Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to determine the most appropriate antimicrobial agents for prophylactic antibiotic use during emergency and elective transurethral procedures. METHODS: The study was conducted in five hospitals located in five different geographical regions of Türkiye. The microorganism cultured in urine before emergency and elective transurethral procedures in these centers between March 2021 and March 2022 were reviewed retrospectively from the hospital records. Demographic data (age and gender) of the patients, comorbid disorders, previous urological procedures, anomalies of the urogenital tract, use of urethral catheters (permanent or clean intermittent catheterization), cultured microorganisms, and antibiotic susceptibilities were noted. The patients hospitalized or had antibiotics for any reason in the previous 1 month were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 1450 patients, 742 men (51.2%) and 708 women (48.8%), were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.3±19.36 (1-98) years. Diabetes mellitus was evident in 271 (18.7%) patients. The five most common microorgan-isms cultured in urine, in order of frequency, were: ESBL (-) Escherichia coli in 418 (28.8%), ESBL (+) E. coli in 309 (21.3%), Klebsiella pneumonia in 183 (12.6%), Enterococcus faecalis in 124 (8.6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 89 (6.1%). The susceptibility rates to antimicrobial agents recommended for prophylaxis by the American Urology Association and the European Association of Urology guidelines were found as follows: cefepime 87.1%, ampicillin+sulbactam 84%, TMP-SMX 71.6%, amoxicillin+clavulanate 63.5%, cefoxitin 59%, ceftazidime 58.6%, cefuroxime 43.5%, ceftriaxone 43%, and cefixime 38.4%. CONCLUSION: We found that currently recommended antimicrobials provide poor coverage for the most common pathogens isolated. Urologists should consider patient-based antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic urethral procedures, follow appropriate proto-cols, and consider local antibiotic resistance.

Can HALP score, a new prognostic tool, take the place of traditional scoring systems in Fournier's gangrene?

PURPOSE: Fournier's Gangrene (FG) is a fatal condition, therefore prognosis prediction is a crucial step before treatment planning. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte and Platelet (HALP) score which is frequently employed in vascular disorders and malignancies, on disease severity and survival in FG patients and to compare HALP score with well-known scoring systems on this aspect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven men who had surgical debridement for FG between December 2006 and January 2022 were included in this study. Their symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory tests, medical histories, vital signs, extent and timing of the surgical debridement and antimicrobial therapies were noted. The HALP score, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) were evaluated for their predictive values for survival. RESULTS: FG patients were grouped as survivors (Group 1, n = 71) and non-survivors (Group 2, n = 16) and the results were compared. The mean ages of survivors (59 ± 12.55 years) and non-survivors (64.5 ± 14.6 years) were similar (p = 0.114). The median size of necrotized body surface area was 3% in Group 1 and 4.8% in Group 2 (p = 0.013). On admission, hemoglobin, albumin and serum urea levels and white blood cell counts were significantly different in two study groups. Two study groups were similar for HALP scores. However, ACCI and FGSI scores were greater significantly in non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that HALP score does not predict a survival successfully in FG. However, FGSI and ACCI are successful outcome predictors in FG.