[Acute myelogenous leukemia developed at the 26th week of gestation].

We report here a 35-year-old pregnant woman with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). She was diagnosed with AML (M2) in August 2009, coinciding with the 26(th) week of pregnancy. She underwent a cesarean section at 27 weeks gestation, delivering a very low birth weight male infant (1,066 g). One week later, she received induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine. She achieved complete remission after two courses of chemotherapy. The incidence of acute leukemia during pregnancy is low. Chemotherapy after the 2(nd) trimester is not associated with an increased rate of fetal malformation. However, there are some reports that in utero exposure to chemotherapy during any trimester of pregnancy carries a significant risk for an unfavorable outcome including low birth weight, fetal or neonatal death, and intrauterine growth retardation. Decision on the choice of treatment for acute leukemia during pregnancy should be case-dependent. If an infant has grown sufficiently to be viable outside uterus and the patient does not demonstrate a severe bleeding tendency, delivery by cesarean section preceding chemotherapy is one option.

Erythematous and bullous rash strongly indicating toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a very rare drug reaction associated with a high mortality rate. This condition warrants prompt recognition, diagnosis and treatment. Only one case report of TEN that was possibly induced by ritodrine hydrochloride, a tocolytic agent, was found in English literature. Here, we report the case of a 26-year-old pregnant woman who was suspected with TEN following the intravenous administration of ritodrine hydrochloride in the 35(th) week of gestation. An emergency cesarean section was performed because the labor pains caused systemic intolerable haphalgesia. After the surgery, intensive dermatological treatment commenced, which helped her recover from the serious condition. The result of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for ritodrine hydrochloride was positive. When a skin eruption appears during the administration of ritodrine, we must consider the benefits as well as the risks of continuous use of tocolytic agents because there is a risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or TEN.

[Anaphylaxia induced by etoposide--a case report].

A 32-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 2, visited Teikyo University Hospital with complaints of abnormal uterine bleeding and lower abdominal pain. Urine hCG level was 1,024 x 10(3) IU/l. MRI examination showed a vascular, rich solid mass 10 cm in diameter at the posterior region of the uterus. Under the clinical diagnosis of choriocarcinoma, she underwent total hysterectomy with right salpingooophorectomy. The ovarian choriocarcinoma was confirmed by pathologic examination. Additional chemotherapy was planned using the combined regimen of etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide and oncovin. After 2 min of etoposide administration (100 mg/m2), the patient complained of acute dyspnea, which was caused by bronchospasms and cutaneous flushing. Etoposide infusion was immediately stopped, and anti-anaphylaxic treatment was done by administering hydroxyzine hydrochloride. Five min after the episode had occurred, the patient recovered. This episode was thought to have been induced by etoposide, but etoposide was a key agent for choriocarcinoma. Thus, we devised a modified chemotherapy using etoposide as follows. The regimen was hydrocortisone 100 mg i.v. q6 h and promethazine hydrochloride 50 mg i.m. q6 h for 24 h before infusion of etoposide. The etoposide concentration was diluted to 50%, and the drug administration rate reduced by half. With the modified regimen, the patient showed no anaphylaxic symptoms. The few reports on anaphylaxic reactions to chemotherapeutic agents induced by side effects must be taken into account when we use these drugs.