Chronic variable stress and intravenous methamphetamine self-administration - Role of individual differences in behavioral and physiological reactivity to novelty.

Stress is a contributing factor to the development and maintenance of addiction in humans. However, few studies have shown that stress potentiates the rewarding and/or reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in rodent models of addiction. The present study assessed the effects of exposure to 14 days of chronic variable stress (CVS), or no stress as a control (CON), on the rewarding and reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in adult rats using the conditioned place preference (Experiment 1) and intravenous self-administration (Experiment 2) paradigms. In Experiment 2, we also assessed individual differences in open field locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze (EPM), and physiological responses to a novel environment as possible predictors of methamphetamine intake patterns. Exposure to CVS for 14 days did not affect overall measures of methamphetamine conditioned reward or reinforcement. However, analyses of individual differences and direct vs. indirect effects revealed that rats exhibiting high physiological reactivity and locomotor activity in the EPM and open field tests self-administered more methamphetamine and reached higher breakpoints for drug reinforcement than rats exhibiting low reactivity. In addition, CVS exposure significantly increased the proportion of rats that exhibited high reactivity, and high reactivity was significantly correlated with increased levels of methamphetamine intake. These findings suggest that individual differences in physiological and locomotor reactivity to novel environments, as well as their interactions with stress history, predict patterns of drug intake in rodent models of methamphetamine addiction. Such predictors may eventually inform future strategies for implementing individualized treatment strategies for amphetamine use disorders.

Development and in vitro evaluation of topically applied cinnamic acid formulations.

The aim of this study was to formulate microcapsulated cinnamic acid (CN) formulations in w/o and o/w emulsions and to compare their release profiles with w/o, o/w and w/o/w emulsions without microcapsules through cellulose acetate, cellulose nitrate membranes and excised rat skin. The experimental design approach was used for understanding the influence of different formulation factors on release characteristics and to optimise most accurate formulating parameters. The data obtained in this study were subjected to statistical analysis by a repeated measures ANOVA, following Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. A significantly different release was observed due to the core:wall ratio of microcapsules. Emulsions containing microcapsules with 2:1 core:wall ratio were found to be ideal according to the factorial design, dissolution and diffusion studies. The type of emulsion was found to be a very important factor affecting the release profile of CN. The results described in this study indicate that microencapsulation of CN in w/o emulsion could be suggested as an effective carrier for CN to achieve sustained release and to protect the drug. Moreover, w/o/w emulsions were also useful carriers for prolonged release by encapsulating the substances in their internal aqueous phase and they also protect drugs and their preparation and application are easy. By the way, in the case of o/w emulsion any significant difference was observed. The type of the membrane also affected release. According to the release results, rat skin was found to be significantly different from the synthetic membranes.

Trail-induced apoptosis and interaction with cytotoxic agents in soft tissue sarcoma cell lines.

Five human soft tissue sarcoma (STS) cell lines (HTB-82 rhabdomyosarcoma, HTB-91 fibrosarcoma, HTB-92 liposarcoma, HTB-93 synovial sarcoma and HTB-94 chondrosarcoma) were analysed for their sensitivity to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and the function of the TRAIL apoptotic pathway in these cells. TRAIL induced significant apoptosis (>90%) in HTB-92 and HTB-93 cells, whereas no effect was observed in HTB-82, HTB-91 and HTB-94 cells. TRAIL-Receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1) was expressed in TRAIL-sensitive HTB-92 and HTB-93 cell lines, but not in TRAIL-resistant HTB-91 and HTB-94 cells. HTB-82 cells, which expressed the long (c-FLIP(L)) and short (c-FLIP(S)) splice variants of the FLICE-like inhibitory protein (FLIP), were resistant to TRAIL in spite of the presence of TRAIL-R1. TRAIL-R2,-R3,-R4 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression did not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity. Coincubation of TRAIL and doxorubicin led to the overexpression of TRAIL-R2 resulting in a synergistic effect of doxorubicin and TRAIL in TRAIL-sensitive cell lines and in the overcoming of TRAIL-resistance in all of the TRAIL-resistant cell lines, except HTB-91, which lacked caspase 8 expression. These data suggest that TRAIL, either as a single agent or in combination with cytotoxic agents, might represent a new treatment option for advanced STS, which constitutes a largely chemotherapy-resistant disease.

Chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: past results and recent developments.

This review summarises the results of previously conducted clinical trials, and subsequently presents data arising from all phase II-III studies on chemotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) published since the last relevant overview. While response rates exceeding 30% have barely been achieved with established cytotoxic drugs in MPM therapy, novel chemotherapeutic agents and their combinations appear more promising. This applies especially to the antimetabolites, and in particular to pemetrexed that produced response rates of up to 45% in combination with platinum compounds. Raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin has also been shown to be effective, and gemcitabine-applied as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin-as well as vinorelbine appear to improve the quality of life in patients presenting with MPM. Data can now be more precisely analysed by increasingly implemented randomised studies, applying a standardised staging system, and distinguishing prognostic groups. While chemotherapy for MPM remains a challenging task, important steps have clearly been made in the past years to combat this aggressive disease. The publication of pemetrexed with cisplatin phase III results in a peer-reviewed journal may soon establish a standard of care.

Anti-Her-2/neu antibody induces apoptosis in Her-2/neu overexpressing breast cancer cells independently from p53 status.

Anti-Her-2/neu antibody is known to induce apoptosis in HER-2/neu overexpressing breast cancer cells. However, exact regulatory mechanisms mediating and controlling this phenomenon are still unknown. In the present study, we have investigated the effect of anti-Her-2/neu antibody on apoptosis of HER-2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer cell lines SK-BR-3, HTB-24, HTB-25, HTB-27, HTB-128, HTB-130 and HTB-131 in relation to p53 genotype and bcl-2 status. SK-BR-3, HTB-24, HTB-128 and HTB-130 cells exhibited mutant p53, whereas wild type p53 was found in HTB-25, HTB-27 and HTB-131 cells. All seven cell lines weakly expressed bcl-2 protein (10-20%). Anti-Her-2/neu antibody, irrespective of p53 and bcl-2 status, induced apoptosis in all 7 cell lines dose- and time-dependently and correlated with Her-2/neu overexpression. In addition, incubation of cell lines with anti-Her-2/neu antibody did not alter p53 or bcl-2 expression. Anti-HER-2/neu antibody did not induce apoptosis in HER-2/neu negative HBL-100 and HTB-132 cell lines. Our results indicate that within the panel of tested breast cancer cell lines, anti-Her-2/neu antibody-induced apoptosis was independent from the presence of intact p53.

Docetaxel as rescue medication in anthracycline- and ifosfamide-resistant locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma not amenable to curative surgery has a dismal prognosis. Aggressive treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide represents the current therapeutic mainstay in these patients, most of whom succumb to relapses. Thus, the efficacy of subsequent therapeutic approaches has to be weighed against toxicity caused by palliative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma refractory to treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide were enrolled into the present phase II study. Patients were assigned to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 every three weeks. In case of severe toxicity, patients were switched to a weekly schedule of docetaxel (40 mg/m2). RESULTS: A total of 106 cycles (80% at the scheduled 100 mg/m2 dose level) were administered in 27 patients. Partial response was observed in 4 (15%) patients and 4 (15%) patients experienced disease stabilization. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 2.4 (range: 0.9-23.9) and 7.7 (range: 1.0-44.3) months, respectively. Upon renewed progression, three patients initially responsive to treatment with docetaxel were successfully reinduced by treatment with docetaxel. The safety profile of docetaxel was tolerable and the administration mostly manageable on an outpatient basis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that docetaxel represents an efficacious and tolerable treatment in a minority of patients refractory to standard treatment. There is a need for better identification of patients most likely to benefit from salvage treatment with docetaxel.

[Acceptance of and satisfaction with medical information provided to cancer patients]. / Annahme von Aufklärungsinhalten und Zufriedenheit bei Krebspatienten.

BACKGROUND: Medical information to oncologic patients about their disease as well as regularly updated information about the course of their disease and the therapeutic success are essential components of a comprehensive treatment in cancer patients. STUDY GOAL: The quality of the patient-doctor-interaction as well as the hospital preference of oncologic patients were evaluated by a questionnaire at the Oncologic Out-Patient Clinic of the University Hospital of Vienna. METHODS: 350 questionnaires containing 12 questions about medical information, anti-cancer therapy, suggestions for improvement and hospital preference were distributed. The questions were correlated with the patients' demographic and medical data. RESULTS: Out of 350 questionnaires, 234 (67%)--160 (68%) by women and 74 (32%) by men--were returned. 75% of the patients were satisfied with the provided medical information. In contrast, 12% of patients felt incompletely informed about their particular cancer and 19% were unsatisfied with their state of information about the actual status of their disease. Our institution was mostly visited for quality-associated reasons and only in 3% for pragmatic reasons. 58% of the patients had no suggestions for improvement of medical care, although 28% of the patients wanted to spend more time with their doctors, 10% asked for more psychological care and 8% for additional alternative therapeutic modalities. CONCLUSION: The Oncologic Out-Patient Clinic is frequented mainly for quality-associated reasons. Although satisfaction with medical management is very high, there remains space for improvement of information about the underlying disease and its current status.

Soluble ICAM-1 in breast cancer: clinical significance and biological implications.

OBJECTIVES: In previous experiments, we demonstrated a decreased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule I (ICAM-1) on both tumour cells and antigen-presenting cells derived from patients with breast cancer, resulting in an abrogation of antigen presentation and tumour cell lysis. Recently, increased levels of a soluble isoform of ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) have been detected in the sera of breast cancer patients. The present investigation was performed in order to investigate the biological relevance of serum concentrations and the effects of sICAM-1 in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: sICAM-1 was determined using a sandwich enzyme immunoassay on sera from 88 patients with various stages of breast cancer and correlated with clinical parameters. The effect of sICAM-1 present in the sera of patients with breast cancer upon unspecific and anti-Her-21/neu antibody-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), as well as upon antigen presentation, was determined using a 51Cr-release assay and [3H]thymidine-uptake of T cells after co-incubation with tetanus-toxoid-pulsed antigen-presenting cells. RESULTS: In patients with early breast cancer, serum levels of sICAM-1 were significantly lower compared to patients with metastatic disease, but did not correlate with usual clinical parameters. In patients with metastatic breast cancer, a significant correlation of sICAM-1 with tumour markers CEA and CA 15-3 was observed. No influence of sICAM-1 upon unspecific cytotoxicity, ADCC, or the ability to present antigen was observed. DISCUSSION: The origin of sICAM-1 in the sera of patients with breast cancer remains unknown. In contrast to its membrane-bound isoform, sICAM-1 was increased in the sera of patients with various stages of breast cancer, but its presence did not influence unspecific cytotoxicity, ADCC, or antigen-induced T cell proliferation.

Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The present phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas. Sixteen patients received six courses of an i.v. cytotoxic regimen consisting of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (35 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15) administered in 28-day intervals. Complete remission (CR) occurred in one patient (6%), partial remission (PR) in four patients (25%) and stable disease in seven patients (44%), whereas four patients (25%) developed progressive disease resulting in an overall response rate of 31%. Mean duration of responses (CR+PR) was 3.6 (range 0.7-8.5) months and mean time to progression was 7.4 (range 3.8-12.6) months. After a mean observation period of 11.5 months the overall survival was 9.6 months with 12 patients (75%) still being alive, which compares favorably with historical data of the administration of gemcitabine alone. The performance status improved in three (19%) and stabilized in eight (50%) out of 16 patients for 4 weeks or longer. Treatment-associated toxicity included alopecia of WHO grade III in all cases, leukopenia of WHO grades I and II in 10 patients (63%), grade III in five patients (31%), and thrombocytopenia grades I and II in four patients (25%), and grades III and IV in 10 patients (63%). We conclude that the administered dosage and schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer of the pancreas constitutes an active cytotoxic regimen associated with moderate toxicity.

Phase II study of second-line oxaliplatin, irinotecan and mitomycin C in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer.

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the therapeutic value of second-line treatment with oxaliplatin, irinotecan (CPT-11) and mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. A total of 10 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, all of whom had developed progressive disease from advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing first-line chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin, were entered in this study. At the time of relapse, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 plus CPT-11 80 mg/m2 given i.v. on therapeutic day 1, and MMC 6 mg/ m2 given i.v. on day 15, respectively, was initiated. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks for a total of six courses unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The overall response rate was 30% with three partial responses for all 10 assessable patients. Two additional patients (20%) had stable disease and five patients (50%) progressed. The median overall survival duration has not been reached yet and is longer than 7.1 months (range 2-23.5+) from the beginning of second-line therapy. Four patients are currently alive with progressive disease. The tolerance of second-line treatment was generally mild to moderate and easy to treat. Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin, CPT-11 and MMC in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5-FU-based chemotherapy is feasible and has substantial antitumor activity. Further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Monotherapy with docetaxel in second- or third-line treatment of anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Nineteen breast cancer patients pretreated with one or two anthracycline-containing regimens for visceral metastases received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on day 1, q 21d. Docetaxel was administered as second-line therapy in 11 patients, whereas eight patients received docetaxel in a third-line setting. In the second-line setting, complete response (CR) was achieved in two (18%), partial response (PR) in four (36%) and stable disease (SD) in three (27%) patients resulting in a response rate (RR) of 54%. In the third-line setting three (38%) patients experienced PR (RR 38%) and two (25%) SD. In the second-line setting, median time to progression was 6.5+/-3.9 months (range 2.1-15.8) versus 4.7+/-5.5 months (range 0.6-15.9) in the third-line setting. Median overall survival was 9.6+/-8.0 months (range 2.7-25.8) versus 11.2-6.1 months (range 4.8-18.7). Overall, no patient experienced treatment-limiting toxicities. We conclude that docetaxel induced responses in 48% of anthracycline-resistant patients enrolled into the present study. The safety profile of docetaxel was manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represented efficacious treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Single-agent gemcitabine as second- and third-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer.

In the present study, 25 patients with breast cancer pretreated with one or two anthracycline-based regimens for visceral metastases were enrolled. Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, q28d. Nine patients received gemcitabine as second-line treatment, whereas 16 patients received gemcitabine as third-line cytotoxic treatment, respectively. In the second-line setting, two (22%) patients gained PR (RR 22%) and four (44%) patients experienced SD (P=0.2), respectively. In the third-line-setting, one (6%) patient gained CR, one patient PR (6%) and four patients (25%) SD, respectively, resulting in a response rate (RR) of 12%. In the second-line-setting, median time to progression was 5.1 +/- 4.0 months (range: 1.6-13.9) versus 3.5-2.5 months (range: 1.3-10.4) in the third-line-setting. Median overall survival was 12.6 +/- 9.1 months (range: 3.9-30.8) versus 7.5 +/- 6.7 months (range: 2.0-26.0), respectively. Overall, no patient experienced treatment limiting toxicities. We conclude from the present study that gemcitabine induced an overall RR of 16% following prior treatment with anthracyclines. However, median time to progression and median overall survival were limited. In the search for efficacious treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer, gemcitabine constitutes a valid tool in anthracycline-resistant disease and thus might represent a valuable option for combination chemotherapy in controlled trials in this condition.