Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 48(1): 192, 2022 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36461032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: US Food and Drug Administration has issued Emergency Use Authorizations for hundreds of serological assays to support Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate, for the first time in children, the performance of three widely utilized SARS-CoV-2 serology commercial assays, Diesse Diagnostics (IgG, IgA, IgM) and Roche Diagnostics, both Roche Nucleocapsid (N) IgG and Roche Spike (S) IgG assays. METHODS: Sensitivity and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each of the three different serological tests and mixed and direct comparison were performed. Univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models were fitted to calculate incidence rate ratios and 95% CIs as estimate of the effects of age, gender, time on the serology title. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 149 children were enrolled in the study. A low sensitivity was found for Diesse IgA, IgM and IgG. Compare to Diesse, Roche S had a higher sensitivity at 15-28 days from infection (0.94, 95%CI: 0.73-1.0) and Roche N at 28-84 days (0.78, 95%CI: 0.58-0.91). When a direct comparison of IgG tests sensitivity was feasible for patients with pairwise information, Roche S and Roche N showed a statistically significant higher sensitivity compared to Diesse in all the study periods, whereas there was no difference between the two Roche tests. CONCLUSION: Roche S and Roche N serology tests seem to better perform in children. Large prospective studies are needed to better define the characteristics of those tests.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , United States , Child , Humans , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M
2.
J Chemother ; 34(2): 73-86, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34633268

ABSTRACT

Viral infections are particularly common among children. They often have a mild course, are self-limiting and do not need any specific treatment. However, in some cases, the disease can be severe and lead to permanent disabilities. A variety of antiviral drugs are available for the treatments of certain infectious agents: for instance, acyclovir is used to treat herpes simplex virus encephalitis. Recommendations for flu treatment may change according to the current epidemiological surveillance data, on the basis of which antiviral sensibility can be forecast: recommended drugs for the 2020-21 flu season are oseltamivir, zanamivir, peramivir and baloxavir. Some drugs are used to treat congenital infections, such as valganciclovir and ganciclovir in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Antiretroviral prophylaxis in newborns from HIV-1 infected mothers must be initiated as soon as possible, with one or more drugs according to therapeutic regimens based on the baby's risk category. According to the most recent guidelines, antiretroviral therapy must be started at diagnosis. Several antiretroviral drugs are available today and approved for use in children, so several combinations can be made. However, out of the 29 antiretroviral drugs approved for adults, only 38% (11/29) are approved for children under the age of two and about 60% (18/29) for children under the age of twelve. Treatment with direct antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus is approved for children over the age of three; it consists in different therapeutic regimens chosen on the basis of the viral genotype (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for genotypes 1, 4, 5 and 6, sofosbuvir/ribavirin for genotypes 2 and 3, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for all genotypes) and it has dramatically changed the course of the illness. Many molecules have been studied in order to treat SARS-CoV-2 infection, but only remdesivir seems to play a role in shortening recovery time, although inclusion criteria are very specific and data on the use in children is limited.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Drug Therapy, Combination , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Headache Pain ; 19(1): 108, 2018 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30428826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This multicentric survey investigates the prevalence and characteristics of Airplane Headache in children affected by primary headaches. METHODS: Patients with symptoms of Airplane Headache were recruited from nine Italian Pediatric Headache Centres. Each patient was handed a structured questionnaire which met the ICHD-III criteria. RESULTS: Among 320 children suffering from primary headaches who had flights during their lifetime, 15 (4.7%) had Airplane Headache, with mean age of 12.4 years. Most of the patients were females (80%). The headache was predominantly bilateral (80%) and localized to the frontal area (60%); it was mainly pulsating, and lasted less than 30 min in all cases. Accompanying symptoms were tearing, photophobia, phonophobia in most of the cases (73.3%). More than 30% of patients used medications to treat the attacks, with good results. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that Airplane Headache is not a rare disorder in children affected by primary headaches and highlights that its features in children are peculiar and differ from those described in adults. In children Airplane Headache prevails in females, is more often bilateral, has frequently accompanying symptoms and occurs at any time during the flight. Further studies are needed to confirm the actual frequency of Airplane Headache in the general pediatric population not selected from specialized Headache Centres, with and without other concomitant headache condition, and to better clarify the clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and potential therapies.


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Headache Disorders/epidemiology , Pain Measurement/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Travel , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Pain Measurement/trends , Photophobia/diagnosis , Photophobia/epidemiology , Travel/trends
4.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 138(6): 523-530, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30109707

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVIES: Monosomy 1p36 syndrome is a recognized syndrome with multiple congenital anomalies; medical problems of this syndrome include developmental delay, facial dysmorphisms, hearing loss, short stature, brain anomalies, congenital heart defects. Epilepsy can be another feature but there are few data about the types of seizures and long term prognosis. The aim of this work was to analyse the electroclinical phenotype and the long-term outcome in patients with monosomy 1p36 syndrome and epilepsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 22 patients with monosomy 1p36 syndrome and epilepsy were reconstructed by reviewing medical records. For each patient we analysed age at time of diagnosis, first signs of the syndrome, age at seizure onset, seizure type and its frequency, EEG and neuroimaging findings, the response to antiepileptic drugs treatment and clinical outcome up to the last follow-up assessment. RESULTS: Infantile Spasm (IS) represents the most frequent type at epilepsy onset, which occurs in 36.4% of children, and a half of these were associated with hypsarrhythmic electroencephalogram. All patients with IS had persistence of seizures, unlike other patients with different seizures onset. Children with abnormal brain neuroimaging have a greater chance to develop pharmacoresistant epilepsy. CONCLUSION: This syndrome represents a significant cause of IS: these patients, who develop IS, can suffer from pharmacoresistent epilepsy, that is more frequent in children with brain abnormalities.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Disorders/complications , Chromosome Disorders/physiopathology , Epilepsy/genetics , Epilepsy/physiopathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosome Deletion , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Phenotype
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...