Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital ; 35(5): 362-4, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26824920

ABSTRACT

Isolated bilateral orbital floor fractures are uncommon and are rarely described in the scientific literature. They are usually seen in association with naso-ethmoidal fractures, zygomatic fractures, or fractures of the middle third. We report our experience in the management of a patient presenting bilateral isolated orbital floor fracture. The difficulties in management of these fractures are due to the lack of an uninjured contralateral side for intraoperative comparison.


Subject(s)
Orbital Fractures/surgery , Humans , Zygomatic Fractures
2.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 35(3): 158-64, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16618848

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of scanning parameters on the precision of the data acquired using a facial laser scanner and to assess the reliability of automatic model recording in humans. METHODS: Data were acquired using a laser scanner (Cyberware 3030RGB); analysis and measurements were performed with Rapid Form 2004 software. A mannequin and six volunteers were scanned to investigate the effects of environmental conditions, positioning, head orientation, and software procedures. Precision and accuracy of the data were evaluated comparing six linear measures calculated on scanned data with those obtained directly. Two sessions with different head inclination were performed. The reliability of repeated scans was also assessed measuring the distance between the surfaces reconstructed from two separate scans of the same subject, at 12 anatomical points, in 5 subjects, during two sessions using a different head inclination. Differences were analysed using paired t-tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The accuracy of scanning was +/-0.65 mm. The development of a specific protocol resulted in a mean scanning error of 1-1.2 mm and a recording error of 0.3-0.4 mm on repeated scans of human subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that scanning of the human face may be hampered by errors and artefacts, mainly due to movements. While the effect of trembling and involuntary movements during the exam may be minimized using faster scanning devices, comparative observation over time may be affected by unreal differences due to the uncertainty of facial expression. The overall error is, however, in the range useful for most clinical studies.


Subject(s)
Computer Graphics , Face/anatomy & histology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lasers , Models, Anatomic , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Artifacts , Cephalometry , Facial Expression , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Male , Movement , Phantoms, Imaging , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Minerva Stomatol ; 51(11-12): 479-93, 2002 Dec.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12660615

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aesthetic requests of patients undergoing orthognatic surgery have increased over time and represent nowadays the leading subjective motivation for the patient and a major aim of the treatment for the surgeon. In this regard, anthropometric evaluation has considerably improved the diagnostic capacity of the orthodontist and of the surgeon. Aim of the study is to provide the orthognatic surgeon with anthropometric normal values based on a sample of aesthetically pleasant Italian subjects and to discuss the use of a simplified aesthetical analysis in the set-up of the surgical plan and in the evaluation of treatment outcome. METHODS: The present study analyses 94 Italian subjects, by means of anthropometric measurements on photographic images, considering 28 facial proportions and 33 angular values. These figures were compared with the aesthetic judgement provided by 3 common observers and 3 orthodontists. The aesthetic score was attributed on a subjective discrete scale (common observer: above average/average/below average; orthodontist: eumorphic/ dismorphic). Data were also compared with similar evaluations on North-American and African subjects reported in the international literature. RESULTS: This study confirms the sexual dismorphism and the ethnic variability already reported by other Authors and documents specific morphological characters in the Italian population. CONCLUSIONS: The described method appears acceptably simple and consistent for clinical application. Its use in orthognatic surgery may provide objective and reproducible data for evaluating the aesthetic outcome of treatment.


Subject(s)
Esthetics , Face/anatomy & histology , Facial Asymmetry/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Anthropometry/methods , Cephalometry/methods , Facial Asymmetry/pathology , Female , Humans , Italy/ethnology , Male , Observer Variation , Orthodontics , Photography , Sex Characteristics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL