Health outcomes of telemonitoring of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: One-year results from a randomized controlled trial (Optimizing care of Patients via Telemedicine In Monitoring and aUgmenting their control of diabetes Mellitus).

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth increases care accessibility to patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus but the duration of its implementation to sustain optimal glycaemic control remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the health outcomes of these patients using the Optimizing care of Patients via Telemedicine In Monitoring and aUgmenting their control of diabetes Mellitus (OPTIMUM) home tele-monitoring (HTM) system 6 months post-intervention, compared to standard care. METHODS: An open-labelled randomized controlled trial involving 330 participants with type-2 diabetes mellitus, aged 26-65 years, and suboptimal glycaemic control (HbA1c = 7.5%-10%) was conducted. Intervention group received OPTIMUM HTM for 6 months followed by usual care for another 6 months, while control group received usual care for 12 months. OPTIMUM HTM includes in-app video-based tele-education, tele-monitoring of the blood pressure, capillary glucose and weight via Bluetooth devices and mobile applications, followed by algorithm-based tele-management by the OPTIMUM HTM team. Assessments using self-care inventory scale and medication adherence were administered for both groups at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month timepoints. RESULTS: Complete data from 156 (intervention) and 159 (control) participants, with comparable demographic profiles, were analysed. Both groups showed a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline (p < 0.001). From 6-month to 12-month time-points, the intervention group was twice as likely to maintain their HbA1c ≤ 8% (adjusted odds ratio = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.18-3.49; p < 0.011). The intervention group demonstrated higher scores for self-care behaviours (adjusted odds ratio = 3.83 [95%CI = 1.68-5.97], p = 0.001) and not skipping medications (adjusted odds ratio = 2.32 [95%CI = 1.09-4.97], p = 0.030) at 12 months. DISCUSSION: The OPTIMUM HTM system enabled patients to maintain their glycaemic control beyond the intervention period. The favourable outcomes could be the effect of telehealth in sustaining self-care behaviour and medication adherence.

A multidisciplinary effort to increase COVID-19 vaccination among the older adults.

Background: COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduces the risk of infection and its associated morbidity and mortality. However, poor uptake of the COVID-19 vaccination was reported among the high-risk group of older people amidst emerging variants of concern. This community case study reports an outreach program in Singapore, COVE (COVID-19 Vaccination for the Elderly) initiated by healthcare workers in a cluster of primary care clinics. They assessed the vaccine hesitancy among these older persons, addressed their concerns and facilitated their vaccination appointment during a brief phone conversation. Method: Twenty one thousand six hundred and sixty three unvaccinated adults aged ≥60 years were contacted by healthcare worker volunteers over two phases from June to October 2021. In phase I, they contacted adults aged above 70 years over 2 weeks. Adults who were uncontactable in phase I and those aged 60-69 years were sent SMS in phase II. Data were analyzed via descriptive data analysis. Results: After phase 1, 65.5% (n = 5,646/8,617) of older adults had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The respondents expressed intention to vaccinate (39%, n = 3,390), requested to seek further information (25%, n = 2,138), reported access barrier (8%, n = 715), or were concerned of the vaccine adverse effects (3%, n = 288). Vaccination was refused by 24% (n = 2,086) of the respondents. Eventually 60.4% (n = 13,082/21,663) of them were vaccinated 3 months after COVE implementation. Conclusion: The COVE program increased the COVID-19 vaccination uptake of older adults from 84.6 to 96.3%. A person-centric proactive approach by healthcare workers addressed vaccine hesitancy and optimized vaccination. The outreach scheduling of vaccination appointments is key in promoting vaccination uptake among older adults.

An innovation involving self-surveillance and serious gaming to increase smoking quit rate: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Smoking is a health hazard. Current smoking cessation measures such as behavioral change counselling by trained professionals, nicotine replacement therapy and medications have limited success. Smoking intensity is assessed using a portable device to measure the smokers' exhaled breath carbon monoxide (eCO) level. A systematic review suggests the potential of serious gaming to increase smoking quit rate. However, the related studies were unable to explain and determine the effect gamification on smoking cessation. A handy personalized eCO measurement device linked to a smart-phone applications (app) has been developed (integrated STEADES-2 system). This novel system incorporates app-based video and print learning resources, authentication function and gamification using the eCO data as game element. Trained multidisciplinary healthcare professionals access the STEADES-2 data to monitor smoking status and support smokers via asynchronous virtual coaching. The pilot randomized controlled trial will enroll 20 smokers to use the STEADES-2 system (intervention group) and another 20 to the existing smoking cessation programme (control group) in primary care. The primary feasibility outcomes will include the recruitment response rate, the smokers' usability of the STEADES-2 system, their self eCO monitoring, frequencies of participation in the serious games and interactions with their virtual coaches. Their smoking literacy, utility and experience of the STEADES-2 system are other outcomes. Smokers in both groups will be compared on their cigarette abstinence as secondary outcome based on eCO levels and urine cotinine test (primary outcomes after 12 weeks). The results will be disseminated via conferences and publications.

Association between asthma control and asthma cost: Results from a longitudinal study in a primary care setting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Asthma control can be assessed with the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and a score of 20 or higher indicates good asthma control. Patients pay for their consultation and treatment in the fee-for-service primary healthcare system in Singapore. We hypothesized that achieving asthma control would result in lower asthma costs through reduced acute exacerbations, fewer physician consultations and lower lost productivity. The study compared the healthcare costs of patients who achieved asthma control and those with suboptimal asthma control based on ACT scores. Factors influencing asthma control and healthcare expenditure over time were also examined. METHODS: A total of 736 patients were enrolled into an asthma care programme in two polyclinics during 2008 and 2013. Direct costs of asthma management were derived from the frequency of polyclinic consultations, medication costs and hospitalization. Indirect costs were estimated from lost workdays due to exacerbations. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) approach was used to longitudinally model the factors associated with total healthcare expenditure. RESULTS: Patients with asthma control spent S$48 (US$36) more per doctor visit on asthma drugs (P < 0.01) but incurred S$65 (US$48) less per doctor visit in total costs (P < 0.01) than those with suboptimal asthma control. The savings from achieving asthma control for obese patients were greater than for normal-weight patients (S$42 or the equivalent of US$31; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Optimal asthma control was associated with reduced healthcare costs. An effective treatment regimen should also consider other modifiable factors such as weight control to achieve asthma control and eventually reduce asthma costs.

Management of hypertension and multiple risk factors to enhance cardiovascular health - a feasibility study in Singapore polyclinics.

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure (BP) is a leading contributor to cardiovascular mortality globally. There is scarcity of information on effective health systems interventions to lower BP and reduce cardiovascular risk in Southeast Asian countries. We conducted a pilot exploratory trial on 100 adults aged 40 years or older with uncontrolled hypertension to optimize the design for a structured multi-component intervention in primary care clinics for management of hypertension. METHODS: Two clinics were involved, each enrolling 50 participants, with one as the intervention clinic and the other as the control (usual care). The intervention comprised the following four components: 1) an algorithm-driven intervention using a fixed-dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive treatment and lipid lowering medication for high risk individuals, 2) subsidized FDC antihypertensive medication; 3) motivational conversation (MC) for high risk individuals; and 4) telephone follow-ups of all individuals. The process outcomes were intervention fidelity measures. The outcomes of change in parameters of interest were healthy lifestyle index (composite score of body mass index, physical activity, dietary habit, dietary quality and smoking), adherence to antihypertensive medications, and systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to follow-up at 3 months. RESULTS: Greater than 90 % fidelity was achieved for 3 of the 4 intervention components. Although not designed for conclusive results, the healthy lifestyle score increased by 0.16 (±0.68) with the intervention and decreased by 0.18 (±0.75) with usual care (p = 0.02). Adherence to anti-hypertensive medications at follow-up was 95.3 % in the intervention group compared to 83.8 % for usual care (p = 0.01). Systolic and diastolic BP decreased in both intervention and control groups, although statistical significance between groups was not achieved. Hypertensive individuals rated all intervention components 'highly favorable' on a Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the proposed, structured multi-component approach for management of hypertension is feasible for implementation in primary care clinics in Singapore, with some changes to the protocol. The observed improvement in the healthy lifestyle index and adherence to anti-hypertensive medications is promising. A large scale, adequately powered trial would be informative to assess intervention effectiveness on BP and cardiovascular risk reduction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02330224 . Registered on 28 December 2014.