Autoimmune hepatitis induced by the prolonged hepatitis A virus infection.

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis in the world. Rarely, acute infection may persist for a long time. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may provide anti-HAV IgM positivity detection for a prolonged time. On the other hand, HAV as an infectious agent may also trigger AIH. Here we presented a case which seemed like a simple acute viral hepatitis A infection at the beginning but turned out to be an AIH according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group's system. A 21-year-old female was diagnosed as symptomatic acute HAV infection with anti-HAV IgM positivity and elevated aminotransferase levels. The other viral serological tests were negative. On the 6th, 12th and 18th months of the follow up, her anti-HAV IgM positivity still continued and transaminase levels were also 3 to 7 times high of the upper limit of normal. In addition, antinuclear antibody was positive. However, on the 19th month anti-HAV IgM could be detected as negative. Liver histology was prominent. The patient had a score of 16 according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group's system. She was given prednisolone (10 mg/day) and azathioprine (100 mg/day). The aminotransferase levels were detected within normal ranges at the end of the first month of therapy. She was in remission during follow up for 6 years. In conclusion, prolonged HAV infection and AIH may not only trigger each other but also deteriorate the liver histology. AIH should be investigated in cases of long-lasting HAV infection in order to begin the treatment earlier. On the other hand, AIH patients should also be vaccinated for both HBV and HAV to avoid more severe diseases.

Clinicopathologic features of dual chronic hepatitis B and C infection: a comparison with single hepatitis B, C and delta infections.

UNLABELLED: There is controversial data in the literature about the characteristics or features of dual hepatitis B and C infection. Several studies have reported that the dual infection has a more severe histological picture; faster progression leading to cirrhosis and a higher risk for hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the single infections. These findings have not yet been supported. We assessed the patients with dual hepatitis B and C infection with respect to their different features in our country. METHOD: the chronic hepatitis patients of our clinics were tested, and both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive patients with chronic hepatitis were enrolled to the study. All patients were tested for the biochemical parameters and the presence of HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Of the 1950 patients, 51 (2.6%) were both HBsAg and anti-HCV positive and 67 were anti-delta positive. Patients were followed up for 5.4+/-2.1 years. Of the 51 dual hepatitis patients, 6 had no HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA detectable by PCR, 36 were only HCV-RNA positive, 9 were only HBV-DNA positive and 3 were both HBV-DNA and HCV-RNA positive. Dominant infection in (3/4) of the patients was hepatitis C. Clinical and histological properties of the cases with dual Hepatitis B and C infection showed no significant differences compared to the single infections. In conclusion, regarding the prognosis, no significant differences were found between such dual and single infections. Dual infection with hepatitis B virus and delta virus is a significantly more severe condition than the dual infection with hepatitis B and C viruses.