Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 56(7): 753-763, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34541881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the front-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), where phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated their safety and efficacy. However, trial patients may not be representative of real-world patients (RWPs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate RWP clinical factors associated with effectiveness and safety in CML patients treated with TKIs. METHODS: Patients with CML treated with at least 30 days of imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib between 2014 and 2018 were included. Patients were stratified into categories based on the number of factors that would have precluded enrollment into pivotal TKI phase 3 trials (0, 1, ≥2). End points included complete hematologic response (CHR), early molecular response (EMR), major molecular response (MMR), adverse event (AE)-induced dose decreases, treatment interruptions, and treatment discontinuations. RESULTS: Final analyses included 174 patients. Patients with ≥2 factors had a higher risk of dose decreases (relative risk = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.02-2.34; P = 0.02) and a shorter time to dose decrease (hazard ratio = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.23-4.97; P = 0.006) compared with patients with 0 factors. Significant differences were observed in CHR at 1 month and MMR at 3 months between patients with 0 and ≥2 factors (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Approximately 60% of our RWPs would have been excluded from the pivotal phase 3 TKI trials. These data suggest that RWPs require more precise dosing to achieve CML clinical milestones and to mitigate AEs, but findings should be validated prospectively.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Dasatinib/adverse effects , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/adverse effects , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/chemically induced , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
PLoS One ; 16(6): e0253021, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34153052

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Radium-223, abiraterone, and enzalutamide have each been shown to significantly improve survival as monotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, effects of combination radium-223 plus abiraterone or enzalutamide on survival and safety remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases who were treated with radium-223 between April 1, 2014 and February 19, 2019. Patients who received radium-223 monotherapy were compared to patients who received a combination of radium-223 plus either abiraterone or enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, time to symptomatic skeletal event, symptomatic skeletal event-free survival, and incidence of drug-related adverse events. Time-to-event analyses were estimated by log rank tests using Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived from Cox proportional hazards models. Chi-square tests evaluated difference in serious adverse events between the two arms. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 41 in the monotherapy arm, n = 19 in the combination arm). Differences in median overall survival were not observed (12.7 vs. 12.8 months; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.59-2.23; P = 0.68), but median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the combination arm (7.6 vs. 4.9 months; HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.11-3.40; P = 0.02). Significant differences were not observed in time to first SSE (P = 0.97), SSE-free survival (P = 0.16), or in the overall incidence of serious adverse events (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Combination radium-223 plus abiraterone or enzalutamide did not improve overall survival, but prolonged progression-free survival without increasing the incidence of serious adverse events in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. However, these results are limited by small numbers and patient selection inherent in retrospective analysis.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Radium/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Benzamides/administration & dosage , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Nitriles/administration & dosage , Phenylthiohydantoin/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(11): e011318, 2019 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137991

ABSTRACT

Background Energy drinks have been linked to an increase in emergency room visits and deaths. We aim to determine the impact of energy drinks on electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in young healthy volunteers. Methods and Results A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. Participants consumed 32 oz of either energy drink A, energy drink B, or placebo within 60 minutes on 3 study days with a 6-day washout period in between. The primary end point of QT c interval and secondary end points of QT interval, PR interval, QRS duration, heart rate, and brachial and central blood pressures were measured at baseline, and every 30 minutes for 240 minutes. A repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance was performed with the main effects of intervention, time, and an interaction of intervention and time. Thirty-four participants were included (age 22.1±3.0 years). The interaction term of intervention and time was statistically significant for Bazett's corrected QT interval, Fridericia's corrected QT interval, QT , PR , QRS duration, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, central systolic blood pressure, and central diastolic blood pressure (all P<0.001). The maximum change from baseline in Bazett's corrected QT interval for drinks A, B, and placebo were +17.9±13.9, +19.6±15.8, and +11.9±11.1 ms, respectively ( P=0.005 for ANOVA ) ( P=0.04 and <0.01, respectively compared with placebo). Peripheral and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were statistically significantly different compared with placebo (all P<0.001). Conclusion Energy drinks significantly prolong the QT c interval and raise blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03196908.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/drug effects , Caffeine/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Electrocardiography , Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Action Potentials/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Caffeine/administration & dosage , California , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...