Efficacy and Safety of Avalglucosidase Alfa in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease After 97 Weeks: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In the previously reported Comparative Enzyme Replacement Trial With neoGAA Versus rhGAA (COMET) trial, avalglucosidase alfa treatment for 49 weeks showed clinically meaningful improvements in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) compared with alglucosidase alfa. Objective: To report avalglucosidase alfa treatment outcomes during the COMET trial extension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3 double-blind randomized clinical trial with crossover in the extension period enrolled patients 3 years and older with previously untreated late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) between November 2, 2016, and February 10, 2021, with primary analysis after 49 weeks. Patients were treated at 55 referral centers in 20 countries. Efficacy outcomes were assessed at 97 weeks and safety outcomes to last follow-up, with data cutoff at February 10, 2021. Data were analyzed from May to June 2021. Interventions: Random assignment (1:1) to receive 20 mg/kg of avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa by intravenous infusion every other week for 49 weeks; thereafter, all patients received 20 mg/kg of avalglucosidase alfa every other week. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in FVC percent predicted. Secondary outcomes included the LS mean change from baseline in 6MWT, muscle strength, motor function, quality of life, and disease biomarkers. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: Of 100 participants from the double-blind treatment period, 95 entered the extension period. Of these, 51 (54%) were men, and the mean (range) age was 48.3 (10-79) years. At the start of this study, mean upright FVC percent predicted was similar between treatment arms, and 6MWT distance was greater in the avalglucosidase alfa arm. From baseline to week 97, LS mean (SE) FVC percent predicted increased by 2.65 (1.05) for those who continued avalglucosidase alfa and 0.36 (1.12) for those who switched to avalglucosidase alfa. The LS mean (SE) 6MWT distance increased by 18.60 (12.01) m and 4.56 (12.44) m, respectively. For participants who switched to avalglucosidase alfa, FVC percent predicted remained stable (LS mean [SE] change from week 49 to 97, 0.09 [0.88]) and 6MWT distance improved (LS mean [SE] change from week 49 to 97, 5.33 [10.81] m). Potentially treatment-related adverse events were reported in 29 patients (56.9%) who continued avalglucosidase alfa and in 25 patients (56.8%) who switched. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial extension, maintenance of positive clinical outcomes was demonstrated for patients continuing avalglucosidase alfa treatment and, to a lesser extent, patients who switched from alglucosidase alfa. No new safety concerns were observed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02782741.

Tumor islands in resected early-stage lung adenocarcinomas are associated with unique clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics and worse prognosis.

Tumor islands-large collections of tumor cells isolated within alveolar spaces-can be seen in lung adenocarcinomas. Recently we observed by 3-dimensional reconstruction that these structures were connected with each other and with the main tumor in different tissue planes, raising the possibility of tumor islands being a means of extension. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of tumor islands remains unknown. In this study, we compared clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics and prognosis of stages I to II lung adenocarcinomas with tumor islands (n=58) and those without (n=203). Lung adenocarcinomas with tumor islands were more likely to occur in smokers, exhibit higher nuclear grade and a solid or micropapillary pattern of growth, and harbor KRAS mutations. In contrast, lung adenocarcinomas without tumor islands were more likely to present as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, show a lepidic pattern of growth, and harbor EGFR mutations. Although there was no difference in stage, the prognosis of lung adenocarcinomas with tumor islands was significantly worse than those without. The 5-year recurrence-free survival for patients with tumor islands and those without was 44.6% and 74.4%, respectively (log rank P=0.010). The survival difference remained significant (P <0.020) by multivariate analysis, and the presence of tumor islands was associated with almost 2-fold increase in the risk of recurrence. Even in the stage IA cohort, more than half of the patients with tumor islands experienced recurrence within 5 years. Thus, aggressive surveillance and/or further intervention may be indicated for patients whose tumors exhibit tumor islands.

FGFR1 amplification in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

INTRODUCTION: Amplification of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) has been reported in squamous cell lung carcinoma and may be a molecular target for therapy. Little is known, however, about the clinical and demographic correlates of FGFR1 amplification. METHODS: The study is an Institutional Review Board approved retrospective analysis of 226 patients with squamous cell lung cancer seen at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2005 to 2011. Clinical and demographic characteristics of all patients were obtained, as well as treatment details including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and overall survival. fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed for FGFR1 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. Clinical genotyping results were also reviewed where available. RESULTS: Thirty-seven of 226 patients (16%) with squamous cell lung cancer were found positive for amplification using a definition of amplification of a gene to copy number control ratio of 2.2 or higher. FGFR1 amplification status was not associated with age, sex, stage, histologic subtype within squamous cell, smoking history, or pack-years of smoking. We found no significant difference in overall survival by FGFR1 amplification status as a whole; in the advanced stage subset, our findings are inconclusive because of the small sample size. CONCLUSION: FGFR1 amplification was found in 16% of a clinical cohort of squamous cell lung cancer patients. The lack of any specific clinicodemographic features that correlates with FGFR1 amplification suggests that all squamous cell patients should be tested for this genomic change.