Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 112: 20-27, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30930247

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: If a gold standard is lacking in a diagnostic test accuracy study, expert diagnosis is frequently used as reference standard. However, interobserver and intraobserver agreements are imperfect. The aim of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of a panel diagnosis for pediatric infectious diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Pediatricians from six countries adjudicated a diagnosis (i.e., bacterial infection, viral infection, or indeterminate) for febrile children. Diagnosis was reached when the majority of panel members came to the same diagnosis, leaving others inconclusive. We evaluated intraobserver and intrapanel agreement with 6 weeks and 3 years' time intervals. We calculated the proportion of inconclusive diagnosis for a three-, five-, and seven-expert panel. RESULTS: For both time intervals (i.e., 6 weeks and 3 years), intrapanel agreement was higher (kappa 0.88, 95%CI: 0.81-0.94 and 0.80, 95%CI: NA) compared to intraobserver agreement (kappa 0.77, 95%CI: 0.71-0.83 and 0.65, 95%CI: 0.52-0.78). After expanding the three-expert panel to five or seven experts, the proportion of inconclusive diagnoses (11%) remained the same. CONCLUSION: A panel consisting of three experts provides more reproducible diagnoses than an individual expert in children with lower respiratory tract infection or fever without source. Increasing the size of a panel beyond three experts has no major advantage for diagnosis reproducibility.


Subject(s)
Clinical Decision-Making/methods , Fever of Unknown Origin/diagnosis , Pediatrics , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Expert Testimony/methods , Expert Testimony/standards , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/standards , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Standard of Care
2.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 19(9): 557-561, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28971639

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The closure of an atrial septal defect is procedure that is frequently performed in both adults and children. Currently, the most commonly used devices are the Amplatzer® and Occlutech® Figulla® atrial septal occluders. Studies conducted in adults have shown that these devices all have similar performance efficiency for the closure of secundum atrial septal defects. No study to date has examined their performance in the pediatric population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the performance of Amplatzer® and Occlutech® Figulla® atrial septal occluders in the pediatric population. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective study of exclusively pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect with these devices was conducted at our institute. RESULTS: The study comprised 110 children, 50 in the Amplatzer® device group and 60 in the Occlutech® Figulla® device group. The groups had similar demographic and defect characteristics, except for defect size per transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which was 2.1 mm larger in the Amplatzer® device group (P = 0.02). No adverse events were recorded in either of the study groups. Complete defect closure at 12 months follow-up (procedural success) was achieved in all but one of the patients in the Amplatzer® group and all but two in the Figulla® group (P = 1). The residual shunt rates of fenestrated defects were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For children with an isolated secundum atrial septal defect, percutaneous closure is equally safe and effective with either Amplatzer® or Occlutech® Figulla® devices.


Subject(s)
Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/therapy , Septal Occluder Device , Cardiac Catheterization , Child , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Acta Paediatr ; 105(6): 600-4, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26859502

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Haemangiomas represent the most common tumour of infancy. Although most cases are cutaneous benign lesions, multiple skin haemangiomas are associated with visceral involvement, especially of the liver. Hepatic haemangiomatosis may be complicated by high-output cardiac failure due to high-flow arteriovenous connections within the lesions. Different therapeutic strategies for treating haemangiomatosis causing heart failure include medical, surgical and interventional modalities. This study aimed to review the treatment options, discuss their benefits and flaws and propose a practical therapeutic approach for this medical situation. CONCLUSION: Our approach incorporates heart failure medications, dietary support and propranolol as first-line treatment, while corticosteroids, vincristine, percutaneous intervention and surgery are reserved for refractory cases.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/etiology , Hemangioma/complications , Liver Neoplasms/complications , Skin Neoplasms/complications , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Hemangioma/therapy , Humans , Infant , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy
5.
Cardiol Ther ; 2(1): 97-102, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25135292

ABSTRACT

A 45-year-old patient presented with a cerebrovascular attack and was subsequently found to have a multi-fenestrated atrial septal defect. Various therapeutic options for percutaneous transcatheter closure with their respective benefits and flaws are discussed, as well as procedural and financial considerations. The decision making process leading to a successful result using a single occlusive device is presented, alongside a review of the literature.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL