The efficacy of combination therapy with oncolytic herpes simplex virus HF10 and dacarbazine in a mouse melanoma model.

Advanced melanoma has long been treated with chemotherapy using cytotoxic agents like dacarbazine (DTIC), but overall survival rates with these drugs have been generally low. Recently, immunoregulatory monoclonal antibodies and molecularly targeted therapy with a BRAF inhibitor and/or a MEK inhibitor, have been used to treat malignant melanoma and have improved the survival rate of patients with advanced melanoma. However, high prices of these drugs are problematic. In this study, we evaluated the oncolytic efficacy of HF10, an attenuated, replication-competent HSV, with DTIC in immunocompetent mice model of malignant melanoma. For in vitro studies, cytotoxicity assays were conducted in clone M3 mouse melanoma cells. For the in vivo studies, subcutaneous melanoma models were prepared in DBA/2 mice with clone M3 cells, and then HF10 was intratumorally inoculated with/without intraperitoneal DTIC injection. The efficacy of the therapies was evaluated by survival, growth of subcutaneous tumor, and histopathological and immunological analyses. Both HF10 infection and DTIC treatment showed cytotoxic effects in melanoma cells, but combination treatment with HF10 and DTIC showed a rapid and strong cytotoxic effect compared with monotherapy. In the subcutaneous melanoma model, intratumoral HF10 inoculation significantly inhibited tumor growth. HF10 also inhibited the growth of non-inoculated contralateral tumors when it was injected into the ipsilateral tumors of mice. In histologic and immunohistochemical analysis, tumor lysis and inflammatory cell infiltration were observed after intratumoral HF10 inoculation. When mice were treated with HF10 and DTIC, the combination therapy induced a robust systemic anti-tumor immune response and prolonged survival. IFN-γ secretion from splenocytes of the HF10-DTIC combination therapy group showed more IFN-γ secretion than did the other groups. These data showed the efficacy of HF10 and DTIC combination therapy in a mouse melanoma model.

Oscillation of a rotating levitated droplet: Analysis with a mechanical model.

A droplet of millimeter-to-centimeter scale can exhibit electrostatic levitation, and such levitated droplets can be used for the measurement of the surface tension of the liquids by observing the characteristic frequency of oscillatory deformation. In the present study, a simple mechanical model is proposed by considering a single mode of oscillation in the ellipsoidal deformation of a levitated rotating droplet. By measuring the oscillation frequency with respect to the rotational speed and oscillation amplitude, it is expected that the accuracy of the surface tension measurement could be improved. Using the proposed model, the dependences of the characteristic frequency of oscillatory deformation and the averaged aspect ratio are calculated with respect to the rotational angular velocity of a rotating droplet. These dependences are found to be consistent with the experimental observations.

Evaluation of the antihistamine effects of olopatadine and levocetirizine during a 24-h period: a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled comparison in skin responses induced by histamine iontophoresis.

The antihistamine effects of olopatadine and levocetirizine, in standard-dose application described in their information (5 mg twice a day for olopatadine; 5 mg once daily for levocetirizine), were examined from 11.5 to 24 h after application. The test was designed in a double-blind, randomized, cross-over, placebo-controlled study of 12 healthy volunteers on histamine-induced flare and wheal response using an iontophoresis technique. The suppressive effect of olopatadine on the wheals induced by a 0.1-mA histamine iontophoresis lasted for 24 h after dosing. Both drugs inhibited flare induced by histamine iontophoresis almost completely until 24 h after the first administration. Suppression of the 0.2-mA-induced wheal response by levocetirizine, taken once daily, decreased with time, although 0.1-mA-induced flare was almost completely suppressed by the drug. Olopatadine completely suppressed even the wheal response induced by a 0.2-mA histamine iontophoresis. Compared with the placebo, the two drugs significantly suppressed the subjective itching assessed by visual analog scale at all intervals. There were no significant differences in subjective drowsiness and objective cognitive function between drug- and placebo-treated subjects. These results demonstrate that olopatadine seems to be more potent than levocetirizine when administrated in a standard dose. In conclusion, mild to moderate urticaria could be controlled by standard application as described in their information. On the other hand, severe urticaria could be managed by a standard application of olopatadine, but levocetirizine may need an additional dose to control severe urticaria.