ABSTRACT
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the performance of an HIV antigen-antibody combination assay (fourth-generation) by comparing it with second generation assays that detect anti-HIV. Methods: A total of 105,439 HIV screening tests were performed from January 2004 to March 2015; the second - and fourth generation assays were used for 75,302 and 30,137 samples, respectively. Samples positive on a screening test were confirmed by anti-HIV-1 western blotting (WB) and nucleic acid amplification. By the results of confirmation tests, the efficacies of the second and fourth generation assays were estimated. The clinical backgrounds with false-positive samples were examined. Results: Of 75,302 samples, 136(0.18%) were positive by the second-generation assay; 14 were confirmed positives, and 122 were false positives. Of 30,137 samples, 18(0.06%) were positive by the fourth-generation assay; 6 were confirmed positives, and 12 were false positives. The reliability of the positives by fourth-generation assay was significantly improved (p=0.006) Samples form individuals with malignant neoplasms were frequently false positive by both the second and fourth-generation assays. Of 67 samples performed by WB, 10 samples, including 6 from patients with a malignancy, showed indeterminate results. All indeterminate samples were found to have antibodies responding to HIV core protein. Conclusion: The fourth-generation assay had satisfactory reliability of the positives for HIV screening. Antibodies responding to HIV core protein may result in false positive HIV screening tests. [Original]