Prevalence of micronutrient inadequacy differs by severity of food insecurity among adults living in Canada in 2015.

Household food insecurity is generally associated with poorer quality diets in Canada, but whether household food insecurity heightens the probability of inadequate micronutrient intakes is unknown. The objective of this research was to investigate how prevalence of micronutrient inadequacy differed by severity of household food insecurity among adults in Canada. Using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey Nutrition, this study included participants aged 19-64 years who completed up to two 24 h dietary recalls and provided details about household food insecurity (n = 9486). Children and older adults were not included due to sample size limitations. Usual micronutrient intake distributions were estimated by a four-level measure of food insecurity status using the National Cancer Institute method. Welch's t tests assessed differences in prevalence of inadequacy for selected micronutrients. Prevalence differed for some micronutrients among those living in marginally and moderately food insecure compared to food-secure households. The greatest differences in prevalence of inadequacy were observed between severely food-insecure and food-secure households: vitamin A (60.0%, SE = 11.9 vs. 40.6%, SE = 2.7, p < 0.0001), vitamin B6 (42.7%, SE = 9.1 vs. 12.8%, SE = 2.5, p < 0.0001), folate (39.4%, SE = 10.0 vs. 15.9%, SE = 2.2, p < 0.0001), vitamin C (63.3%, SE = 5.2 vs. 29.1%, SE = 2.8, p < 0.0001), calcium (78.6%, SE = 6.4 vs. 58.7%, SE = 1.3, p < 0.0001), magnesium (75.6%, SE = 9.5 vs. 48.7%, SE = 1.2, p < 0.0001), and zinc (34.9%, SE = 10.0 vs. 23.2%, SE = 2.4, p = 0.0009). Apparent underreporting also differed by severity of food insecurity, with increased underreporting observed with worsening food insecurity. The probability of inadequate micronutrient intakes among adults rises sharply with more severe household food insecurity in Canada.

Household food insecurity is negatively associated with achievement of prenatal intentions to feed only breast milk in the first six months postpartum.

Background: Household food insecurity (HFI) has been associated with suboptimal breastfeeding practices. Postpartum factors reported by caregivers include stressful life circumstances and maternal diet quality concerns. It is unknown whether prenatal breast milk feeding intentions, a well-established predictor of breastfeeding outcomes, differ by HFI status. We explored associations between HFI and prenatal intentions to feed any and only breast milk in the first 6 months postpartum, and achievement of these intentions. Methods: We utilized data from self-identified biological mothers with children 6-12 months of age who responded to a retrospective, cross-sectional online infant feeding survey conducted in Nova Scotia, Canada. HFI (yes/no) was assessed using the Household Food Security Survey Module. Prenatal intentions to feed any and only breast milk were assessed based on responses to five options for infant milk feeding plans. Achievement of intentions was assessed by breast milk and formula feeding practices in the first 6 months. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted, adjusting for maternal socio-demographics. Results: Among 459 respondents, 28% reported HFI; 88% intended to feed any breast milk and 77% intended to feed only breast milk, with no difference by HFI status. Of those intending to feed any breast milk, 99% succeeded, precluding further analysis. Among mothers who intended to provide only breast milk, only 51% achieved their intention, with lower odds among those with HFI (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-0.98). Conclusion: HFI was not associated with intentions for feeding breast milk in the first 6 months postpartum, but mothers with HFI were less likely to achieve their intention to provide only breast milk. Further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for this and to guide intervention designs to address HFI and help mothers reach their breastfeeding goals.

The relationship between household food insecurity and overweight or obesity among children and adults in Canada: a population-based, propensity score weighting analysis.

Household food insecurity is independently associated with adverse health outcomes among Canadians, but its association with overweight and obesity is poorly understood partly because of limited attention to confounding. This study assessed the relationship between food insecurity status and overweight/obesity in Canada. Cross-sectional data for individuals aged 2-64 years were drawn from the 2004 and 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition. Overweight/obesity was defined using body mass index calculated with measured height and weight. Food insecurity status was assessed with the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module. The relationship was examined among preschool children (n = 2007), girls (n = 5512), boys (n = 5507), women (n = 8317), and men (n = 7279) using propensity score weighted logistic regressions to control for confounding. Relative to their food-secure counterparts, girls in moderately food-insecure households (39.7% vs. 28.5%), boys in severely food-insecure households (54.4% vs. 35.0%), and women in moderately and severely food-insecure households (58.9% and 73.1% vs. 50.7%) had higher overweight/obesity prevalence; men in moderately food-insecure households had a lower prevalence (48.9% vs. 66.3%). With propensity score weighting, no association existed between food insecurity and overweight/obesity among preschool children, girls, boys, or men. For women, moderate (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.61; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.06-2.47) and severe (AOR: 2.33; 95%CI: 1.22-4.44) food insecurity was positively associated with overweight/obesity; the association was strongest for severe food insecurity and obesity (AOR: 3.38; 95%CI: 1.60-7.16). Additional research is needed to better understand the nature of the relationship among women. Problems of food insecurity and overweight/obesity among Canadian children and men should not be conflated in public health interventions.

Public policy interventions to mitigate household food insecurity in Canada: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to synthesise the evidence on public policy interventions and their ability to reduce household food insecurity (HFI) in Canada. DESIGN: Four databases were searched up to October 2023. Only studies that reported on public policy interventions that might reduce HFI were included, regardless of whether that was the primary purpose of the study. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, risk of bias and certainty of the evidence assessments were conducted by two reviewers. RESULTS: Seventeen relevant studies covering three intervention categories were included: income supplementation, housing assistance programmes and food retailer subsidies. Income supplementation had a positive effect on reducing HFI with a moderate to high level of certainty. Housing assistance programmes and food retailer studies may have little to no effect on HFI; however, there is low certainty in the evidence that could change as evidence emerges. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that income supplementation likely reduces HFI for low-income Canadians. Many questions remain in terms of how to optimise this intervention and additional high-quality studies are still needed.

The association between household food insecurity and healthcare costs among Canadian children.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between household food insecurity and healthcare costs in children living in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based study using four cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2011-2012, 2013-2014) linked with administrative health databases (ICES). We included Ontario children aged 1-17 years with a measure of household food insecurity (Household Food Security Survey Module) over the previous 12 months. Our primary outcome was the direct public-payer healthcare costs per child over the same time period (in Canadian dollars, standardized to year 2020). We used gamma-log-transformed generalized estimating equations accounting for the clustering of children to examine this relationship, and adjusted models for important sociodemographic covariates. As a secondary outcome, we examined healthcare usage of specific services and associated costs (e.g. visits to hospitals, surgeries). RESULTS: We found that adjusted healthcare costs were higher in children from food-insecure than from food-secure households ($676.79 [95% CI: $535.26, $855.74] vs. $563.98 [$457.00, $695.99], p = 0.047). Compared with children living in food-secure households, those in insecure households more often accessed hospitals, emergency departments, day surgeries, and home care, and used prescription medications. Children from food-secure households had higher usage of non-physician healthcare (e.g. optometry) and family physician rostering services. CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for measurable social determinants of health, household food insecurity was associated with higher public-payer health services costs and utilization among children and youth. Efforts to mitigate food insecurity could lessen child healthcare needs, as well as associated costs to our healthcare systems.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Examiner la relation entre l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages et les coûts des soins de santé chez les enfants vivant en Ontario, au Canada. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude populationnelle transversale en utilisant les quatre cycles de l'Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes (2007­2008, 2009­2010, 2011­2012, 2013­2014) liés à des bases de données administratives sur la santé (ICES). Nous avons inclus les enfants ontariens de 1 à 17 ans et un indicateur d'insécurité alimentaire des ménages (le Module d'enquête sur la sécurité alimentaire des ménages) au cours des 12 mois antérieurs. Les coûts directs des soins de santé publics par enfant au cours de cette période (en dollars canadiens de 2020) ont constitué notre résultat principal. Nous avons utilisé des équations d'estimation généralisées transformées par la fonction logarithme gamma tenant compte du regroupement des enfants pour analyser cette relation, et des modèles ajustés pour les covariables sociodémographiques importantes. Comme résultat secondaire, nous avons analysé l'utilisation de certains services de soins de santé (p. ex. les visites dans les hôpitaux, les chirurgies) et les coûts associés. RéSULTATS: Nous avons constaté que les coûts ajustés des soins de santé étaient plus élevés chez les enfants des ménages aux prises avec l'insécurité alimentaire que chez ceux des ménages à l'abri de l'insécurité alimentaire (676,79 $ [IC de 95%: 535,26 $, 855,74 $] contre 563,98 $ [457,00 $, 695,99 $], p = 0,047). Comparativement aux enfants des ménages à l'abri de l'insécurité alimentaire, ceux qui vivaient dans des ménages aux prises avec l'insécurité avaient plus souvent recours aux hôpitaux, aux services des urgences, aux chirurgies d'un jour et aux soins à domicile, et ils prenaient des médicaments sur ordonnance. Les enfants des ménages à l'abri de l'insécurité alimentaire avaient plus souvent recours aux soins de santé non médicaux (p. ex. l'optométrie) et aux services de leur médecin de famille attitré. CONCLUSION: Même après l'apport d'ajustements pour tenir compte des déterminants sociaux de la santé mesurables, l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages était associée à des coûts de soins de santé publics plus élevés et à une plus grande utilisation de ces soins chez les enfants et les jeunes. Des efforts pour atténuer l'insécurité alimentaire pourraient réduire les besoins de soins de santé des enfants, ainsi que les coûts associés pour nos systèmes de soins de santé.

Household food insecurity and health service use for mental and substance use disorders among children and adolescents in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity is a serious public health problem and is linked to the mental health of children and adolescents; however, its relationship with mental health service use is unknown. We sought to estimate the association between household food insecurity and contact with health services for mental or substance use disorders among children and adolescents in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We used health administrative data, linked to 5 waves of the Canadian Community Health Survey, to identify children and adolescents (aged 1-17 yr) who had a household response to the Household Food Security Survey Module. We identified contacts with outpatient and acute care services for mental or substance use disorders in the year before survey completion using administrative data. We estimated prevalence ratios for the association between household food insecurity and use of mental health services, adjusting for several confounding factors. RESULTS: The sample included 32 321 children and adolescents, of whom 5216 (16.1%) were living in food-insecure households. Of the total sample, 9.0% had an outpatient contact and 0.6% had an acute care contact for a mental or substance use disorder. Children and adolescents in food-insecure households had a 55% higher prevalence of outpatient contacts (95% confidence interval [CI] 41%-70%), and a 74% higher prevalence of acute care contacts (95% CI 24%-145%) for a mental or substance use disorder, although contacts for substance use disorders were uncommon. INTERPRETATION: Children and adolescents living in a food-insecure household have greater use of health services for mental or substance use disorders than those living in households without food insecurity. Focused efforts to support food-insecure families could improve child and adolescent mental health and reduce strain on the mental health system.

Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of food insecurity among post-secondary students and non-students of similar age in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The results of several recent campus-based studies indicate that over half of post-secondary students in Canada are food insecure, but the vulnerability of this group has not been considered in research on predictors of food insecurity in the Canadian population. Our objectives were to (1) compare the prevalence of food insecurity among post-secondary students and non-students of similar age; (2) examine the relationship between student status and food insecurity among young adults while accounting for sociodemographic characteristics; and (3) identify the sociodemographic characteristics associated with food insecurity among post-secondary students. METHODS: Using data from the 2018 Canadian Income Survey, we identified 11,679 young adults aged 19-30 and classified them into full-time postsecondary students, part-time post-secondary students, and non-students. Food insecurity over the past 12 months was assessed with the 10-item Adult Scale from the Household Food Security Survey Module. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds of food insecurity by student status while accounting for sociodemographic characteristics, and to identify sociodemographic characteristics predictive of food insecurity among post-secondary students. RESULTS: The prevalence of food insecurity was 15.0% among full-time postsecondary students, 16.2% among part-time students, and 19.2% among non-students. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, full-time postsecondary students had 39% lower odds of being food insecure as compared to non-students (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.50-0.76). Among postsecondary students, those with children (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 1.10-3.40), those living in rented accommodation (aOR 1.60, 95%CI 1.08-2.37), and those in families reliant on social assistance (aOR 4.32, 95%CI 1.60-11.69) had higher adjusted odds of food insecurity, but having at least a Bachelor's degree appeared protective (aOR: 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.95). Every $5000 increase in adjusted after-tax family income was also associated with lower adjusted odds of food insecurity (aOR 0.88, 95%CI 0.84-0.92) among post-secondary students. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, population-representative sample, we found that young adults who did not attend post-secondary school were more vulnerable to food insecurity, particularly severe food insecurity, than full-time post-secondary students in Canada. Our results highlight the need for research to identify effective policy interventions to reduce food insecurity among young, working-age adults in general.

Canadian Nutrition Society Dialogue on disease-related malnutrition: a commentary from the 2022 Food For Health Workshop.

This commentary represents a dialogue on key aspects of disease-related malnutrition (DRM) from leaders and experts from academia, health across disciplines, and several countries across the world. The dialogue illuminates the problem of DRM, what impact it has on outcomes, nutrition care as a human right, and practice, implementation, and policy approaches to address DRM. The dialogue allowed the germination of an idea to register a commitment through the Canadian Nutrition Society and the Canadian Malnutrition Task Force in the UN/WHO Decade of Action on Nutrition to advance policy-based approaches for DRM. This commitment was successfully registered in October 2022 and is entitled CAN DReaM (Creating Alliances Nationally for Policy in Disease-Related Malnutrition). This commitment details five goals that will be pursued in the Decade of Action on Nutrition. The intent of this commentary is to record the proceedings of the workshop as a stepping stone to establishing a policy-based approach to DRM that is relevant in Canada and abroad.

Employment Insurance may mitigate impact of unemployment on food security: Analysis on a propensity-score matched sample from the Canadian Income Survey.

Food insecurity, the inadequate access to food due to financial constraints, affects one-sixth of Canadian households, with substantial health implications. We examine the impact of unemployment and the mitigating effect of Employment Insurance (EI) on household food insecurity in Canada. Using the Canadian Income Survey 2018-2019, we sampled 28,650 households with adult workers 18-64 years old. We used propensity score matching to pair the 4085 households with unemployed workers with 3390 households with only continuously employed workers on their propensity towards unemployment. Among unemployed households, we also matched 2195 EI recipients with 950 nonrecipients. We applied adjusted logistic regression to the two matched samples. Food insecurity affected 15.1% of the households without unemployed workers and 24.6% of their unemployed counterparts, including 22.2% of EI recipients and 27.5% of nonrecipients. Unemployment was associated with 48% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-1.66; 5.67 percentage points) higher likelihood of food insecurity. This association was significant and similar across income levels, full-time and part-time workers, and household compositions. EI receipt was associated with 23% (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90; 4.02 percentage points) lower likelihood of food insecurity, but this association was only significant among households with lower income, full-time workers, and children under 18. The findings suggest a broad impact of unemployment on working adults' food insecurity and a substantial mitigating effect by EI on select unemployed workers. Making EI more generous and accessible for part-time workers may help alleviate food insecurity.

Household food insecurity is prevalent in a cohort of postpartum women who registered in the Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program in Toronto.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, severity and socio-demographic predictors of household food insecurity among vulnerable women accessing the Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP) and to examine associations between household food insecurity and breastfeeding practices to 6 months. DESIGN: Cohort investigation pooling data from two studies which administered the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module at 6 months postpartum and collected prospective infant feeding data at 2 weeks and 2, 4 and 6 months. Household food insecurity was classified as none, marginal, moderate or severe. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess predictors of household food insecurity and associations between household food security (any and severity) and continued and exclusive breastfeeding. SETTING: Three Toronto sites of the CPNP, a federal initiative targeting socially and/or economically vulnerable women. PARTICIPANTS: 316 birth mothers registered prenatally in the CPNP from 2017 to 2020. RESULTS: Household food insecurity at 6 months postpartum was highly prevalent (44 %), including 11 % in the severe category. Risk of household food insecurity varied by CPNP site (P < 0·001) and was higher among multiparous participants (OR 2·08; 95 % CI 1·28, 3·39). There was no association between the prevalence or severity of food insecurity and continued or exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months postpartum in the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Household food insecurity affected nearly half of this cohort of women accessing the CPNP. Further research is needed on household food insecurity across the national CPNP and other similar programmes, with consideration of the implications for programme design, service delivery and policy responses.

Effect of Canada Child Benefit on Food Insecurity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity-the inadequate access to food due to financial constraints-affects 1 in 6 households in Canada, with serious health implications. Family benefit programs supplementing income have shown potential in mitigating the risk of food insecurity, but there is little understanding of their protective effects. The authors aimed to estimate the impacts of the additional Canada Child Benefit provided to families with children aged <6 years on household food insecurity. METHODS: The authors sampled 28,435 households receiving Canada Child Benefit with children aged <8 years from the Canadian Income Survey 2018-2020 fielded in 2019-2021 and analyzed in 2022. Households without children aged <6 years were 1:1 propensity-score matched to those with children aged <6 years, who received up to $1,068 in additional Canada Child Benefit per child annually. The authors compared the 2 groups' 12-month food insecurity likelihood after matching. Subsample analyses were performed by household income, housing tenure, and household type. RESULTS: Receipt of the additional Canada Child Benefit ($724 on average) was associated with 2.89 (95% CI=1.35, 4.42) percentage points lower probability of experiencing food insecurity among recipients with children aged <6 years (from 24.30% to 21.42%). The association was similar across socioeconomic subgroups and significant among all but high-income earners and mortgage-free homeowners. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found plausibly causal evidence that the more generous Canada Child Benefit for Canadian families with young children reduces their probability of food insecurity. Increasing benefits for economically disadvantaged households, characterized by low incomes, single parenthood, and renting (versus owning), may improve the program's efficiency and equity in supporting families' food security.

The prevalence and predictors of household food insecurity among adolescents in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Household food insecurity is almost four times more prevalent among adolescents than among older adults in Canada, and it adversely affects their health. Our objective was to describe the sociodemographic and geographic patterning of household food insecurity among adolescents. METHODS: Our analytic sample comprised all 12-17-year-old respondents to the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey with complete data on household food insecurity (n = 8416). We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to identify respondent- and household-level sociodemographic characteristics associated with household food insecurity. RESULTS: The prevalence of household food insecurity among adolescents was 20.7%. The adjusted odds of food insecurity were significantly elevated among adolescents who identified as Black or Indigenous (aOR 1.80), those living with a single parent (aOR 1.60), those living with a greater number of children ≤ 5 years (aOR 1.45) or 12-17 years (aOR 1.25), those in rented accommodation (aOR 1.98), those in households with only secondary school education (aOR 1.38), and those in households reliant on social assistance (aOR 2.03). Higher before-tax income was protective (aOR 0.99). In comparison with Ontario, the adjusted odds of food insecurity among adolescents were higher in Nunavut (aOR 6.77), Northwest Territories (aOR 2.11), and Alberta (aOR 1.48), and lower in Manitoba (aOR 0.66). CONCLUSION: The markedly higher odds of exposure to household food insecurity among adolescents who are Black or Indigenous and those living in households characterized by markers of social and economic disadvantage highlight the need for more effective policy interventions to protect vulnerable families from this hardship.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'insécurité alimentaire des ménages est près de quatre fois plus prévalente chez les adolescents que chez les personnes âgées au Canada, et elle nuit à leur santé. Nous avons cherché à décrire la structuration sociodémographique et géographique de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages chez les adolescents. MéTHODE: Notre échantillon d'analyse comprenait tous les répondants de 12 à 17 ans du cycle 2017-2018 de l'Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes, ainsi que les données complètes sur l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages (n = 8 416). Nous avons utilisé des modèles de régression logistique bivariés et multivariés pour déterminer les caractéristiques sociodémographiques des répondants et des ménages associées à l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages. RéSULTATS: La prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages chez les adolescents était de 20,7 %. Le risque relatif rapproché d'insécurité alimentaire était significativement élevé chez les adolescents s'identifiant comme étant noirs ou autochtones (rapport de cotes ajusté [RCa] 1,80), vivant avec un seul parent (RCa 1,60), vivant avec un grand nombre d'enfants de ≤ 5 ans (RCa 1,45) ou de 12 à 17 ans (RCa 1,25), vivant dans des logements locatifs (RCa 1,98), vivant dans des ménages n'ayant fait que des études secondaires (RCa 1,38) et vivant dans des ménages dépendant de l'aide sociale (RCa 2,03). Le revenu élevé avant impôt était un facteur de protection (RCa 0,99). Comparativement à l'Ontario, le risque relatif rapproché d'insécurité alimentaire chez les adolescents était plus élevé au Nunavut (RCa 6,77), aux Territoires du Nord-Ouest (RCa 2,11) et en Alberta (RCa 1,48), et plus faible au Manitoba (RCa 0,66). CONCLUSION: Le risque nettement plus élevé d'exposition à l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages chez les adolescents noirs ou autochtones et chez ceux vivant dans des ménages caractérisés par les indicateurs de défavorisation sociale et économique montre que des interventions stratégiques plus efficaces sont nécessaires pour protéger les familles vulnérables de cette épreuve.

What is known about the prevalence of household food insecurity in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. / État des connaissances au sujet de la prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages canadiens durant la pandémie de COVID-19 : revue systématique.

INTRODUCTION: Household food insecurity (HFI) is a persistent public health issue in Canada that may have disproportionately affected certain subgroups of the population during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this systematic review is to report on the prevalence of HFI in the Canadian general population and in subpopulations after the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. METHODS: Sixteen databases were searched from 1 March 2020 to 5 May 2021. Abstract and full-text screening was conducted by one reviewer and the inclusions verified by a second reviewer. Only studies that reported on the prevalence of HFI in Canadian households were included. Data extraction, risk of bias and certainty of the evidence assessments were conducted by two reviewers. RESULTS: Of 8986 studies identified in the search, four studies, three of which collected data in April and May 2020, were included. The evidence concerning the prevalence of HFI during the COVID-19 pandemic is very uncertain. The prevalence of HFI (marginal to severe) ranged from 14% to 17% in the general population. Working-age populations aged 18 to 44 years had higher HFI (range: 18%-23%) than adults aged 60+ years (5%-11%). Some of the highest HFI prevalence was observed among households with children (range: 19%-22%), those who had lost their jobs or stopped working due to COVID-19 (24%-39%) and those with job insecurity (26%). CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may have slightly increased total household food insecurity in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in populations that were already vulnerable to HFI. There is a need to continue to monitor HFI in Canada.

Feasibility and measurement error in using food supply data to estimate diet costs in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The cost of food is a key influence on diet. The majority of diet cost studies match intake data from population-based surveys to a single source of food supply prices. Our aim was to examine the methodological significance of using food supply data to price dietary intakes. METHODS: Nationally representative 24-hour dietary recall data from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition (CCHS-N) was matched to the 2015 Canadian Consumer Price Index (CPI) food price list. Proportions and means of reported intakes covered by the 2015 CPI price list were used to compare reported intakes of food groups and food components of interest and concern overall, and by quartile of CPI coverage. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 20,487 Canadians ages one and older. RESULTS: The CPI covered on average 76.3% of total dietary intake (g) without water. Staple food groups that were more commonly consumed had better CPI price coverage than those less commonly consumed. Yet some food groups (vegetables, additions, sweets) that were also commonly consumed by Canadians were not well covered by price data. Individuals in the poorest CPI coverage quartile reported consuming significantly greater fibre (g), gram weight (g), dietary fibre (g), and energy (kcal) as compared to those with the best coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Differential CPI price coverage exists among food components and commonly consumed food groups; additionally dietary intake differs significantly in the population by CPI coverage. Methodological refinements are needed to better account for error when using prices from food supply data to estimate diet costs.

Pain-driven emergency department visits and food insecurity: a cross-sectional study linking Canadian survey and health administrative data.

BACKGROUND: As the leading cause of emergency department visits in Canada, pain disproportionately affects socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. We examine the association between household food insecurity and individuals' pain-driven emergency department visits. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study linking the Canadian Community Health Survey 2005-2017 to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System 2003-2017. Food insecurity was measured using a validated questionnaire. We excluded individuals with missing food insecurity status, individuals younger than 12 years and jurisdiction-years with partial emergency department records. We assessed emergency department visits driven by pain at different sites (migraine, other headaches, chest-throat pain, abdomen-pelvis pain, dorsalgia, joint pain, limb pain, other pain) and their characteristics (frequency, cause, acuity and time of emergency department visit) in Ontario and Alberta. We adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle and prior non-pain-driven emergency department visits in the models. RESULTS: The sample contained 212 300 individuals aged 12 years and older. Compared with food-secure individuals, marginally, moderately and severely food-insecure people had 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-1.68), 1.64 (95% CI 1.37-1.96) and 1.99 (95% CI 1.61-2.46) times higher adjusted incidence rates of pain-driven emergency department visits, respectively. The association was similar across sexes and significant among adults but not adolescents. Food insecurity was further associated with site-specific pain, with severely food-insecure individuals having significantly higher pain incidence than food-secure individuals. Severe food insecurity predicted more frequent, multicause, high-acuity and after-hours emergency department visits. INTERPRETATION: Household food insecurity status is significantly associated with pain-driven emergency department visits in the Canadian population. Policies targeting food insecurity may reduce pain and emergency department utilization.

A comparison of household food insecurity rates in Newfoundland and Labrador in 2011-2012 and 2017-2018.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of household food insecurity in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) fell sharply between 2007 and 2011, but it appears to have risen since then. Our objective was to compare the prevalence of food insecurity between 2011-2012 and 2017-2018 in relation to population socio-demographic characteristics. METHODS: Our analytic sample comprised all NL households in the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) cycles 2011-2012 and 2017-2018, n = 6800. We stratified the prevalence of household food insecurity for each cycle by socio-demographic characteristics and applied multivariable logistic regression models to determine food insecurity odds in 2017-2018 compared with 2011-2012 after controlling for socio-demographic covariates. Interactions of covariates with survey cycle were tested and models stratified when warranted. RESULTS: The prevalence of food insecurity rose from 12.0% (95% CI 10.5, 13.6) in 2011-2012 to 14.7% (95% CI 13.1, 16.6) in 2017-2018. After adjusting for household socio-demographic variables, the odds of food insecurity was 1.49 (95% CI 1.27, 1.75) in 2017-2018. The prevalence of food insecurity had increased significantly among unattached individuals, renters, households with low educational attainment, and households with income above the Low Income Measure, with concomitant increases in the contribution of these groups to the total provincial prevalence of food insecurity in 2017-2018 compared with that in 2011-2012. CONCLUSION: The odds of food insecurity among NL households increased significantly from 2011-2012 to 2017-2018. Given the serious negative health implications of household food insecurity, the province should draw on the lessons from its earlier success in food insecurity reduction to reverse the current trend.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: La prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages à Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador (T.-N.-L.) a connu une forte baisse entre 2007 et 2011, mais depuis, elle semble avoir augmenté. Nous avons cherché à comparer la prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire entre 2011-2012 et 2017-2018 en lien avec le profil sociodémographique de la population. MéTHODE: Notre échantillon d'analyse comprenait tous les ménages de T.-N.-L. inclus dans les cycles 2011-2012 et 2017-2018 de l'Enquête sur la santé dans les collectivités canadiennes (ESCC), soit n = 6 800. Nous avons stratifié la prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages pour chaque cycle selon le profil sociodémographique et appliqué des modèles de régression logistique multivariée pour déterminer la probabilité d'insécurité alimentaire en 2017-2018 comparativement à 2011-2012 compte tenu des covariables sociodémographiques. Nous avons testé les interactions des covariables avec les cycles de l'enquête et stratifié les modèles au besoin. RéSULTATS: La prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire a augmenté, passant de 12 % (IC de 95 % 10,5, 13,6) en 2011-2012 à 14,7 % (IC de 95 % 13,1, 16,6) en 2017-2018. Après l'apport d'ajustements pour tenir compte des variables sociodémographiques des ménages, la probabilité d'insécurité alimentaire était de 1,49 (IC de 95 % 1,27, 1,75) en 2017-2018. La prévalence de l'insécurité alimentaire avait augmenté de façon significative chez les personnes seules, les locataires, les ménages ayant un faible niveau d'instruction et les ménages ayant un revenu supérieur à la mesure de faible revenu, avec des augmentations concomitantes de l'apport de ces groupes à la prévalence provinciale totale de l'insécurité alimentaire en 2017-2018 par rapport à 2011-2012. CONCLUSION: La probabilité d'insécurité alimentaire des ménages de T.-N.-L. a augmenté de façon significative entre 2011-2012 et 2017-2018. Étant donné les graves conséquences négatives de l'insécurité alimentaire des ménages pour la santé, la province devrait tirer des leçons de son succès antérieur dans la réduction de l'insécurité alimentaire pour inverser la tendance actuelle.

The relationship between diet quality and the severity of household food insecurity in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the dietary quality of Canadian children and adults and household food insecurity status. DESIGN: Dietary intake was assessed with one 24-h recall. Households were classified as food secure or marginally, moderately or severely food insecure based on their responses to the Household Food Security Survey Module. We applied multivariable analyses of variance to determine whether % energy from ultra-processed foods, fruit and vegetable intake, Healthy Eating Index (HEI) scores, macronutrient composition and micronutrient intakes per 1000 kcal differed by food insecurity status after accounting for income, education and region. Analyses were run separately for children 1-8 years and 9-18 years and men and women 19-64 years of age. SETTING: Ten provinces in Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents to the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition, aged 1-64 years, with complete food insecurity data and non-zero energy intakes, N 15 909. RESULTS: Among adults and children, % energy from ultra-processed foods was strongly related to severity of food insecurity, but no significant trend was observed for fruit and vegetable intake or HEI score. Carbohydrate, total sugar, fat and saturated fat intake/1000 kcal did not differ by food insecurity status, but there was a significant negative trend in protein/1000 kcal among older children, a positive trend in Na/1000 kcal among younger children and inverse associations between food insecurity severity and several micronutrients/1000 kcal among adults and older children. CONCLUSIONS: With more severe household food insecurity, ultra-processed food consumption was higher, and diet quality was generally lower among both adults and children.

Classification Differences in Food Insecurity Measures between the United States and Canada: Practical Implications for Trend Monitoring and Health Research.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity, inadequate access to food due to financial constraints, is a major public health issue in the United States and Canada, where the same 18-item questionnaire is used to monitor food insecurity. Researchers often assume that findings on food insecurity from the 2 countries are comparable with each other, but there are between-country differences in how food insecurity status is determined. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the distribution of household food insecurity in the Canadian population applying the US and Canadian classification schemes. We also examined the extent to which associations between food insecurity and adults' health differ under the 2 schemes. METHODS: We used the population-representative Canadian Community Health Survey 2005-2017 linked to administrative health records. Food insecurity was measured by the Household Food Security Survey Module. Adults 18 y and older with valid food insecurity status were included from all jurisdictions except Quebec (n = 403,200). We cross-tabulated food insecurity status classified by the US and Canadian schemes. We also fitted logistic regressions on self-reported and objective health measures adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: Applying the Canadian classification scheme, 7.7% of households were food insecure; the number fell to 6.0% with the US scheme. Associations between food insecurity status and health measures were mostly similar across classification schemes, although the associations between food insecurity and self-reported health were slightly larger if the US scheme was applied. Marginal food security/insecurity was associated with worse health measures irrespective of the classification scheme. United States-Canada discordance in classification of marginal food security/insecurity had a limited effect on health prediction. CONCLUSIONS: United States-Canada differences in classification affected the apparent distribution of household food insecurity but not the associations between food insecurity and measures of adult health. Marginal food security/insecurity should be set apart from the food-secure group for trend monitoring and health research.