ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare malignancy. Many cases of BIA-ALCL are identified based on the presence of late-onset effusion and/or masses. Importantly, the United States Food and Drug Administration noted that in all cases diagnosed in patients with textured implants, the patients either had a history of mixed implantation of smooth and textured devices or no clinical history was supplied for review. In Japan, the first case of BIA-ALCL was reported in 2019, and we encountered the third case in Japan in December 2021. There have been a total of five cases of BIA-ALCL previously reported at Japanese academic conferences (Japan Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Society. http://jopbs.umin.jp/medical/index.html ), of which only the first case has been published. Unlike the first case, this patient had clinical features that were highly suggestive of the postoperative chest wall recurrence of breast cancer, with a mass and rash on the skin. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 45-year-old woman who had undergone breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery of the right breast 8 years previously. The patient presented with a mass and skin rash inside the inframammary area, and we suspected a damaged silicone breast implant (SBI) or chest wall recurrence. We examined the mass by a core needle biopsy and made a pathological diagnosis of BIA-ALCL. Imaging findings suggested internal thoracic lymph node swelling and lymphoma infiltration beyond the capsule but no metastatic lesions (cStage III). After en bloc resection of the SBI and lymphoma, adjuvant systemic therapy was performed. CONCLUSION: We encountered the third case of BIA-ALCL in Japan. This was a case with clinically advanced stage of disease; however, the BIA-ALCL was found to be in remission.
ABSTRACT
A 19-year-old woman had stage IA endometrial carcinoma treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate and experienced a recurrence. This patient's experience illustrates the importance of a thorough history and endometrial assessment in younger patients.
ABSTRACT
Several high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma cases that cannot be classified into any existing established categories have been reported. These cases were provisionally classified into undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). Some dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) cases may also have been classified into the UPS category due to the absence of MDM2 amplification or an atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma component. We retrieved and reviewed 77 high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma cases, initially diagnosed as UPS in 66 cases and DDLS in 11 cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses of DDIT3 and MDM2 were performed for available cases. Of the cases successfully subjected to DDIT3 FISH (n = 56), nine (7 UPS and 2 DDLS) showed DDIT3 amplification but no MDM2 amplification. Two UPS cases showed both telomeric (5') and centromeric (3') amplification of DDIT3 or low polysomy of chromosome 12, whereas 5 UPS and 2 DDLS cases showed 5'-predominant DDIT3 amplification. Histopathologically, all cases showed UPS-like proliferation of atypical pleomorphic tumor cells. Immunohistochemically, only one case showed focal nuclear positivity for DDIT3, supporting the previous finding that DDIT3 expression was not correlated with DDIT3 amplification. All three cases with focal MDM2 expression involved 5'-predominant amplification, two of which showed DDLS-like histological features. The majority of cases (7/9) showed decreased expression in p53 staining, suggesting that DDIT3 amplification regulates the expression of TP53 like MDM2. From a clinicopathological perspective, we hypothesize that DDIT3-amplified sarcoma, especially with 5'-predominant amplification, can be reclassified out of the UPS category.
Subject(s)
Histiocytoma, Malignant Fibrous , Lipoma , Liposarcoma , Sarcoma , Soft Tissue Neoplasms , Humans , Liposarcoma/pathology , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Gene Amplification , Sarcoma/genetics , Sarcoma/pathology , Lipoma/diagnosis , Chromosome Aberrations , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Transcription Factor CHOP/genetics , Transcription Factor CHOP/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2/analysisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examine how advancements in novel antirheumatic drugs affect the clinicopathologic features of lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this multicenter study across 53 hospitals in Japan, we characterized patients with RA who developed LPDs and visited the hospitals between January 1999 and March 2021. The statistical tools used included Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U-test, the log-rank test, logistic regression analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Overall, 752 patients with RA-associated LPD (RA-LPD) and 770 with sporadic LPD were included in the study. We observed significant differences in the clinicopathologic features between patients with RA-LPD and those with sporadic LPD. Histopathological analysis revealed a high frequency of LPD-associated immunosuppressive conditions. Furthermore, patients with RA-LPD were evaluated based on the antirheumatic drugs administered. The methotrexate (MTX) plus tacrolimus and MTX plus tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) groups had different affected site frequencies and histologic subtypes than the MTX-only group. Moreover, MTX and TNFi may synergistically affect susceptibility to Epstein-Barr virus infection. In case of antirheumatic drugs administered after LPD onset, tocilizumab (TCZ)-only therapy was associated with lower frequency of regrowth after spontaneous regression than other regimens. CONCLUSION: Antirheumatic drugs administered before LPD onset may influence the clinicopathologic features of RA-LPD, with patterns changing over time. Furthermore, TCZ-only regimens are recommended after LPD onset.