Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Children (Basel) ; 9(6)2022 Jun 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35740792

ABSTRACT

The need for dental rehabilitations under general anesthesia (DRGAs) is continuously increasing, particularly for dental treatment of children. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate potential risk factors for repeated need of DRGA in a cohort of patients from a private pediatric dental practice. Demographic and anamnestic data, dental status, and treatments performed during DRGA were retrospectively analyzed from the electronic dental charts of 1155 children that received at least one DRGA between October 2016 and December 2021. The median age of all children was 5 years at time of their first DRGA. The rate of repeated DRGAs was 9%. Patients with repeated need of DRGA were significantly younger at time of their first DRGA and revealed significantly more often a history of preterm birth and current use of a baby bottle as compared to patients with only one DRGA. There were significantly fewer treatments (regardless of type) in the second DRGA than at the first. Within the limitations of this study, young age at first DRGA, a history of preterm birth, and current use of a baby bottle may be risk factors for repeated need of DRGA. The search for effective strategies to minimize the repeated need for DRGA in children remains critical.

2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 26(1): 449-461, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129074

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In the context of the phase-down of amalgam, development of easily applicable, permanent restorative materials is of high clinical interest. Aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel, tooth-colored, self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative (SABF, 3M Oral Care) and a conventional bulk-fill composite (Filtek One, 3M Oral Care; FOBF) for restoring class II cavities. The null-hypothesis tested was that both materials perform similar regarding clinical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized split-mouth study, 30 patients received one SABF and one FOBF restoration each. Scotchbond Universal (3M Oral Care) was used as adhesive for FOBF (self-etch mode), while SABF was applied directly without adhesive. Restorations were evaluated by two blinded examiners at baseline, 6 months and 12 months employing FDI criteria. Non-parametric statistical analyses and χ2-tests (α = 0.05) were applied. RESULTS: Thirty patients (60 restorations) were available for the 6- and 12-month recalls exhibiting 100% restoration survival. All restorations revealed clinically acceptable FDI scores at all time points and for all criteria. Only regarding esthetic properties, FOBF performed significantly better than SABF regarding surface lustre (A1) and color match and translucency (A3) at all time points and marginal staining (A2b) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The null-hypothesis could not be rejected. Both materials performed similarly regarding clinical performance within the first year of clinical service. SABF exhibited slightly inferior, but clinically fully acceptable esthetic properties as compared to FOBF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Within the limitations of this study, the self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative showed promising results and may be recommended for clinical use.


Subject(s)
Dental Restoration, Permanent , Resin Cements , Composite Resins , Dental Cements , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Mouth
3.
J Dent ; 115: 103837, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34624421

ABSTRACT

Objectives To determine the clinical performance of partial ceramic crowns (PCCs) luted with a conventional resin cement combined with a universal adhesive without or with selective enamel etching or luted with a self-adhesive resin cement. Methods In a split-mouth design, each three CAD/CAM-PCCs (Vita Mark II, Cerec) were placed in 50 patients. Two PCCs were luted with a conventional resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) combined with a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) without (SB-E) or with (SB+E) selective enamel etching. The third PCC was luted with a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem 2; RXU). Chi-square tests (α≤0.05) were applied. Based on clinical failures (complete debonding or need for replacement of the restorations), Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results 31 patients were evaluated clinically using FDI criteria at 39 months. Clinically acceptable results were detected over time, except for "fracture of material and retention" (inacceptable fractures and debondings). Within materials, statistically significant differences (p ≤ 0.003) between baseline and 39 months were found for "marginal adaptation" and "marginal staining". At 39-month, SB+E and SB-E showed significantly better results compared to RXU in "marginal adaptation"(p ≤ 0.021) and "marginal staining"(p ≤ 0.013). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher survival rates after 39 months for SB+E (96%) and SB-E (88%) compared to RXU (69%) with statistically significant differences between RXU vs. SB-E (p = 0.022) and RXU vs. SB+E (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions After 39-months, PCCs luted with the self-adhesive resin cement exhibited a statistically significant inferior survival rate compared to restorations luted with the conventional resin cement combined with a universal adhesive without or with selective enamel etching. Clinical significance Currently, self-adhesive resin cements cannot be recommended for luting partial ceramic crowns. However, the standard adhesive luting procedure comprising a universal adhesive and luting composite yielded good clinical results for more than 3 years irrespectively of application of a selective enamel etching step.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental , Resin Cements , Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Ceramics/chemistry , Ceramics/therapeutic use , Crowns , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Dental Enamel , Humans , Materials Testing , Resin Cements/chemistry , Resin Cements/therapeutic use , Surface Properties
4.
Dent Mater ; 33(12): e428-e437, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29102158

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of two flowable composites for restoration of Class-V non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), one with novel (N'Durance® Dimer Flow, Septodont; ND) and one with modified conventional matrix composition (Filtek™ Supreme XTE Flow, 3M-ESPE; FS). The null hypothesis was that both flowable composite materials perform equally regarding clinical quality and survival. METHODS: 50 patients received one ND and one FS restoration of NCCLs in premolars using Clearfil Protect Bond (Kuraray) as an adhesive without additional selective enamel etching. Restorations were evaluated at baseline (BL), after 30 and 60 months employing selected original FDI criteria and refined FDI criteria by separate evaluation of enamel and dentine margins. Non-parametric statistical analyses and χ2 tests were applied (α=0.05). RESULTS: 38 patients with both restorations under risk were available for the 60-mo recall (recall rate: 76%). At 60-mo, 94.7% of ND and 84.2% of FS restorations were rated clinically acceptable. No significant differences for all selected FDI criteria were recorded between ND and FS at each examination time point except for the criteria surface lustre at 60-mo, where FS showed significantly better results. No significant differences over time could be detected for both materials. There was a trend for more deterioration along the enamel margins than along the dentine margins (criteria marginal staining and marginal adaptation). SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limitations of the study, the null hypothesis that materials perform equally could not be rejected. Both flowable composites performed similarly regarding clinical performance.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Restoration, Permanent/methods , Tooth Demineralization/therapy , Bicuspid , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Materials Testing , Prospective Studies , Resin Cements/chemistry , Treatment Outcome
5.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 15(1): 57-68, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26630185

ABSTRACT

Light-mediated killing of pathogens by cationic photosensitizers (PS) is a promising antimicrobial approach avoiding resistance as being present upon the use of antibiotics. In this study we focused on the impact of the substituents in phenalen-1-one PS. Photodynamic efficacy depending on positively charged moieties including a primary aliphatic, quaternary aliphatic, aromatic ammonium and a guanidinium cation was investigated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Considering the altered steric demand and lipophilicity of these functional groups we deduced a structure-activity relationship. SAGUA was the most potent PS in this series reaching a maximum efficacy of ≥6log10 steps of bacteria killing at a concentration of 10 µM upon irradiation with blue light (20 mW cm(-2)) for 60 s (1.2 J cm(-2)) without exhibiting inherent dark toxicity. Its guanidinium moiety may be able to form strong bidentate and directional hydrogen bonds to carboxylate groups of bacterial surfaces in addition to ionic charge attraction. This may supplement fast and effective antimicrobial activity.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Phenalenes/chemistry , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/chemistry , Photosensitizing Agents/pharmacology , Actinomyces/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemical synthesis , Cations/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Structure , Photosensitizing Agents/chemical synthesis , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptococcus mutans/drug effects , Structure-Activity Relationship
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...