Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(8): e43256, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37692702

ABSTRACT

A 54-year-old female presented to the otolaryngology (ENT) outpatient department with an eight-month history of unilateral nasal obstruction and headache. There was no change in the sense of smell, rhinorrhoea, facial pain, or associated epistaxis. On examination, there was a large, erythematous mass in the superior aspect of the right nasal cavity, filling the space between the nasal septum, middle, and superior meatus. The rest of the ENT examination was normal. Vital signs were all within the normal range. There was no significant past medical history, and she had tried steroid nasal spray without any benefit. She had a complete resolution of symptoms from surgical intervention, and the mass was confirmed to be an angiofibroma through histopathology. This case report discusses the importance of considering nasopharyngeal angiofibroma as a differential diagnosis for patients presenting with unilateral nasal masses, including female patients, regardless of age.

3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 105(7): 2466-2474, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34844812

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and assess the effectiveness of an encounter decision aid for Malaysian patients with MDD to support treatment decision-making during the consultation. METHODS: The decision aid prototype was developed following a literature review and six focus groups. Alpha testing assessed its comprehensibility, acceptability, usability and desirability through user-centered cognitive interviews. Beta-testing evaluated preliminary evidence on its efficacy using the SDM Scale and PDMS. Feasibility was assessed by timing the consultation. RESULTS: The alpha testing demonstrated that the decision aid was patient-oriented, comprehensible, comprehensive, concise and objective with an appealing design. Beta-testing indicated that PtDA significantly increased patients satisfaction with SDM from patients' [83.32 (13.92) vs 85.76 (13.80); p < 0.05] and physicians' [81.07 (10.09) vs 86.36 (10.10); p < 0.05] perspectives and prepared the patients for decision making from the patients' [PDMS patients: 84.10 (12.69)] and physicians' [PDMS physicians: 83.78 (16.62)] perspectives as well. There was no change in the consultation time between the control and the intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an antidepressant PtDA for Malaysian patients with MDD that increases patients' involvement in shared decision making and enhances their preparedness for decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Using the PtDA can support collaborative decision-making in routine clinical practice without extending the consultation time.


Subject(s)
Decision Support Techniques , Depressive Disorder, Major , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Decision Making , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Humans , Patient Participation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL