Localized colorectal cancer database integrating 4 randomized controlled trials; (JCOG2310A).

Although phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the most robust statistical approach for answering clinical questions, they require massive expenditures in terms of time, labor, and funding. Ancillary and supplementary analyses using RCTs are sometimes conducted as alternative approaches to answering clinical questions, but the available integrated databases of RCTs are limited. In this background, the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) established a database of ancillary studies integrating four phase III RCTs (JCOG0212, JCOG0404, JCOG0910 and JCOG1006) conducted by the CCSG to investigate specific clinicopathological factors in pStage II/III colorectal cancer (JCOG2310A). This database will be updated by adding another clinical trial data and accelerating several analyses that are clinically relevant in the management of localized colorectal cancer. This study describes the details of this database and planned and ongoing analyses as an initiative of JCOG cOlorectal Young investigators (JOY).

Prognostic impact of primary tumour location after curative resection in Stage I-III colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship of tumour site with post-recurrence course and outcome after primary surgery in resectable colorectal cancer is unclear. This study investigated the prognostic impact of primary tumour location following radical resection without preoperative treatment in Stage I-III colorectal cancer. METHODS: We analyzed 3770 patients with Stage I-III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection at our hospital during 2000-15. We defined the right-sided colon as the cecum, ascending colon and transverse colon, and the left-sided colon as the descending colon, sigmoid and rectosigmoid junction. Patients were divided into three groups according to tumour site: right-sided colon, left-sided colon and rectum. Endpoints were overall survival, recurrence-free survival by stage and survival after recurrence, respectively. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with stage I left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 98.2, 97.3 and 97.2%, respectively (P = 0.488). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with Stage II left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 96.2, 88.7 and 83.0, respectively (P = 0.070). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with Stage III left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 88.7, 83.0 and 80.2, respectively (P = 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients with Stage I left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 95.1, 94.5 and 90.6% (P = 0.027). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients with Stage II left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 85.2, 90.2 and 76.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of patients with Stage III left-sided colon cancer, right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer were 75.3, 75.3 and 59.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Right-sided colon cancer was significantly associated with better recurrence-free survival compared with left-sided colon cancer (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.63; P = 0.025) and rectal cancer (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.51-2.38; P < 0.001) after adjusting for clinical factors. Amongst patients with recurrence, right-sided colon cancer was significantly associated with poorer survival after recurrence compared with left-sided colon cancer (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97; P = 0.036), and showed a tendency towards poorer survival after recurrence compared with rectal cancer (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.10; P = 0.164). CONCLUSIONS: In Stage I-III colorectal cancer without preoperative treatment, our results suggest that the three tumour sites (right-sided colon, left-sided colon or rectum) may have prognostic significance for recurrence-free survival and survival after recurrence, rather than sidedness alone.

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Major guidelines consistently recommend 5 years of postoperative surveillance for patients with colorectal cancer. However, they differ in their recommendations for examination intervals and whether they should vary according to disease stage. Furthermore, there are no reports on the cost-effectiveness of the different surveillance schedules. The objective of this study is to identify the most cost-effective surveillance intervals after curative resection of colorectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 3701 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital were included. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted for the five surveillance strategies with reference to the guidelines. Expected medical costs and quality-adjusted life years after colorectal cancer resection were calculated using a state-transition model by Monte Carlo simulation. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained was calculated for each strategy, with a maximum acceptable value of 43 500-52 200 USD (5-6 million JPY). RESULTS: Stages I, II and III included 1316, 1082 and 1303 patients, respectively, with 45, 140 and 338 relapsed cases. For patients with stage I disease, strategy 4 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $26 555/quality-adjusted life year) was considered to be the most cost-effective, while strategies 3 ($83 071/quality-adjusted life year) and 2 ($289 642/quality-adjusted life year) exceeded the threshold value. In stages II and III, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for strategy 3 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $18 358-22 230/quality-adjusted life year. CONCLUSIONS: In stage I, the cost-effectiveness of intensive surveillance is very poor and strategy 4 is the most cost-effective. Strategy 3 is the most cost-effective in stages II and III.

Prognostic impact of extramural venous invasion detected by contrast-enhanced CT colonography in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of computed tomography (CT)-detected extramural venous invasion on the recurrence of colon cancer is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of extramural venous invasion diagnosed before surgery by contrast-enhanced CT colonography using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction images. METHODS: Patients with colon cancer staged greater than or equal to T2 and/or stage I-III who underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography between 2013 and 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan were retrospectively investigated for CT-detected extramural venous invasion. Inter-observer agreement for the detection of CT-detected extramural venous invasion was evaluated and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for recurrence-free survival using CT-TNM staging and CT-detected extramural venous invasion. Preoperative clinical variables were analysed using Cox regression for recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: Out of 922 eligible patients, 544 cases were analysed (50 (9.2 per cent) were diagnosed as positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion and 494 (90.8 per cent) were diagnosed as negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion). The inter-observer agreement for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a κ coefficient of 0.830. The group positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a median follow-up of 62.1 months, whereas the group negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a median follow-up of 60.7 months. When CT-TNM stage was stratified according to CT-detected extramural venous invasion status, CT-T3 N(-)extramural venous invasion(+) had a poor prognosis compared with CT-T3 N(-)extramural venous invasion(-) and CT-stage I (5-year recurrence-free survival of 50.6 versus 89.3 and 90.1 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). In CT-stage III, the group positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion also had a poor prognosis compared with the group negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion (5-year recurrence-free survival of 52.0 versus 78.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis revealed that recurrence was associated with CT-T4 (HR 3.10, 95 per cent c.i. 1.85 to 5.20; P < 0.001) and CT-detected extramural venous invasion (HR 3.08, 95 per cent c.i. 1.90 to 5.00; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT-detected extramural venous invasion was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence and could be used in combination with preoperative TNM staging to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

Sketch-based semantic retrieval of medical images.

The volume of medical images stored in hospitals is rapidly increasing; however, the utilization of these accumulated medical images remains limited. Existing content-based medical image retrieval (CBMIR) systems typically require example images, leading to practical limitations, such as the lack of customizable, fine-grained image retrieval, the inability to search without example images, and difficulty in retrieving rare cases. In this paper, we introduce a sketch-based medical image retrieval (SBMIR) system that enables users to find images of interest without the need for example images. The key concept is feature decomposition of medical images, which allows the entire feature of a medical image to be decomposed into and reconstructed from normal and abnormal features. Building on this concept, our SBMIR system provides an easy-to-use two-step graphical user interface: users first select a template image to specify a normal feature and then draw a semantic sketch of the disease on the template image to represent an abnormal feature. The system integrates both types of input to construct a query vector and retrieves reference images. For evaluation, ten healthcare professionals participated in a user test using two datasets. Consequently, our SBMIR system enabled users to overcome previous challenges, including image retrieval based on fine-grained image characteristics, image retrieval without example images, and image retrieval for rare cases. Our SBMIR system provides on-demand, customizable medical image retrieval, thereby expanding the utility of medical image databases.

Lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in T2 low rectal cancer: is TME alone sufficient for cure?

BACKGROUND: Some patients with even T2 low rectal cancer are known to develop lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis. This study aimed to investigate real-world evidence regarding lateral nodal metastasis on T2 low rectal cancer treatment. METHODS: Consecutive patients with pathological T2 low rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent surgery between January 2007 and December 2015 at two Japanese cancer centres dedicated to lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were identified and included in the analysis. Lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis was defined as pathologically confirmed metastatic lateral pelvic lymph node or lateral-local recurrence after primary surgery. RESULTS: A total of 215 consecutive patients, including 101 and 114 patients who did and did not undergo bilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, were included in the analysis. Overall, 19 (8.8%) patients had lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis, including 13 with pathologically confirmed metastatic lateral pelvic lymph node and six with lateral-local recurrence. A total of 10 (4.7%) patients had local recurrence, including six with lateral-local recurrence, two with central-local recurrence and two with anastomotic recurrence. Five/7-year cumulative risks of lateral-local recurrence in patients with and without lateral pelvic lymph node dissection were 1.1/1.1% and 3.9/5.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The problem of the relatively high rate of lateral local recurrence remains in treating T2 low rectal cancer with only total mesorectal excision. The selection of high-risk patients of lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis and the indication of additional treatment in T2 low rectal cancer should be discussed further.

A review of 14 cases of perianal Paget's disease: characteristics of anorectal cancer with pagetoid spread.

BACKGROUND: Perianal Paget's disease (PPD) is an intraepithelial invasion of the perianal skin and is frequently associated with underlying anorectal carcinoma. The relatively rare nature of this disease has made it difficult to develop treatment recommendations. This study aims to analyze the clinical and pathological features of perianal Paget's disease (PPD) and to explore rational treatment options and follow-up for this disease. METHODS: The National Cancer Center Hospital database was searched for all cases of perianal Paget's disease diagnosed between 2006 and 2021. In the 14 patients identified, we reviewed the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adenocarcinoma with pagetoid spread, including suspected or recurrent cases. RESULTS: All 14 cases met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up period after diagnosis was 4.5 (range, 0.1-13.0) years. Pagetoid spread before initial treatment was suspected in 12 cases (85.7%). Underlying rectal cancer was identified in 6 cases, and no primary tumor was detected in the other 6 cases. Seven patients had recurrent disease, with the median time to recurrence of 34.6 (range, 19.2-81.7) months. The time to the first relapse was 3 months, and that to the second relapse was 6 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 90.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and radiologic evaluation, as well as immunohistologic examination, should be performed. is to differentiate PPD with and without underlying anorectal carcinoma. The time to first recurrence varies widely, and long-term and regular follow-up for more than 5 years is considered necessary for local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Prognostic differences between oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease after resection in patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases: Retrospective analysis of a large cohort at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival data are lacking, and prognostic factors are not well-defined for patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or lung metastases. This study evaluated the outcomes after resection of oligometastatic hepatic or lung metastases from colorectal cancer and sought to identify prognostic factors. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 1,123 patients with colorectal cancer and hepatic or pulmonary metastases who underwent curative surgery between January 1991 and December 2016. RESULTS: Of the 1,123 patients, 719 had hepatic metastases, 287 had pulmonary metastases, and 117 had both. The 5-year overall survival rate was 52.3% in the hepatic metastases group, 70.4% in the pulmonary metastases group, and 71.4% in the hepatic and pulmonary metastases group (P < .001). In total, 1,045 patients had oligometastases (1-5 metastatic lesions in 1 or 2 organs) and 78 had polymetastases (≥6 metastases in 1 or 2 organs). Prognosis was significantly better in patients with oligometastases than in those with polymetastases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 59.0% in the oligometastases group and 35.3% in the polymetastases group (P < .001); the respective 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 37.5% and 11.6% (P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified predictors of both poor overall survival and relapse-free survival to be a high carcinoembryonic antigen level before the first metastasectomy, largest metastasis measuring ≥2 cm, polymetastases, and synchronous metastases. CONCLUSION: Prognosis after curative resection was better in patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer in the liver or lung than in those with polymetastases. Multidisciplinary decision-making strategies, including about surgery, should be based on number of metastases rather than their site.

Risk of non-colorectal cancer-related death in elderly patients with the disease: A comparison of five preoperative risk assessment indices.

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) die of non-CRC-related causes. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification, Charlson Comorbidity Index, National Institute on Aging, and National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index, and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 score are all known predictors of survival in patients with CRC. However, the utility of these indices for predicting non-CRC-related death in elderly CRC patients is not known. METHODS: The study population comprised 364 patients aged 80 years or more who received curative resection for stage I-III CRC between 2000 and 2016. The association of each index with non-CRC-related death was compared by competing-risks analysis such as the cumulative incidence function and proportional subdistribution hazards regression analysis as well as time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: There were 85 deaths (40 CRC-related and 45 non-CRC-related) during a median observation period of 53.2 months. Cumulative incidence function analysis identified CONUT score as the most suitable for risk stratification for non-CRC-related death. In proportional subdistribution hazards regression, risk of non-CRC-related death increased significantly as CONUT score worsened (2/3/4 vs. 0/1, hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-3.15; ≥5 vs. 2/3/4, hazard ratio 2.71, 95% CI 1.08-6.81). Time-dependent ROC curve analysis showed that CONUT score were consistently superior to other indices during the 5-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of deaths in elderly patients with CRC were not CRC-related. CONUT score was the most useful predictor of non-CRC-related death in these patients.

Prognostic Role for Primary Tumor Location in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparison of Right-Sided Colon, Left-Sided Colon, and Rectum.

BACKGROUND: Although right-sided colon cancer is increasingly recognized as having a worse prognosis than left-sided colorectal cancer for colorectal liver metastases, little is known about the differences between the left-sided colon and rectum. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the prognostic value of primary tumor location in patients with colorectal liver metastases by examining the left-sided colon and rectum separately. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study from 2003 to 2017. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in a National Cancer Center Hospital. PATIENTS: The study cohort included 489 patients with colorectal liver metastases from right-sided colon cancer ( n = 119, 24%), left-sided colon cancer ( n = 251, 51%), or rectal cancer ( n = 119, 24%) who underwent hepatic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were relapse-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Five-year relapse-free survival rates for patients with right-sided colon cancer, left-sided colon cancer, and rectal cancer were 28.6%, 34.1%, and 26.4%, and 5-year overall survival rates were 53.9%, 70.3%, and 60.8%. Multivariable analysis revealed significant differences in relapse-free survival and overall survival between left-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer (relapse-free survival: HR = 1.37, p = 0.03; overall survival: HR = 1.49, p = 0.03) and between left-sided colon cancer and right-sided colon cancer (relapse-free survival: HR = 1.39, p = 0.02; overall survival: HR = 1.60, p = 0.01), but not between right-sided colon cancer and rectal cancer. In patients with recurrence ( n = 325), left-sided colon cancer had the lowest multiple-site recurrence rate and the highest surgical resection rate for recurrence (left-sided colon cancer, 20%/46%; right-sided colon cancer, 32%/30%; rectal cancer, 26%/39%). LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective in design. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer was associated with worse relapse-free survival and overall survival compared with left-sided colon cancer in patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent hepatic resection. Our findings suggest that the left-sided colon and rectum should be considered distinct entities in colorectal liver metastases. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B882 . PAPEL PRONSTICO DE LA UBICACIN DEL TUMOR PRIMARIO EN PACIENTES CON METSTASIS HEPTICAS COLORRECTALES UNA COMPARACIN ENTRE COLON DERECHO, COLON IZQUIERDO Y RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Aunque se reconoce cada vez más que el cáncer de colon del lado derecho tiene un peor pronóstico que el cáncer colorrectal del lado izquierdo para las metástasis hepáticas colorrectales, se sabe poco acerca de las diferencias entre el recto y el colon del lado izquierdo.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó el valor pronóstico de la ubicación del tumor primario en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales examinando el recto y el colon del lado izquierdo por separado.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de 2003 a 2017.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un Hospital del Centro Nacional de Cáncer.PACIENTES:La cohorte del estudio incluyó a 489 pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales de cáncer de colon del lado derecho (n = 119, 24%), cáncer de colon del lado izquierdo (n = 251, 51%) o cáncer de recto (n = 119, 24%). %) que fueron sometidos a resección hepática.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Los resultados primarios fueron la supervivencia sin recaídas y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:Las tasas de supervivencia sin recaída a cinco años para los pacientes con cáncer de colon derecho, cáncer de colon izquierdo y cáncer de recto fueron del 28,6%, 34,1%, y 26,4%, respectivamente, y las tasas de supervivencia general a los 5 años fueron del 53,9%, 70,3%, y 60,8%, respectivamente. El análisis multivariable reveló diferencias significativas en la supervivencia sin recaída y la supervivencia general entre el cáncer de colon izquierdo y el cáncer de recto (supervivencia sin recaída: HR = 1,37, p = 0,03; supervivencia general: HR = 1,49, p = 0,03) y entre el cáncer de colon izquierdo y el cáncer de colon del lado derecho (supervivencia libre de recaídas: HR = 1,39, p = 0,02; supervivencia global: HR = 1,60, p = 0,01), pero no entre el cáncer de colon del lado derecho y el cáncer de recto. En pacientes con recurrencia (n = 325), el cáncer de colon izquierdo tuvo la tasa de recurrencia en sitios múltiples más baja y la tasa de resección quirúrgica más alta por recurrencia (cáncer de colon izquierdo, 20%/46%; cáncer de colon derecho, 32%/30%; cáncer de recto, 26%/39%).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue de diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El cáncer de recto se asoció con una peor supervivencia sin recaída y una supervivencia general peor en comparación con el cáncer de colon izquierdo en pacientes con metástasis hepáticas colorrectales que se sometieron a resección hepática. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que el colon y el recto del lado izquierdo deben considerarse entidades distintas en las metástasis hepáticas colorrectales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B882 . (Tradducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Prognostic impact of conversion hepatectomy for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of conversion hepatectomy in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and to identify prognostic factors after conversion hepatectomy. METHODS: Correlations of conversion hepatectomy with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively investigated in 554 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM in 2000-2017. Prognostic factors after conversion hepatectomy were examined in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Five hundred and nine patients (92%) had initially resectable CRLM at diagnosis and underwent hepatectomy (primary resection group) and 45 (8%) underwent conversion hepatectomy following chemotherapy (conversion group). The 5-year RFS was 30.0% in the primary resection group and 19.8% in the conversion group (p = 0.042); the respective 5-year OS rates were 62.0% and 52.4% (p = 0.253). Multivariable analysis did not identify conversion hepatectomy as a significant prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-1.37, p = 0.796) or OS (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67-1.79, p = 0.667). In the conversion group, multivariable analysis identified the following independent prognostic factors: timing of liver metastases for RFS (synchronous: HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.20-8.24, p = 0.020) and preoperative CEA level for RFS (> 5 ng/ml: HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.45-6.61, p = 0.003) and OS (> 5 ng/ml: HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.18-9.17, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: RFS and OS rates after conversion hepatectomy were not inferior to those after primary resection in patients with CRLM. Patients with a normal CEA level before hepatectomy can be expected to have good long-term prognosis after conversion hepatectomy.

Laparoscopic resection of a solitary fibrous tumor in the mesentery of the small intestine: a case report.

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that are usually localized in the mesothelium of soft tissues. Although SFTs of pleural origin are common, SFTs arising in the small intestine are extremely rare, and there are few reports of laparoscopic resection of these tumors. A 74-year-old woman presented to her local physician with intermittent pain in the lower abdomen. Computed tomography showed a 25 mm mass in the ileum with extramural protrusion and small intestine capsule endoscopy showed a submucosal tumor-like elevation covered by normal mucosa. The diagnosis was ileal tumor, which was removed by laparoscopic partial resection of the small intestine. Macroscopically, the tumor was found to be a substantial mass within subplasmalemmal fatty tissue that had no continuity with the muscular layer. Histological analysis showed proliferation of homogeneous spindle-shaped cells against a background of fibrous stroma. Immunostaining was positive for STAT6 and negative for KIT, Dog1, and S100, and SFT was diagnosed. The tumor was low risk according to Demicco's risk classification. In conclusion, a less invasive laparoscopic procedure is preferable if the tumor can be resected completely without applying excessive external force that results in seeding of tumor cells in the abdominal cavity.

Clinical outcomes of surgical and imatinib treatment for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours: retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are rare and treated mainly by radical surgery. Although the importance of perioperative imatinib has been recognized, there are few reports on its outcomes. METHOD: Consecutive patients diagnosed with rectal GISTs between July 2008 and February 2021 were identified from a prospective database. Effects of perioperative imatinib were investigated, and surgical and survival outcomes were compared between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery. RESULTS: 34 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Compared with upfront surgery (n = 11), the neoadjuvant imatinib group (n = 23) had significantly larger tumours (median size 8.3 versus 2.5 cm; P = 0.01) and included a significantly greater proportion of high-risk patients according to the modified Fletcher classification (20/23 (87.0%) versus 6/11 (54.5%); P = 0.02). Comparing the operation planned based on imaging before neoadjuvant imatinib and the operation performed, there was an increase in sphincter-preserving surgery (4/23 (17.4%) to 11/23 (47.8%); P = 0.02), abdominoperineal resection 11/23 (47.8%) reduced to 7/23 (30.4%); P = 0.13) and total pelvic exenteration reduced from 8/23 (34.8%) to 5/23 (21.7%); P = 0.01). Tumours were downsized by a median of 30 per cent (range 0 per cent to -56 per cent; P = 0.01). During follow-up (median 42, range 5-131 months), there was no postoperative recurrence in 29 patients who received perioperative imatinib. One of the five patients who underwent surgery without neoadjuvant or adjuvant imatinib developed local recurrence. CONCLUSION: Treatment with imatinib for rectal GISTs seems to improve outcomes, and neoadjuvant imatinib increases the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery.

Evaluation of the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery using the cumulative sum method.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the number of cases required to master the techniques required in robot-assisted surgery for different surgical fields and techniques. The purpose of this study was to clarify the learning curve of robot-assisted rectal surgery for malignant disease by surgical process. METHOD: The study retrospectively analyzed robot-assisted rectal surgeries performed between April 2014 and July 2020 for which the operating time per process was measurable. The following learning curves were created using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method: (1) console time required for total mesorectal excision (CUSUM tTME), (2) time from peritoneal incision to inferior mesenteric artery dissection (CUSUM tIMA), (3) time required to mobilize the descending and sigmoid colon (CUSUM tCM), and (4) time required to mobilize the rectum (CUSUM tRM). Each learning curve was classified into phases 1-3 and evaluated. A fifth learning curve was evaluated for robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection (CUSUM tLLND). RESULTS: This study included 149 cases. Phase 1 consisted of 32 cases for CUSUM tTME, 30 for CUSUM tIMA, 21 for CUSUM tCM, and 30 for CUSUM tRM; the respective numbers were 54, 48, 45, and 61 in phase 2 and 63, 71, 83, and 58 in phase 3. There was no significant difference in the number of cases in each phase. Lateral lymph node dissection was initiated in the 76th case where robot-assisted rectal surgery was performed. For CUSUM tLLND, there were 12 cases in phase 1, 6 in phase 2, and 7 cases in phase 3. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery is the same for all surgical processes. Surgeons who already have adequate experience in robot-assisted surgery may be able to acquire stable technique in a smaller number of cases when they start to learn other techniques.

Lymphocyte-to-C-Reactive Protein Ratio Is the Most Sensitive Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score in Patients With Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation contributes to the progression of malignancies. The preoperative lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio has recently been shown to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer who undergo surgery, but its prognostic value remains unclear in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the prognostic values of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, focusing on the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study from a prospectively collected database. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary cancer center in Japan. PATIENTS: The subjects were 756 consecutive patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who received systemic chemotherapy from 2000 to 2015. The prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio was evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was conducted to compare the prognostic impact of the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio with the impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, or the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the correlations of prognostic scores with overall survival. RESULTS: Median survival times of patients with high, intermediate, and low lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratios were 29.4, 19.3, and 13.1 months (p < 0.001). In all subgroups according to key prognostic factors (performance status, use of targeted agents, pretreatment CEA levels, tumor sidedness, M category, and primary tumor resection), patient prognosis could be clearly stratified into 3 groups by the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio. Multivariable analysis revealed that decreased lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio was independently associated with reduced survival (low vs high: HR 1.96, p < 0.001; intermediate vs high: HR 1.44, p < 0.001). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed that the lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio was the most sensitive predictor of survival among all inflammation-based prognostic scores on a continuous basis. LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective in nature. CONCLUSIONS: The lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio is a useful prognostic biomarker for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer and could contribute to accurate prognostication and therapeutic decision making. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B600. RELACIN ENTRE LINFOCITOS Y PROTENA C ES EL SCORE PRONOSTICO INFLAMATORIO MAS SENSIBLE EN PACIENTES CON CNCER COLORRECTAL METASTSICO IRRESECABLE: ANTECEDENTES:La inflamación sistémica contribuye en la progresión de neoplasias malignas. Recientemente se ha demostrado que la proporción preoperatoria de linfocitos -proteína C reactiva predice la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal que se sometieron a cirugía, pero su valor pronóstico sigue sin estar claro en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico irresecable.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el valor pronostico de los scores inflamtorios centrandose en linfocito- proteina c reactiva en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospective evaluando una base de datos.AJUSTE:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro oncológico terciario multidisciplinario de gran volumen en Japón.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 756 pacientes consecutivos todos con cáncer colorrectal metastásico irresecable que recibieron quimioterapia sistémica de 2000 a 2015. El valor pronóstico de la proteína C reactiva se evaluó mediante análisis univariables y multivariables. Se realizó análisis de la curva de características operativas del receptor dependiente del tiempo para comparar el impacto pronóstico de la proteína linfocito-C-reactiva con el de la proporción de neutrófilos a linfocitos, la proporción de plaquetas a linfocitos, la proporción de linfocitos a monocitos o la proporción de puntuación pronóstica segun escala de Glasgow modificada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Correlacion de las puntuaciones pronósticas con la supervivencia global.RESULTADOS:La mediana de supervivencia de los pacientes con niveles altos, intermedios y bajos de proteína C reactiva de linfocitos fue de 29,4, 19,3 y 13,1 meses, respectivamente (p <0,001). En todos los subgrupos de acuerdo con los factores pronósticos clave (estado funcional, uso de agentes dirigidos, niveles de antígeno carcinoembrionario antes del tratamiento, lado del tumor, categoría M y resección del tumor primario), el pronóstico del paciente podría estratificarse claramente en tres grupos por linfocito a C- proteína reactiva. El análisis multivariable reveló que la disminución de linfocitos a proteína C reactiva se asoció de forma independiente con una supervivencia reducida (baja frente a alta: cociente de riesgo 1,96, p <0,001; intermedio frente a alto: cociente de riesgo 1,44, p <0,001). El análisis de la curva de características operativas del receptor dependiente del tiempo reveló que de linfocito a proteína C reactiva era el predictor de supervivencia más sensible entre todas las puntuaciones de pronóstico basadas en inflamación de forma continua.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio fue de naturaleza retrospectiva.CONCLUSIONES:La proteína C reactiva de linfocitos a C es un biomarcador pronóstico útil para el cáncer colorrectal metastásico irresecable y podría contribuir a un pronóstico preciso y a la toma de decisiones terapéuticas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B600.

Preoperative Nutritional Scores as Host-Related Prognostic Factors for Both Overall Survival and Postoperative Complications in Patients With Stage II to III Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the TNM eighth edition, nutritional status and inflammatory scores are newly described as host-related prognostic factors for esophageal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer. However, only age and race are listed as host-related prognostic factors for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of nutritional and inflammatory scores for postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study using a database that prospectively collects data. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary cancer center in Japan. PATIENTS: Study participants were 1880 consecutive patients with stage II to III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 2004 and 2012. Two nutritional scores (prognostic nutritional index and controlling nutritional status score) and 4 inflammatory scores (modified Glasgow prognostic score, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, platelet:lymphocyte ratio, and C-reactive protein:albumin ratio) were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlations of nutritional scores and inflammatory scores with overall survival and postoperative complications were measured. RESULTS: After adjusting for key clinical and pathologic factors by multivariable analysis, 2 nutritional scores (prognostic nutritional index and controlling nutritional status score) and 2 inflammatory scores (neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and C-reactive protein:albumin ratio) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. With respect to discriminative ability, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and Harrell concordance index revealed that prognostic nutritional index and controlling nutritional status score were superior to the 4 inflammatory scores for predicting overall survival. Multivariable logistic regression analyses also revealed that prognostic nutritional index, controlling nutritional status score, and C-reactive protein:albumin ratio were independent predictors for postoperative complications. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective design of the study was a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative nutritional scores are promising host-related prognostic factors for overall survival and postoperative complications in patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B587. EVALUACIN DE SCORE NUTRICIONALES PREOPERATORIOS COMO FACTORES PRONSTICOS PARA SOBREVIDA Y COMPLICACIONES POSTOPERATORIAS EN PACIENTES CON CANCER COLORECTAL ETAPA II Y III: ANTECEDENTES:En las últimas etapificaciones T-N-M, tanto el estado nutricional como inflamatorio han sido descritos como factores pronósticos en cáncer de esófago, hepático y pancreático. Sin embargo en cáncer colorectal solo la edad y la raza son enumerados como factores pronósticos.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la importancia pronóstica de los scores nutricionales e inflamatorias para los resultados posoperatorios en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo utilizando una base de datos.AJUSTE:Centro oncológico teciario en Japón.PACIENTES:Fueron incluidos en el estudio 1880 pacientes, consecutivos, con cancer colorectal etapa II y III sometidos a reseeción curativa en el National Cancer Center Hospital entre 2004 y 2012. Se aplicaron dos scores: nutricional (índice nutricional pronóstico y puntuación del estado nutricional) e inflamatorias (Glasgow modificada, proporción de neutrófilos a linfocitos, de plaquetas a linfocitos y de proteína C reactiva a albúmina).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Evaluar scores nutricional e inflamatorio con sobrevida y complicaciones postoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Después de ajustar los factores clínicos y patológicos clave mediante análisis multivariable, dos scores nutricionales (índice nutricional pronóstico y puntuación del estado nutricional de control) y dos inflamatorias (proporción de neutrófilos a linfocitos y proporción de proteína C reactiva a albúmina) fueron pronósticos independientes factores para la sobrevida. Con respecto a la capacidad discriminativa, las curvas de características operativas del receptor, dependientes del tiempo y el índice de concordancia de Harrell, revelaron que el índice nutricional pronóstico y del estado nutricional de control eran superiores a las cuatro inflamatorias para predecir la sobrevida general. Los análisis de regresión logística multivariable también revelaron que el índice nutricional pronóstico, el estado nutricional de control y la relación proteína C reactiva / albúmina fueron predictores independientes de complicaciones postoperatorias.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de tipo retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los scores nutricionales preoperatorias son factores pronósticos prometedores relacionados con la sobrevida y las complicaciones postoperatorias en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio II y III. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B587.

Laparoscopic versus Open Colectomy for Elderly Patients with Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Analysis with the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score.

The feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for elderly patients remains unclear, as these patients usually present with comorbidities. Recently, the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has drawn attention as an evaluation score of patients' general status as well as a predictor of survival. We retrospectively analyzed overall survival in 424 patients aged ≥75 years with colon cancer, who underwent curative surgery (laparoscopic (n = 167) or open surgery (n = 257)) between January 2004 and December 2013. To adjust for heterogeneity in both groups, a propensity score-matched analysis was performed, with the CONUT score as a confounding covariate. 5-year overall survival rates of patients with normal (0-1), mildly abnormal (2-4), or abnormal (≥5) CONUT score were 88.6%, 79.4%, and 41.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). T3 or less, N negative, late period (2009-2013), and normal CONUT score were associated with the tendency to undergo laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.001). The analysis of the propensity score-matched cohort (124 pairs) revealed that patients in the laparoscopic surgery group had a similar prognosis to those in the open surgery group, with a 5-year overall survival of 91.9% vs. 82.0%, respectively (p = 0.102). Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is an acceptable surgical approach in elderly patients.

Nutritional and inflammatory measures predict survival of patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of nutritional and inflammatory measures (controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS)) on overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Subjects were 996 patients with stage IV CRC who were referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital between 2001 and 2015. We retrospectively investigated correlations between OS and CONUT score, PNI, and mGPS. Multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: After adjusting for known factors (age, gender, BMI, ECOG performance status, location of primary tumor, CEA levels, histological type, M category, and prior surgical treatment), all three measures were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with stage (CONUT score, p < 0.001; PNI, p < 0.001; mGPS, p < 0.001). Significant differences in OS were found between low CONUT score (0/1) (n = 614; 61%) and intermediate CONUT score (2/3) (n = 276; 28%) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.42, p = 0.032), and intermediate CONUT score and high CONUT score (≥4) (n = 106; 11%) (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.01-1.67, p = 0.045). Significant differences in OS were found between mGPS = 0 (n = 633; 64%) and mGPS = 1 (n = 234; 23%) (HR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.54-2.19, p < 0.001), but not between mGPS = 1 and mGPS = 2 (n = 129; 13%) (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.88-1.41, p = 0.349). Patients with low PNI (< 48.0) (n = 443; 44%) showed a significantly lower OS rate than those with high PNI (≥48.0) (n = 553; 56%) (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.19-1.62, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CONUT score, PNI, and mGPS were found to be independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with stage IV CRC, suggesting that nutritional and inflammatory status is a useful host-related prognostic indicator in stage IV CRC.

Prognostic impact of preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized carcinoembryonic antigen levels following curative resection of stage I-III rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative and early postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are known prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Recently, a large-scale study on colon cancer revealed that "preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA levels" is not an indicator of poor prognosis. However, whether this hold true in rectal cancer patients is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA levels in rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection. METHODS: Subjects were consecutive stage I-III rectal cancer patients who underwent curative resection without preoperative treatment at National Cancer Center Hospital between 2000 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) and the hazard function of recurrence or death were analyzed according to the CEA levels, as follows: normal preoperative CEA (normal group), preoperatively elevated but postoperatively normalized CEA (normalized group), and preoperatively and postoperatively elevated CEA (elevated group). RESULTS: The normalized group (n =235) had worse OS (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.08-2.04; P = .0142) compared to the normal group (n = 1208), and better OS compared to the elevated group (n = 47) (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.91; P = .0208). The elevated group had the highest and earliest peak in hazard function, followed by the normalized group and the normal group, with median times to recurrence of 8.8, 15.5, and 18.5 months, respectively (P = .0223). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis after resection of rectal cancer was worse in patients with preoperatively elevated and postoperatively normalized CEA compared to those with normal preoperative CEA. Patients with elevated preoperative CEA might require intensive follow-up even if levels normalize after resection, especially in earlier periods, for early detection of recurrence.

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a preoperative risk assessment index for older patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of preoperative general condition to predict postoperative outcomes is important, particularly in older patients who typically suffer from various comorbidities and exhibit impaired functional status. In addition to various indices such as Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index (NIA/NCI), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA-PS), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is recently gaining attention as a tool to evaluate the general condition of patients from a nutritional perspective. However, the utility of these indices in older patients with colorectal cancer has not been compared. METHODS: The study population comprised 830 patients with Stage I - IV colorectal cancer aged 75 years or older who underwent surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014. Associations of each index with overall survival (OS) (long-term outcome) and postoperative complications (short-term outcome) were examined. RESULTS: For the three indices with the highest Akaike information criterion values (i.e., CONUT score, CCI and ACE-27), but not the remaining indices (NIA/NCI and ASA-PS), OS significantly worsened as general condition scores decreased, after adjusting for known prognostic factors. In contrast, for postoperative complications, only CONUT score was identified as a predictive factor (≥4 versus 0-3; odds ratio: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.13-3.13; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: For older patients with colorectal cancer, only CONUT score was a predictive factor of both long-term and short-term outcomes after surgery, suggesting that CONUT score is a useful preoperative risk assessment index.