Biodegradable airway stents in infants - Potential life-threatening pitfalls.

OBJECTIVE: The solution of severe tracheobronchial obstructions in early childhood means a great challenge. Biodegradable stents were intended to be a minimally invasive temporary solution which may decrease the number of interventions and limit the possible complications of stenting procedures. However, our first experiences have brought out a new, - especially in childhood - potentially life-threatening complication of this concept. METHODS: Five SX-ELLA biodegradable polydioxanone stents was applied in three patients because of severe tracheobronchial obstruction: congenital tracheomalacia (7 day-old), acquired tracheomalacia (10 month-old), and congenital trachea-bronchomalacia (10 month-old). RESULTS: The breathing of all children improved right after the procedure. We observed degradation of the stent from the 5th postoperative week which resulted in large intraluminar fragments causing significant airway obstruction: one patient died of severe pneumonia, the other baby required urgent bronchoscopy to remove the obstructing 'foreign body' from the trachea. In the third case repeated stent placements successfully maintained the tracheal lumen. CONCLUSIONS: Polydioxanone stents may offer an alternative to metallic or silastic stents for collapse or external compression of the trachea in children; however, large decaying fragments mean a potential risk especially in the small size pediatric airway. The fragmentation of the stent, which generally starts in the 4-6 postoperative weeks, may create large sharp pieces. These may be anchored to the mucosa and covered by crust leading to obstruction. As repeated interventions are required, we do not consider the application of biodegradable stents unambiguously advantageous.

Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for adaptation in burn injury.

OBJECTIVES: A number of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are available for managing burn injury patients but clinical practice is highly variable. We report the first steps to trans-contextual adaptation of international burn CPGs to local settings. METHODS: Key clinical topics and questions to be covered in the final guideline were defined and prioritized. Systematic search between 1990 and 2008 retrieved 546 citations, of which 24 were CPGs on the general and intensive care of burn patients. Assessment of the clinical content of CPGs was carried out. Methodological quality of CPGs was evaluated using the AGREE instrument. RESULTS: Of the 24 CPGs evaluated, 10 (42%) were evidence-based. All major burn topics were covered by at least one CPG, but no single CPG addressed all areas important in terms of outcomes. According to the AGREE criteria, 2 CPGs (8%) were strongly recommended, 14 with provisos or alterations (58%) and the rest were not recommended for adaptation. CONCLUSIONS: Although existing CPGs for the management of burn may accurately reflect agreed clinical practice, most performed poorly when evaluated for methodological quality. Future CPG efforts addressing these methodological shortcomings would add substantially to the improved management of burned patients.