Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 50(2): 197-199, 2023 Feb.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36807170

ABSTRACT

An 83-year-old woman underwent an examination for right lower abdominal pain and was diagnosed with highly advanced cecal cancer. CT showed no metastasis; thus, we attempted resection or bypass surgery. While no liver metastasis or peritoneal dissemination was observed intraoperatively, the circumflex region was highly infiltrated to the peritoneum and retroperitoneum. Considering the patient's age, resection was deemed overly invasive, so an ileum and transverse colon bypass surgery was performed. To downsize and safely remove the primary lesion, capecitabine plus bevacizumab was started. A CT examination performed after 3 courses revealed that the tumor had decreased in size. After the 4th course, surgery was performed. Intraoperative findings showed no obvious peritoneal dissemination, the tumor size was reduced, and the tumor was movable. A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy plus D3 dissection was performed. She was discharged on postoperative day 5. No obvious recurrence has been observed 6 months after surgery.


Subject(s)
Cecal Neoplasms , Colon, Transverse , Colonic Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colon, Transverse/surgery , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Cecal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
2.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 47(13): 2302-2304, 2020 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33468941

ABSTRACT

In general, gastrojejunal bypass is performed for unresectable gastric cancers with stenosis. It enables patients to take food and be discharged from the hospital earlier. Previously, we used to primarily perform open gastrojejunal bypass; however, recently, we perform laparoscopic gastrojejunal bypass because it is minimally invasive. We evaluated 31 patients who underwent gastrojejunal bypass for unresectable gastric cancer in our department between December 2009 and December 2019. We retrospectively compared the laparoscopic surgery group(n=7)with the open surgery group(n=24). No significant difference in patient background was found between the study groups. Compared to patients in the open surgery group, those in the laparoscopic group had significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and time until initiation of oral intake, relatively lesser blood loss, and no postoperative complications. Moreover, more patients in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group were administered postoperative chemotherapy. Further, postoperative chemotherapy was administered sooner in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery group. Laparoscopic gastrojejunal bypass is a safe and less invasive treatment for unresectable gastric cancer with stenosis. It may be superior to the conventional open surgery with regard to early postoperative chemotherapy for cancer.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass , Laparoscopy , Pyloric Stenosis , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Pyloric Stenosis/etiology , Pyloric Stenosis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
3.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 47(13): 2421-2423, 2020 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33468981

ABSTRACT

An 84-year-old man on hemodialysis was referred to our department for an advanced gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis. Pre-operative CT showed thickening of the stomach wall at the primary lesion and regional lymph node metastasis, while no clear peritoneal metastasis was found. However, we found peritoneal disseminations during the operation, so gastrojejunal bypass was performed. After the operation, he hoped chemotherapy despite risk factors such as renal failure and old age. We introduced a reduced dose of weekly nab-paclitaxel to him. After 3 courses, CT showed the primary lesion had decreased in size, and after 6 courses, serum CA19-9 level decreased to 61.8 U/mL from 2,343 U/mL at the before treatment. No serious adverse events were observed during the chemotherapy. However, after 8 courses, the tumor markers was gradually re-increased, and CT showed the primary tumor re-increased after 9 courses. Therefore, he received irinotecan alone as the second-line. He is still alive 1 year and 8 months after diagnosis of gastric cancer. It is generally said that the risk of cancer chemotherapy for dialysis patients and the elderly is high. However, we suggest that it could be safely performed by examining the appropriate drug and dose. Weekly nab-paclitaxel regimen could be one of the promising options for these patients.


Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Albumins , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Humans , Male , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...