Predicting survival in locally advanced gastric cancer using prognostic factors - neoadjuvant rectal score and downstaging depth score.

BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models are needed to accurately predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who have received neoadjuvant therapy and to determine the best treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to determine the role of two prognostic factors, the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and the downstaging depth score (DDS), in predicting survival in patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent curative gastrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 129 patients who had been diagnosed with primary gastric cancer and underwent radical gastrectomy after receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We calculated the NAR score and DDS values for each patient and conducted a survival analysis to assess the accuracy of these prognostic factors in predicting overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival time of the patients was found to be 29 months. Patients with low NAR scores and high DDS had significantly longer overall survival. Univariate analyses based on clinical and laboratory characteristics showed that gender, surgery type, resection type, neural invasion, grade, adjuvant radiotherapy, lymphocyte level, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, NAR score, and DDS were associated with survival. Moreover, multivariate analyses showed that lymphocyte level, DDS, and NAR score were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In summary, our research indicates that NAR score and DDS may serve as useful prognostic markers for predicting overall survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Patients with high DDS and low NAR scores were found to have better prognoses.

Oral premedication for the prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel.

Premedication with dexamethasone, H1 and H2 receptor antagonists given intravenously prior to paclitaxel are highly successful in preventing life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. We conducted a prospective study to assess the availability and safety of the administration of promethazine and dexamethasone per os in the premedication of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions. Of 180 eligible cancer patients, 100 patients received paclitaxel weekly and 80 patients, every 3 weeks. Patients received premedication with promethazine 25 mg per os, dexamethasone 2-20 mg per os and cimetidine 300 mg intravenously. One hundred patients in the weekly group received 940 cycles of paclitaxel. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in one (1%) patient. There were no hypersensitivity reactions in 99% of patients. Eighty patients in the 3 weekly group received 464 cycles of paclitaxel. Hypersensitivity reactions occurred in (3) 4% of patients while 96% of patients had no hypersensitivity reactions. Two of these three patients had no further hypersensitivity reactions after receiving premedication intravenously. In the two groups 40 min/cycle reduction in treatment duration was observed. In conclusion, this study shows that drugs used for premedication prior to paclitaxel can be given orally. This strategy is feasible, gives excellent results in reducing hypersensitivity reactions and shortens the time of treatment for patients and treating staff.