Full adherence to cirrhosis quality indicators is associated with lower mortality in acute variceal bleeding: Nationwide audit.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a major complication in patients with cirrhosis. Using a nationwide AVB audit, we performed a nested cohort study to determine whether full adherence to the AVB quality indicator (QI) improves clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and AVB. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We assessed real-world adherence to AVB QI among patients with cirrhosis admitted for AVB in all public hospitals in Singapore between January 2015 and December 2020. Full adherence was considered when all 5 QIs were fulfilled: prophylactic antibiotics, vasoactive agents, timely endoscopy, endoscopic hemostasis during index endoscopy, and nonselective beta-blockers after AVB. We compare 6-week mortality between the full adherence and suboptimal adherence groups using a propensity-matched cohort.A total of 989 patients with AVB were included. Full adherence to all AVB QI was suboptimal (56.5%). Analysis of the propensity-matched cohort with comparable baseline characteristics showed that full adherence was associated with a lower risk of early infection (20.0% vs. 26.9%), early rebleeding (5.2% vs. 10.2%), and mortality at 6 weeks (8.2% vs. 19.7%) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 35.4%) ( p <0.05 for all). While full adherence was associated with a lower 6-week mortality regardless of the MELD score, nonadherence was associated with a higher 6-week mortality despite a lower predicted risk of 6-week mortality. Despite high adherence to the recommended process measures, patients with CTP-C remain at a higher risk of rebleeding, 6-week and 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Full adherence to the AVB QI should be the target for quality improvement in patients with cirrhosis.

Associations of non-invasive indices of liver steatosis and fibrosis with progressive kidney impairment in adults with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Longitudinal data linking non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to kidney dysfunction in type 2 diabetes (T2D) are limited. This study evaluated the associations of non-invasive indices of liver steatosis and liver fibrosis with kidney impairment, and the mediatory role of the pro-angiogenic factor leucine-rich α-2 glycoprotein 1 (LRG1). METHODS: T2D adults (n = 2057) were followed for a mean period of 6.1 ± 1.6 years. Baseline liver steatosis [(hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and Zhejiang University index (ZJU)] and liver fibrosis [aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase ratio (AAR) and BARD] indices derived from composite scoring systems were calculated. Plasma LRG1 levels were quantified using immunoassay. The study outcomes were progressive kidney function decline defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of ≥ 40% and albuminuria progression defined as an increase in albuminuria category. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, liver steatosis and liver fibrosis indices were associated with increased albuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine ratio ≥ 30 µg/mg) and reduced renal function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) after covariate adjustment, respectively. Approximately 32% of the participants experienced progressive kidney function decline, while 38% had albuminuria worsening over time. Longitudinal analysis revealed that baseline AAR (hazard ratio: 1.56; 95% CI 1.15-2.11) and BARD (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI 1.04-1.28) predicted progressive kidney function decline, partly mediated by LRG1. In contrast, liver steatosis (HSI and ZJU) but not liver fibrosis (AAR and BARD) indices were independently associated with albuminuria progression. CONCLUSIONS: Increased liver steatosis scores were associated with albuminuria deterioration. Conversely, liver fibrosis indices may be associated with progressive kidney function decline, potentially driven by increased inflammation and angiogenesis.

Is there such a thing as protocol immunosuppression in liver transplantation?

Protocol immunosuppression in liver transplantation is largely an outdated concept. Immunosuppression is now personalized to the individual patient on the basis of several factors including underlying etiology of original liver disease (e.g., HCV, hepatocellular carcinoma), renal function, metabolic co-morbidities and the patient's immunological state. These include omission of corticosteroids in HCV infection and those with major metabolic risk factors, the minimization of calcineurin inhibitors in the presence of renal dysfunction and the use of mTOR inhibitors in patients with malignancy. The basis for such decision-making is discussed in this editorial.

Current options for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

The diagnostic options for chronic pancreatitis have evolved over recent years. The previous gold standard references for structural imaging and exocrine pancreatic function testing have both been supplanted and redesigned. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography has now been overtaken by endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, whilst the old technique for Dreiling tube pancreatic function testing has now been replaced by the endoscopic pancreatic function test. New advances in endoscopic ultrasound elastography have also extended the options for evaluating pancreatic masses to differentiate mass-forming chronic pancreatitis from malignancy. Genetic contribution to chronic pancreatitis is also now more widely recognized than ever before.