ABSTRACT
Determining the label to target ratio, also known as the degree of labeling (DOL), is crucial for quantitative fluorescence microscopy and a high DOL with minimal unspecific labeling is beneficial for fluorescence microscopy in general. Yet robust, versatile and easy-to-use tools for measuring cell-specific labeling efficiencies are not available. Here we present a DOL determination technique named protein-tag DOL (ProDOL), which enables fast quantification and optimization of protein-tag labeling. With ProDOL various factors affecting labeling efficiency, including substrate type, incubation time and concentration, as well as sample fixation and cell type can be easily assessed. We applied ProDOL to investigate how human immunodeficiency virus-1 pathogenesis factor Nef modulates CD4 T cell activation measuring total and activated copy numbers of the adapter protein SLP-76 in signaling microclusters. ProDOL proved to be a versatile and robust tool for labeling calibration, enabling determination of labeling efficiencies, optimization of strategies and quantification of protein stoichiometry.
Subject(s)
Microscopy, Fluorescence , Staining and Labeling , Humans , Staining and Labeling/methods , Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/metabolism , Lymphocyte Activation , HIV-1ABSTRACT
Cells contain numerous substructures that have been proposed to form via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). It is currently debated how to reliably distinguish LLPS from other mechanisms. Here, we benchmark different methods using well-controlled model systems in vitro and in living cells. We find that 1,6-hexanediol treatment and classical FRAP fail to distinguish LLPS from the alternative scenario of molecules binding to spatially clustered binding sites without phase-separating. In contrast, the preferential internal mixing seen in half-bleach experiments robustly distinguishes both mechanisms. We introduce a workflow termed model-free calibrated half-FRAP (MOCHA-FRAP) to probe the barrier at the condensate interface that is responsible for preferential internal mixing. We use it to study components of heterochromatin foci, nucleoli, stress granules and nuage granules, and show that the strength of the interfacial barrier increases in this order. We anticipate that MOCHA-FRAP will help uncover the mechanistic basis of biomolecular condensates in living cells.
Subject(s)
Cell Nucleolus , Heterochromatin , Cell Nucleolus/metabolism , Binding Sites , Heterochromatin/metabolismABSTRACT
The counting of discrete photobleaching steps in fluorescence microscopy is ideally suited to study protein complex stoichiometry in situ. The counting range of photobleaching step analysis has been significantly improved with more-sophisticated algorithms for step detection, albeit at an increasing computational cost and with the necessity for high-quality data. Here, we address concerns regarding robustness, automation, and experimental validation, optimizing both data acquisition and analysis. To make full use of the potential of photobleaching step analysis, we evaluate various labeling strategies with respect to their molecular brightness, photostability, and photoblinking. The developed analysis algorithm focuses on automation and computational efficiency. Moreover, we validate the developed methods with experimental data acquired on DNA origami labeled with defined fluorophore numbers, demonstrating counting of up to 35 fluorophores. Finally, we show the power of the combination of optimized trace acquisition and automated data analysis by counting labeled nucleoporin 107 in nuclear pore complexes of intact U2OS cells. The successful in situ application promotes this framework as a new resource enabling cell biologists to robustly determine the stoichiometries of molecular assemblies at the single-molecule level in an automated manner.
Subject(s)
Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods , Photobleaching/drug effects , Algorithms , DNA , Fluorescence , Fluorescent DyesABSTRACT
Quantitative assessment of protein complexes, such as receptor clusters in the context of cellular signalling, has become a pressing objective in cell biology. The advancements in the field of single molecule fluorescence microscopy have led to different approaches for counting protein copy numbers in various cellular structures. This has resulted in an increasing interest in robust calibration protocols addressing photophysical properties of fluorescent labels and the effect of labelling efficiencies. Here, we want to give an update on recent methods for protein counting with a focus on novel calibration protocols. In this context, we discuss different types of calibration samples and identify some of the challenges arising in molecular counting experiments. Some recently published applications offer potential approaches to tackle these challenges.