Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 16(2): e53557, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38445160

ABSTRACT

The number of patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) and high thromboembolic risk (HTR) is increasing. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIH), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and pulmonary embolism (PE) are representative conditions due to HBR/HTR. Although these disorders are located at opposite ends of the same disease spectrum, this does not mean a patient with HBR cannot have a concomitant HTR. The clinical manifestation of these two risks mostly results in critically ill patients for whom management means a huge challenge. We have numerous well-structured guidelines about treating GIH, ACS, or PE, but the literature and recommendations about the concomitant onset of these diseases are limited. Expert recommendations suggest an integrative, comprehensive assessment of patient and intervention-related factors to decide on the antithrombotic regimen with the best clinical benefit by assessing thrombotic and bleeding risks. In general, if thrombotic factors predominate, a longer duration, more aggressive antithrombotic regimen should be planned, and if bleeding susceptibility is higher, a shorter duration, de-escalated regimen should be pursued. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical dilemmas involved by presenting two cases with delicate management.

2.
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J ; 18(1): 85-89, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36246498

ABSTRACT

Dual distal mini-balloon aortic valvuloplasty stabilized an 85-year-old patient with severe aortic stenosis. Puncturing both radial arteries solves the issue of large diameters at the aortic ring, introducing a feasible strategy in selected cases of fragile octogenarian patients with a high hemorrhagic risk. Moving at the anatomical snuffbox offers better postprocedural occlusion rates and better workspace ergonomics during the procedure.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Balloon Valvuloplasty , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Balloon Valvuloplasty/adverse effects , Balloon Valvuloplasty/methods , Humans , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging
4.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 40: 152-157, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although not yet recommended by the guidelines, distal radial access, a new site for cardiovascular interventions, has been rapidly acknowledged and adopted by many centers due to its high rate of success, safety and fewer complications. We present our experience using secondary distal radial access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), proposing a new, even more minimal approach. METHODS: As of November 2020, a systematic distal radial approach as secondary access site for TAVI was adopted in our center. Primary endpoints were technical success and major adverse events (MAEs). Secondary endpoints: the access site complication rate, hemodynamic and clinical results of the intervention, procedural related factors, crossover rate to the femoral access site, and hospitalization duration (in days). RESULTS: From November 2020, 41 patients underwent TAVI using this strategy. Patients had a mean age of 76 ± 11.2 years, 41% were male. Six (14.63%) patients received a balloon-expandable valve and 35 (85.37%) received a self-expandable valve. TAVI was successful in all cases. No complications occurred due to transradial access. Puncture success, defined as completed sheath placement was maximum (N = 41/41,100%) and emergent transfemoral secondary access was not required in any case. Primary transfemoral vascular access site complications occurred in 7 cases (17%) of which 4 (13.63%) were resolved through distal radial access: one occlusion, two flow-limiting stenoses and four perforations of the common femoral artery. There were no additional major vascular complications at 30 days. Overall MACE rate was 2.4%. CONCLUSION: The use of the distal radial approach for secondary access in TAVI is safe, feasible and has several advantages over old access sites.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Artery/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Treatment Outcome
5.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 20(1): 35-39, 2019 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31184094

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery septic embolization is a rare, but severe complication of infective endocarditis involving the leftside of the valves. The first case mentioned in the literature was a postmortem finding of a left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion by a vegetation fragment. Since this case, there have been several therapeutic strategies published with this clinical setting including medical treatment, percutaneous coronary angioplasty addressing coronary occlusion, surgical intervention for both the infected valve and coronary embolization, and hybrid procedures with transcatheter septic embolus aspiration followed by surgical valvular interventions. Out of the three interventions mentioned, the latter provided the best results and was in concordance with results observed in a case of mitral valve infected endocarditis complicated with acute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery in patient whose comorbidities included hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A transcatheter left anterior descending coronary artery embolus aspiration was performed , followed by a surgical mitral valve replacement and septal myectomy with an uneventful postoperative course. Although rare, this severe complication of infective endocarditis has a specific clinical course and therapeutic strategy, and in our opinion, it could be mentioned as a separate entity among embolic complications of infective endocarditis in future guidelines. Previously published cases suggest that the hybrid intervention might be the therapy of choice for this clinical setting; however, larger studies are necessary for confirmation.


Subject(s)
Coronary Occlusion/microbiology , Embolism/microbiology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/microbiology , Mitral Valve/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cardiac Catheterization , Coronary Occlusion/diagnosis , Coronary Occlusion/therapy , Embolism/diagnosis , Embolism/therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/complications , Endocarditis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Humans , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/surgery , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/surgery , Suction , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...