ABSTRACT
Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) is a gender-affirmation surgery designed to remove or reduce breast tissue, with or without nipple reconstruction. GAM is the most commonly performed gender-affirmation surgery and risk factors associated with unplanned return to the operating room and reoperation continue to be investigated. This is the largest study of transgender and nonbinary patients undergoing GAM to determine predictors of unplanned reoperation. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing GAM from 2012 to 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of unplanned reoperation within 30 days postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the indication for unplanned reoperation within this period. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine significant predictors of reoperation after GAM. Results: A total of 2316 patients underwent GAM, of whom 2.2% (nâ =â 51) underwent unplanned reoperation of the chest. The most common indication for unplanned reoperation was hematoma (nâ =â 41, 71.9%) followed by abscess (nâ =â 5, 8.8%). Significant predictors of reoperation were corticosteroid use [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.07 (1.07-23.89)] and diabetes [aOR (CI) 10.98 (3.0-40.33)]. Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity [aOR (CI) 3.19 (1.22-8.33)] and corticosteroid use [aOR (CI) 6.81 (1.45-31.98)] were significant predictors of unplanned reoperation for hematoma evacuation after GAM. Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus and corticosteroid use were associated with unplanned reoperation after GAM. Ethnic correlations remain to be better elucidated as well as the effect of intersectionality. These findings can be used to guide patient selection and surgical decision-making.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of social determinants of health (SDoH) with eye care utilization among people with diabetes mellitus using the 2013-2017 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants ≥ 18 years of age with self-reported diabetes. METHODS: The SDoH in the following domains were used: (1) economic stability; (2) neighborhood, physical environment, and social cohesion; (3) community and social context; (4) food environment; (5) education; and (6) health care system. An aggregate SDoH score was calculated and divided into quartiles, with Q4 representing those with the highest adverse SDoH burden. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association of SDoH quartile with eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months. A linear trend test was conducted. Domain-specific mean SDoH scores were calculated, and the performance of domain-specific models was compared using area under the curve (AUC). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Eye care utilization in the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: Of 20 807 adults with diabetes, 43% had not used eye care. Greater adverse SDoH burden was associated with decrements in odds of eye care utilization (P < 0.001 for trend). Participants in the highest quartile of adverse SDoH burden (Q4) had a 58% lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.47) of eye care utilization than those in Q1. The domain-specific model using economic stability had the highest performing AUC (0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Among a national sample of people with diabetes, adverse SDoH were associated with decreased eye care utilization. Evaluating and intervening upon the effects of adverse SDoH may be a means by which to improve eye care utilization and prevent vision loss. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
