Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ther Clin Risk Manag ; 19: 567-578, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37425344

ABSTRACT

Background: The activities of tissue establishments are constantly and rapidly evolving. The development of a new type of allograft, full-thickness acellular dermal matrix, with high mechanical properties to be used in tendon repair surgeries and abdominal wall reconstruction, has determined the need for quality by design process in order to assess evidence of quality, safety and efficacy. The EuroGTPII methodologies were specifically tailored to perform the risk assessment, identify and suggest tests in order to mitigate the potential risk consequences of a novel tissue preparation implementation. Methods: The new allograft and associated preparation processes were assessed using the EuroGTP methodologies and characterized to properly evaluate the novelty (Step 1), identify and quantify the potential risks and risk consequences (Step 2), and define the extent of pre-clinical and clinical assessments required to mitigate the risks identified in the assessment (Step 3). Results: Four risk consequences associated with the preparation process were identified: (i) implant failure related with tissue procurement and the reagents used during the decellularization protocol; (ii) unwanted immunogenicity related with the processing; (iii) disease transmission linked with the processing, reagents used, reduction in the reliability of microbiology testing and the storage conditions; and (iv) toxicity related to the reagents used and handling of the tissue during clinical application. The outcome of the risk assessment was a low level of risk. Nevertheless, it determined the need for a series of risk mitigation strategies proposed to reduce each individual risk and to provide additional evidence of the safety and efficacy of full-thickness acellular dermal matrix grafts. Conclusion: EuroGTPII methodologies allow us to identify the risks and ensure the correct definition of pre-clinical assessments required to address and mitigate the potential risk consequences, before proceeding with clinical use of the new allografts in patients.

2.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 7(Suppl 2): A2, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37282690

ABSTRACT

Since the start of the pandemic, the tissue donation in Catalonia (Spain) has decreased drastically. At the beginning of the lockdown (from March to May 2020) there was a drop of around 70% in donation of corneas and of approximately 90% in donation of placentas. Despite the fast updating of standard operating procedures, we had big difficulties in different points. For instance, in the availability of the transplant coordinator for the donor detection and evaluation, in obtaining the necessary PPE (personal protective equipment), or in the resources available in the quality control laboratories for screening. This, added to the collapse that hospitals suffered due to the large number of patients hospitalized each day, made donation levels slowly rebound.In order to provide solutions to all patients, we tried to adapt quickly to these emerging changes.In the case of corneas, we found a scenario that we had never had before. Although the cornea transplant plummeted at the beginning of the confinement (decreased by 60% compared to 2019), we run out of corneas -even for emergency situations- at the end of March.This situation led us to develop a new type of therapeutic solution in our Eye Bank. The cryopreserved cornea for tectonic purposes is a tissue that is kept frozen at -196°C and can be preserved for up to 5 years. Therefore, it is a tissue that allows us to respond to possible emergencies in subsequent similar situations.Regarding amniotic membrane for ocular care indications, the strategy was completely different. For this kind of tissue, we carried out an adaptation of our processing with two different purposes. On the one hand, to make sure that we could inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus, if it was there. On the other hand, to increase the donation of placentas. For this, changes in the transport medium and in the antibiotic cocktail were performed. In addition, an irradiation step was added to the final product.Little by little, it seems that the donations of corneas and placentas have been recovering. However, it is necessary to think about future contingency strategies in case a stop in donation is repeated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Eye Banks , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Communicable Disease Control , Cornea
4.
Front Immunol ; 11: 482, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32528460

ABSTRACT

Development of semi-automated devices that can reduce the hands-on time and standardize the production of clinical-grade CAR T-cells, such as CliniMACS Prodigy from Miltenyi, is key to facilitate the development of CAR T-cell therapies, especially in academic institutions. However, the feasibility of manufacturing CAR T-cell products from heavily pre-treated patients with this system has not been demonstrated yet. Here we report and characterize the production of 28 CAR T-cell products in the context of a phase I clinical trial for CD19+ B-cell malignancies (NCT03144583). The system includes CD4-CD8 cell selection, lentiviral transduction and T-cell expansion using IL-7/IL-15. Twenty-seven out of 28 CAR T-cell products manufactured met the full list of specifications and were considered valid products. Ex vivo cell expansion lasted an average of 8.5 days and had a mean transduction rate of 30.6 ± 13.44%. All products obtained presented cytotoxic activity against CD19+ cells and were proficient in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Expansion kinetics was slower in patient's cells compared to healthy donor's cells. However, product potency was comparable. CAR T-cell subset phenotype was highly variable among patients and largely determined by the initial product. TCM and TEM were the predominant T-cell phenotypes obtained. 38.7% of CAR T-cells obtained presented a TN or TCM phenotype, in average, which are the subsets capable of establishing a long-lasting T-cell memory in patients. An in-depth analysis to identify individual factors contributing to the optimal T-cell phenotype revealed that ex vivo cell expansion leads to reduced numbers of TN, TSCM, and TEFF cells, while TCM cells increase, both due to cell expansion and CAR-expression. Overall, our results show for the first time that clinical-grade production of CAR T-cells for heavily pre-treated patients using CliniMACS Prodigy system is feasible, and that the obtained products meet the current quality standards of the field. Reduced ex vivo expansion may yield CAR T-cell products with increased persistence in vivo.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Academic Medical Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Automation , Bioreactors , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , Child , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Female , Humans , Immunologic Memory , Male , Point-of-Care Systems , Young Adult
5.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 21(2): 189-204, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32020423

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the feasibility and performed a risk-benefit analysis of the storage and widespread distribution of stromal lenticules for clinical application using a new systematic tool (European Good Tissue and cells Practices II-EuroGTP II tool), specifically designed for assessing the risk, safety and efficacy of substances of human origin. Three types of potential tissue preparations for human stromal lenticules were evaluated: cryopreserved, dehydrated and decellularized. The tool helps to identify an overall risk score (0-2: negligible; 2-6: low; 6-22: moderate; > 22: high) and suggests risk reduction strategies. For all the three types of products, we found the level of risk to be as "moderate". A process validation, pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo evaluations and a clinical study limited to a restricted number of patients should therefore be performed in order to mitigate the risks. Our study allowed to establish critical points and steps necessary to implement a new process for safe stromal lenticule preparation by the eye banks to be used in additive keratoplasty. Moreover, it shows that the EuroGTP II tool is useful to assess and identify risk reduction strategies for introduction of new Tissue and Cellular Therapies and Products into the clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Corneal Stroma/physiology , Risk Assessment , Tissue Banks , Cryopreservation , Dehydration , Humans
6.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 32(1): 80-84, 2020 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31087044

ABSTRACT

A systematic methodology, able to assess risk and predict clinical safety and efficacy of Substances of Human Origin' (SoHO) has been developed. The model consists of a risk based approach taking into account factors such as novelty of the product, preparation process, clinical indication, and its technical complexity.


Subject(s)
Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , European Union , Humans , Risk Factors , Translational Research, Biomedical , Treatment Outcome
7.
Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev ; 12: 134-144, 2019 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623002

ABSTRACT

Genetically modifying autologous T cells to express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) has shown impressive response rates for the treatment of CD19+ B cell malignancies in several clinical trials (CTs). Making this treatment available to our patients prompted us to develop a novel CART19 based on our own anti-CD19 antibody (A3B1), followed by CD8 hinge and transmembrane region, 4-1BB- and CD3z-signaling domains. We show that A3B1 CAR T cells are highly cytotoxic and specific against CD19+ cells in vitro, inducing secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and CAR T cell proliferation. In vivo, A3B1 CAR T cells are able to fully control disease progression in an NOD.Cg-Prkdc scid Il2rd tm1Wjl /SzJ (NSG) xenograph B-ALL mouse model. Based on the pre-clinical data, we conclude that our CART19 is clearly functional against CD19+ cells, to a level similar to other CAR19s currently being used in the clinic. Concurrently, we describe the implementation of our CAR T cell production system, using lentiviral vector and CliniMACS Prodigy, within a medium-sized academic institution. The results of the validation phase show our system is robust and reproducible, while maintaining a low cost that is affordable for academic institutions. Our model can serve as a paradigm for similar institutions, and it may help to make CAR T cell treatment available to all patients.

8.
Eur J Cancer ; 64: 167-74, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27428073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autologous tumour lysate dendritic cell vaccine (ADC) has T-cell stimulatory capacity and, therefore, potential antitumour activity. We designed a phase II randomised trial of ADC + best supportive care (BSC) (experimental arm [EA]) compared with BSC (control arm [CA]), in pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive mCRC, at least to two chemotherapy regimens and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-2, were randomised to EA versus CA. Stratification criteria: ECOG PS (0-1 versus 2) and lactate dehydrogenase (ULN). EA was administered subcutaneously till progressive disease. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included (28 EA/24 CA). An interim analysis recommended early termination for futility. No objective radiological response was observed in EA. Median PFS in EA was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-3.2 months) versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-2.5 months) in CA (p = 0.628). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.4-7.9 months) in EA versus 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.3-7 months) in CA (p = 0.41). No ADC-related adverse events were reported. Immunization induces tumour-specific T-cell response in 21 of 25 (84%) patients. Responder patients have an OS of 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.2-9.4 months) versus 3.8 months (95% CI, 0.6-6.9 months) in non-responders; p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Our randomised clinical trial comparing ADC + BSC versus BSC in mCRC demonstrates that ADC generates a tumour-specific immune response but not benefit on PFS and OS. Our results do not support the use of ADC alone, in a phase III trial.


Subject(s)
Cancer Vaccines/administration & dosage , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Dendritic Cells/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Vaccines/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/secondary , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Survival Analysis
9.
Dev Ophthalmol ; 53: 189-200, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24732772

ABSTRACT

Rapid development in the fields of cellular and molecular biology, biotechnology, and bioengineering medicine has brought new, highly innovative treatments and medicinal products, some of which contain viable cells and tissues associated with scaffolds and devices. These new cell-based therapy approaches in regenerative medicine have great potential for use in the treatment of a number of diseases that at present cannot be managed effectively. Given the unique challenges associated with the development of human cell-based medicinal products, great care is required in the development of procedures, practices, and regulation. In cell therapy, appropriate methodologies in the areas of production, reproducibility, maintenance, and delivery are essential for accurate definition and reliable assurance of the suitability and quality of the final products. Recently, the official European Community agencies (EMA) and the relevant authority in the USA (FDA) have made significant efforts to establish regulatory guidance for use in the application of the cell-based therapies for human patients. The guidelines surrounding cell-based therapy take into account the current legislation, but focus less on the heterogeneity and requirements of individual human cell-based products, including specific combination products and applications. When considering guidelines and regulation, a risk assessment approach is an effective method of identifying priority areas for the development of human cell-based medicinal products. Additionally, effective design and thorough validation of the manufacturing process in line with existing Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and quality control regimes and a program that ensures the traceability and biovigilance of the final products are also all essential elements to consider.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/methods , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy/standards , Legislation, Medical , Retinal Diseases/therapy , Animals , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL