Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Womens Health ; 23(1): 576, 2023 11 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37936116

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compile existing evidence on the significance of the NLR in predicting endometriosis in order to aid clinical decision-making and outcomes. METHODS: We searched ProQuest, Web of Science, and PubMed for related studies published before January 2, 2023. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported for each outcome. Because a significant level of heterogeneity was found, we used the random-effects model to calculate pooled effects. We used Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality assessment. RESULTS: Overall, 18 article with were included in the analysis. A random-effect model revealed that patients with endometriosis had elevated levels of NLR compared to healthy controls (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.33 to 1.25, P < 0.001). Patients with endometriosis had elevated levels of NLR compared to those with other benign tumors (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.17 to 1.53, P = 0.014). In addition, NLR level of patients with stage III and IV endometriosis was not different from that of patients with stage I and II endometrioma (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI = -0.14 to 0.74, P = 0.18). However, NLR level was not different between endometriosis patients with and without peritoneal lesions (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.34to 0.10, P = 0.28), between patients with and without endometrioma (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.55, P = 0.26) and between endometriosis patients with and without deep lesions (SMD = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.28, P = 0.72). The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.60-0.73), and the pooled specificity was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: NLR might be utilized in clinics as a possible predictor to help clinicians diagnose endometriosis in affected women.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Peritoneal Diseases , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/diagnosis , Endometriosis/pathology , Neutrophils/pathology , Lymphocytes/pathology
2.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2022: 9680591, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36387932

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to consolidate the available data on the role of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting adnexal torsion (AT), to help guide clinical decision-making and outcomes. Methods: We used Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus to conduct a systematic search for relevant publications published before June 26, 2022. We reported standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Because a significant level of heterogeneity was found, we used the random-effects model to calculate pooled effects. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) too for quality assessment. Results: Overall, 15 articles were included in the analysis. A random-effects model revealed that patients with AT had elevated levels of NLR compared to those with other adnexal masses (SMD = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.67 to 1.45, p < 0.001). So, NLR had diagnostic value. In the subgroup analysis according to ethnicity, we found that Caucasian patients with AT had elevated levels of NLR compared to patients who were operated due to adnexal mass and reported as having a benign ovarian cyst, without torsion (SMD = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.71 to 1.54, p < 0.001). However, in the case of East Asian patients, there was no difference between cases and controls (SMD = 0.86, 95%CI = -0.21 to 1.94, p = 0.11). The pooled sensitivity of NLR was 0.79 (95%CI = 0.72-0.85), and the pooled specificity was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.91). Conclusion: In conclusion, there has been an interest in the use of NLR as a diagnostic marker for AT.


Subject(s)
Neutrophils , Ovarian Torsion , Female , Humans , Lymphocytes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL