting gammas produced in water, Perspex, carbon and liquid-nitrogen targets. Measurements were carried out at several positions around the depth corresponding to the location of the Bragg peak for water and Perspex targets in order to investigate prompt gamma emission as a function of depth along the beam path. This work also focused on validating the Geant4 Monte Carlo model of the passive-scatter proton beam line and LaBr3detector by making a direct comparison between the simulated and experimental results. The initial prompt gamma measurements were overwhelmed by the high amount of scattered radiation when measuring at isocenter, shifting the target further downstream from the final collimator significantly reduced the background radiation. Prompt gamma peaks were then clearly identified for the water, Perspex and graphite targets. The developed Geant4 Monte Carlo model was able to replicate the measured prompt gamma ray energy spectra, including production for important photopeaks to within 10%, except for the 4.44 MeV peak from the water target, which had more than a 50% overestimation of the number of produced prompt gamma rays. The prompt gamma measurements at various depths correlated well with the proton dose deposition; the 4.44 and 6.13 MeV photopeak profiles peaked within 1 cm of the Bragg peak and the R50%value for the 3-7 MeV energy range predicted the proton range within 8 mm.


Subject(s)
Proton Therapy , Gamma Rays , Phantoms, Imaging , Polymethyl Methacrylate , Protons , Water
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 64(8): 085005, 2019 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30650402

ABSTRACT

A new methodology for assessing linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy beams using thermoluminescent detectors is presented. The method is based on the different LET response of two different lithium fluoride thermoluminescent detectors (LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P) for measuring charged particles. The relative efficiency of the two detector types was predicted using the recently developed Microdosimetric d(z) Model in combination with the Monte Carlo code PHITS. Afterwards, the calculated ratio of the expected response of the two detector types was correlated with the fluence- and dose- mean values of the unrestricted proton LET. Using the obtained proton dose mean LET as input, the RBE was assessed using a phenomenological biophysical model of cell survival. The aforementioned methodology was benchmarked by exposing the detectors at different depths within the spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) of a clinical proton beam at iThemba LABS. The assessed LET values were found to be in good agreement with the results of radiation transport computer simulations performed using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4. Furthermore, the estimated RBE values were compared with the RBE values experimentally determined by performing colony survival measurements with Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells during the same experimental run. A very good agreement was found between the results of the proposed methodology and the results of the in vitro study.


Subject(s)
Linear Energy Transfer , Proton Therapy/instrumentation , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Animals , CHO Cells , Cell Survival , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Proton Therapy/methods
3.
Phys Med ; 55: 149-154, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30420271

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Proton CT is widely recognised as a beneficial alternative to conventional X-ray CT for treatment planning in proton beam radiotherapy. A novel proton CT imaging system, based entirely on solid-state detector technology, is presented. Compared to conventional scintillator-based calorimeters, positional sensitive detectors allow for multiple protons to be tracked per read out cycle, leading to a potential reduction in proton CT scan time. Design and characterisation of its components are discussed. An early proton CT image obtained with a fully solid-state imaging system is shown and accuracy (as defined in Section IV) in Relative Stopping Power to water (RSP) quantified. METHOD: A solid-state imaging system for proton CT, based on silicon strip detectors, has been developed by the PRaVDA collaboration. The system comprises a tracking system that infers individual proton trajectories through an imaging phantom, and a Range Telescope (RT) which records the corresponding residual energy (range) for each proton. A back-projection-then-filtering algorithm is used for CT reconstruction of an experimentally acquired proton CT scan. RESULTS: An initial experimental result for proton CT imaging with a fully solid-state system is shown for an imaging phantom, namely a 75 mm diameter PMMA sphere containing tissue substitute inserts, imaged with a passively-scattered 125 MeV beam. Accuracy in RSP is measured to be ⩽1.6% for all the inserts shown. CONCLUSIONS: A fully solid-state imaging system for proton CT has been shown capable of imaging a phantom with protons and successfully improving RSP accuracy. These promising results, together with system the capability to cope with high proton fluences (2×108 protons/s), suggests that this research platform could improve current standards in treatment planning for proton beam radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Protons , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Monte Carlo Method
4.
Phys Med Biol ; 47(17): 3055-71, 2002 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12361210

ABSTRACT

In recent codes of practice for reference dosimetry in clinical proton beams using ionization chambers, it is recommended to perform the measurement in a water phantom. However, in situations where the positioning accuracy is very critical, it could be more convenient to perform the measurement in a plastic phantom. In proton beams, a similar approach as in electron beams could be applied by introducing fluence correction factors in order to account for the differences in particle fluence distributions at equivalent depths in plastic and water. In this work, fluence correction factors as a function of depth were determined for proton beams with different energies using the Monte Carlo code PTRAN for PMMA and polystyrene with reference to water. The influence of non-elastic nuclear interaction cross sections was investigated. It was found that differences in proton fluence distributions are almost entirely due to differences in non-elastic nuclear interaction cross sections between the plastic materials and water. For proton beams with energies lower than 100 MeV, for which the contributions from non-elastic interactions become small compared to the total dose, the fluence corrections are smaller than 1%. For beams with energies above 200 MeV, depending on the cross sections dataset for non-elastic nuclear interactions, fluence corrections of 2-5% were found at the largest depths. The results could, with an acceptable accuracy, be represented as a correction per cm penetration of the beam, yielding values between 0.06% and 0.15% per cm for PMMA and 0.06% to 0.20% per cm for polystyrene. Experimental information on these correction factors was obtained from depth dose measurements in PMMA and water. The experiments were performed in 75 MeV and 191 MeV non-modulated and range-modulated proton beams. From the experiments, values ranging from 0.03% to 0.15% per cm were obtained. A decisive answer about which dataset for non-elastic nuclear interactions would result in a better representation of the measurements could not be given. We conclude that below 100 MeV, dosimetry could be performed in plastic phantoms without a dramatic loss of accuracy. On the other hand, in clinical high-energy proton beams, where accurate positioning in water is in general not an issue, substantial correction factors would be required for converting dose measurements in a plastic phantom to absorbed dose to water. It is therefore not advisable to perform absorbed dose measurements nor to measure depth dose distributions in a plastic phantom in high-energy proton beams.


Subject(s)
Polymethyl Methacrylate , Polystyrenes , Protons , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/instrumentation , Calibration , Computer Simulation , Cyclotrons , Models, Theoretical , Monte Carlo Method , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Plastics , Quality Control , Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/standards , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...