Compulsive sexual behavior disorder in an inpatient sample with substance use disorder.

Background: Several studies indicate that compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) shares core elements with substance use disorder (SUD). These findings support the assumption of common mechanisms in addiction, which may lead to a higher tendency in patients with SUD to have comorbid CSBD. Nevertheless, this relationship between CSBD and SUD is poorly understood to date. Aim: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of CSBD and its subtype pornography use disorder (PUD) between a SUD group and a matched control group. Herein, we aimed to test whether patients with SUD are more likely to have a comorbid CSBD/PUD. We further hypothesized that a higher CSBD/PUD prevalence in patients with SUD is accompanied by more pronounced CSBD- and PUD-related personal characteristics. Methods: We assessed CSBD, PUD, and related personal characteristics in an inpatient SUD sample (N = 92) and a healthy control sample matched by age, gender, and educational level. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were the diagnoses of CSBD/PUD as assessed by questionnaires. CSBD/PUD-related personal characteristics were the early onset of problematic pornography consumption, relationship status as a single person, a high sexual motivation, a high level of time spent watching pornography, and a high degree of problematic pornography consumption (Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale, short version). Results: There was no significant difference between groups regarding CSBD prevalence (SUD sample, 3.3%; control sample, 7.6%) and PUD prevalence (SUD sample, 2.2%; control sample, 6.5%). We found relationship status as a single person and the sexual motivation dimension of importance of sex to be the only CSBD-related personal characteristics that were more pronounced in the SUD sample than the matched control group. Clinical Implications: Results indicate no higher tendency for patients with SUD to develop comorbid CSBD/PUD, yet important vulnerabilities (eg, emotional dysregulation) should be considered when treating addictive disorder to prevent possible symptom displacement. Strengths and Limitations: A strength of the study is that we compared a sample of patients with SUD with a matched control sample and used an instrument based on ICD-11 criteria for CSBD. Possible limitations are significant differences between the groups because of the restrictions in an inpatient clinic that may have influenced responses (eg, roommates) and that the control group was not screened for SUD. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with some caution. Conclusion: We found no evidence of an overcomorbidity of SUD and CSBD/PUD. However, a higher rate of vulnerability factors for CSBD/PUD in the SUD sample might suggest some similarities between SUD and CSBD/PUD.

Update on treatment studies for compulsive buying-shopping disorder: A systematic review.

Background and aims: Compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) is mentioned as an example of other specified impulse control disorders in the ICD-11 coding tool, highlighting its clinical relevance and need for treatment. The aim of the present work was to provide a systematic update on treatment studies for CBSD, with a particular focus on online CBSD. Method: The preregistered systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42021257379) was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases. Original research published between January 2000 and December 2022 was included. Risk of reporting bias was evaluated with the CONSORT guideline for randomized controlled trials. Effect sizes for primary CBSD outcomes were calculated. Results: Thirteen studies were included (psychotherapy: 2 open, 4 waitlist control design; medication: 2 open, 3 placebo-controlled, 2 open-label phase followed by a double-blind discontinuation phase; participants treatment/control 349/149). None of the studies addressed online CBSD. Psychotherapy studies suggest that group cognitive-behavioral therapy is effective in reducing CBSD symptoms. Pharmacological studies with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors or topiramate did not indicate superiority over placebo. Predictors of treatment outcome were rarely examined, mechanisms of change were not studied at all. Risk of reporting bias was high in most studies. Discussion: Poor methodological and low quality of reporting of included studies reduce the reliability of conclusions. There is a lack of studies targeting online CBSD. More high-quality treatment research is needed with more emphasis on the CBSD subtype and mechanisms of change.

[The Pathological Buying Screener: Validation in a Clinical Sample]. / Der Pathological Buying Screener: Validierung in einer klinischen Stichprobe.

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 13-item Pathological Buying Screener (PBS, [1]) in a clinical sample. METHOD: The PBS was administered to a total sample of 413 treatment-seeking patients (buying-shopping disorder n=151, gambling disorder n=59, alcohol dependency n=60, other mental disorders [anxiety, depressive, eating, somatoform disorders] n=143). Factor structure was tested in the total sample using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability was determined by means of Cronbach's α. Group comparisons were used to determine to which degree the PBS discriminates between patients with BSD and other clinical groups. The BSD-group completed a battery of other measures to explore convergent and divergent validity. A subgroup (n=29) answered the PBS before and after psychotherapy to investigate sensitivity to change. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with PBS data of patients with buying-shopping disorder and those from a previous community sample 1 was performed to define a cut-off point for buying-shopping disorder. RESULTS: The CFA showed a good model fit for both a one-factor and a two-factor structure with the subscales "loss of control/consequences" (10 items) and "excessive buying behavior" (3 items). The subscales were highly intercorrelated (r=0.92). A hierarchical regression analysis with another BSD measure as dependent variable did not indicate an own incremental validity of the subscale "excessive buying behavior". Good convergent, divergent and discriminative capacity was obtained for the PBS total score. At its recommended cut-off point of ≥29 the PBS has a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 94.7%. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate good psychometric properties of the PBS and suggest that the PBS total score can be used in clinical settings.