Role legitimacy, comfort and confidence providing tobacco, alcohol and other drug care: a cross-sectional study of Australian early-career general practitioners.

Australian general practitioners (GPs) see most Australians each year and, as tobacco, alcohol and other drug use (substance use) are common, GPs often see problematic, risky or dependent substance use. This study aimed to explore early-career GPs' role legitimacy, comfort and confidence managing patients with problematic use of tobacco, alcohol, psychoactive pharmaceutical or illicit substances.Using the '5A's framework: Ask, Assess, Advise, Assist and Arrange, we surveyed 251 early-career GPs (GP registrars) on role legitimacy, confidence managing patient substance use, and sources of clinical information, advice and support.There was strong agreement that managing substance use is a GP's role, with high levels of confidence 'Asking' (screening) about tobacco and alcohol use, which decreased across other substance classes. Early-career GPs reported lower levels of confidence 'Assessing' and 'Advising' (brief interventions); and much lower levels of confidence 'Assisting' (treating) and 'Arranging' (follow up and/or referral) for patients with substance issues across all substances, including tobacco. Participants were most likely to seek advice from senior colleagues in their practice.Early-career GPs reported lower than optimal levels of confidence for all substances. Our findings have important implications for educators globally. Education that improves confidence across all 5As for high-prevalence substances (tobacco and alcohol) while focusing on increasing comfort screening and improving understanding of referral pathway options for low-prevalence substances may improve early-career GPs' confidence. This could increase engagement in managing substance use issues potentially leading to better health and wellbeing outcomes for patients.

Anticholinergic medicines in an older primary care population: a cross-sectional analysis of medicines' levels of anticholinergic activity and clinical indications.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Adverse clinical outcomes have been associated with cumulative anticholinergic burden (to which low-potency as well as high-potency anticholinergic medicines contribute). The clinical indications for which anticholinergic medicines are prescribed (and thus the 'phenotype' of patients with anticholinergic burden) have not been established. We sought to establish the overall prevalence of prescribing of anticholinergic medicines, the prevalence of prescribing of low-, medium- and high-potency anticholinergic medicines, and the clinical indications for which the medicines were prescribed in an older primary care population. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study of Australian early-career general practitioners' (GPs') clinical consultations - the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. In ReCEnT, GPs collect detailed data (including medicines prescribed and their clinical indication) for 60 consecutive patients, on up to three occasions 6 months apart. Anticholinergic medicines were categorized as levels 1 (low-potency) to 3 (high-potency) using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). RESULTS: During 2010-2014, 879 early-career GPs (across five of Australia's six states) conducted 20 555 consultations with patients aged 65 years or older, representing 35 506 problems/diagnoses. Anticholinergic medicines were prescribed in 10·4% [95% CIs 9·5-10·5] of consultations. Of the total anticholinergic load of prescribed medicines ('community anticholinergic load') 72·7% [95% CIs 71·0-74·3] was contributed by Level 1 medicines, 0·8% [95% CIs 0·5-1·3] by Level 2 medicines and 26·5% [95% CIs 24·8-28·1] by Level 3 medicines. Cardiac (40·0%), Musculoskeletal (16·9%) and Respiratory (10·6%) were the most common indications associated with Level 1 anticholinergic prescription. For Level 2 and 3 medicines (combined data), Psychological (16·1%), Neurological (16·1%), Musculoskeletal (15·7%) and Urological (11·1%) indications were most common. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic medicines are frequently prescribed in Australian general practice, and the majority of the 'community' anticholinergic burden is contributed by 'low'-anticholinergic potency medicines whose anticholinergic effects may be largely 'invisible' to prescribing GPs. Furthermore, the clinical 'phenotype' of the patient with high anticholinergic burden may be very different to common stereotypes (patients with urological, psychological or neurological problems), potentially making recognition of risk of anticholinergic adverse effects additionally problematic for GPs.

The Innovative Socio-economic Interventions Against Tuberculosis (ISIAT) project: an operational assessment.

SETTING: Tuberculosis (TB) affected households in impoverished shantytowns, Lima, Peru. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate socio-economic interventions for strengthening TB control by improving uptake of TB care and prevention services. DESIGN: Barriers to TB control were characterised by interviews with TB-affected families. To reduce these barriers, a multidisciplinary team offered integrated community and household socio-economic interventions aiming to: 1) enhance uptake of TB care by education, community mobilisation and psychosocial support; and 2) reduce poverty through food and cash transfers, microcredit, microenterprise and vocational training. An interim analysis was performed after the socio-economic interventions had been provided for 2078 people in 311 households of newly diagnosed TB patients for up to 34 months. RESULTS: Poverty (46% earned