Higher than recommend dosage of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate for treating angina pectoris: a case report and review of the literature.

Nitrates primarily cause arterial and venous vasodilation effects, which increases coronary artery blood supply, and decreases cardiac preload and afterload by enhancing nitric oxide (NO) levels. The dosage of nitrates used for angina pectoris widely differs among individuals, and therapeutic resistance and tolerance gradually occur. Increasing doses of nitrates are needed to abolish ischemia chest pain onset in patients with angina pectoris, and to obtain satisfactory therapeutic effects. Here, we report the case of a 37-year-old male who was hospitalized six times, from September 2013 to April 2018, with recurrent angina pectoris. Although the patient was implanted with stents, he still presented with chest pain associated with physical efforts. Diagnosis with acute myocardial infarction was based on his ST-segment changes on electrocardiogram (ECG), elevated troponin-T level and coronary angiography. After the stents were implanted, his chest pain had no relief. Following three times of coronary angiography revealed that distal and small branch vessels still had stenosis, but was not required to revascularization. Due to serious headache resulted from sublingual or oral nitroglycerin; he had to take sublingual isosorbide dinitrate, from 20 mg to 150 mg each time, to obtain rapid relief from angina pectoris without doctor's consent. Followed up to April 2019, the patient has continued to take 100-150 mg sublingual isosorbide dinitrate for angina pectoris onset triggered by physical efforts, and has obtained remarkable relief within a few minutes, without blood pressure decrease and other side effects. Higher than recommend dosage of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate might establish better efficacy for angina pectoris in rarely patient.

Successful treatment of amniotic fluid embolism complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation with rivaroxaban: A case report.

RATIONALE: An amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a rare, lethal syndrome that is commonly associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Anticoagulation therapy is the most important strategy to inhibit excessive activation of the coagulation cascade in patients with AFE and DIC. At present, treatment of AFE with rivaroxaban has not been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a 37-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 1) at 39 weeks' gestation with irregular contractions of the uterus was admitted to the obstetrical department. Ten minutes after the spontaneous rupture of the membranes, the patient complained of dyspnea and dysphoria and exhibited cyanosis of her lips. The patient's blood pressure decreased and heart rate increased rapidly, and 2100 mL of unclotted blood flowed from her vagina within 1 hour. Her platelet count dropped to 21 × 10/L, and the results from routine coagulation tests, and D-dimer and fibrin degradation product tests were obviously abnormal. DIAGNOSES: According to the current research consensus, AFE with DIC should be considered immediately when sudden cardiovascular collapse occurs around the time of labor and delivery, followed by the development of coagulopathy and hemorrhage. INTERVENTIONS: In addition, the variety of supportive treatments, rivaroxaban was used in anticoagulant therapy. OUTCOMES: At follow-up 30 and 60 days, there were no complaints of discomfort or abnormal laboratory assays. The patient recovered completely. LESSONS: This case highlights that rivaroxaban, as a direct inhibitor of activated factor Xa, demonstrates a good therapeutic efficacy for treating AFE with DIC.

Considerations for routine coagulation monitoring with rivaroxaban: A case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant that does not require coagulation monitoring based on current recommendations. Our goal is to explore whether routine coagulation monitoring should not be required for all patients receiving oral rivaroxaban, what relationship between routine coagulation abnormalities and bleeding, and how to deal with the above clinical situations through our case and review of the literature. CASE SUMMARY: We report a 67-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation who presented to the hospital with worsening dyspnea and cough. Based on electrocardiogram, venous compression ultrasonography, and computed tomography pulmonary angiography, the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, deep venous thrombosis, and acute pulmonary embolism was confirmed. Her coagulation assays and renal function were normal on admission; she was not underweight, did not have a history of hemorrhagic disease, and her CHA2DS2-VAS, HAS-BLED, and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index scores were 3, 0, and 0, respectively. Oral rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily) was administered. The following day, she presented gastrointestinal and gum bleeding, combined with coagulation abnormalities. Following cessation of rivaroxaban, her bleeding stopped and tests improved over the next 2 d. Rivaroxaban was begun again 3 d after recovery. However, she again presented with gastrointestinal and gum bleeding and the abnormal tests, and the therapy was discontinued. At 30-d follow-up after discharge, she presented normal coagulation tests without bleeding. CONCLUSION: Although current guidelines recommend that using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants including rivaroxaban do not require coagulation monitoring, a small number of patients may develop routine coagulation test changes and bleeding during rivaroxaban therapy, especially in the elderly. Clinicians should pay attention to these patients and further obtain evidence in practice.