ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation has shown promise, adoption has been limited by the technical expertise required, unclear antiarrhythmic mechanism, and complication risk. Delayed pericardial effusions have been associated with ethanol infusion into the VOM in prior studies. Very little is known about how the procedural approach itself can impact the risk of delayed effusions. We sought to understand the incidence and influence of procedural technique on complications including delayed pericardial effusions from VOM ethanol infusion at a large single medical center. METHODS: A total of 275 atrial ablation cases wherein VOM ethanol infusion was attempted were identified from the time of the program's inception in 2019 at Maine Medical Center (Portland, ME) until October of 2023. Cases were classified into phase I cases (early experience) and phase II cases (later experience) based upon temporal programmatic changes in the ethanol dose and infusion rate as well as the use of routine VOM venography. Procedural details and complications were adjudicated from the medical record. RESULTS: The overall VOM ethanol infusion success was 91.4%. Nine complications (3.3%) occurred in eight patients (2.9% of patients). These were more frequent in phase I (5.8%) compared to phase II (1.3%, p = 0.047). This difference was driven by a difference in delayed presentations of tamponade, which occurred in four patients in phase I (3.3%) and in no patients in phase II (0%, p = 0.037). Twelve-month estimated atrial arrhythmia freedom did not differ between groups (73.8% phase I vs 70.4% phase II, p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: In our single-center experience, adjustments to the procedural approach with lower ethanol infusion rate and dosage, combined with utilizing selective VOM venography, associated with a lowering of complication rates and in particular, delayed pericardial tamponade.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The marginal benefit of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (VOM) as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation ablation has shown promise in a single randomized study and case series from very experienced centers. However, adoption has not been widespread and the impact on real-world outcomes outside of leading centers is not established. The objective in this study is to understand the learning curve, and explore procedural outcomes and safety with VOM ethanol infusion from a large single medical center. METHODS: One hundred twenty nine atrial ablation cases wherein VOM ethanol infusion was attempted were identified from the time of the program's inception in 2019 at Maine Medical Center (Portland, ME). Our technical approach, procedural success, and complications were adjudicated from the medical record. RESULTS: The overall VOM ethanol infusion success was 90%. Infusion success rates improved and fluoroscopy utilization decreased with experience. Arrhythmia recurrence was 14% after a mean follow-up of 9.5 months. Complications occurred in 5.4% of patients, including a 3.1% risk of delayed tamponade. CONCLUSION: In our single center experience, VOM ethanol infusion was feasible with a high technical success rate. These positive results are balanced against a concerning rate of delayed tamponade.